How much did PIERCE KATHARINE C UW grant in FY2024?

PIERCE KATHARINE C UW reported 42 grants totaling $273,400 in its FY2024 IRS filing.

Where is PIERCE KATHARINE C UW based?

PIERCE KATHARINE C UW is based in TX.

PIERCE KATHARINE C UW

Foundation Dossiers

· Private foundation

PIERCE KATHARINE C UW

This foundation accepts unsolicited grant applications.

$273k

Granted FY2024

Grants

Communities

$23k

Largest

01What you fund

0163% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2020–2024.

Human Services$626kHealth$138kFood & Nutrition$51kEducation$29kArts & Culture$25kOther$505k

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2020

southcambridge

2021

littlesouth

2022

littlefood

2023

food pantry

2024

food pantry

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2024 · 42 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

Under $10k34 grants · $163k
$10k–50k8 grants · $110k

$5,000

Median grant

States reached

$7.2M

Total assets

Largest grants

AGING SERVICES OF N CNTL MASSACHUSETTS$23,200
MYSTIC VALLEY ELDER SERVICES INC$13,400
CENTRAL BOSTON ELDER SERVICES INC$13,200
SPRINGWELL INC$13,000
WESTMASS ELDERCARE INC$12,050
TRI-VALLEY INC$12,050
OLD COLONY ELDER SERVICES INC$12,000
SOMERVILLE-CAMBRIDGE ELDER SERVICES INC$11,500
SENIORCARE INC$9,600
MINUTEMAN SENIOR SERVICES INC$8,400
ELDER SERVICES OF WORCESTER AREA$8,050
Alianza Dv Services Inc$7,500
ECUMENICAL SOCIAL ACTION COMMITTEE INC$7,500
CENTRE STREET FOOD PANTRY$7,500
GREATER SPRINGFIELD SENIOR SERVICES INC$7,200

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $593k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11% — the area typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$1.2M · 46 repeat orgs$130k to everyone else

46 repeat relationships — 30 still active in FY2024, 16 since wound down; 12 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$1.2M

$82k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+47%

+94%

Still filing today

72%

55%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 83% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $47k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

Human ServicesHealthFood & NutritionEducationArts & CultureOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

MV
MYSTIC VALLEY ELDER SERVICES INC
5× · 2020–2024 · $83k · revenue +45%
SI
SPRINGWELL INC
5× · 2020–2024 · $62k · revenue +190%
OC
OLD COLONY ELDER SERVICES INC
5× · 2020–2024 · $60k · revenue +30%

Funded once

RI
RESPOND INCgraduated
one grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue +144%
TU
THE URBAN FARMING INSTITUTE
one grant, 2022 · $10k
SOUTHEAST ASIAN COALITION OF CENTRAL MAgraduated
one grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue +238%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Coastline Elderly Services Inc

Coastline elderly services, inc. is a community-based elder care agency located in new bedford, massachusetts, that provides social services to the elderly in greater new bedford and surrounding areas.

Human Services

Eastern Area Agency on Aging

It is the mission of Eastern Area Agency on Aging to be the best source of information, options and services for seniors, adults with disabilities and caregivers.

Human Services

Cooperative Elder Services Inc

Daycare services for the elderly.

Human Services

Massachusetts Senior Action Council Inc

The massachusetts senior action council, inc.'s (msac) mission is to provide a collective voice for senior citizens to address quality-of-life concerns in various areas including health care, housing and security.

Civil Rights

Northeast Senior Services Inc

To assist seniors in living independently in their homes

—

Eastern Area Adult Services Inc

Maximize the independence of older adults via a variety of programs and services.

Human Services

Nantucket Community Service Inc

Low income elderly housing

—

Assisted Living Center Inc

Provide assisted living facilities for low to moderate income elders.

Housing & Shelter

Council On Aging for Southeastern

To promote the well-being and dignity of older adults.

—

89 South Care Support Inc

To enhance and improve the quality of life of older adults supported by berkshire retirement home, inc. and providing home care services and residency for older adults.

Housing & Shelter

Garden Path Elder Living Inc

Garden Path Elder Living operates a residential care home for elders that provide assistance with daily living and nursing oversight.

Human Services

Visiting Nurse Association of

To provide comprehensive, high-quality home healthcare to the community to all who need services within our financial resources and through the generosity of the communities served by the vna.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Boston Senior Home Care Inc and the most unlike its peers is Perkins School for the Blind. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 51 years old; the field is 17. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

2%1/50

the rest of the field

10%

3,063/31,261

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

50 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

48/50

Grantees still filing

47/50

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Human Services$625,604Other$504,692Health$138,147Food & Nutrition$50,662Education$28,500Arts & Culture$25,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Eastern Bank FoundationMA54.9× affinity28 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Eastern Bank Foundation · Meals on Wheels America · Boston Foundation Inc · Massachusetts Bankers Association · Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Foundation Inc · Rockland Trust Charitable Foundation · Arbella Insurance Foundation · Point32health Foundation Inc · Cummings Foundation Grants Inc (Fka Oneworld Boston Inc) · Eastern Cambridge Foundation Inc · Cambridge Savings Charitable · United Way Of Massachusetts Bay Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation PIERCE KATHARINE C UW funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2025

’20’21’22’23’24’25

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

6get no government money at all

3rely on government for over half their income

typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: WELLESLEY NEIGHBORS INC.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

insufficient risk

Limited financial data in public filings.

Track record & reputation

low risk

8 years of Form 990 filings, still active.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 383801678 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on WELLESLEY NEIGHBORS INC, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

Awaiting reportFinancial stability— Runway not derivable from filings.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2025; revenue contracted over the period.
On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 7% of their budget — diversified.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Pierce Katharine C Uw?

Find your warmest path to Pierce Katharine C Uw through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

PIERCE KATHARINE C UW

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

50 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Pierce Katharine C Uw?

More from the funding graph

PIERCE KATHARINE C UW

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

50 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Pierce Katharine C Uw?

More from the funding graph