Skip to content

· Private foundation

Pettit Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$2.6M
Granted FY2024still arriving
26
Grants FY2024still arriving
8
States reached
$500k
Largest
01What it funds
0189% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Arts & Culture$2.7MEducation$2.6MHealth$1.2MSocial Science$1.0MEnvironment$988kCivil Rights$775kFood & Nutrition$560kCrime & Legal$475kOther$0
02FY2024 · 26 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k8 grants · $140k
  • $50k–250k14 grants · $1.1M
  • $250k+4 grants · $1.4M
$50,000
Median grant
8
States reached
$47M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTE$500,000
PLANNED PARENTHOOD$300,000
FOUNDATION FOR ANTHROPOLOGICAL STUD$300,000
ACLU$275,000
MUSIC ASSOCIATION OF ASPEN$200,000
CATLIN GABLE SCHOOL$110,000
OPERATION PUSH$100,000
ASPEN CENTER FOR ENVIRONMENTAL$100,000
EVERYTOWN FOR GUN SAFETY$100,000
AMERICANS FOR OXFORD$100,000
EARTHWAYS FOUNDATION$50,000
AIM FOR HIGH SCHOOL$50,000
ST CLOUD TECHNICAL COMMUNITY COLLEG$50,000
MAYO CLINIC$50,000
THE LIVING DESERT$50,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–24, $100k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%THE HOPE CENTER: $50k → 14%THE HOPE CENTER: $50k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ID
MT
MN
NY
MA
OR
CA
CO
MD
NM
DC
HI
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

75%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$8.3M · 28 repeat orgs$2.7M to everyone else

28 repeat relationships: 19 still active in FY2024, 9 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

28
18

Total granted

$8.3M
$2.0M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+10%
+15%

Still filing today

46%
39%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 72% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $730k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’20’21’22’23’24
EducationEnvironmentArts & CultureHealthCrime & LegalPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AF
    AMERICANS FOR OXFORD INC
    4× · 2020–2024 · $1.1M · revenue +55%
  • EVERYTOWN FOR GUN SAFETY SUPPORT FUND INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $475k · revenue +37%
  • MA
    MUSIC ASSOCIATES OF ASPEN INC
    4× · 2020–2024 · $475k · revenue +410%

Funded once

  • TA
    THE ARTHUR SACKLER GALLERY
    one grant, 2023 · $1.1M
  • PI
    PORTLAND INSTITUTE OF CONTEMPORARY
    one grant, 2017 · $200k
  • OV
    OCEANS VAYAGES INSTITUTE
    one grant, 2021 · $150k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
2
Uc Santa Barbara Foundation

The uc santa barbara foundation actively works to further the goals of the university of california, santa barbara. the foundation seeks to maintain and nurture the university's quality and distinction. on behalf of the campus, the…

Education
3
Ucsf Foundation Investment Company

The organization provides professional investment management services for endowed gifts and financial assets entrusted to the ucsf foundation.

Education
4
The Uc Davis Foundation

The mission of the uc davis foundation is to secure, steward and manage private gifts for uc davis.

Education
5
The Union of Concerned Scientists Inc

The union of concerned scientists puts rigorous, independent science into action, developing solutions and advocating for a healthy, safe, and just future.

International
6
Augustana College

Rooted in the liberal arts & sciences & lutheran expression of the christian faith, & is committed to offering a challenging education that develops qualities of mind, spirit, & body necessary for a rewarding life of leadership & service…

Education
7
American Association for the Advancement of Science

Advance science, engineering, and innovation throughout the world for the benefit of all. the world's largest multidisciplinary scientific society and a leading publisher of cutting-edge research through its science family of journals,…

Science & Tech
8
Silicon Schools Fund Inc

The mission of the silicon schools fund is to improve education through supporting the launch of excellent new schools, improving academic instruction in existing schools, and by funding some of the boldest innovations in education…

Education
9
Cal State East Bay Educational Foundation

To accept and manage restricted and unrestricted gifts benefiting california state university east bay. additionally, the trustees support the university through advocacy, development, personal contributions and counsel to the university's…

Education
10
University of California Irvine Foundation

The mission of the university of california, irvine foundation (uc irvine foundation) is to raise and manage private funds to support uc irvine's broader mission of excellence in teaching, research and public service. to this end, the uc…

Education
11
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
12
Association of California School Administrators

The association serves its members by creating resources that enable california school administrators to develop and apply creative leadership and management skills and in turn, improve the educational process for all students.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Aspen Institute Inc; the most unlike its peers is Lighthouse Project Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

29 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 29 of the 56 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
29/29
Grantees still filing
20/29
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE ARTHUR SACKLER GALLERY: $1,100,000 · OtherTHE ARTHUR SACKLER GALLERYFOUNDATION FOR ANTHROPOLOGICAL STUD: $990,000 · OtherFOUNDATION FOR ANTHROPOLOGICAL STUDPLANNED PARENTHOOD: $760,000 · OtherPLANNED PARENTHOODACLU: $725,000 · OtherACLUASIAN UNIVERSITY FOR WOMEN FOUNDATI: $450,000 · OtherASIAN UNIVERSITY FOR WOMEN FOUNDATIEARTH COUNCIL FOUNDATION: $407,500 · OtherEARTH COUNCIL FOUNDATIONMCDS: $380,000 · OtherTHE FREER GALLERY OF ART: $300,000 · OtherAIM FOR HIGH SCHOOL: $300,000 · Other+30 more: $1,964,433 · Other+30 moreAMERICANS FOR OXFORD INC: $1,111,809 · EducationAMERICANS FOR OX…UCLA FOUNDATION: $200,000 · EducationUCLA FOUNDATIONCATLIN GABEL SCHOOL: $110,000 · EducationCATLIN GABEL SCH…MARIN COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL: $70,000 · EducationROARING FORK VALLEY EARLY LEARNING FUND: $70,000 · Education+2 more: $90,000 · Education+2 moreSMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION: $500,000 · Arts & CultureSMITHSONI…MUSIC ASSOCIATES OF ASPEN INC: $475,000 · Arts & CultureMUSIC ASS…EVERYTOWN FOR GUN SAFETY SUPPORT FUND INC: $475,000 · Crime & LegalASPEN HOPE CENTER: $225,000 · HealthMAYO CLINIC: $115,000 · HealthASPEN VALLEY HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $60,000 · HealthASPEN CENTER FOR ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES: $310,000 · EnvironmentLIVING DESERT THE: $50,000 · EnvironmentADVENTURERS AND SCIENTISTS FOR CONSERVATION: $20,000 · EnvironmentSANTA FE INSTITUTE: $175,000 · Science & Tech
Other$7,376,933Education$1,651,809Arts & Culture$975,000Crime & Legal$475,000Health$400,000Environment$380,000Science & Tech$175,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAMERICANS FOR OXFORD INC: $1,111,809 over 4y, 1.0% of budgetSMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION: $500,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEVERYTOWN FOR GUN SAFETY SUPPORT FUND INC: $475,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetMUSIC ASSOCIATES OF ASPEN INC: $475,000 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetASPEN CENTER FOR ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES: $310,000 over 4y, 2.2% of budgetASPEN HOPE CENTER: $225,000 over 4y, 4.1% of budgetUCLA FOUNDATION: $200,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSANTA FE INSTITUTE: $175,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetMAYO CLINIC: $115,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCATLIN GABEL SCHOOL: $110,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTHE GEORGE BALANCHINE FOUNDATION INC: $100,000 over 3y, 9.4% of budgetThe Hope Center Inc: $100,000 over 2y, 20% of budgetMUST: $75,000 over 1y, 8.6% of budgetMARIN COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL: $70,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetROARING FORK VALLEY EARLY LEARNING FUND: $70,000 over 5y, 7.4% of budgetASPEN VALLEY HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $60,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetSan Francisco Education Fund: $50,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetEARTHWAYS FOUNDATION INC: $50,000 over 1y, 8.0% of budgetLIVING DESERT THE: $50,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE LOWER EAST SIDE GIRLS CLUB OF NEW YORK INC: $50,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetTHE ASPEN INSTITUTE INC: $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCENTRAL COAST VINEYARD TEAM: $50,000 over 3y, 2.8% of budgetTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $40,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSAN FRANCISCO FOOD BANK: $35,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetLighthouse Project Inc: $30,000 over 3y, 18% of budgetElectronic Frontier Foundation Inc: $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetADVENTURERS AND SCIENTISTS FOR CONSERVATION: $20,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetPAYPAL CHARITABLE GIVING FUND: $10,600 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSANTA BARBARA FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds AMERICANS FOR OXFORD INC ↗
  • Who funds SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION ↗
  • Who funds EVERYTOWN FOR GUN SAFETY SUPPORT FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds MUSIC ASSOCIATES OF ASPEN INC ↗
  • Who funds ASPEN CENTER FOR ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES ↗
  • Who funds ASPEN HOPE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds UCLA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SANTA FE INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds MAYO CLINIC ↗
  • Who funds CATLIN GABEL SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds THE GEORGE BALANCHINE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds The Hope Center Inc ↗
  • Who funds MUST ↗
  • Who funds MARIN COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds ROARING FORK VALLEY EARLY LEARNING FUND ↗
  • Who funds ASPEN VALLEY HOSPITAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds San Francisco Education Fund ↗
  • Who funds EARTHWAYS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds LIVING DESERT THE ↗
  • Who funds THE LOWER EAST SIDE GIRLS CLUB OF NEW YORK INC ↗
  • Who funds THE ASPEN INSTITUTE INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management IncNY15.1× affinity7 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Charities Aid Foundation America · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Pettit Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Pettit Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Catlin Gabel School: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 56 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Pettit’s filings →

More from the funding graph