· Private foundation
Perrigo Company Charitable Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2022–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k73 grants · $239k
- $10k–50k25 grants · $357k
- $50k–250k3 grants · $368k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| INTERNATIONAL SCHOLARSHIP & TUITION SERVICES INC | $165,000 |
| HEART OF WEST MI UNITED WAY | $130,468 |
| UNITED WAY - ALLEGAN | $72,144 |
| KIDS FOOD BASKET | $30,000 |
| SYLVIA'S PLACE | $25,000 |
| WINGS HOME INC | $25,000 |
| WINGS OF HOPE HOSPICE INC | $20,000 |
| EMERGENCY ASSISTANCE FOUNDATION | $20,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $16,500 |
| THE PARRIS FOUNDATION INC | $15,000 |
| CITY ON A HILL MINISTRIES | $15,000 |
| AMERICAN RED CROSS GRAND RAPIDS | $15,000 |
| JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT | $15,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $15,000 |
| FEEDING AMERICAN WEST MI | $15,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY22–25, $521k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 33% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +10% since the first grant, against +3% for the ones you funded once.
114 repeat relationships — 61 still active in FY2025, 53 since wound down; 40 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 69% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $300k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- EAEMERGENCY ASSISTANCE FOUNDATION INC2× · 2022–2025 · $145k · revenue +10%
- WOWINGS OF HOPE HOSPICE & PALLIATIVE CARE INC4× · 2022–2025 · $93k · revenue +62%
- SPSYLVIA'S PLACE4× · 2022–2025 · $85k · revenue +1%
Funded once
- MOMEALS ON WHEELS WEST MIone grant, 2022 · $43k
- SCSEATTLE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL (DBA FRIENDS OF COSTCO GUILD)graduatedone grant, 2022 · $23k · revenue +42%
- DUDAVENPORT UNIVERSITYone grant, 2022 · $20k · revenue -3%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Through internal expertise, external partnerships, and advocacy, the area agency on aging of western michigan provides older adults, adults with disabilities, and their caregivers equitable access to services that promote independence and…
Changing lives through the power of work.
Muskegon family care is a federally qualified health center with medical and dental clinics reaching out to uninsured and underinsured patients in muskegon county.
The Food Bank of Eastern Michigan's mission is to be the Food Source for people in need. Partnering with organizations to feed the hungry, we advocate and build a community solution to a community problem. By leveraging an abundance of…
Hope is a not-for-profit interdenominational christian medical, dental, and social service organization. hope's goal is to provide compassionate and practical help, ministering to the whole person with dignity and respect. this includes…
Partner to alleviate hunger one meal at a time, to create a future where everyone has access to nourishing food.
The mission of the Center for Family Health is opening the door to health care for all.
The mission of the washtenaw housing alliance is to end homelessness in our community.
Mid michigan community action guides local residents on the path to self-sufficiency through empowerment, education and community enrichment.
Southwestern vermont health care exists to provide exceptional health care and comfort to the people we serve. see schedule o for additional details.
With the mission of "helping people move from crisis to hope," common ground is dedicated to helping youths, adults and families by providing programs and services in three distinct impact areas: responding to crisis; providing safety and…
Creating healthy communities - together
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Kids' Food Basket Inc and the most unlike its peers is Stanardsville Volunteer Fire Department. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 29 years old; the field is 17. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
159 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2026, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 159 of the 295 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds EMERGENCY ASSISTANCE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds KIDS' FOOD BASKET INC ↗
- Who funds WINGS HOME ↗
- Who funds WINGS OF HOPE HOSPICE & PALLIATIVE CARE INC ↗
- Who funds SYLVIA'S PLACE ↗
- Who funds CONGREGATIONAL KITCHEN ↗
- Who funds PART OF THE SOLUTION ↗
- Who funds ARC OF ALLEGAN COUNTY ↗
- Who funds CITY ON A HILL MINISTRIES ↗
- Who funds MEALS ON WHEELS WESTERN MICHIGAN ↗
- Who funds The Parris Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds THE AMERICAN IRELAND FUND (DBA THE IRELAND FUNDS AMERICA/THE IRELAND FUNDS) ↗
- Who funds SAUGATUCK CENTER FOR THE ARTS INC ↗
- Who funds Kids Hope USA ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY ACTION HOUSE ↗
- Who funds RESILIENCE ADVOCATES FOR ENDING VIOLENCE ↗
- Who funds HUNGRY FOR CHRIST ↗
- Who funds ALLEGAN HOMELESS SOLUTIONS ↗
- Who funds HOLLAND FREE HEALTH CLINIC ↗
- Who funds FAMILY PROMISE OF GRAND RAPIDS ↗
- Who funds HAND2HAND ↗
- Who funds MEL TROTTER MINISTRIES ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S HEALING CENTER ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF NEW YORK CITY ↗
- Who funds SEATTLE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL (DBA FRIENDS OF COSTCO GUILD) ↗
- Who funds KALAMAZOO COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds The Young Men's Christian Association of Greater Grand Rapids (3019) ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Grand Rapids Community Foundation · The Community Foundation of the Holland/Zeeland Area Inc · Heart of West Michigan United Way · The Mignon Sherwood Delano Fund · Frey Foundation · Consumers Energy Foundation · The Allegan County Community Foundation · Grand Haven Area Community Foundation Inc · The Mercantile Bank Foundation · The Meijer Foundation · Greater Ottawa County United Way · Peter C & Emajean Cook Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Perrigo Company Charitable Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Age Well Inc — 60% of income from government
- Prevent Child Abuse Vermont — 58% of income from government
- Maquam Bay of Missisquoi Inc — 43% of income from government
- Dismas of Vermont Inc — 39% of income from government
- United Way of Northwest Vermont Inc — 34% of income from government
- St Albans Historical Society Inc — 32% of income from government
- Hunger Free Vermont Inc — 24% of income from government
- The Green Mountain Club Inc Debonis — 17% of income from government
- Governor's Institutes of Vermont — 15% of income from government
- Fairfield Community Center Associn — 14% of income from government
- Vermont Foodbank — 13% of income from government
- The University of Vermont Health Network — 2% of income from government
- The Bottom Line Inc — 0% of income from government
- Wounded Warrior Project Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Perrigo Company Charitable Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Perrigo Company Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.