· Public charity
Greater Ottawa County United Way
To improve lives by mobilizing the caring power of community to advance the common good.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2023.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 27 grants below total $566,500 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $630,000 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $63,500 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2023
- Under $10k6 grants · $47k
- $10k–50k19 grants · $391k
- $50k–250k2 grants · $129k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| COMMUNITY ACTION HOUSE | $66,083 |
| RESILIENCE ADVOCATES FOR ENDING VIOLENCE | $63,250 |
| CHILDRENS ADVOCACY CENTER | $42,000 |
| MOSAIC COUNSELING | $42,000 |
| ARBOR CIRCLE | $32,500 |
| REACH FOR RECOVERY | $30,000 |
| SALVATION ARMY - GRAND HAVEN | $27,000 |
| COMMUNITY ACCESS LINE OF THE LAKESHORE | $23,000 |
| GOOD SAMARITAN MINISTRIES | $23,000 |
| MEDIATION SERVICES | $22,000 |
| HOPE COLLEGE - CASA | $18,000 |
| CITY ON A HILL MINISTRIES | $18,000 |
| ZEE BUS | $17,000 |
| HOPE COLLEGE - TRIO UPWARD BOUND | $17,000 |
| LEGAL AID OF WESTERN MICHIGAN | $13,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–23, $1.7M) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 14% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +46% since the first grant, against +18% for the ones you funded once.
43 repeat relationships — 25 still active in FY2023, 18 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2023, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $17k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CACOMMUNITY ACTION HOUSE7× · 2017–2023 · $430k · revenue +506%
- TSTHE SALVATION ARMY WORLD SERVICE OFFICE7× · 2017–2023 · $385k · revenue +1%
- MCMOSAIC COUNSELING7× · 2017–2023 · $361k · revenue +345%
Funded once
- HHHERITAGE HOMES INCone grant, 2017 · $17k · revenue +18%
- AOARC OF ALLEGAN COUNTYone grant, 2022 · $13k · revenue -12%
- BCBETHANY CHRISTIAN SERVICESgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $7k · revenue +64%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Catholic Social Services of Washtenaw County D/B/A Catholic Charities Washtenaw County provides diverse, holistic social services including adoption and pregnancy counseling, food and basic needs assistance, domestic and child abuse…
Standing with our neighbors, Lakeshore Legal Aid fights poverty and injustice through advocacy and by providing meaningful and dignified access to the legal system.
Catholic human services inc. enhances the lives of those we serve by providing hope-filled social, emotional and spiritual support to all people.
Through internal expertise, external partnerships, and advocacy, the area agency on aging of western michigan provides older adults, adults with disabilities, and their caregivers equitable access to services that promote independence and…
To ensure that children who have experienced abuse and/or neglect are in safe and permanent homes by recruiting, screening and training volunteers to advocate on their behalf within the third judicial circuit court's family juvenile…
Mid michigan community action guides local residents on the path to self-sufficiency through empowerment, education and community enrichment.
Community & home supports, inc. was founded to help people and communities address poverty and homelessness. we strive to fulfill our purpose by developing, leading, and participating in collaborative and innovative efforts that support…
The mission of cornerhouse is to partner with families, communities, and systems - entrusted with the safety of children, youth and vulnerable adults - to reduce trauma and end abuse.
With the mission of "helping people move from crisis to hope," common ground is dedicated to helping youths, adults and families by providing programs and services in three distinct impact areas: responding to crisis; providing safety and…
The mission of the washtenaw housing alliance is to end homelessness in our community.
To promote a violence free atmosphere from domestic and sexual violence in which survivors can recognize their options to have the opportunity to continue living violence free and regain their sense of self-worth; to educate and raise…
Leading the way in promoting healthy family living by reaching out to underserved populations and those who are in our community.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Heritage Homes Inc and the most unlike its peers is Northeast Ottawa Forum. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 40 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 21% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
48 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 48 of the 53 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds RESILIENCE ADVOCATES FOR ENDING VIOLENCE ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY ACTION HOUSE ↗
- Who funds THE SALVATION ARMY WORLD SERVICE OFFICE ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S ASSESSMENT CENTER ↗
- Who funds MOSAIC COUNSELING ↗
- Who funds REACH FOR RECOVERY INC ↗
- Who funds GOOD SAMARITAN MINISTRIES ↗
- Who funds CASA of Kent County Inc ↗
- Who funds Child Development Services of Ottawa County Inc ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY ACCESS LINE OF THE LAKESHORE 211 ↗
- Who funds YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSN - TRI-CITIES MICHIGAN ↗
- Who funds LATIN AMERICANS UNITED FOR PROGRESS INC ↗
- Who funds THE LITTLE RED HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds HOPE COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds NORTHEAST OTTAWA FORUM ↗
- Who funds LADDER INC ↗
- Who funds CITY ON A HILL MINISTRIES ↗
- Who funds THE ARBOR CIRCLE CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds LAKESHORE ETHNIC DIVERSITY ALLIANCE ↗
- Who funds HIS HARVEST STAND ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF GREATER HOLLAND ↗
- Who funds CENTER FOR DISPUTE RESOLUTION DBA MEDIATION SERVICES ↗
- Who funds Legal Aid of Western Michigan ↗
- Who funds ASSOCIATION FOR THE BLIND AND VISUALLY IMPAIRED ↗
- Who funds FOUR POINTS INC FOUR POINTS INC ↗
- Who funds GIRL SCOUTS OF MICHIGAN SHORE TO SHORE ↗
- Who funds THE PEOPLE CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds DESTINATION EDUCATION ↗
- Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
- Who funds BIG BROTHERBIG SISTER FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds ARCADVOCACY & RESOURCE CENTER PEGGY FAKLER EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR ↗
- Who funds GRAND HAVEN AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Feeding America ↗
- Who funds READY FOR SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds THE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF THE HOLLAND/ZEELAND AREA INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Grand Haven Area Community Foundation Inc · The Community Foundation of the Holland/Zeeland Area Inc · Heart of West Michigan United Way · Allegan County United Way · Perrigo Company Charitable Foundation · Consumers Energy Foundation · Frey Foundation · Grand Rapids Community Foundation · The Allegan County Community Foundation · Millerknoll Foundation · Community Foundation for Muskegon County · Howard Miller Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Greater Ottawa County United Way funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.