Skip to content

· Private foundation

Perillo Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$57k
Granted FY2025still arriving
5
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$40k
Largest
01What it funds
0188% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2022 to 2025.

Human Services$114kReligion$56kHealth$46kPublic Safety & Disaster$11kYouth Development$4kCommunity Improvement$1kHousing & Shelter$1kOther$0
02FY2025 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $7k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $50k
$5,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$96k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Lurie Children's Foundation Ascend$40,000
Shrine of Our Lady of Pompeii$10,000
HARDY STRONG FOUNDATION$5,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
OUR PLACE$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–23, $516) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%TURNING POINTE AUTISM FOUNDATION: $516 → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

82%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$195k · 11 repeat orgs$42k to everyone else

11 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
11

Total granted

$195k
$41k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-2%
+15%

Still filing today

45%
45%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23’24’25
HealthArts & CultureEducationYouth DevelopmentCommunity ImprovementPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LC
    Lurie Children's Foundation Ascend
    4× · 2022–2025 · $98k
  • SO
    Shrine of Our Lady of Pompeii
    4× · 2022–2025 · $31k
  • HC
    HIPPOCRATIC CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDAT
    2× · 2022–2024 · $14k

Funded once

  • CO
    Church of the Ascension
    one grant, 2024 · $25k
  • WJ
    WE JUST BREATHE FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2022 · $3k
  • CY
    Chicago Youth Centers
    one grant, 2022 · $3k · revenue -1%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Gastro Intestinal Research Foundation Inc

The GI Research Foundation works to treat, prevent, and cure digestive diseases. In collaboration with the physicians and scientists at the University of Chicago Digestive Diseases Center, we fund innovative clinical and laboratory…

Health
2
Chicago Plastic Surgery Research Foundation Inc

To fund research for plastic surgery.

Health
3
The Chicago Innovation Foundation
Philanthropy
4
Pediatric Faculty Foundation Inc

We value excellence and innovation in clinical and basic research, coordinated and comprehensive patient care, ongoing physician education, and evidence-based child advocacy. our goal is to provide leadership in endeavors that promote the…

Health
5
The Foundation for Peripheral Neuropathy

The mission of the Foundation is to dramatically improve the lives of people living with peripheral neuropathy. It is focused on discovering more effective treatment options and finding a cure for peripheral neuropathy. The Foundation…

Health
6
Lurie Children's Surgical Foundation Inc

Provide pediatric and subspecialty surgical, research, and educational services.

—
7
Third Coast International Audio Festival

To cultivate a growing international culture of listening.

Arts & Culture
8
True Chicago
Arts & Culture
9
Stanley Manne Childrens Research Institute

Stanley manne children's research institute strives to generate new knowledge and advance the prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of pediatric diseases.

Health
10
North Shore Health Care Foundation

To expand equitable health care and healthy living in Cook County and champion solutions through funding, education and advocacy.

Health
11
Chicagoland Chamber of Commerce

The chicagoland chamber of commerce combines the power of people, with our legacy of leadership and business advocacy, to drive a dynamic economy. we focus on delivering value for our members, making chicagoland a world-class place to live…

—
12
Children's Tumor Foundation

Our mission: drive research, expand knowledge, and advance care for the nf community. our vision: end nf.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Chicago Youth Centers; the most unlike its peers is Lynn Sage Breast Cancer Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
5/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Lurie Children's Foundation Ascend: $98,272 · OtherLurie Children's Foundation AscendShrine of Our Lady of Pompeii: $30,500 · OtherShrine of Our Lady of PompeiiChurch of the Ascension: $25,000 · OtherChurch of the AscensionHIPPOCRATIC CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDAT: $14,000 · OtherHIPPOCRATIC CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATTHE RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE: $10,000 · Other+11 more: $16,666 · Other+11 moreHARDYSTRONG FOUNDATION NFP: $12,500 · PhilanthropyCHICAGO POLICE MEMORIAL FOUNDATION: $11,095 · Arts & CultureTHE THANC FOUNDATION INC: $6,000 · HealthFACIAL PAIN RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 · HealthCHILD'S VOICE SCHOOL: $3,500 · EducationChicago Youth Centers: $2,500 · Youth DevelopmentLYNN SAGE BREAST CANCER FOUNDATION: $2,000 · Housing & Shelter
Other$194,438Philanthropy$12,500Arts & Culture$11,095Health$11,000Education$3,500Youth Development$2,500Housing & Shelter$2,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHARDYSTRONG FOUNDATION NFP: $12,500 over 3y, 2.2% of budgetCHICAGO POLICE MEMORIAL FOUNDATION: $11,095 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetTHE THANC FOUNDATION INC: $6,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetFACIAL PAIN RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetCHILD'S VOICE SCHOOL: $3,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetChicago Youth Centers: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLYNN SAGE BREAST CANCER FOUNDATION: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetST JOSEPH SERVICES INC: $1,650 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetITALIAN AMERICAN CHAMBER OF COMMERC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTURNING POINTE AUTISM FOUNDATION: $516 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds HARDYSTRONG FOUNDATION NFP ↗
  • Who funds CHICAGO POLICE MEMORIAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE THANC FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds FACIAL PAIN RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds CHILD'S VOICE SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds Chicago Youth Centers ↗
  • Who funds LYNN SAGE BREAST CANCER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ST JOSEPH SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds ITALIAN AMERICAN CHAMBER OF COMMERC ↗
  • Who funds TURNING POINTE AUTISM FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The a Montgomery Ward FoundationTX13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The a Montgomery Ward Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Network for Good · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Perillo Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Perillo Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 23 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Perillo’s filings →

    More from the funding graph