Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Perillo Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$57k
Granted FY2025still arriving
5
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$40k
Largest
01What you fund
0188% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20222025.

Human Services$114kReligion$56kHealth$46kPublic Safety & Disaster$11kYouth Development$4kCommunity Improvement$1kHousing & Shelter$1kOther$0
02FY2025 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $7k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $50k
$5,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$96k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Lurie Children's Foundation Ascend$40,000
Shrine of Our Lady of Pompeii$10,000
HARDY STRONG FOUNDATION$5,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
OUR PLACE$1,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY23–23, $516) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%TURNING POINTE AUTISM FOUNDATION: $516 → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

82%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$195k · 11 repeat orgs$42k to everyone else

11 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
11

Total granted

$195k
$41k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-2%
+15%

Still filing today

45%
45%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23’24’25
HealthArts & CultureEducationYouth DevelopmentCommunity ImprovementPhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LC
    Lurie Children's Foundation Ascend
    4× · 2022–2025 · $98k
  • SO
    Shrine of Our Lady of Pompeii
    4× · 2022–2025 · $31k
  • HC
    HIPPOCRATIC CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDAT
    2× · 2022–2024 · $14k

Funded once

  • CO
    Church of the Ascension
    one grant, 2024 · $25k
  • WJ
    WE JUST BREATHE FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2022 · $3k
  • CY
    Chicago Youth Centers
    one grant, 2022 · $3k · revenue -1%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Gastro Intestinal Research Foundation Inc

The GI Research Foundation works to treat, prevent, and cure digestive diseases. In collaboration with the physicians and scientists at the University of Chicago Digestive Diseases Center, we fund innovative clinical and laboratory…

Health
2
Chicago Plastic Surgery Research Foundation Inc

To fund research for plastic surgery.

Health
3
The Chicago Innovation Foundation
Philanthropy
4
Pediatric Faculty Foundation Inc

We value excellence and innovation in clinical and basic research, coordinated and comprehensive patient care, ongoing physician education, and evidence-based child advocacy. our goal is to provide leadership in endeavors that promote the…

Health
5
The Foundation for Peripheral Neuropathy

The mission of the Foundation is to dramatically improve the lives of people living with peripheral neuropathy. It is focused on discovering more effective treatment options and finding a cure for peripheral neuropathy. The Foundation…

Health
6
Lurie Children's Surgical Foundation Inc

Provide pediatric and subspecialty surgical, research, and educational services.

7
Third Coast International Audio Festival

To cultivate a growing international culture of listening.

Arts & Culture
8
True Chicago
Arts & Culture
9
Stanley Manne Childrens Research Institute

Stanley manne children's research institute strives to generate new knowledge and advance the prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of pediatric diseases.

Health
10
North Shore Health Care Foundation

To expand equitable health care and healthy living in Cook County and champion solutions through funding, education and advocacy.

Health
11
Chicagoland Chamber of Commerce

The chicagoland chamber of commerce combines the power of people, with our legacy of leadership and business advocacy, to drive a dynamic economy. we focus on delivering value for our members, making chicagoland a world-class place to live…

12
Children's Tumor Foundation

Our mission: drive research, expand knowledge, and advance care for the nf community. our vision: end nf.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Chicago Youth Centers and the most unlike its peers is Lynn Sage Breast Cancer Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
5/10
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Lurie Children's Foundation Ascend — $98,272 · OtherLurie Children's Foundation AscendShrine of Our Lady of Pompeii — $30,500 · OtherShrine of Our Lady of PompeiiChurch of the Ascension — $25,000 · OtherChurch of the AscensionHIPPOCRATIC CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDAT — $14,000 · OtherHIPPOCRATIC CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATTHE RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE — $10,000 · Other+11 more — $16,666 · Other+11 moreHARDYSTRONG FOUNDATION NFP — $12,500 · PhilanthropyCHICAGO POLICE MEMORIAL FOUNDATION — $11,095 · Arts & CultureTHE THANC FOUNDATION INC — $6,000 · HealthFACIAL PAIN RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC — $5,000 · HealthCHILD'S VOICE SCHOOL — $3,500 · EducationChicago Youth Centers — $2,500 · Youth DevelopmentLYNN SAGE BREAST CANCER FOUNDATION — $2,000 · Housing & Shelter
Other$194,438Philanthropy$12,500Arts & Culture$11,095Health$11,000Education$3,500Youth Development$2,500Housing & Shelter$2,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetHARDYSTRONG FOUNDATION NFP — $12,500 over 3y, 2.2% of budgetCHICAGO POLICE MEMORIAL FOUNDATION — $11,095 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetTHE THANC FOUNDATION INC — $6,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetFACIAL PAIN RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC — $5,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetCHILD'S VOICE SCHOOL — $3,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetChicago Youth Centers — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLYNN SAGE BREAST CANCER FOUNDATION — $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetST JOSEPH SERVICES INC — $1,650 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetITALIAN AMERICAN CHAMBER OF COMMERC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTURNING POINTE AUTISM FOUNDATION — $516 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds HARDYSTRONG FOUNDATION NFP
  • Who funds CHICAGO POLICE MEMORIAL FOUNDATION
  • Who funds THE THANC FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds FACIAL PAIN RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds CHILD'S VOICE SCHOOL
  • Who funds Chicago Youth Centers
  • Who funds LYNN SAGE BREAST CANCER FOUNDATION
  • Who funds ST JOSEPH SERVICES INC
  • Who funds ITALIAN AMERICAN CHAMBER OF COMMERC
  • Who funds TURNING POINTE AUTISM FOUNDATION

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The a Montgomery Ward FoundationTX13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The a Montgomery Ward Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Network for Good · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Perillo Charitable Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 23 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph