How much did PEPSICO FOUNDATION INC grant in FY2024?

Philanthropy$95MInternational$50MEducation$13MHuman Services$11MEnvironment$6.1MCommunity Improvement$4.4MPublic Safety & Disaster$3.7MPublic Benefit$2.5MArts & Culture$1.4MOther$76M

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2020

relief covidcooperative reliefwomen businessrescuerelief everywherefeed childrenwater

2021

gayoutreachtrue impactchildrensrelief coviddistrictaction

2022

catholicstatesgirlsdonor advisedglobalmetropolitanlouis

2023

army territorycapitalsalvation armybrothers sistersorangedonor advisedwestchester

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2024 · 57 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

Under $10k8 grants · $45k
$10k–50k11 grants · $267k
$50k–250k19 grants · $2.0M
$250k+19 grants · $35M

$100,000

Median grant

States reached

$113M

Total assets

Largest grants

CHARITIES AID FOUNDATION AMERICA$14,366,928
AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF COMMUNITY COLLEGES$5,218,954
SCHOLARSHIP AMERICA INC$5,211,952
GLOBAL IMPACT$2,150,000
MYRIAD USA INC$1,982,024
CARE Inc (Cooperative for Assistance and Relief)$989,000
GLOBALGIVING FOUNDATION INC$677,000
WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC$650,000
WATERAID AMERICA INC$566,652
AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS$500,000
SAVE THE CHILDREN FEDERATION INC$500,000
THE LEBRON JAMES FAMILY FOUNDATION$500,000
UNIDOSUS$340,000
THE BARACK OBAMA FOUNDATION$300,000
PYXERA GLOBAL INC$300,000

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $11.4M) land where the poverty rate runs at 16% — the area typically sits at 11%. 98% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

79%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$210M · 100 repeat orgs$54M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +74% since the first grant, against +65% for the ones you funded once.

100 repeat relationships — 33 still active in FY2024, 67 since wound down; 24 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

100

250

Total granted

$210M

$49M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+74%

+65%

Still filing today

79%

68%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 85% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5.6M went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

EducationPhilanthropyHuman ServicesInternationalFood & NutritionCommunity ImprovementOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

CA
CHARITIES AID FOUNDATION AMERICA
5× · 2020–2024 · $72M · revenue +449%
NU
NATIONAL URBAN LEAGUE INC
4× · 2020–2023 · $8.0M · revenue +46%
AA
AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF COMMUNITY COLLEGES
2× · 2022–2024 · $5.3M · revenue +63%

Funded once

AT
ALLIANCE TO END PLASTIC WASTE INC
one grant, 2020 · $6.0M
C(
CARE (COOP FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE)
one grant, 2021 · $3.8M
BG
BLACKBAUD GIVING FUND LLC
one grant, 2022 · $2.7M

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

United Food Bank

Uniting communities to alleviate hunger.

Food & Nutrition

Global Fund for Children

To advance the rights and opportunities of children and youth worldwide.

Arts & Culture

Washington Area Community Investment

To increase equity and economic opportunity by investing knowledge, social, and financial capital in low- and moderate-income washington area entrepreneurs.

—

The Nasdaq Entrepreneurial Center Inc

Deliver world-class resources and mentoring to enable every entrepreneur across the globe to realize their maximum potential.

Arts & Culture

Coop Careers Inc

Building a movement of diverse, upwardly mobile college grads overcoming underemployment through digital skills and peer connections.

Education

Central Pennsylvania Food Bank

Fighting hunger, improving lives, strengthening communities.

Food & Nutrition

Global Ties Us

To build trust and advance peace and prosperity though international exchange.

International

Central Indiana Corporate

The central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is transforming our regional economy, bringing together the ceos of central indiana's largest and most civically engaged employers and university presidents to advance "big picture"…

Community Improvement

Arizona Community Foundation

To lead, serve and collaborate to mobilize enduring philanthropy for a better arizona.

Philanthropy

The Common Application Inc

The common application promotes access, equity, and integrity in the college admission process.

Education

College Summit Inc

Peerforward transforms the lives of low-income youth by connecting them to college and career.

Education

Channel One Inc

Channel one strengthens food access and builds healthy communities.

Food & Nutrition

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Friends of the World Food Program Inc and the most unlike its peers is White Plains Hospital Medical Center. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side

Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 33 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 1% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.4% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

0.4%1/281

the rest of the field

11%

206,163/1,819,284

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

271 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

266/271

Grantees still filing

216/271

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Philanthropy$95,481,264Other$83,592,774International$49,740,819Education$13,425,021Human Services$11,429,500Environment$6,057,500Community Improvement$4,430,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Coca-Cola Foundation IncGA29.1× affinity12 shared granteesties to 10 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Coca-Cola Foundation Inc · American Association of Community · Robert R McCormick Foundation · United Way of Metropolitan Dallas Inc · United Way of Metropolitan Chicago Inc · AT&T Foundation · Pwc Foundation Inc · Unidosus · Charities Aid Foundation America · The Kroger Co Zero Hunger Zero · Gates Foundation · Texas Women's Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation PEPSICO FOUNDATION INC funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

14get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: IRAQ FUND FOR HIGHER EDUCATION.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

high risk

~1 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 5 filed years.

Track record & reputation

low risk

5 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up 103.0× since.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 844738191 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on IRAQ FUND FOR HIGHER EDUCATION, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

FlagFinancial stability— Roughly 1 months of cash on hand.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue grew over the period.
WatchReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 97% of their budget — load-bearing; a dependency Plinth would track.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Pepsico Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Pepsico Foundation Inc through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

PEPSICO FOUNDATION INC

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

271 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Pepsico Foundation Inc?

More from the funding graph

PEPSICO FOUNDATION INC

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

271 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Pepsico Foundation Inc?

More from the funding graph