Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersAlso receives grants — funding profile →
Plinth

· Private foundation

Pepsico Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$38M
Granted FY2024still arriving
57
Grants FY2024still arriving
13
States reached
$14M
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What you fund
0199% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2024.

International$137MEducation$40MPhilanthropy$25MEnvironment$14MCivil Rights$11MFood & Nutrition$8.6MCommunity Improvement$7.6MPublic Safety & Disaster$6.2MOther$0
02FY2024 · 57 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k8 grants · $45k
  • $10k–50k11 grants · $267k
  • $50k–250k19 grants · $2.0M
  • $250k+19 grants · $35M
$100,000
Median grant
13
States reached
$113M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CHARITIES AID FOUNDATION AMERICA$14,366,928
AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF COMMUNITY COLLEGES$5,218,954
SCHOLARSHIP AMERICA INC$5,211,952
GLOBAL IMPACT$2,150,000
MYRIAD USA INC$1,982,024
CARE Inc (Cooperative for Assistance and Relief)$989,000
GLOBALGIVING FOUNDATION INC$677,000
WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC$650,000
WATERAID AMERICA INC$566,652
THE LEBRON JAMES FAMILY FOUNDATION$500,000
SAVE THE CHILDREN FEDERATION INC$500,000
AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS$500,000
UNIDOSUS$340,000
PYXERA GLOBAL INC$300,000
THE BARACK OBAMA FOUNDATION$300,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $14.8M) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 98% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%CHICANOS POR LA CAUSA INC: $25k → 11%SAN FRANCISCO FORTY NINERS FOUNDATION: $10k → 8%RESCUE MISSION ALLIANCE OF SYRACUSE NY: $10k → 14%COLUMBIA URBAN LEAGUE INC: $25k → 16%JHOSLEN ANGELS INC: $5k → 15%BAXTER COMMUNITY CENTER: $15k → 11%BRIDGEPORT RESCUE MISSION INC: $100k → 9%COMPREHENSIVE COMMUNITY ACTION INC: $20k → 14%CATHOLIC CHARITIES NEW HAMPSHIRE: $10k → 7%GLOBAL ECONOMIC DIVERSITY DEVELOPMENT INITIATIVE: $12k → 15%HEAVEN SOUTH: $20k → 14%COBURN PLACE SAFEHAVEN LI INC: $10k → 16%ASIAN COUNSELING & REFERRAL SERVICE: $20k → 9%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF GALVESTON: $50k → 16%WHEELER MISSION MINISTRIES INC: $10k → 16%UNITED WAY OF WESTCHESTER AND PUTNAM INC: $100k → 9%WISH FOR WHEELS INC: $5k → 12%UNITED WAY OF WESTCHESTER AND PUTNAM INC: $15k → 9%LATINO NETWORK: $15k → 12%URBAN LEAGUE OF LOUISIANA: $25k → 23%ST VINCENT DE PAUL OF BALTIMORE INC: $50k → 19%PARTNERSHIP WITH NATIVE AMERICANS: $10k → 14%CITYSQUARE: $25k → 14%CITYSQUARE: $10k → 14%CITYSQUARE: $10k → 14%BEAUTY 2 THE STREETZ: $10k → 14%FOR OAK CLIFF: $145k → 14%AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS: $1.1M → 17%YMCA OF METROPOLITAN DALLAS: $10k → 14%AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS: $500k → 17%AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS: $250k → 17%NATIONAL URBAN LEAGUE INC: $2.0M → 17%NATIONAL URBAN LEAGUE INC: $2.0M → 17%NATIONAL URBAN LEAGUE INC: $2.0M → 17%NATIONAL URBAN LEAGUE INC: $2.0M → 17%UCAN: $3k → 14%AMERICAN CORPORATE PARTNERS: $50k → 17%AMERICAN CORPORATE PARTNERS: $50k → 17%AMERICAN CORPORATE PARTNERS: $50k → 17%AMERICAN CORPORATE PARTNERS: $50k → 17%AMERICAN CORPORATE PARTNERS: $50k → 17%WOMEN IN NEED INC: $50k → 17%FRIENDS OF THE WORLD FOOD PROGRAM INC: $1.1M → 14%FRIENDS OF THE WORLD FOOD PROGRAM INC: $1.0M → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $850k → 14%WORLD FOOD PROGRAM USA: $550k → 14%FRIENDS OF THE WORLD FOOD PROGRAM INC: $350k → 14%FRIENDS OF THE WORLD FOOD PROGRAM INC: $10k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

VT
NH
WA
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
NV
IA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
CO
MO
KY
WV
VA
MD
AZ
TN
NC
SC
DC
HI
OK
LA
MS
AL
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

72%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$105M · 92 repeat orgs$41M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +21% since the first grant, against +15% for the ones you funded once.

92 repeat relationships — 29 still active in FY2024, 63 since wound down; 23 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

92
228

Total granted

$105M
$37M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+21%
+15%

Still filing today

86%
75%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 82% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3.4M went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHuman ServicesInternationalFood & NutritionPhilanthropyCommunity ImprovementOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SCHOLARSHIP AMERICA INC
    3× · 2020–2022 · $12M · revenue +32%
  • COOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE INC
    3× · 2020–2023 · $9.6M · revenue +37%
  • TR
    THE RECYCLING PARTNERSHIP INC
    3× · 2020–2022 · $6.0M · revenue +69%

Funded once

  • AT
    ALLIANCE TO END PLASTIC WASTE INC
    one grant, 2020 · $6.0M
  • C(
    CARE (COOP FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE)
    one grant, 2021 · $3.8M
  • AF
    ALLIES FOR COMMUNITY BUSINESS INC
    one grant, 2021 · $2.0M · revenue -20%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Central Indiana Corporate Partnership Inc

Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…

Community Improvement
2
United Way of Greater Philadelphia and Southern New Jersey

United way's mission is to end intergenerational poverty in our region by harnessing, leveraging and strategically investing the collective power of donors, advocates and volunteers, to help individuals and families break the cycle of…

Philanthropy
3
Washington Area Community Investment Fund Inc

The washington area community investment fund (wacif) is a nonprofit community loan fund focused on increasing equity and economic opportunity in the washington, dc area's underserved communities. wacif's mission is driven is driven by…

—
4
The Common Application Inc

The common application is a not-for-profit membership organization of over 1,100 colleges and universities across the globe committed to access, equity, and integrity in the college admission process. every year, over 1.5 million students…

Education
5
Coop Careers Inc

Building a movement of diverse, upwardly mobile college grads overcoming underemployment through digital skills and peer connections.

Education
6
Partners in Food Solutions

Improve the food value chain in developing countries by mobilizing corporate volunteers to share knowledge and expertise with small and growing food processors.

International
7
National Association for College Admission Counseling

Empowering college admission counseling professionals through education, advocacy, and community.

Education
8
Upwardly Global

Upwardly global removes employment barriers for immigrant, refugee, and asylee professionals while advancing the inclusion of their skills into the u.s. economy.

Employment
9
National Association of Corporate Directors

We empower directors and transform boards to be future ready.

Public Benefit
10
United Food Bank

United Food Bank unites communities to alleviate hunger.

Food & Nutrition
11
American Gas Association

American gas association's (the association) mission is to develop and advocate for informed, innovative, and durable policy that fulfills our nation's energy needs, environmental aspirations and economic potential. we are committed to…

—
12
Arizona Community Foundation

To lead, serve and collaborate to mobilize enduring philanthropy for a better arizona.

Philanthropy

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mile High United Way Inc and the most unlike its peers is Firehouse Community Arts Center of Chicago. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyChristian Missionary Organi…Immigrant Worker SupportSchool District FoundationsWomen & Girls Leadership De…Youth Development CentersCancer Support ServicesFaith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Affordable Housing Construc…Military Veterans SupportIndependent K-12 SchoolsDevelopmental Disabilities …Youth Sports ProgramsYmca Youth DevelopmentYouth Development ServicesSenior Support ServicesAffordable Housing Developm…Domestic Violence ServicesCommunity College Foundatio…Local Food System Organizat…Local History MuseumsHealth Access Advocacy and …Environmental Conservation …Lgbtq+ Community SupportPolicy Research and AdvocacyUnited Way AffiliatesFood Banks and PantriesCommunity Foundations
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 33 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%1%<5yr14%8%5–10yr19%16%10–20yr16%27%20–35yr13%27%35–55yr16%21%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%0%<5yr14%1%5–10yr19%10%10–20yr16%56%20–35yr13%10%35–55yr16%23%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 1% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.7% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.7%2/305
the rest of the field
13%
240,394/1,819,260

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

292 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 292 of the 363 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
34
Early backer (in before they grew)
287/292
Grantees still filing
188/292
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

CHARITIES AID FOUNDATION AMERICA — $72,018,972 · PhilanthropyCHARITIES AID FOUNDATION AMERICAUNITED WAY WORLDWIDE — $10,247,443 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY WORLDWIDETHE BLACKBAUD GIVING FUND — $4,853,456 · Philanthropy+18 more — $11,344,000 · Philanthropy+18 moreGIVE2ASIA — $22,740,802 · InternationalGIVE2ASIACOOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE INC — $9,644,952 · InternationalCOOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE…WATERAID AMERICA INC — $5,082,133 · InternationalWATERAID AMERICA INCSave The Children Federation Inc — $4,715,000 · InternationalSave The Children Federati…Global Impact — $3,100,000 · InternationalINTERNATIONAL YOUTH FOUNDATION — $2,935,041 · InternationalThe Global FoodBanking Network — $2,054,000 · International+20 more — $10,592,312 · International+20 moreSCHOLARSHIP AMERICA INC — $8,183,373 · OtherSCHOLARSHIP AMERICA I…ALLIANCE TO END PLASTIC WASTE INC — $6,000,000 · OtherALLIANCE TO END PLAST…CARE (COOP FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE) — $3,785,628 · OtherCARE (COOP FOR ASSIST…The Children's Health Fund — $2,000,000 · OtherNational Restaurant Association — $1,750,000 · OtherTEAM RUBICON INC — $3,660,000 · OtherTEAM RUBICON INCTHE LEBRON JAMES FAMILY FOUNDATION — $2,500,000 · Other+92 more — $21,849,151 · Other+92 moreSCHOLARSHIP AMERICA INC — $12,360,698 · EducationSCHOLARSHIP…AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF COMMUNITY COLLEGES — $5,318,954 · EducationAMERICAN AS…Indiana University Foundation — $1,305,000 · EducationBAYLOR UNIVERSITY — $1,000,000 · Education+27 more — $6,799,317 · Education+27 moreNATIONAL URBAN LEAGUE INC — $8,010,000 · Human ServicesFRIENDS OF THE WORLD FOOD PROGRAM INC — $3,000,000 · Human ServicesAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $2,710,000 · Human Services+8 more — $807,500 · Human ServicesTHE RECYCLING PARTNERSHIP INC — $6,000,000 · EnvironmentCIRCULATE INITIATIVE INC — $1,200,000 · Environment+4 more — $842,500 · EnvironmentALLIES FOR COMMUNITY BUSINESS INC — $2,000,000 · Community ImprovementACCION OPPORTUNITY FUND INC — $1,700,000 · Community ImprovementLA PLAZA DE CULTURA Y ARTES — $275,000 · Community Improvement+2 more — $90,000 · Community Improvement
Philanthropy$98,463,871International$60,864,240Other$49,728,152Education$26,783,969Human Services$14,527,500Environment$8,042,500Community Improvement$4,065,000

Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCHARITIES AID FOUNDATION AMERICA — $72,018,972 over 5y, 3.8% of budgetGIVE2ASIA — $22,740,802 over 5y, 16% of budgetSCHOLARSHIP AMERICA INC — $12,360,698 over 3y, 2.3% of budgetUNITED WAY WORLDWIDE — $10,247,443 over 2y, 5.5% of budgetCOOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE INC — $9,644,952 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetNATIONAL URBAN LEAGUE INC — $8,010,000 over 4y, 2.4% of budgetTHE RECYCLING PARTNERSHIP INC — $6,000,000 over 3y, 8.2% of budgetAMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF COMMUNITY COLLEGES — $5,318,954 over 2y, 20% of budgetWATERAID AMERICA INC — $5,082,133 over 5y, 6.3% of budgetTHE BLACKBAUD GIVING FUND — $4,853,456 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetSave The Children Federation Inc — $4,715,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetTEAM RUBICON INC — $3,660,000 over 4y, 5.7% of budgetGlobal Impact — $3,100,000 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE WORLD FOOD PROGRAM INC — $3,000,000 over 4y, 1.9% of budgetINTERNATIONAL YOUTH FOUNDATION — $2,935,041 over 2y, 14% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $2,710,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetROBIN HOOD FOUNDATION — $2,600,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetTHE LEBRON JAMES FAMILY FOUNDATION — $2,500,000 over 3y, 8.7% of budgetThe Global FoodBanking Network — $2,054,000 over 3y, 8.1% of budgetALLIES FOR COMMUNITY BUSINESS INC — $2,000,000 over 1y, 16% of budgetThe Children's Health Fund — $2,000,000 over 1y, 18% of budgetUNITED NATIONS FOUNDATION INC — $2,000,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetMYRIAD USA INC — $1,982,024 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC — $1,850,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetNational Restaurant Association — $1,750,000 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetGenYOUTH Incorporated — $1,575,000 over 5y, 4.5% of budgetIndiana University Foundation — $1,305,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetSHARE OUR STRENGTH — $1,260,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetCIRCULATE INITIATIVE INC — $1,200,000 over 3y, 29% of budgetUNITED WAY OF METROPOLITAN DALLAS INC — $1,022,500 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetUNIDOSUS — $1,003,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetUnited States Association for UNHCR — $1,000,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetBAYLOR UNIVERSITY — $1,000,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAVINA AMERICAS INC — $800,000 over 1y, 13% of budgetCONGRESSIONAL HISPANIC CAUCUS INSTITUTE INC — $750,000 over 5y, 1.8% of budgetGLOBALGIVING FOUNDATION INC — $677,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetWESTCHESTER COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC — $615,000 over 2y, 5.9% of budgetHOUSTON COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION — $600,000 over 2y, 4.3% of budgetTHE BARACK OBAMA FOUNDATION — $600,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetCOLORADO COMMUNITY COLLEGE SYSTEM FOUNDATION — $600,000 over 2y, 7.3% of budgetFOUNDATION FOR THE LOS ANGELES COMMUNITY COLLEGES — $600,000 over 2y, 17% of budgetCity Colleges of Chicago Foundation — $600,000 over 2y, 3.4% of budgetDALLAS COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC — $600,000 over 1y, 4.7% of budgetMIAMI DADE COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC — $600,000 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetEXECUTIVE LEADERSHIP COUNCIL — $595,000 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetTHE GREATER NEW ORLEANS FOUNDATION — $550,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetGLOBAL POVERTY PROJECT INC — $510,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetTHE MAYOR'S FUND FOR LOS ANGELES — $500,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Coca-Cola Foundat…AT&T FoundationUnited Way of Metropo…The Rockefeller Found…Texas Women's Foundat…The Addy FoundationThe Kroger Co Zero Hu…Robert R McCormick Fo…American Association …Hillcrest FoundationWells Fargo FoundationCharities Aid Foundat…
The Coca-Cola Foundation IncGA32.3× affinity14 shared granteesties to 8 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Coca-Cola Foundation Inc · AT&T Foundation · United Way of Metropolitan Dallas Inc · The Rockefeller Foundation · Texas Women's Foundation · The Addy Foundation · The Kroger Co Zero Hunger Zero Waste Foundation · Robert R McCormick Foundation · American Association of Community Colleges · Hillcrest Foundation · Wells Fargo Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Pepsico Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 90%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 15%
  • Oregon Tradeswomen Inc — 46% of income from government
  • St Vincent De Paul of Baltimore Inc — 40% of income from government
  • Save the Children Federation Inc — 30% of income from government
  • Harbor House of Central Florida Inc — 24% of income from government
  • International Youth Foundation — 17% of income from government
  • Latino Network — 15% of income from government
  • Trustees of Tufts College — 13% of income from government
  • Maryland New Directions Inc — 8% of income from government
  • Bethune-Cookman University — 6% of income from government
  • Solve — 5% of income from government
  • Feed the Children Inc — 1% of income from government
  • Boston Foundation Inc — 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
9get no government money at all
52report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Pepsico Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Pepsico Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 363 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines