Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation Dossiers
Plinth

· Private foundation

Peierls Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$5.7M
Granted FY2024still arriving
47
Grants FY2024still arriving
14
States reached
$720k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.

International$9.8MHealth$7.1MEducation$5.1MEnvironment$4.2MPublic Safety & Disaster$3.7MYouth Development$3.5MHuman Services$3.1MCivil Rights$1.5MOther$0
02FY2024 · 47 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k13 grants · $415k
  • $50k–250k29 grants · $2.4M
  • $250k+5 grants · $2.8M
$69,500
Median grant
14
States reached
$107M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS USA$720,000
INTERNATIONAL RESCUE COMMITTEE$650,000
AMERICAN RED CROSS$565,000
CARE INC$480,000
THE NATURE CONSERVANCY$380,000
PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA$249,000
AMERICAN INDIAN COLLEGE FUND$110,000
RAISING AUSTIN (TOGETHER4CHILDREN)$110,000
PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF GREATER TEXAS$107,500
PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF THE GREAT NORTHWEST$107,500
PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF METROPOLITAN NEW JERSEY$107,500
THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS FOUNDATION$101,000
COLORADO UPLIFT$99,500
ALL MAY SEE FOUNDATION$97,500
ACCESS ESPERANZA CLINICS INC$97,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $847k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 74% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%DZI FOUNDATION: $40k → 7%AMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR THE BLIND: $20k → 19%LEARNING ALLY: $41k → 11%AMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR THE BLIND: $23k → 7%DZI FOUNDATION: $38k → 7%AMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR THE BLIND: $20k → 19%LEARNING ALLY: $39k → 11%AMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR THE BLIND: $23k → 7%DZI FOUNDATION: $38k → 7%LEARNING ALLY: $34k → 11%AMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR THE BLIND: $22k → 7%DZI FOUNDATION: $36k → 7%LEARNING ALLY: $33k → 11%LEARNING ALLY: $32k → 11%LEARNING ALLY: $32k → 11%HOPE CENTER: $76k → 12%HOPE CENTER: $70k → 12%HOPE CENTER: $65k → 12%HOPE CENTER: $58k → 12%HOPE CENTER: $57k → 12%HOPE CENTER: $49k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

WA
NY
MA
OR
IA
PA
NJ
CT
CA
CO
WV
VA
MD
TN
DC
LA
GA
TX

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$35M · 54 repeat orgs$271k to everyone else

54 repeat relationships — 45 still active in FY2024, 9 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

54
6

Total granted

$35M
$271k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+64%
+136%

Still filing today

76%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’20’21’22’23’24
HealthEducationYouth DevelopmentHuman ServicesInternationalCivil RightsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC
    6× · 2017–2024 · $4.8M · revenue +98%
  • IR
    International Rescue Committee INC
    6× · 2017–2024 · $4.0M · revenue +81%
  • PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC
    6× · 2017–2024 · $1.6M · revenue +12%

Funded once

  • MH
    MILE HIGH UNITED WAY (READING CORP)
    one grant, 2017 · $90k
  • TM
    TSNE MISSIONWORLS (FOR TOOLS OF THE MIND)
    one grant, 2017 · $70k
  • PL
    Pacific Legal Foundationgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $41k · revenue +136%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
2
Augustana College

Rooted in the liberal arts & sciences & lutheran expression of the christian faith, & is committed to offering a challenging education that develops qualities of mind, spirit, & body necessary for a rewarding life of leadership & service…

Education
3
The Rand Corporation

Help improve policy and decision making through research and analysis.

Public Benefit
4
Albright College

As a diverse community of learners, we cultivate integrity, curiosity, connection and resilience.

Education
5
The Union of Concerned Scientists Inc

The union of concerned scientists puts rigorous, independent science into action, developing solutions and advocating for a healthy, safe, and just future.

International
6
President and Fellows of Harvard College

Undergraduate, graduate, and professional education and research across a broad array of academic domains.

Education
7
American Association for the Advancement of Science

Advance science, engineering, and innovation throughout the world for the benefit of all. the world's largest multidisciplinary scientific society and a leading publisher of cutting-edge research through its science family of journals,…

Science & Tech
8
Banner -University Medical Group

Assist banner health complete its mission to make health care easier so life can be better by providing integrated & coordinated care & population health management.

Health
9
Central Indiana Corporate Partnership Inc

Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…

Community Improvement
10
University Associates in Obstetrics and Gynecology University Faculty Pract ice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
11
Education Commission of the States

The mission of education commission of the states is to advocate for attaining educational excellence for all and to help state leaders identify, develop and implement public policy for education that addresses current and future needs of…

Education
12
Asociacion Interamericana Para La Defensa Del Ambiente

To strenghten people's ability to guarantee their individual and collective right to a healthy environment, via the development, implementation, and effective enforcement of national and international law.

Crime & Legal

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Rocky Mountain Planned Parenthood Inc and the most unlike its peers is International Rescue Committee Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyCommunity College Foundatio…Elementary Literacy TutoringChristian Youth CampsPregnancy Support ServicesHealth Access Advocacy and …Independent K-12 SchoolsCancer Support ServicesWomen & Girls Leadership De…Community Foundations
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 48 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%0%<5yr14%0%5–10yr19%2%10–20yr16%26%20–35yr13%33%35–55yr16%40%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%0%<5yr14%0%5–10yr19%1%10–20yr16%19%20–35yr13%33%35–55yr16%47%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/46
the rest of the field
13%
240,396/1,819,519

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

45 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 45 of the 62 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
9
Early backer (in before they grew)
45/45
Grantees still filing
41/45
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

THE NATURE CONSERVANCY — $3,597,100 · OtherTHE NATURE CONSERVANCYAMERICAN RED CROSS — $2,579,200 · OtherAMERICAN RED CROSSCARE INC — $1,808,200 · OtherCARE INCRAISING AUSTIN (TOGETHER4CHILDREN) — $812,200 · OtherRAISING AUSTIN (TOGETHER4CHILDREN)THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS FOUNDATION INC — $537,300 · Other+23 more — $4,751,070 · Other+23 moreMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $4,841,800 · InternationalMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA …International Rescue Committee INC — $3,955,600 · InternationalInternational Rescue Committe…COOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE INC — $960,000 · InternationalCOOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AN…Unitarian Universalist Service Committee Inc — $451,200 · InternationalPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC — $1,581,250 · HealthPLANNED PARENTHOO…PLANNED PARENTHOOD GREAT NORTHWEST HAWAII ALASKA INDIANA AND KENTUCKY — $652,000 · HealthPLANNED PARENTHOO…That Man May See Inc DBA All May See Foundation — $650,800 · HealthThat Man May See …PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF METROPOLITAN NEW JERSEY — $650,200 · HealthPLANNED PARENTHOO…PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF GREATER TEXAS INC — $650,200 · HealthPLANNED PARENTHOO…ACCESS ESPERANZA CLINICS INC — $640,500 · HealthACCESS ESPERANZA …ROCKY MOUNTAIN PLANNED PARENTHOOD INC — $516,350 · HealthROCKY MOUNTAIN PL…VIRGINIA GARCIA MEMORIAL HEALTH CENTER — $506,600 · HealthVIRGINIA GARCIA M…HEARING HEALTH FOUNDATION — $226,900 · Health+1 more — $59,500 · HealthCOLORADO UPLIFT INC — $835,700 · EducationCOLORADO UPL…AMERICAN INDIAN COLLEGE FUND — $749,200 · EducationAMERICAN IND…READING PARTNERS — $580,300 · EducationREADING PART…METROPOLITAN STATE UNIVERSITY OF DENVER FOUNDATION INC — $521,400 · EducationMETROPOLITAN…WESTMINSTER PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION — $438,200 · EducationWESTMINSTER …MEHARRY MEDICAL COLLEGE — $380,900 · EducationMEHARRY MEDI…DENVER SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION — $324,100 · EducationDENVER SCHOL…Austin Community College Foundation — $288,400 · EducationAustin Commu…Yale University — $287,400 · EducationYale Univers…American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $1,137,250 · Human ServicesHope Center Inc — $374,950 · Human ServicesLearning Ally Inc — $211,400 · Human ServicesDZI FOUNDATION — $152,000 · Human ServicesAMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR THE BLIND INC — $130,100 · Human ServicesCOLORADO YOUTH FOR A CHANGE — $562,900 · Youth DevelopmentREACH OUT AND READ COLORADO — $476,500 · Youth DevelopmentBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF COLORADO INC — $433,300 · Youth DevelopmentGIRLS INCORPORATED OF METRO DENVER — $183,700 · Youth DevelopmentGREATER COLORADO COUNCIL BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA — $175,450 · Youth DevelopmentAMERICANS UNITED FOR SEPARATION OF CHURCH AND STATE — $374,200 · Civil Rights
Other$14,085,070International$10,208,600Health$6,134,300Education$4,405,600Human Services$2,005,700Youth Development$1,831,850Civil Rights$374,200

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $4,841,800 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetInternational Rescue Committee INC — $3,955,600 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY — $3,597,100 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC — $1,581,250 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $1,137,250 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCOOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE INC — $960,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCOLORADO UPLIFT INC — $835,700 over 6y, 3.5% of budgetAMERICAN INDIAN COLLEGE FUND — $749,200 over 6y, 0.6% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD GREAT NORTHWEST HAWAII ALASKA INDIANA AND KENTUCKY — $652,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetThat Man May See Inc DBA All May See Foundation — $650,800 over 6y, 3.1% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF METROPOLITAN NEW JERSEY — $650,200 over 6y, 1.1% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF GREATER TEXAS INC — $650,200 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetACCESS ESPERANZA CLINICS INC — $640,500 over 6y, 1.5% of budgetREADING PARTNERS — $580,300 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetCOLORADO YOUTH FOR A CHANGE — $562,900 over 5y, 2.9% of budgetTHE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS FOUNDATION INC — $537,300 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetMETROPOLITAN STATE UNIVERSITY OF DENVER FOUNDATION INC — $521,400 over 6y, 1.3% of budgetROCKY MOUNTAIN PLANNED PARENTHOOD INC — $516,350 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetVIRGINIA GARCIA MEMORIAL HEALTH CENTER — $506,600 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetREACH OUT AND READ COLORADO — $476,500 over 5y, 9.0% of budgetUnitarian Universalist Service Committee Inc — $451,200 over 6y, 0.9% of budgetWESTMINSTER PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION — $438,200 over 6y, 19% of budgetBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF COLORADO INC — $433,300 over 6y, 2.6% of budgetMEHARRY MEDICAL COLLEGE — $380,900 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetHope Center Inc — $374,950 over 6y, 3.5% of budgetAMERICANS UNITED FOR SEPARATION OF CHURCH AND STATE — $374,200 over 6y, 0.9% of budgetNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC — $370,100 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCAMP FIRE COLUMBIA — $361,300 over 5y, 2.6% of budgetTHE INTERFAITH ALLIANCE FOUNDATION INC — $354,500 over 6y, 7.2% of budgetREPRODUCTIVE FREEDOM FOR ALL FOUNDATION — $341,400 over 6y, 0.8% of budgetCOLORADO DREAM FOUNDATION — $334,700 over 3y, 8.4% of budgetDENVER SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION — $324,100 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetAustin Community College Foundation — $288,400 over 6y, 3.2% of budgetYale University — $287,400 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetHEARING HEALTH FOUNDATION — $226,900 over 6y, 1.3% of budgetENERGY OUTREACH COLORADO — $216,250 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetLearning Ally Inc — $211,400 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetGIRLS INCORPORATED OF METRO DENVER — $183,700 over 4y, 2.9% of budgetGREATER COLORADO COUNCIL BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA — $175,450 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetDZI FOUNDATION — $152,000 over 4y, 3.1% of budgetWESTERN ENVIRONMENTAL LAW CENTER — $150,000 over 3y, 1.3% of budgetAMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR THE BLIND INC — $130,100 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetARTHRITIS FOUNDATION INC — $59,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetPacific Legal Foundation — $41,300 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetSOUTHERN INSTITUTE FOR EDUCATION & RESEARCH INC — $17,600 over 1y, 15% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds International Rescue Committee INC ↗
  • Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
  • Who funds COOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE INC ↗
  • Who funds COLORADO UPLIFT INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN INDIAN COLLEGE FUND ↗
  • Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD GREAT NORTHWEST HAWAII ALASKA INDIANA AND KENTUCKY ↗
  • Who funds That Man May See Inc DBA All May See Foundation ↗
  • Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF METROPOLITAN NEW JERSEY ↗
  • Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF GREATER TEXAS INC ↗
  • Who funds ACCESS ESPERANZA CLINICS INC ↗
  • Who funds READING PARTNERS ↗
  • Who funds COLORADO YOUTH FOR A CHANGE ↗
  • Who funds THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds METROPOLITAN STATE UNIVERSITY OF DENVER FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds ROCKY MOUNTAIN PLANNED PARENTHOOD INC ↗
  • Who funds VIRGINIA GARCIA MEMORIAL HEALTH CENTER ↗
  • Who funds REACH OUT AND READ COLORADO ↗
  • Who funds Unitarian Universalist Service Committee Inc ↗
  • Who funds WESTMINSTER PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF COLORADO INC ↗
  • Who funds MEHARRY MEDICAL COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds Hope Center Inc ↗
  • Who funds AMERICANS UNITED FOR SEPARATION OF CHURCH AND STATE ↗
  • Who funds NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC ↗
  • Who funds CAMP FIRE COLUMBIA ↗
  • Who funds THE INTERFAITH ALLIANCE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds REPRODUCTIVE FREEDOM FOR ALL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds COLORADO DREAM FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds DENVER SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Austin Community College Foundation ↗
  • Who funds Yale University ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Colorado Gives Founda…Rose Community Founda…The Denver FoundationThe Denver Children's…Rose FoundationIma FoundationThe Colorado Health F…Xcel Energy FoundationMile High United Way …Schlessman Foundation…Denver Broncos Founda…Denver Post Community…
Colorado Gives FoundationCO23.5× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Colorado Gives Foundation · Rose Community Foundation · The Denver Foundation · The Denver Children's Foundation · Rose Foundation · Ima Foundation · The Colorado Health Foundation · Xcel Energy Foundation · Mile High United Way Inc · Schlessman Foundation Inc · Denver Broncos Foundation · Denver Post Community Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Peierls Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%5%11%20%your share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →median 11%
  • Yale University — 12% of income from government
  • Virginia Garcia Memorial Health Center — 11% of income from government
  • Learning Ally Inc — 4% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
15report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Peierls Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Peierls Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 62 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines