Skip to content
Pbp Foundation of New York Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

Pbp Foundation of New York Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$16k
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$121kEducation$69kEnvironment$38kPhilanthropy$20kCivil Rights$19kHuman Services$18kArts & Culture$17kFood & Nutrition$10kOther$0
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,500
Median grant
4
States reached
$25k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ECOSYSTEMS OF CARE NFP MARKETBOX$5,000
THE KIND FOUNDATION$2,000
PROXIMITY 2 HUMANITY CORP$2,000
HELEN KELLER INTL$2,000
PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF NYC$1,500
HUDSON VALLEY SHAKESPEARE FESTIVAL$1,000
AGAINST MALARIA FOUNDATION$1,000
SCS FOUNDATION$1,000
TRICKLE UP$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $14k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%PROXIMITY 2 HUMANITY CORP: $2k → 13%CENTER ON HALSTED: $3k → 14%HENRY STREET SETTLEMENT: $2k → 17%HENRY STREET SETTLEMENT: $1k → 17%HENRY STREET SETTLEMENT: $1k → 17%HENRY STREET SETTLEMENT: $1k → 17%HENRY STREET SETTLEMENT: $1k → 17%HENRY STREET SETTLEMENT: $1k → 17%HENRY STREET SETTLEMENT: $1k → 17%GIRLS WHO CODE: $1k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
IL
NY
OH
NJ
CT
CA
MO
MD
NC
DC
AL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

88%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$291k · 24 repeat orgs$42k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +39% since the first grant, against +16% for those funded once.

24 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2025, 19 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

24
29

Total granted

$291k
$36k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+39%
+16%

Still filing today

75%
69%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 63% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthEducationArts & CultureHuman ServicesCivil RightsCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CC
    CARLETON COLLEGE
    6× · 2017–2022 · $50k · revenue +39%
  • GH
    Garnet Health Medical Center
    2× · 2017–2018 · $12k · revenue +32%
  • HV
    HUDSON VALLEY SHAKESPEARE FESTIVAL INC
    7× · 2017–2025 · $10k · revenue +691%

Funded once

  • SHARE OUR STRENGTH
    one grant, 2020 · $5k · revenue -44%
  • CO
    Center on Halstedgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $3k · revenue +46%
  • HP
    HARMONIE PRESERVATION FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2019 · $3k · revenue -50%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
2
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
3
Open Markets Institute

The open markets institute works to help people relearn how to use competition policy to build stronger democracies, more just and equitable societies, more innovative and sustainable economies, and a more secure and peaceful world.

Education
4
Project Drawdown

Project drawdown's mission is to drive meaningful climate action by advancing science-based solutions and strategies. project drawdown's work is focused on three pillars: science - advancing science-based climate solutions and strategies;…

Education
5
The Population Council Inc

We generate ideas, produce evidence, and design solutions to improve the lives of underserved populations around the world. we take a multidisciplinary, intergenerational, life-cycle approach that contributes to (see schedule o)four global…

International
6
International Crisis Group

Crisis group works to prevent and resolve deadly conflict around the world by informing and influencing the perceptions and actions of policymakers and other key conflict actors. to this end, we endeavour to talk to all sides and provide…

International
7
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
8
Conservation International Foundation

Ci works to spotlight and secure the critical benefits that nature provides to humanity.

Environment
9
Third Way

To research and develop centrist policy ideas.

Civil Rights
10
Peter G Peterson Institute for International Economics

The peterson institute for international economics (piie) is an independent nonprofit, nonpartisan research organization dedicated to strengthening prosperity and human welfare in the global economy through expert analysis and practical…

Social Science
11
Actionaid Usa

Actionaid is an international network building a just, equitable, and sustainable world in solidarity with communities on the frontlines of poverty and injustice. actionaid usa is the u.s. branch of actionaid international, which works in…

Social Science
12
Council On Foreign Relations Inc

The council on foreign relations (cfr) is an independent, nonpartisan membership organization, think tank, and publisher dedicated to being a resource for its members, government officials, business executives, journalists, educators and…

International
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Partnership With Children Inc; the most unlike its peers is Nehemiah Group dba Chicago Eco House. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

42 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 42 of the 58 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
42/42
Grantees still filing
31/42
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF NYC: $97,500 · OtherPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF NYCTHE KIND FOUNDATION INC: $18,000 · OtherTHE KIND FOUNDATION INCTROUT UNLIMITED: $11,500 · OtherTROUT UNLIMITEDCHICAGO ABORTION FUND: $8,500 · OtherSTART EARLY: $7,500 · OtherECOSYSTEMS OF CARE NFP MARKETBOX: $7,500 · Other+31 more: $58,075 · Other+31 moreCARLETON COLLEGE: $50,000 · EducationCARLETON COLLEGEMIDWAY FOUNDATION INC: $6,000 · EducationMIDWAY FOUNDATION I…+2 more: $1,500 · EducationHUDSON VALLEY SHAKESPEARE FESTIVAL INC: $9,800 · Arts & CultureMETROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART: $3,500 · Arts & CultureHARMONIE PRESERVATION FOUNDATION INC: $2,500 · Arts & CultureSALVADORI CENTER LTD: $2,500 · Arts & CultureGarnet Health Medical Center: $11,500 · HealthTHE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCH: $1,000 · HealthThe Against Malaria Foundation: $1,000 · HealthCANCER RESEARCH INSTITUTE INC: $1,000 · HealthBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $750 · Health+1 more: $500 · HealthHENRY STREET SETTLEMENT: $8,000 · Human ServicesCenter on Halsted: $2,500 · Human ServicesPROXIMITY 2 HUMANITY CORPORATION: $2,000 · Human ServicesGIRLS WHO CODE INC: $1,000 · Human ServicesNehemiah Group dba Chicago Eco House: $7,500 · Community ImprovementTRICKLE UP PROGRAM INC: $3,500 · Community ImprovementNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC: $8,500 · Environment
Other$208,575Education$57,500Arts & Culture$18,300Health$15,750Human Services$13,500Community Improvement$11,000Environment$8,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCARLETON COLLEGE: $50,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHE KIND FOUNDATION INC: $18,000 over 9y, 3.5% of budgetGarnet Health Medical Center: $11,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHUDSON VALLEY SHAKESPEARE FESTIVAL INC: $9,800 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC: $8,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCHICAGO ABORTION FUND: $8,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetHENRY STREET SETTLEMENT: $8,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetSTART EARLY: $7,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNehemiah Group dba Chicago Eco House: $7,500 over 3y, 1.3% of budgetSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC: $6,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMIDWAY FOUNDATION INC: $6,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetPARTNERSHIP WITH CHILDREN INC: $5,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSHARE OUR STRENGTH: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY: $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMETROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART: $3,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTRICKLE UP PROGRAM INC: $3,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetNRDC ACTION FUND INC: $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCenter on Halsted: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHARMONIE PRESERVATION FOUNDATION INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetInvisible Institute: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSALVADORI CENTER LTD: $2,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetGovernment Accountability Project: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHELEN KELLER INTERNATIONAL: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBROOKLYN ACADEMY OF MUSIC INC: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCH: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFeeding America: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGIRLS WHO CODE INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL IMMIGRATION LAW CENTER: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPROSPECT SCHOOLS INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLEAP INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Against Malaria Foundation: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCANCER RESEARCH INSTITUTE INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKIVA MICROFUNDS: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $750 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNORTHWELL HEALTH FOUNDATION: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWASHINGTON UNIVERSITY: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPhysicians For Reproductive Health: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Communal FundGs Donor Advised Phil…The Chicago Community…Jpmorgan Chase Founda…Vanguard Charitable E…The Bank of America C…Raymond James Charita…The Blackbaud Giving …Morgan Stanley Global…National Philanthropi…American Online Givin…Donor Advised Charita…
Jewish Communal FundNY14× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Communal Fund · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · The Chicago Community Trust · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Pbp Foundation of New York Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Pbp Foundation of New York Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    10report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 58 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Pbp Foundation of New York’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home