· Private foundation
Paul Liebman Family Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2018–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k1 grant · $5k
- $10k–50k30 grants · $555k
- $50k–250k15 grants · $1.0M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| GREENWOOD PROJECT | $100,000 |
| SAVE THE BOUNDARY WATERS | $100,000 |
| NATIONAL REGIONAL DEFENSE COUNCIL (NRDC) | $100,000 |
| GREEN EMPOWERMENT | $100,000 |
| ONE SIMPLE WISH | $100,000 |
| CASA FOR CHILDREN INC (COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES) | $75,000 |
| CHILDREN'S HEALING ART PROJECT | $60,000 |
| DAMIANO CENTER | $50,000 |
| READING POWER | $50,000 |
| CHURCHES UNITED IN MINISTRY (CHUM) | $50,000 |
| PATH HOME | $50,000 |
| KIEVE WAVUS EDUCATION | $50,000 |
| ADIRONDACK MOUNTAIN CLUB | $50,000 |
| ROSE HAVEN | $50,000 |
| COLORECTAL CANCER ALLIANCE | $50,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY22–25, $540k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 66% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
33 repeat relationships — 25 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down; 21 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 54% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $740k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- NMNORTHEASTERN MINNESOTANS FOR WILDERNESS4× · 2018–2025 · $165k · revenue +108%
- RPREADING POWER INC3× · 2023–2025 · $150k · revenue +35%
ROSE HAVEN CIC6× · 2020–2025 · $140k · revenue +166%
Funded once
- FFFREEDOM FARM FOR VETSone grant, 2020 · $164k
- MFMAKEWAY FOUNDATION - AYALIK FUNDone grant, 2024 · $60k
THE DIVIDED SKY FOUNDATION CORPORATIONone grant, 2024 · $50k · revenue 0%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Rogue Climate's mission is to empower Southern Oregon communities most impacted by climate change including low-income, rural, youth, seniors & communities of color, to win climate justice by organizing for clean energy, sustainable jobs &…
Mission: together we advance the quality of life for people with disabilities. vision: people of all abilities thrive in the world. values: impact- generate solutions that make a difference. choice - create opportunities for people to lead…
To ensure economic prosperity in the portland region by providing strong leadership, partnership, and programs that encourage business growth and vitality.
We partner with children and adults with disabilities and their families so they may live more meaningful, healthy, and independent lives in their homes and communities.
To provide exceptional reproductive and complementary health care services, honest education, and advocacy for all.
To offer the dignity of fair employment to people living in impoverished communities, who become transformational agents of global forest restoration.
To establish and promote programs to protect the global climate, forests, wildlife and the natural environment, through research, advocacy, and investigation.
Disability rights washington's mission is to advance the dignity, equality, and self determination of people with disabilities. we work to pursue justice on matters related to human and legal rights.
Oregon Justice Network is an alliance built and staffed by criminal legal system impacted people advocating for the well-being of people affected or at-risk of being affected by carceral systems. Our work centers around restorative…
Public land solutions is a non-profit organization dedicated to providing comprehensive recreation planning and stakeholder coordination to support effective and sustainable public land solutions.
Reducing the barriers and burdens that families in poverty experience by increasing access to essential needs.
At l'arche portland people with and without developmental disabilities create home and build community together. we nurture long-term mutual relationships that reveal the gifts of people with developmental disabilities. in doing so we…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Casa for Children Inc and the most unlike its peers is Diversify Whitewater. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 25 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 6% of your grantees by number, and just 5% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
52 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 52 of the 71 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds GREEN EMPOWERMENT ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST ↗
- Who funds NORTHEASTERN MINNESOTANS FOR WILDERNESS ↗
- Who funds ADIRONDACK MOUNTAIN CLUB INC ↗
- Who funds READING POWER INC ↗
- Who funds ROSE HAVEN CIC ↗
- Who funds PATH HOME ↗
- Who funds CASA FOR CHILDREN INC ↗
- Who funds ONE SIMPLE WISH INC ↗
- Who funds Kieve Wavus Education Inc ↗
- Who funds GREENWOOD PROJECT ↗
- Who funds Planned Parenthood of Illinois ↗
- Who funds CHURCHES UNITED IN MINISTRY ↗
- Who funds GOD'S LOVE WE DELIVER INC ↗
- Who funds LENA FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S HEALING ART PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds Sunstone Montessori School Inc ↗
- Who funds THE DIVIDED SKY FOUNDATION CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds FREE GEEK ↗
- Who funds COLORECTAL CANCER ALLIANCE ↗
- Who funds MENTOR NORTH ↗
- Who funds CHESTER BOWL IMPROVEMENT CLUB ↗
- Who funds DAMIANO OF DULUTH INC ↗
- Who funds FUND FOR THE CITY OF NEW YORK INC ↗
- Who funds Pueblo Unido PDX ↗
- Who funds The Rosewood Initiative ↗
- Who funds ENTREAMIGOS ↗
- Who funds PARTNERS FOR A HUNGER FREE OREGON ↗
- Who funds FRESH YOUTH INITIATIVES INC ↗
- Who funds MULTNOMAH BAR FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CULTIVATE INITIATIVES ↗
- Who funds The Equine Sanctuary of Ojai ↗
- Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Oregon Community Foundation · The Collins Foundation · Meyer Memorial Trust · Marie Lamfrom Charitable Foundation Trust · The Autzen Foundation · Careoregon Inc · United Way of the Columbia-Willamette · OCF Joseph E Weston Public Foundation · The Larson Legacy · Lloyd K Johnson Foundation · Rose E Tucker Charitable Trust · Onpoint Community Credit Union
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Paul Liebman Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Pueblo Unido Pdx — 100% of income from government
- Urban League of Portland Inc — 33% of income from government
- Partners for a Hunger Free Oregon — 31% of income from government
- Native American Rehabilitation Association of the Northwest Inc — 16% of income from government
- The Blueprint Foundation — 10% of income from government
- Oxford House Inc — 8% of income from government
- Free Geek — 5% of income from government
- Children's Healing Art Project Inc — 4% of income from government
- The Rosewood Initiative — 3% of income from government
- Casa for Children Inc — 2% of income from government
- Pear — 1% of income from government
- Columbia Gorge Casa — 1% of income from government
- Oregon Public Broadcasting — 1% of income from government
- Cultivate Initiatives — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Paul Liebman Family Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Paul Liebman Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.