Skip to content

· Private foundation

Paul F and Lois K Heiss Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$97k
Granted FY2024still arriving
17
Grants FY2024still arriving
10
States reached
$40k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Religion$292kInternational$107kEducation$21kEnvironment$10kYouth Development$6kHousing & Shelter$3kHuman Services$1kCommunity Improvement$1kOther$0
02FY2024 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k13 grants · $17k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $80k
$1,000
Median grant
10
States reached
$149k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
visionSynergy$40,000
Cru$20,000
Ambassadors For Christ$10,000
Hope International$10,000
Bridges International$3,000
IndoPartners Agency$2,000
Next Door Foundation$2,000
The Jesus Film Project$2,000
Adult and Teen Challenge$1,000
English Language Institute China$1,000
Salvation Army$1,000
Asia Harvest$1,000
American Bible Society$1,000
One for Israel$1,000
Ignition633 Ministries$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY20–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 56% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%IndoPartners Agency: $2k → 11%Families Set Free: $20k → 10%Hope International: $10k → 9%American Bible Society: $1k → 22%The Jesus Film Project: $2k → 10%Bridges International: $3k → 10%One for Israel: $1k → 11%Third Millennium Ministries: $3k → 11%Equip India: $10k → 11%Cru: $36k → 13%WaterOrg: $1k → 15%Young Life: $2k → 6%Ozaukee Christian School: $500 → 6%Eastbrook Academy: $5k → 17%Tiva Water: $10k → 12%Asia Harvest: $1k → 15%Come and See Foundation: $500 → 9%English Language Institute China: $1k → 11%visionSynergy: $50k → 9%Opportunity International: $50k → 14%Ignition633 Ministries: $1k → 10%IndoPartners Agency: $1k → 11%Ambassadors For Christ: $10k → 9%American Bible Society: $1k → 22%The Jesus Film Project: $2k → 10%Bridges International: $3k → 10%One For Israel: $1k → 11%Cru: $20k → 13%Salvation Army: $2k → 17%Asia Harvest: $1k → 15%English Language Institute China: $1k → 11%visionSynergy: $40k → 9%IndoPartners: $1k → 11%Hope International: $10k → 9%American Bible Society: $1k → 22%The Jesus Film Project: $2k → 13%Salvation Army: $1k → 17%Asia Harvest: $1k → 15%Ambassadors For Christ: $10k → 9%Pioneers: $1k → 13%Adult and Teen Challenge: $1k → 17%Hope International: $10k → 9%Teen Challenge: $1k → 17%Next Door Foundation: $2k → 17%Next Door Foundation: $2k → 17%Next Door Foundation: $2k → 17%Salvation Army: $1k → 17%Boy Scouts of America: $500 → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
IL
WI
MI
IA
PA
CA
CO
MO
MD
DE
AZ
TN
NC
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 7% of Paul F and Lois K Heiss Family Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Paul F and Lois K Heiss Family Foundation Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

53%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$232k · 15 repeat orgs$208k to everyone else

15 repeat relationships: 14 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
14

Total granted

$232k
$206k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-3%
+12%

Still filing today

53%
64%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’23’24
ReligionInternationalEducationRecreation & SportsCivil RightsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HOPE INTERNATIONAL
    4× · 2020–2025 · $30k · revenue +56%
  • AF
    AMBASSADORS FOR CHRIST INC
    3× · 2023–2025 · $20k · revenue +14%
  • IA
    INDOPARTNERS AGENCY INC
    3× · 2023–2025 · $3k · revenue +36%

Funded once

  • SN
    SAT-7 NORTH AMERICA
    one grant, 2023 · $100k · revenue +12%
  • OPPORTUNITY INTERNATIONAL INC D/B/A OPPORTUNITY INTERNATIONAL-US
    one grant, 2020 · $50k · revenue -34%
  • FS
    FAMILIES SET FREE INC
    one grant, 2023 · $20k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Christianity Today International

Christianity Today is a global community inspired by evangelical conviction to advance the stories and ideas of the kingdom of God. Our mission is to elevate the storytellers and sages of the global church.

Religion
2
Institute of Chinese Studies

ChinsSource is a trusted partner and platform for educating the global church on critical issues facing the church and ministries in China and for connecting Christians inside and outside China to advance the kingdom of God globally

International
3
Mission Without Borders International

The organization is dedicated to reaching people for christ through an international network of christians who journey with the poor and marginalized, bringing practical and spiritual support with hope of a better future,(continued on…

International
4
International Leadership Institute

The international leadership institute (ili) changes history by accelerating the spread of the gospel through training and mobilizing leaders of leaders to reach their nations. ili accomplishes this purpose through cutting edge leadership…

Religion
5
Christian Mission for the United Nations Community

Christian Mission for the United Nations Community is a ministry aimed at leading the head of every nation and other top leaders to faith in Jesus Christ and helping them to walk in dependence upon God as they discharge the…

—
6
Leadership Resources International

International missions: this organization is an international mission agency focusing on leadership development through teaching of the scriptures

Religion
7
Youth for Christ International Ministries

As part of the body of Christ, to see that every young person in every people group in every nation has the opportunity to make an informed decision to be a follower of Jesus Christ and become a part of the local church.

Religion
8
Global Outreach International Inc

To get the good news to every nation this generation by showing and sharing god's love by providing opportunities and supporting christian missionaries in over fifty seven countries around the world.

International
9
InitiativeGlobal

To join in the completion of the Great Commission through Scripture Engagement in all languages and every people group.

Religion
10
International Commission Inc

Equipping and enabling believers worldwide to conduct church-based evangelism projects to reach unbelievers and make disciples.

Religion
11
Next Worldwide Inc

With a desire to see the Gospel proclaimed in all nations, we exist to make and multiply disciples of the next generation through the vehicles of church-planting missions and missional leadership training.

—
12
Freedom in Christ Ministries

To provide resources, training, and continuing support to leaders in the us and around the world in order that they may help others find freedom in christ.

Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Opportunity International Inc D/B/a Opportunity International-Us; the most unlike its peers is Families Set Free Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 32 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/18
Grantees still filing
9/18
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

VISIONSYNERGY: $90,000 · InternationalVISIONSYNERGYOPPORTUNITY INTERNATIONAL INC D/B/A OPPORTUNITY INTERNATIONAL-US: $50,000 · InternationalOPPORTUNITY INTERNATIONAL INC D/B/A OPPORTUNITY IN…HOPE INTERNATIONAL: $30,000 · InternationalHOPE INTERNATIONALFAMILIES SET FREE INC: $20,000 · InternationalFAMILIES SET FREE INC+3 more: $7,000 · InternationalSAT-7 NORTH AMERICA: $100,000 · ReligionSAT-7 NORTH AMERICAAMBASSADORS FOR CHRIST INC: $20,000 · ReligionAMBASSADORS FOR CHRIST INCEQUIP INDIA INC: $10,000 · ReligionEQUIP INDIA INC+4 more: $11,000 · Religion+4 moreCru: $55,640 · OtherCruIndividual grant recipient: $10,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipi…Bridges International: $6,000 · OtherBridges InternationalSalvation Army: $4,000 · OtherThe Jesus Film Project: $4,000 · Other+9 more: $11,200 · Other+9 moreNEXT DOOR FOUNDATION INC: $6,000 · Recreation & SportsEASTBROOK ACADEMY INC: $5,000 · EducationOZAUKEE CHRISTIAN SCHOOL INC: $500 · EducationActon Institute for the Study of Religion and Liberty: $200 · Civil Rights
International$197,000Religion$141,000Other$90,840Recreation & Sports$6,000Education$5,500Civil Rights$200

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSAT-7 NORTH AMERICA: $100,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetVISIONSYNERGY: $90,000 over 3y, 2.7% of budgetHOPE INTERNATIONAL: $30,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetFAMILIES SET FREE INC: $20,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetEQUIP INDIA INC: $10,000 over 1y, 7.8% of budgetNEXT DOOR FOUNDATION INC: $6,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetEASTBROOK ACADEMY INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetINDOPARTNERS AGENCY INC: $3,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetTHIRD MILLENNIUM MINISTRIES INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetENGLISH LANGUAGE INSTITUTE IN CHINA: $3,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetASIA HARVEST INC: $3,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN BIBLE SOCIETY: $3,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetOne For Israel: $2,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetWATERORG: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOZAUKEE CHRISTIAN SCHOOL INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetActon Institute for the Study of Religion and Liberty: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SAT-7 NORTH AMERICA ↗
  • Who funds VISIONSYNERGY ↗
  • Who funds OPPORTUNITY INTERNATIONAL INC D/B/A OPPORTUNITY INTERNATIONAL-US ↗
  • Who funds HOPE INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds AMBASSADORS FOR CHRIST INC ↗
  • Who funds FAMILIES SET FREE INC ↗
  • Who funds EQUIP INDIA INC ↗
  • Who funds NEXT DOOR FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds EASTBROOK ACADEMY INC ↗
  • Who funds INDOPARTNERS AGENCY INC ↗
  • Who funds THIRD MILLENNIUM MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds ENGLISH LANGUAGE INSTITUTE IN CHINA ↗
  • Who funds ASIA HARVEST INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN BIBLE SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds One For Israel ↗
  • Who funds WATERORG ↗
  • Who funds OZAUKEE CHRISTIAN SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds Acton Institute for the Study of Religion and Liberty ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

International Generosity Foundation TrustFL15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: International Generosity Foundation Trust · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Servant Foundation · T Rowe Price Program for Charitable Giving Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · National Philanthropic Trust · American Endowment Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Paul F and Lois K Heiss Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Paul F and Lois K Heiss Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    4get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 32 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2024, the most recent year this funder made grants.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Paul F and Lois K Heiss Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph