Skip to content

· Private foundation

Paul and Katherine Morrow Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$463k
Granted FY2025still arriving
51
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$203k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$707kReligion$470kInternational$415kHuman Services$190kEducation$173kYouth Development$137kArts & Culture$79kFood & Nutrition$56kOther$0
02FY2025 · 51 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k46 grants · $90k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $20k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $353k
$1,500
Median grant
7
States reached
$5.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SPECTRUM OF SOLUTIONS (FORMERLY MARC)$202,500
FREE WHEELCHAIR MISSION$100,000
OPERATION ENDURING SUPPORT$50,000
INTERNATIONAL JUSTICE MISSION$10,000
BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF MIDLAND$10,000
DOMINICAN DEVELOPMENT GROUP$8,000
AMERICARES FOUNDATION INC$7,000
SAVE THE CHILDREN FEDERATION INC$6,000
WEST TEXAS FOOD BANK$5,000
SENIOR LIFE MIDLAND$3,000
MANOR PARK INC$3,000
MIDLAND STORYTELLING FESTIVAL$3,000
ARCHWAY OUTREACH$3,000
NONPROFIT MANAGEMENT CENTER$3,000
MIDLAND FAIR HAVENS INC$2,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $76k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%MANOR PARK INC: $10k → 12%MANOR PARK INC: $10k → 12%SENIOR LIFE MIDLAND: $3k → 12%MANOR PARK INC: $3k → 12%MANOR PARK INC: $2k → 12%UNITED WAY OF MIDLAND: $10k → 12%UNITED WAY OF MIDLAND: $10k → 12%CENTERS FOR CHILDREN & FAMILIES: $5k → 12%SPRINGBOARD CENTER: $3k → 14%CENTERS FOR CHILDREN & FAMILIES: $5k → 12%CENTERS FOR CHILDREN & FAMILIES: $3k → 12%CENTERS FOR CHILDREN & FAMILIES: $3k → 12%SPRINGBOARD CENTER: $2k → 14%SPRINGBOARD CENTER: $2k → 14%SPRINGBOARD CENTER: $1k → 14%PRESBYTERIAN CHILDRENS HOME: $500 → 14%CENTERS FOR CHILDREN & FAMILIES INC: $3k → 12%CENTERS FOR CHILDREN & FAMILIES INC: $3k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
WI
MA
IA
IN
CT
CA
CO
TN
NC
DC
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.4M · 70 repeat orgs$133k to everyone else

70 repeat relationships: 44 still active in FY2025, 26 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

70
22

Total granted

$2.4M
$69k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+20%
+27%

Still filing today

71%
64%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 86% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $64k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthArts & CultureHuman ServicesEducationInternationalRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IJ
    INTERNATIONAL JUSTICE MISSION
    7× · 2017–2025 · $261k · revenue +82%
  • MI
    MARC INC
    5× · 2017–2021 · $170k · revenue +20%
  • FW
    FREE WHEELCHAIR MISSION
    4× · 2017–2025 · $160k · revenue +88%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2018 · $10k
  • 2A
    29 ACRES INC
    one grant, 2023 · $5k · revenue -3%
  • IW
    I-20 WILDLIFE PRESERVE & JENNA WELC
    one grant, 2018 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Midland Community Healthcare Services Inc

Midland community healthcare services provides affordable, comprehensive, accessible, culturally appropriate, cost-effect, primary healthcare services to residents mainly in midland county.

Health
2
Permian Basin Community Centers for Mhmr

Our mission is to enhance the behavioral and developmental health and wellness of our community by helping people live their best lives.

Health
3
Presbyterian Medical Services

Presbyterian medical services designs and delivers quality, integrated health, education, and human services in response to identified community needs of the multicultural people of the southwest.

Health
4
Meals On Wheels of Odessa Inc

Meals on Wheels of Odessa enables people to live with dignity by offering community support and sustenance through coordinated services and enable older adults to live in their own homes safely and independently as long as they are able.

—
5
Lubbock Family Outreach Center Inc Dba Family Guidance & Outreach Center

The Family Guidance & Outreach Center of Lubbock is dedicated to the prevention of child abuse and neglect and supporting, mentoring, and educating parents.

Human Services
6
East Texas Community Clinic Inc

To provide comprehensive primary care and preventive care to all persons regardless of their ability to pay.

—
7
Family and Child Guidance Center

Our mission is to provide quality mental health services to children and adults in low income families who are impacted by severe and persistent mental illness, emotional disturbances, child abuse and neglect, high-risk behaviors and…

Health
8
Texas Tribune Inc

The texas tribune promotes civic engagement and public education across the state by producing and sharing for free public data interactives, statewide events and intensive and daily reporting on texas public policy, politics and current…

Education
9
Presbyterian Medical Care Mission

Operate a non-profit medical clinic exclusively for charitable purposes to provide medical health services to uninsured and low income adults in the Abilene area.

—
10
Palmer Drug Abuse Program Midland Texas Incorporated

Helping young people & their families fight the disease of addiction on all fronts through education, prevention, intervention & recovery.

—
11
Hospice of South Texas Inc

Hospice care of terminally ill patients

—
12
Childrens Advocacy Center of West Texas Inc

The Organizations mission is to bring unity and efficiency to investigations of child abuse through the use of a multi-disciplinary team and, thereby, to provide the best possible services to victims of child abuse and their families.

Crime & Legal
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is United Way of Midland Inc; the most unlike its peers is Share Corporation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

69 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 69 of the 99 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
16
Early backer (in before they grew)
68/69
Grantees still filing
45/69
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

FIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $441,250 · OtherFIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCHSPECTRUM OF SOLUTIONS (FORMERLY MARC): $216,500 · OtherSPECTRUM OF SOLUTIONS (FORMERLY MARC)MARC INC: $169,500 · OtherMARC INCIndividual grant recipient: $103,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientWEST TEXAS FOOD BANK: $52,500 · OtherOPERATION ENDURING SUPPORT: $50,000 · Other+51 more: $437,100 · Other+51 moreINTERNATIONAL JUSTICE MISSION: $260,500 · InternationalINTERNATIONAL JU…AMERICARES FOUNDATION INC: $85,000 · InternationalAMERICARES FOUND…Save The Children Federation Inc: $24,600 · InternationalSave The Childre…FREE WHEELCHAIR MISSION: $160,000 · HealthFREE WHEELC…OPERATION ENDURING SUPPORT INC: $44,500 · HealthOPERATION E…HIGH SKY CHILDRENS RANCH INC: $16,500 · HealthHIGH SKY CH…+8 more: $25,300 · Health+8 moreMIDLAND MONTESSORI SCHOOL INC: $32,500 · EducationMIDLAND COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $26,500 · EducationBYNUM SCHOOL: $22,000 · EducationAPHASIA CENTER OF WEST TEXAS INC: $20,500 · EducationCOMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS OF THE PERMIAN BA: $18,500 · EducationTEXAS TECH FOUNDATION INC: $7,500 · EducationMidland County Public Library Foundation: $7,300 · Education+1 more: $3,000 · EducationBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF MIDLAND INC: $100,739 · Youth DevelopmentMANOR PARK INC: $25,000 · Human ServicesCENTERS FOR CHILDREN AND FAMILIES INC: $20,500 · Human ServicesUNITED WAY OF MIDLAND INC: $20,000 · Human ServicesSENIOR LIFE MIDLAND INC: $10,500 · Human ServicesTHE SPRINGBOARD CENTER: $6,500 · Human ServicesTHE ATTIC FOSTER NETWORK: $5,000 · Human Services+3 more: $5,500 · Human ServicesMIDLAND COMMUNITY THEATRE INC: $31,500 · Arts & CultureMUSEUM OF THE SOUTHWEST: $15,500 · Arts & CultureMIDLAND FESTIVAL BALLET: $12,000 · Arts & CultureMIDLAND STORYTELLING FESTIVAL: $5,500 · Arts & CulturePERMIAN BASIN PUBLIC TELECOMMUNICATIONS INC: $4,000 · Arts & Culture+5 more: $7,500 · Arts & Culture
Other$1,470,350International$370,100Health$246,300Education$137,800Youth Development$100,739Human Services$93,000Arts & Culture$76,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetINTERNATIONAL JUSTICE MISSION: $260,500 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetMARC INC: $169,500 over 5y, 0.9% of budgetFREE WHEELCHAIR MISSION: $160,000 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF MIDLAND INC: $100,739 over 6y, 5.0% of budgetAMERICARES FOUNDATION INC: $85,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetWEST TEXAS FOOD BANK: $52,500 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetHillcrest School Inc: $49,000 over 6y, 1.4% of budgetOPERATION ENDURING SUPPORT INC: $44,500 over 5y, 9.3% of budgetCITY OF MIDLAND AQUATICS INC: $35,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetMIDLAND MONTESSORI SCHOOL INC: $32,500 over 6y, 0.8% of budgetMIDLAND COMMUNITY THEATRE INC: $31,500 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetMIDLAND COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $26,500 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetMANOR PARK INC: $25,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSave The Children Federation Inc: $24,600 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetBYNUM SCHOOL: $22,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetAPHASIA CENTER OF WEST TEXAS INC: $20,500 over 6y, 1.3% of budgetCENTERS FOR CHILDREN AND FAMILIES INC: $20,500 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetUNITED WAY OF MIDLAND INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetCOMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS OF THE PERMIAN BA: $18,500 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetMISSION AGAPE: $18,000 over 5y, 1.9% of budgetHIGH SKY CHILDRENS RANCH INC: $16,500 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetMUSEUM OF THE SOUTHWEST: $15,500 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetSAFE PLACE OF THE PERMIAN BASIN: $14,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetARCHWAY OUTREACH INC: $14,000 over 4y, 1.5% of budgetHOSPICE OF MIDLAND INC: $14,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetSERVLIFE INTERNATIONAL INC: $13,600 over 3y, 1.2% of budgetMIDLAND FESTIVAL BALLET: $12,000 over 3y, 1.9% of budgetSENIOR LIFE MIDLAND INC: $10,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTEEN FLOW YOUTH MINISTRY: $8,500 over 5y, 1.2% of budgetTEXAS TECH FOUNDATION INC: $7,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMidland County Public Library Foundation: $7,300 over 6y, 0.7% of budgetTHE SPRINGBOARD CENTER: $6,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSOLDIERS' ANGELS: $6,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS OF TEXAS INC: $6,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMIDLAND STORYTELLING FESTIVAL: $5,500 over 2y, 2.2% of budget29 ACRES INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMIDLAND FAIR HAVENS: $5,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetTHE ATTIC FOSTER NETWORK: $5,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetAGAPE CHRISTIAN SERVICES: $5,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTREVOR PROJECT INC: $4,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPERMIAN BASIN REHABILITATION CENTER: $4,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCRISIS CENTER OF WEST TEXAS: $4,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMidland Rape Crisis Center Inc: $4,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $4,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF THE PERMIAN BASIN INC: $4,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetMIDLAND CHILDRENS REHABILITATION CENTER INC: $4,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetPERMIAN BASIN PUBLIC TELECOMMUNICATIONS INC: $4,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds INTERNATIONAL JUSTICE MISSION ↗
  • Who funds MARC INC ↗
  • Who funds FREE WHEELCHAIR MISSION ↗
  • Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF MIDLAND INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICARES FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds WEST TEXAS FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds Hillcrest School Inc ↗
  • Who funds OPERATION ENDURING SUPPORT INC ↗
  • Who funds CITY OF MIDLAND AQUATICS INC ↗
  • Who funds MIDLAND MONTESSORI SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds MIDLAND COMMUNITY THEATRE INC ↗
  • Who funds MIDLAND COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds MANOR PARK INC ↗
  • Who funds Save The Children Federation Inc ↗
  • Who funds BYNUM SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds APHASIA CENTER OF WEST TEXAS INC ↗
  • Who funds CENTERS FOR CHILDREN AND FAMILIES INC ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF MIDLAND INC ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS OF THE PERMIAN BA ↗
  • Who funds SHARE CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds MISSION AGAPE ↗
  • Who funds HIGH SKY CHILDRENS RANCH INC ↗
  • Who funds MUSEUM OF THE SOUTHWEST ↗
  • Who funds SAFE PLACE OF THE PERMIAN BASIN ↗
  • Who funds ARCHWAY OUTREACH INC ↗
  • Who funds HOSPICE OF MIDLAND INC ↗
  • Who funds SERVLIFE INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
  • Who funds MIDLAND FESTIVAL BALLET ↗
  • Who funds SENIOR LIFE MIDLAND INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Abell-Hanger FoundationTX95.9× affinity44 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Abell-Hanger Foundation · Scharbauer Foundation Inc · Permian Basin Area Foundation · Helen Greathouse Charitable Trust · The Henry Foundation · Wayne & Jo Ann Moore Charitable Foundation · Beal Foundation · Pevehouse Family Foundation · Fmh Foundation · Yarborough Foundation · The Fasken Foundation · Bryant Family Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Paul and Katherine Morrow Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Paul and Katherine Morrow Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Save the Children Federation Inc: 30% of income from government
  • Americares Foundation Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Partners in Health a Nonprofit Corporation: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
17report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Paul and Katherine Morrow Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Paul and Katherine Morrow Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 99 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Paul and Katherine Morrow Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph