Skip to content

Missouri · Private foundation

Paul and Elizabeth Younts Char Tuw

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$78k
Granted FY2025(still arriving)
6
Grants FY2025
6
Organizations funded FY2024
33%
First-time grantees FY2024
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2025
$10,000
Largest grant, FY2025
$19,500
Organizations funded a year
3 to 8
FY2019 to FY2024
States reached, FY2025
4
Total assets, FY2025
$1.5M
Applications
Preselected organizations only
Per its most recent filing; check its own site

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2024, 33% of the organizations Paul and Elizabeth Younts Char Tuw funded were first-time grantees, receiving 23% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 77% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $18k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
HealthYouth DevelopmentCrime & Legal
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2025still arriving6$78k33%
FY20246$75k33%
FY20236$90k17%
FY20227$90k29%
FY20218$75k38%
FY20205$75k60%
FY20193$116kn/a
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Health$426kReligion$159kHuman Services$10kCrime & Legal$5k

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2019 to FY2025, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

Show all 15 grantees

What it could do for these grantees

Plus 1 recipient with no EIN on record ($10k), not named here.

Where it is load-bearing

Each grantee by its size and the share of its budget Paul and Elizabeth Younts Char Tuw supplied at peak.

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHeineman-Robicsek Foundation Inc: $158,500 over 7y, 2.8% of budgetOrthocarolina Research Institute Inc: $40,500 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetHenderson County Free Medical Clinic Inc: $40,000 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetPresbyterian Hospital Foundation: $37,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetChildren's Cancer Partners of the Carolinas Inc: $32,500 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetAdvocates for Healthy Citizens Dba Healthnet Gaston: $30,000 over 3y, 1.8% of budgetCool Kids Campaign Foundation Inc: $26,500 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetSamaritan Health Center Inc: $17,500 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetCook Community Clinic Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetGreat Smokies Health Foundation: $10,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetCommunity Free Clinic Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetThe Presbyterian Hospital: $7,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFields of Hope: $5,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetWestern Carolina Medical Society Foundation Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 14.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Foundation for the CarolinasNC26.2× affinity11 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Foundation for the Carolinas · The Leon Levine Foundation · North Carolina Association of Free and Charitable Clinics Inc · Duke Energy Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Paul and Elizabeth Younts Char Tuw with peer funders

About Paul and Elizabeth Younts Char Tuw

How much does Paul and Elizabeth Younts Char Tuw give?
Paul and Elizabeth Younts Char Tuw reported 6 grants totaling $78,000 in its FY2025 IRS filing. It funded between 3 and 8 organizations a year over FY2019 to FY2024.
What does Paul and Elizabeth Younts Char Tuw fund?
By grant dollars over FY2019 to FY2025, its largest causes are Health (71%), Religion (26%), Human Services (2%).
Who are Paul and Elizabeth Younts Char Tuw's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2019 to FY2025: Heineman-Robicsek Foundation Inc ($159k), Westminster Presbyterian Church ($159k), Orthocarolina Research Institute Inc ($41k).
Does Paul and Elizabeth Younts Char Tuw fund new organizations?
In FY2024, 33% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Does Paul and Elizabeth Younts Char Tuw accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and does not take unsolicited requests. Check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
Which funders back the same organizations as Paul and Elizabeth Younts Char Tuw?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Foundation for the Carolinas, The Leon Levine Foundation, North Carolina Association of Free and Charitable Clinics Inc.
Where is Paul and Elizabeth Younts Char Tuw based?
Paul and Elizabeth Younts Char Tuw is based in MO.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Paul and Elizabeth Younts Char Tuw’s filings →

More from the funding graph