Skip to content
Pasadena Hospital Association Ltd at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

Pasadena Hospital Association Ltd

Huntington Health stands for community.

$217k
Granted FY2025still arriving
6
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$35k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$1.8MHousing & Shelter$56kHuman Services$45kYouth Development$28kFood & Nutrition$21kRecreation & Sports$11kPublic Benefit$7k
02FY2025 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 6 grants below total $83,340, the rows itemized in this filing. The $216,504 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $133,164 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $28k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $56k
$6,945
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.3B
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Union Station Homeless Service$34,725
Heluna Health$20,835
Partners in Care Foundation$6,945
Pasadena Ronald McDonald House$6,945
Cancer Support Community$6,945
Hospital Association of Southern CA$6,945
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–25, $41k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Union Station Homeless Service: $35k → 14%PASADENA SENIOR CENTER: $6k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

85%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.7M · 7 repeat orgs$299k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +33% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

7 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
10

Total granted

$1.7M
$243k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+33%
0%

Still filing today

100%
80%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 33% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $56k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentEducationHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AH
    American Heart Association Inc
    5× · 2017–2022 · $393k · revenue +33%
  • PUBLIC HEALTH FOUNDATION ENTERPRISES INC
    3× · 2019–2025 · $106k · revenue +429%
  • CC
    COMMUNITY CENTER OF LA CANADA FLINTRIDGE
    4× · 2017–2023 · $34k · revenue +99%

Funded once

  • ALTAMED HEALTH SERVICES CORPORATION
    one grant, 2024 · $175k · revenue 0%
  • SG
    SAN GABRIEL VALLEY CONSORTIUM ON HOMELESSNESSgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $14k · revenue +63%
  • NS
    NAMI SAN GABRIEL VALLEY
    one grant, 2023 · $9k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Pasadena Hospital Association Ltd

Huntington Health stands for community. We stand for compassion. But more than anything, Huntington stands for health. Providing world-class health care is our specialty, and it's what we've been doing for the San Gabriel Valley since…

Health
2
Asian Pacific Health Care Venture Inc

Asian Pacific Health Care Venture, Inc. is a family of community health centers whose mission is to be the medical home for our patients by providing personalized, quality health care services in a culturally accessible manner.

—
3
Community Medical Centers Inc

The organization provides primary medical, behavior health, and dental care to the population of san joaquin, and solano counties without regard to patients' ability to pay.

Health
4
San Fernando Community Hospital

Provides primary care, oral health, and behavioral health care, including health education to the community without regard to the ability to pay for services.

Health
5
California Health M R C
Community Improvement
6
California Pan-Ethnic Health Network

To promote health equity by advocating for public policies and sufficient resources to address the health needs of communities of color.

Health
7
Community Clinic Association of Los Angeles County

Ccalac empowers community health centers to remain at the forefront of health care transformation. we forge partnerships, foster innovation, promote health equity, and advocate for the communities they serve.

Health
8
Sutter Bay Hospitals

MISSION STATEMENT: MISSION: CARING FOR OUR PATIENTS FIRST AND OUR PEOPLE ALWAYS. VISION: TO BE THE MOST COMPREHENSIVE, INTEGRATED AND CONNECTED HEALTH SYSTEM FOR GETTING AND STAYING WELL. VALUES: EXCELLENCE - We deliver high-quality,…

Health
9
Hospital Council of N & C California

To provide membership services, local level issue management, education, shared services, research, media support & consultation to northern california hospitals.

—
10
South Central Family Health Center

To improve the quality of life for the diverse communities we serve providing affordable and comprehensive healthcare and education in a welcoming multi-cultural environment.

Health
11
East Valley Community Health Center Inc

East valley community health center's mission is to provide access to excellent health care while engaging and empowering our patients, employees and partners to improve their well-being and health of our communities.

—
12
Via Care Community Health Center

Providing health care services to the poor and underserved of los angeles.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Young & Healthy; the most unlike its peers is Nami San Gabriel Valley. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/20
Grantees still filing
11/20
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

HUNTINGTON MEDICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTES: $1,092,698 · HealthHUNTINGTON MEDICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTESAmerican Heart Association Inc: $393,000 · HealthAmerican Heart Association IncALTAMED HEALTH SERVICES CORPORATION: $175,000 · HealthALTAMED HEALTH SERVICES CORPORATION+5 more: $53,215 · HealthPUBLIC HEALTH FOUNDATION ENTERPRISES INC: $105,835 · OtherPUBLIC HEA…RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $31,945 · OtherRONALD MCD…SAN GABRIEL VALLEY CONSORTIUM ON HOMELESSNESS: $13,870 · OtherSAN GABRIE…NAMI SAN GABRIEL VALLEY: $8,813 · OtherHOSPITAL ASSOCIATION OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $6,945 · OtherCANCER SUPPORT COMMUNITY SOUTH BAY: $6,945 · OtherCITY OF PASADENA: $6,935 · OtherNational Charity League San Marino Area Chapter Inc: $6,925 · OtherUNION STATION HOMELESS SERVICES: $34,725 · Human ServicesPASADENA SENIOR CENTER: $6,000 · Human ServicesCOMMUNITY CENTER OF LA CANADA FLINTRIDGE: $33,596 · Youth DevelopmentMONTEBELLO HOUSING DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $6,935 · Housing & ShelterPANDA CARES FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 · Education
Health$1,713,913Other$188,213Human Services$40,725Youth Development$33,596Housing & Shelter$6,935Education$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHUNTINGTON MEDICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTES: $1,092,698 over 5y, 2.8% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $393,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetALTAMED HEALTH SERVICES CORPORATION: $175,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPUBLIC HEALTH FOUNDATION ENTERPRISES INC: $105,835 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetUNION STATION HOMELESS SERVICES: $34,725 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCOMMUNITY CENTER OF LA CANADA FLINTRIDGE: $33,596 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $31,945 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetCOMMUNITY HEALTH ALLIANCE OF PASADENA: $18,900 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSAN GABRIEL VALLEY CONSORTIUM ON HOMELESSNESS: $13,870 over 1y, 17% of budgetCONVALESCENT AID SOCIETY: $13,500 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetPARTNERS IN CARE FOUNDATION: $6,945 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMONTEBELLO HOUSING DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $6,935 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetNATIONAL HISPANIC HEALTH FOUNDATION: $6,935 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetYOUNG & HEALTHY: $6,935 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetNational Charity League San Marino Area Chapter Inc: $6,925 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetPASADENA SENIOR CENTER: $6,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetPANDA CARES FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Ralph M Parsons F…Kaiser Foundation Hos…Pasadena Community Fo…The Ahmanson Foundati…California Community …The California Wellne…Rotary Club of Pasade…The Patron Saints Fou…Ann Peppers FoundationS Mark Taper Foundati…The Green FoundationThe Rose Hills Founda…
The Ralph M Parsons FoundationCA19.6× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Ralph M Parsons Foundation · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · Pasadena Community Foundation · The Ahmanson Foundation · California Community Foundation · The California Wellness Foundation · Rotary Club of Pasadena Foundation · The Patron Saints Foundation · Ann Peppers Foundation · S Mark Taper Foundation · The Green Foundation · The Rose Hills Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Pasadena Hospital Association Ltd funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Pasadena Hospital Association Ltd. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 21 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Pasadena Hospital Association Ltd’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home