Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Pasadena Hospital Association Ltd

Huntington Health stands for community.

$217k
Granted FY2025still arriving
6
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$35k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Health$1.8MHousing & Shelter$56kHuman Services$45kYouth Development$28kFood & Nutrition$21kRecreation & Sports$11kPublic Benefit$7k
02FY2025 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 6 grants below total $83,340 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $216,504 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $133,164 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $28k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $56k
$6,945
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.3B
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Union Station Homeless Service$34,725
Heluna Health$20,835
Partners in Care Foundation$6,945
Pasadena Ronald McDonald House$6,945
Hospital Association of Southern CA$6,945
Cancer Support Community$6,945
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–25, $41k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Union Station Homeless Service: $35k → 14%PASADENA SENIOR CENTER: $6k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

85%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.7M · 7 repeat orgs$299k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +33% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.

7 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
10

Total granted

$1.7M
$243k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+33%
0%

Still filing today

100%
80%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 33% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $56k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentEducationHousing & ShelterOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AH
    American Heart Association Inc
    5× · 2017–2022 · $393k · revenue +33%
  • PUBLIC HEALTH FOUNDATION ENTERPRISES INC
    3× · 2019–2025 · $106k · revenue +429%
  • CC
    COMMUNITY CENTER OF LA CANADA FLINTRIDGE
    4× · 2017–2023 · $34k · revenue +99%

Funded once

  • ALTAMED HEALTH SERVICES CORPORATION
    one grant, 2024 · $175k · revenue 0%
  • SG
    SAN GABRIEL VALLEY CONSORTIUM ON HOMELESSNESSgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $14k · revenue +63%
  • NS
    NAMI SAN GABRIEL VALLEY
    one grant, 2023 · $9k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Pasadena Hospital Association Ltd

Huntington Health stands for community. We stand for compassion. But more than anything, Huntington stands for health. Providing world-class health care is our specialty, and it's what we've been doing for the San Gabriel Valley since…

Health
2
Community Medical Centers Inc

The organization provides primary medical, behavior health, and dental care to the population of san joaquin, and solano counties without regard to patients' ability to pay.

Health
3
Asian Pacific Health Care Venture Inc

Asian Pacific Health Care Venture, Inc. is a family of community health centers whose mission is to be the medical home for our patients by providing personalized, quality health care services in a culturally accessible manner.

4
San Fernando Community Hospital

Provides primary care, oral health, and behavioral health care, including health education to the community without regard to the ability to pay for services.

Health
5
Hospital Council of N & C California

To provide membership services, local level issue management, education, shared services, research, media support & consultation to northern california hospitals.

6
Health Center Partners of Southern California

Health center partners of southern california (formerly: council of community clinics) ("hcp") was established in 1977 as a 501(c)(3) nonprofit corporation.a premier consortium of primary healthcare organizations, hcp is an advocate for…

7
California Health M R C
Community Improvement
8
South Central Family Health Center

To improve the quality of life for the diverse communities we serve providing affordable and comprehensive healthcare and education in a welcoming multi-cultural environment.

Health
9
Children's Hospital Los Angeles

Promotion and advancement of children's health through patient care, research, and education.

Health
10
Scripps Health

Founded in 1924 by philanthropist Ellen Browning Scripps, Scripps Health is a $4.9 billion, private not-for-profit integrated health system in San Diego, Ca. (see Sch O)

Health
11
Community Clinic Association of Los Angeles County

Ccalac empowers community health centers to remain at the forefront of health care transformation. we forge partnerships, foster innovation, promote health equity, and advocate for the communities they serve.

Health
12
Sutter Bay Hospitals

MISSION STATEMENT: MISSION: CARING FOR OUR PATIENTS FIRST AND OUR PEOPLE ALWAYS. VISION: TO BE THE MOST COMPREHENSIVE, INTEGRATED AND CONNECTED HEALTH SYSTEM FOR GETTING AND STAYING WELL. VALUES: EXCELLENCE - We deliver high-quality,…

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Young & Healthy and the most unlike its peers is Nami San Gabriel Valley. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/20
Grantees still filing
11/20
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

HUNTINGTON MEDICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTES — $1,092,698 · HealthHUNTINGTON MEDICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTESAmerican Heart Association Inc — $393,000 · HealthAmerican Heart Association IncALTAMED HEALTH SERVICES CORPORATION — $175,000 · HealthALTAMED HEALTH SERVICES CORPORATION+5 more — $53,215 · HealthPUBLIC HEALTH FOUNDATION ENTERPRISES INC — $105,835 · OtherPUBLIC HEA…RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA — $31,945 · OtherRONALD MCD…SAN GABRIEL VALLEY CONSORTIUM ON HOMELESSNESS — $13,870 · OtherSAN GABRIE…NAMI SAN GABRIEL VALLEY — $8,813 · OtherHOSPITAL ASSOCIATION OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA — $6,945 · OtherCANCER SUPPORT COMMUNITY SOUTH BAY — $6,945 · OtherCITY OF PASADENA — $6,935 · OtherNational Charity League San Marino Area Chapter Inc — $6,925 · OtherUNION STATION HOMELESS SERVICES — $34,725 · Human ServicesPASADENA SENIOR CENTER — $6,000 · Human ServicesCOMMUNITY CENTER OF LA CANADA FLINTRIDGE — $33,596 · Youth DevelopmentMONTEBELLO HOUSING DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION — $6,935 · Housing & ShelterPANDA CARES FOUNDATION INC — $5,000 · Education
Health$1,713,913Other$188,213Human Services$40,725Youth Development$33,596Housing & Shelter$6,935Education$5,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetHUNTINGTON MEDICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTES — $1,092,698 over 5y, 2.8% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc — $393,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetALTAMED HEALTH SERVICES CORPORATION — $175,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPUBLIC HEALTH FOUNDATION ENTERPRISES INC — $105,835 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetUNION STATION HOMELESS SERVICES — $34,725 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCOMMUNITY CENTER OF LA CANADA FLINTRIDGE — $33,596 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA — $31,945 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetCOMMUNITY HEALTH ALLIANCE OF PASADENA — $18,900 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSAN GABRIEL VALLEY CONSORTIUM ON HOMELESSNESS — $13,870 over 1y, 17% of budgetCONVALESCENT AID SOCIETY — $13,500 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetPARTNERS IN CARE FOUNDATION — $6,945 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYOUNG & HEALTHY — $6,935 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetMONTEBELLO HOUSING DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION — $6,935 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetNATIONAL HISPANIC HEALTH FOUNDATION — $6,935 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetNational Charity League San Marino Area Chapter Inc — $6,925 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetPASADENA SENIOR CENTER — $6,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetPANDA CARES FOUNDATION INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Ralph M Parsons FoundationCA19.6× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Ralph M Parsons Foundation · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · Pasadena Community Foundation · The Ahmanson Foundation · California Community Foundation · The California Wellness Foundation · Rotary Club of Pasadena Foundation · The Patron Saints Foundation · Ann Peppers Foundation · S Mark Taper Foundation · The Green Foundation · The Rose Hills Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Pasadena Hospital Association Ltd funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 21 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph