Skip to content
Partners in Health a Nonprofit Corporation at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

Partners in Health a Nonprofit Corporation

Partners In Health (PIH) is a non-profit, global health organization that fights social injustice by bringing the benefits of modern medical science first and foremost to the most vulnerable communities worldwide.

$53M
Granted FY2025still arriving
14
Grants FY2025still arriving
9
States reached
$1.6M
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$30MScience & Tech$7.9MEducation$7.0MPublic Safety & Disaster$4.1MInternational$2.1MHuman Services$880kEmployment$614kCommunity Improvement$171kOther$0
02FY2025 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 14 grants below total $2,897,836, the rows itemized in this filing. The $52,855,211 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $49,957,375 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $8k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $125k
  • $50k–250k7 grants · $736k
  • $250k+2 grants · $2.0M
$60,589
Median grant
9
States reached
$387M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Community Outreach & Patient Empowerment (COPE)$1,620,521
Stanford University (Stanford Biodesign)$407,597
President & Fellows of Harvard College$239,136
North Carolina Community Health Worker Assoc$168,479
University of Washington$92,680
Public Equity$60,668
Regents of the University of California SF$60,589
Massachusetts General Hospital$60,000
Partners In Agriculture Inc$54,715
Summits Education Inc$49,164
Tufts University$44,380
Grassroot Soccer Inc$17,344
Brigham and Women's Hospital$14,494
Univ of WI Madison$8,069
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–22, $1.3M) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 74% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%NorthStar Learning Centers Inc: $83k → 11%Partners In Agriculture: $203k → 10%Eugene Bell Foundation: $84k → 26%NC Field Inc: $136k → 21%United Community Corporation: $245k → 16%Maine Community Action Association: $30k → 15%American Indian Association of Tucson Inc: $130k → 15%Eugene Bell Foundation: $81k → 26%Helping All People Excel: $55k → 20%NC Field Inc: $61k → 21%Eugene Bell Foundation: $72k → 26%Alliance for Fair Food: $137k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
NH
WA
MN
IL
WI
NY
MA
OH
NJ
CA
CO
MD
AZ
NM
NC
SC
DC
AL
FL

Grants abroad, by region: $50M on the FY2025 return

Schedule F, as filed: 7 regions. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.

Central America and the Caribbean$38M · 77% · 2 grants

Stated purpose: Healthcare

Sub-Saharan Africa$6.8M · 14% · 8 grants

Stated purpose: Healthcare

North America (Canada and Mexico)$3.4M · 7% · 2 grants

Stated purpose: Healthcare

Middle East and North Africa$515k · 1% · 1 grant

Stated purpose: Healthcare

Russia and Neighboring States$414k · 1% · 1 grant

Stated purpose: Healthcare

Europe (including Iceland and Greenland)$280k · 1% · 3 grants

Stated purpose: Healthcare

South America$124k · 0% · 2 grants

Stated purpose: Healthcare

How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 17% of Partners in Health a Nonprofit Corporation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 37% of the giving stays in MA; by stated purpose, 44%.

Partners in Health a Nonprofit Corporationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 5.9% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

78%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$34M · 30 repeat orgs$9.5M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +41% since the first grant, against +16% for those funded once.

30 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2025, 22 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

30
42

Total granted

$34M
$9.3M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+41%
+16%

Still filing today

77%
81%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $205k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesEducationInternationalPublic BenefitCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CO
    COMMUNITY OUTREACH AND PATIENT EMPOWERMENT PROGRAM INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $14M · revenue +16% · 57% of their budget
  • MASSACHUSETTS LEAGUE OF COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS INC
    2× · 2020–2021 · $5.8M · revenue +43%
  • SUMMITS EDUCATION
    5× · 2017–2025 · $699k · revenue +23%

Funded once

  • RT
    Research Triangle Institute
    one grant, 2021 · $5.7M · revenue +16%
  • MR
    MICHAEL REESE HEALTH TRUST
    one grant, 2022 · $504k · revenue +4%
  • BC
    BALTIMORE CORPS INC
    one grant, 2022 · $299k · revenue -26%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
National Committee for Quality Assurance

Our mission: to improve the quality of health care.our vision: better health care. better choices. better health.

Health
2
CommonHealth Action

CommonHealth ACTION develops people and organizations to produce health through equitable policies, programs, and practices.

Health
3
International Aids Vaccine Initiative Inc

A global nonprofit biomedical research organization that develops vaccines and antibodies for hiv, tuberculosis, and emerging infectious diseases.

International
4
Commonwealth Care Alliance Inc

Commonwealth care alliance, inc.'s mission is to improve the health and well-being of people with significant needs by innovating, coordinating and providing the highest quality, individualized care.

Health
5
Central Maine Healthcare Corporation

To provide exceptional healthcare services in a safe and trustful environment through the expertise, committment, and compassion of our family of caregivers.

Health
6
Arbor Research Collaborative for Health

Arbor research collaborative for health is committed to improving patient care through research that shapes medical policies and practice. in particular, arbor research conducts health outcomes research on chronic disease and end-stage…

Health
7
Intealth

See schedule oto serve the public by:- assuring the qualifications of health care professionals- providing primary-source verification of credentials of health careprofessionals, as they serve throughout the world- supporting international…

Education
8
Union Health System

To serve our communities by provding innovative and compassionate healthcare.

Health
9
Public Health Institute

Public health institute generates and promotes research, leadership and partnerships to build capacity for strong public health policy, programs, systems and practices.

Health
10
International Center for Research On Women

The international center for research for women (icrw) is a global research institute, with a mission to advance rights and opportunities for women, girls, and structurally excluded populations with actionable evidence and solutions.

International
11
Intrahealth International Inc

Our mission is to improve the performance of health workers and strengthen the systems in which they work.

Health
12
University Health Inc

Primary functions are the coordination and delivery of health care resources and services, health care education for the hospital service area, long range analysis of health care needs and development of programs, and arranging for…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Montgomery Area Community Wellness Coalition; the most unlike its peers is Associacion De Mexicanos En Carolina Del Nort. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

62 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 62 of the 79 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

4
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
15
Early backer (in before they grew)
61/62
Grantees still filing
41/62
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

COMMUNITY OUTREACH AND PATIENT EMPOWERMENT PROGRAM INC: $13,972,663 · HealthCOMMUNITY OUTREACH AND PATIENT EM…+12 more: $1,866,431 · Health+12 moreMASSACHUSETTS LEAGUE OF COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS INC: $5,838,383 · OtherMASSACHUSETTS LEAGUE OF COMMUNITY…MASS GENERAL BRIGHAM INCORPORATED: $3,602,174 · OtherMASS GENERAL BRIGHAM INCORPORATEDUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO: $2,203,281 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRAN…+38 more: $4,090,077 · Other+38 morePresident and Fellows of Harvard College: $7,951,197 · EducationPresident and Fellows …THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $1,462,917 · EducationTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES …SUMMITS EDUCATION: $699,164 · EducationSUMMITS EDUCATION+6 more: $293,704 · EducationResearch Triangle Institute: $5,651,249 · Science & TechResearch Tri…CORE COMMUNITY ORGANIZED RELIEF EFFORT: $3,580,000 · Public Safety & DisasterPARTNERS IN AGRICULTURE INC: $257,435 · Human ServicesUnited Community Corporation: $245,022 · Human ServicesEugene Bell Foundation Inc: $236,928 · Human ServicesNC Field Inc: $196,357 · Human ServicesALLIANCE FOR FAIR FOOD: $136,884 · Human ServicesAmerican Indian Association of Tucson Inc: $130,000 · Human ServicesNORTHSTAR LEARNING CENTERS INC: $82,725 · Human ServicesHELPING ALL PEOPLE EXCEL INC: $55,000 · Human Services+1 more: $30,000 · Human ServicesPIVOT WORKS INC: $617,609 · InternationalCLINTON HEALTH ACCESS INITIATIVE INC: $66,450 · InternationalASSOCIACION DE MEXICANOS EN CAROLINA DEL NORT: $31,937 · International+2 more: $35,212 · International
Health$15,839,094Other$15,733,915Education$10,406,982Science & Tech$5,651,249Public Safety & Disaster$3,580,000Human Services$1,370,351International$751,208

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCOMMUNITY OUTREACH AND PATIENT EMPOWERMENT PROGRAM INC: $13,972,663 over 9y, 57% of budgetPresident and Fellows of Harvard College: $7,951,197 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetMASSACHUSETTS LEAGUE OF COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS INC: $5,838,383 over 2y, 9.4% of budgetResearch Triangle Institute: $5,651,249 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetCORE COMMUNITY ORGANIZED RELIEF EFFORT: $3,580,000 over 2y, 5.6% of budgetTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $1,462,917 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetSUMMITS EDUCATION: $699,164 over 5y, 7.3% of budgetPIVOT WORKS INC: $617,609 over 3y, 6.1% of budgetMICHAEL REESE HEALTH TRUST: $504,192 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetGRASSROOT SOCCER INC: $366,030 over 6y, 2.2% of budgetBALTIMORE CORPS INC: $298,932 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetACCESS HEALTHCOLUMBUS DBA HEALTH IMPACT OHIO: $277,162 over 2y, 4.3% of budgetThe Coalition of Immokalee Workers Inc: $263,130 over 2y, 16% of budgetPARTNERS IN AGRICULTURE INC: $257,435 over 2y, 5.6% of budgetUnited Community Corporation: $245,022 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetNorth Carolina Community Health Worker Association: $199,882 over 2y, 2.3% of budgetNC Field Inc: $196,357 over 2y, 20% of budgetCOLLIER HEALTH SERVICES INC: $188,248 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetUNITED STATES PUBLIC INTEREST RESEARCH GROUP EDUCATION FUND INC: $183,679 over 1y, 9.2% of budgetBOSTON MEDICAL CENTER CORPORATION: $176,506 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMAINE PEOPLE'S RESOURCE CENTER: $150,000 over 1y, 5.0% of budgetCENTER FOR POPULAR DEMOCRACY INC: $140,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetALLIANCE FOR FAIR FOOD: $136,884 over 1y, 71% of budgetAmerican Indian Association of Tucson Inc: $130,000 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetMONTGOMERY AREA COMMUNITY WELLNESS COALITION: $124,900 over 2y, 3.7% of budgetPUBLIC EQUITY: $115,223 over 2y, 2.3% of budgetGANG FREE INC: $114,157 over 1y, 45% of budgetLINCOLN PARK COAST CULTURAL DISTRICT INC: $110,955 over 1y, 6.7% of budgetMEDIC MOBILE INC: $105,238 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetARIZONA CENTER FOR EMPOWERMENT: $102,452 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetSURGO VENTURES INC: $101,378 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetNorthwestern University: $98,774 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetHENNEPIN HEALTHCARE RESEARCH INSTITUTE: $91,285 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetLAST MILE HEALTH: $90,255 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetACTION INSTITUTE NC: $87,274 over 1y, 6.7% of budgetNORTHSTAR LEARNING CENTERS INC: $82,725 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetCLINTON HEALTH ACCESS INITIATIVE INC: $66,450 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMONTAGNARD ASSOCIATION OF NORTH CAROLINA INC: $63,713 over 1y, 18% of budgetHEALTH RESOURCES IN ACTION INC: $55,727 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHELPING ALL PEOPLE EXCEL INC: $55,000 over 1y, 89% of budgetPresident and Fellows of Middlebury College: $54,464 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetALAMANCE DREAM CENTER INC: $47,021 over 1y, 7.3% of budgetBEHAVIORAL IDEAS LAB INC: $46,592 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTrustees of Tufts College: $44,380 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMaine Public Health Association: $35,638 over 1y, 10% of budgetASSOCIACION DE MEXICANOS EN CAROLINA DEL NORT: $31,937 over 1y, 3.6% of budgetMAINE COMMUNITY ACTION ASSOCIATION DBA MAINE COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP: $30,000 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetCENTRO SAN BONIFACIO INC: $29,999 over 1y, 8.8% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Nc Counts CoalitionBlueprint North Carol…Amalgamated Charitabl…PathGates FoundationJsi Research & Traini…Z Smith Reynolds Foun…Community Foundation …Arie and Ida Crown Me…WK Kellogg FoundationCommon Counsel Founda…Hopewell Fund
Nc Counts CoalitionNC28.1× affinity11 shared granteesties to 7 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Nc Counts Coalition · Blueprint North Carolina · Amalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc · Path · Gates Foundation · Jsi Research & Training Institute Inc · Z Smith Reynolds Foundation Inc · Community Foundation of Greater Greensboro Inc · Arie and Ida Crown Memorial · WK Kellogg Foundation · Common Counsel Foundation · Hopewell Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Partners in Health a Nonprofit Corporation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Partners in Health a Nonprofit Corporation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%6%23%51%90%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 15%
  • Northstar Learning Centers Inc: 63% of income from government
  • United Community Corporation: 45% of income from government
  • Health Resources in Action Inc: 39% of income from government
  • Adventist Development & Relief Agency International: 35% of income from government
  • Boston Medical Center Corporation: 23% of income from government
  • Massachusetts League of Community Health Centers Inc: 15% of income from government
  • Collier Health Services Inc: 15% of income from government
  • Baltimore Corps Inc: 15% of income from government
  • Trustees of Tufts College: 13% of income from government
  • President and Fellows of Harvard College: 7% of income from government
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: 7% of income from government
  • President and Fellows of Middlebury College: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
20report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 79 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Partners in Health a Nonprofit’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home