· Private foundation
Page & George Bradham Family Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| ROOF ABOVE INC | $8,000 |
| HEART MATH TUTORING INC | $6,000 |
| ASHEVILLE COUNTY SCHOOLS FOUNDATION | $6,000 |
| CLASSROOM CENTRAL INC | $5,000 |
| NOURISH UP | $5,000 |
| CHATTOOGA CONSERVANCY INC | $4,000 |
| CAROLINA DAY SCHOOL | $4,000 |
| OPEN DOORS OF ASHEVILLE | $4,000 |
| THE ARC OCONEE COUNTY | $2,500 |
| CATAWBA LAND CONSERVANCY | $2,000 |
| HOPEWAY FOUNDATION | $1,500 |
| MEDGLOBAL | $1,500 |
| JANE'S FUND | $1,500 |
| WEST BLVD MINISTRY | $1,000 |
| FIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH OF CHARLOTTE | $1,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $44k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 2% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +59% since the first grant, against +11% for the ones you funded once.
22 repeat relationships — 11 still active in FY2025, 11 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 81% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $11k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
ROOF ABOVE INC5× · 2020–2025 · $21k · revenue +58%- NUNourish Up4× · 2020–2025 · $17k · revenue +45%
- CCCHATTOOGA CONSERVANCY5× · 2021–2025 · $16k · revenue +19%
Funded once
- FOFOUNDATION OF THE UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHARLOTTEgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $10k · revenue +79%
- CCCatholic Charities Diocese of Charlottegraduatedone grant, 2021 · $8k · revenue +172%
- FAFEEDING AVERY FAMILIES INCone grant, 2024 · $6k · revenue +11%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To unite the Church to transform the city through the power of the Gospel.
Public/private collaborative to plant trees, raise awareness of the canopy, and educate about tree care.
The specific objectives and purposes of this corporation shall be to assist individuals and communities, particularly those in low-income and socially disadvantaged areas, in the creation, expansion, and improvement of rural and…
The mission of Charlotte Family Housing is to empower working families experiencing homelessness to achieve long-term self-sufficiency through shelter, housing, supportive services, and advocacy.
Sustain Charlotte's mission is to create a more equitable, connected, and healthy community by inspiring responsible growth and transportation choices.
The mission of the Organization is to coordinate, support, and advocate for member Food Banks across the Carolinas to create lasting solutions to address hunger.
Central carolina community foundation is a nonprofit community foundation that connects and mobilizes people and resources to strengthen the midlands of south carolina. the foundation partners with donors, nonprofit organizations,…
Provide Charlotte's low-income children and youth with the academic, spiritual, and social development necessary to become Christian leaders determined to restore their communities.
The mission of The Charlotte Center is to help our community flourish. We accomplish our mission by bringing people together to explore community life together through the lens of the humanities and civic imagination.
To provide basic necessities for public school children as well as improving parenting skills in order for the children to be successful in school and to expand professional development opportunities for educators.
To solicit and receive gifts, grants, bequests and contributions for the support of carolina meadows, inc. in order to enhance or extend its mission, programs, services, and facilities.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Community Foundation of Western North Carolina Inc and the most unlike its peers is Maybelle Clark Macdonald Fund. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 23 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 26% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 15% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
58 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 58 of the 76 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds ROOF ABOVE INC ↗
- Who funds Nourish Up ↗
- Who funds CHATTOOGA CONSERVANCY ↗
- Who funds Crisis Assistance Ministry ↗
- Who funds CLASSROOM CENTRAL INC ↗
- Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
- Who funds Heart Math Tutoring Inc ↗
- Who funds FOUNDATION OF THE UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHARLOTTE ↗
- Who funds CHARLOTTE SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds HopeWay Foundation ↗
- Who funds LEAF GLOBAL ARTS ↗
- Who funds CHARLOTTE RESCUE MISSION ↗
- Who funds Catholic Charities Diocese of Charlotte ↗
- Who funds MountainTrue ↗
- Who funds FEEDING AVERY FAMILIES INC ↗
- Who funds AUGUSTINE LITERACY PROJECT - TRIANGLE ↗
- Who funds World Affairs Council of Charlotte ↗
- Who funds City Bridge Inc ↗
- Who funds STRONGER THAN EVER ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF TENWEK INC ↗
- Who funds Carolina Day School Inc ↗
- Who funds Choose Mental Health ↗
- Who funds JANES FUND ↗
- Who funds ARC OF OCONEE COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds THE FLETCHER SCHOOL INC ↗
- Who funds Good Friends ↗
- Who funds THE NOLA NETWORK INC ↗
- Who funds BELOVED ASHEVILLE ↗
- Who funds CMS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ALEXANDER CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds SIERRA CLUB ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Foundation for the Carolinas · The Community Foundation of Western North Carolina Inc · C D Spangler Foundation Inc · Duke Energy Foundation · The Winston-Salem Foundation · Dogwood Health Trust · The Cannon Foundation Inc · The Perper Family Foundation · The Dickson Foundation Inc · The Presbyterian Hospital · Wnc Bridge Foundation · The Leon Levine Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Page & George Bradham Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.