Skip to content

· Private foundation

Overstreet Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$16k
Granted FY2024still arriving
3
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$13k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Education$143kArts & Culture$21kHealth$20kFood & Nutrition$12kRecreation & Sports$12kCivil Rights$10kYouth Development$9kPublic Safety & Disaster$8kOther$0
02FY2024 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k2 grants · $3k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $13k
$2,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$316k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SONOMA ACADEMY$12,500
TUFTS UNIVERSITY$2,000
HILLEL THE FOUNDATION FOR JEWISH CAMPUS LIFE$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–20, $500) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%SAINT JOHNS PROGRAM FOR REAL CHANGE: $500 → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
WI
NY
MA
PA
CA
CO
KY
VA
DC
LA
GA
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

65%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$159k · 9 repeat orgs$86k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +55% since the first grant, against -8% for those funded once.

9 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
34

Total granted

$159k
$85k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+55%
-8%

Still filing today

89%
88%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
EducationArts & CultureFood & NutritionHealthHuman ServicesCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • Trustees of Tufts College
    3× · 2022–2024 · $12k · revenue +9%
  • UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER
    3× · 2020–2022 · $11k · revenue +55%
  • SC
    Sonoma County Grape Growers Foundation
    2× · 2022–2023 · $11k · revenue +112%

Funded once

  • CULINARY INSTITUTE OF AMERICAgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue +27%
  • MM
    MEHARRY MEDICAL COLLEGE
    one grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue +17%
  • DH
    Dallas Holocaust and Human Rights Museumgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue +60%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Stony Brook Surgical Associates University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
2
California Dental Association

The california dental association is committed to the success of our members in service to their patients and the public.

Community Improvement
3
Stony Brook Internists University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
4
The Uc Davis Foundation

The mission of the uc davis foundation is to secure, steward and manage private gifts for uc davis.

Education
5
University Associates in Obstetrics and Gynecology University Faculty Pract ice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
6
California Dental Association Foundation

The foundation's mission is to improve the oral health of all californians by supporting the dental profession and its efforts to meet community needs.

Science & Tech
7
Stony Brook Urology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
8
Ucsf Foundation Investment Company

The organization provides professional investment management services for endowed gifts and financial assets entrusted to the ucsf foundation.

Education
9
Stony Brook Ophthalmology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
10
Albert Einstein College of Medicine

Committed to exceptional healthcare quality for all and actively engaged with our community, einstein drives scientific discovery and educates compassionate leaders in health and science.

Education
11
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
12
Manhattanville University

To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The San Diego Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Neptune Swimming. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

41 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 41 of the 45 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
40/41
Grantees still filing
20/41
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SONOMA ACADEMY: $91,000 · EducationSONOMA ACADEMYTrustees of Tufts College: $12,000 · EducationTrustees of Tufts CollegeUNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER: $11,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTERSONOMA COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL: $10,000 · EducationSONOMA COUNTRY DAY SCHOOLCULINARY INSTITUTE OF AMERICA: $10,000 · EducationCULINARY INSTITUTE OF AMERICAMEHARRY MEDICAL COLLEGE: $10,000 · EducationMEHARRY MEDICAL COLLEGE+3 more: $8,500 · Education+3 moreBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF SONOMA-MARIN: $7,500 · OtherBOYS & GIRLS CLUB…Individual grant recipient: $5,000 · OtherIndividual grant …NATIONAL ABORTION FEDERATION: $2,500 · OtherNATIONAL ABORTION…HILLEL FOUNDATION AT TUFTS UNIVERSITY INC: $2,500 · OtherHILLEL FOUNDATION…THE SAN DIEGO FOUNDATION: $2,500 · OtherTHE SAN DIEGO FOU…MACCABI WORLD UNION INC: $2,500 · OtherMACCABI WORLD UNI…ISRAAID US GLOBAL HUMANITARIAN ASSISTANCE INC: $2,500 · OtherISRAAID US GLOBAL…AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM: $2,500 · OtherAMERICAN FRIENDS …+14 more: $10,200 · Other+14 moreDallas Holocaust and Human Rights Museum: $10,000 · Arts & CultureDallas Ho…CHILDREN'S MUSEUM OF SONOMA COUNTY: $7,500 · Arts & CultureCHILDREN'…FRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH INC: $2,500 · Arts & CultureFRIENDS O…Metropolitan Opera Association Inc: $750 · Arts & Culture+1 more: $500 · Arts & CultureSonoma County Grape Growers Foundation: $11,000 · Food & NutritionFOOD LITERACY CENTER: $500 · Food & Nutrition+1 more: $250 · Food & NutritionANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE FOUNDATION: $10,000 · Civil RightsMACCABI USA INC: $5,000 · Recreation & SportsNeptune Swimming: $4,000 · Recreation & SportsABORTION CARE NETWORK: $2,500 · HealthMedical Society of Sonoma County: $2,000 · HealthDAVID ANDREW POOH MADDAN FOUNDATION: $500 · Health
Education$152,500Other$37,700Arts & Culture$21,250Food & Nutrition$11,750Civil Rights$10,000Recreation & Sports$9,000Health$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSONOMA ACADEMY: $91,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetTrustees of Tufts College: $12,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER: $11,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSonoma County Grape Growers Foundation: $11,000 over 2y, 9.5% of budgetSONOMA COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL: $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCULINARY INSTITUTE OF AMERICA: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMEHARRY MEDICAL COLLEGE: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDallas Holocaust and Human Rights Museum: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN'S MUSEUM OF SONOMA COUNTY: $7,500 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF SONOMA-MARIN: $7,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMACCABI USA INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNeptune Swimming: $4,000 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetMACCABI WORLD UNION INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetISRAAID US GLOBAL HUMANITARIAN ASSISTANCE INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL ABORTION FEDERATION: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetABORTION CARE NETWORK: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHILLEL FOUNDATION AT TUFTS UNIVERSITY INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE SAN DIEGO FOUNDATION: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMedical Society of Sonoma County: $2,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetCornell University: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE YOUNG WOMEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF SONOMA COUNTY: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMINNESOTA FREEDOM FUND: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEVERYTOWN FOR GUN SAFETY SUPPORT FUND INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHILLEL THE FOUNDATION FOR JEWISH CAMPUS LIFE: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMetropolitan Opera Association Inc: $750 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSPCA INTERNATIONAL INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFOOD LITERACY CENTER: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLEE INITIATIVE INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHUMANE SOCIETY OF SONOMA COUNTY: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE GIVING KITCHEN INITIATIVE INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICA GIVES INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDALLAS THEATER CENTER: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSAINT JOHN'S PROGRAM FOR REAL CHANGE: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDAVID ANDREW POOH MADDAN FOUNDATION: $500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetCentral Texas Food Bank Inc: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Sonoma County Community FoundationCA17.5× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Sonoma County Community Foundation · McNabb Foundation · The Heck Foundation · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · Marin Community Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · The Ayco Charitable Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Overstreet Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Overstreet Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 13%
  • Trustees of Tufts College: 13% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 45 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Overstreet Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph