Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation Dossiers
Plinth

· Private foundation

Overstreet Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$16k
Granted FY2024still arriving
3
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$13k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2024.

Education$143kArts & Culture$21kHealth$20kFood & Nutrition$12kRecreation & Sports$12kCivil Rights$10kYouth Development$9kPublic Safety & Disaster$8kOther$0
02FY2024 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k2 grants · $3k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $13k
$2,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$316k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SONOMA ACADEMY$12,500
TUFTS UNIVERSITY$2,000
HILLEL THE FOUNDATION FOR JEWISH CAMPUS LIFE$1,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–20, $500) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%SAINT JOHNS PROGRAM FOR REAL CHANGE: $500 → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

MN
WI
NY
MA
PA
CA
CO
KY
VA
DC
LA
GA
TX

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

65%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$159k · 9 repeat orgs$86k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +55% since the first grant, against -8% for the ones you funded once.

9 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
34

Total granted

$159k
$85k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+55%
-8%

Still filing today

89%
88%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
EducationArts & CultureFood & NutritionHealthHuman ServicesCrime & LegalOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • Trustees of Tufts College
    3× · 2022–2024 · $12k · revenue +9%
  • UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER
    3× · 2020–2022 · $11k · revenue +55%
  • SC
    Sonoma County Grape Growers Foundation
    2× · 2022–2023 · $11k · revenue +112%

Funded once

  • MM
    MEHARRY MEDICAL COLLEGE
    one grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue +17%
  • DH
    Dallas Holocaust and Human Rights Museumgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue +60%
  • ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue +15%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Stony Brook Surgical Associates University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
2
California Dental Association

The california dental association is committed to the success of our members in service to their patients and the public.

Community Improvement
3
Stony Brook Internists University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
4
The Uc Davis Foundation

The mission of the uc davis foundation is to secure, steward and manage private gifts for uc davis.

Education
5
University Associates in Obstetrics and Gynecology University Faculty Pract ice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
6
California Dental Association Foundation

The foundation's mission is to improve the oral health of all californians by supporting the dental profession and its efforts to meet community needs.

Science & Tech
7
Stony Brook Urology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
8
Ucsf Foundation Investment Company

The organization provides professional investment management services for endowed gifts and financial assets entrusted to the ucsf foundation.

Education
9
Stony Brook Ophthalmology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
10
Albert Einstein College of Medicine

Committed to exceptional healthcare quality for all and actively engaged with our community, einstein drives scientific discovery and educates compassionate leaders in health and science.

Education
11
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
12
Manhattanville University

To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The San Diego Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Neptune Swimming. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyJewish Community Organizati…Faith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Pregnancy Support ServicesCommunity College Foundatio…Food Banks and PantriesLocal Food System Organizat…Community Arts CentersCancer Support ServicesCommunity FoundationsYouth Development CentersOrchestra and Ensemble Perf…Policy Research and AdvocacyAnimal Rescue and ShelterYouth Sports ProgramsLocal History MuseumsIndependent K-12 Schools
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 33 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number24%0%<5yr15%6%5–10yr20%21%10–20yr17%27%20–35yr11%21%35–55yr13%27%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value24%0%<5yr15%1%5–10yr20%4%10–20yr17%57%20–35yr11%13%35–55yr13%25%55yr+

The field is 24% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/41
the rest of the field
14%
26,003/186,937

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

41 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 41 of the 45 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
40/41
Grantees still filing
20/41
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

SONOMA ACADEMY — $91,000 · EducationSONOMA ACADEMYTrustees of Tufts College — $12,000 · EducationTrustees of Tufts CollegeUNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER — $11,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTERMEHARRY MEDICAL COLLEGE — $10,000 · EducationMEHARRY MEDICAL COLLEGECULINARY INSTITUTE OF AMERICA — $10,000 · EducationCULINARY INSTITUTE OF AMERICASONOMA COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL — $10,000 · EducationSONOMA COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL+3 more — $8,500 · Education+3 moreBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF SONOMA-MARIN — $7,500 · OtherBOYS & GIRLS CLUB…Individual grant recipient — $5,000 · OtherIndividual grant …NATIONAL ABORTION FEDERATION — $2,500 · OtherNATIONAL ABORTION…HILLEL FOUNDATION AT TUFTS UNIVERSITY INC — $2,500 · OtherHILLEL FOUNDATION…THE SAN DIEGO FOUNDATION — $2,500 · OtherTHE SAN DIEGO FOU…ISRAAID US GLOBAL HUMANITARIAN ASSISTANCE INC — $2,500 · OtherISRAAID US GLOBAL…AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM — $2,500 · OtherAMERICAN FRIENDS …MACCABI WORLD UNION INC — $2,500 · OtherMACCABI WORLD UNI…+14 more — $10,200 · Other+14 moreDallas Holocaust and Human Rights Museum — $10,000 · Arts & CultureDallas Ho…CHILDREN'S MUSEUM OF SONOMA COUNTY — $7,500 · Arts & CultureCHILDREN'…FRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH INC — $2,500 · Arts & CultureFRIENDS O…Metropolitan Opera Association Inc — $750 · Arts & Culture+1 more — $500 · Arts & CultureSonoma County Grape Growers Foundation — $11,000 · Food & NutritionFOOD LITERACY CENTER — $500 · Food & Nutrition+1 more — $250 · Food & NutritionANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE FOUNDATION — $10,000 · Civil RightsMACCABI USA INC — $5,000 · Recreation & SportsNeptune Swimming — $4,000 · Recreation & SportsABORTION CARE NETWORK — $2,500 · HealthMedical Society of Sonoma County — $2,000 · HealthDAVID ANDREW POOH MADDAN FOUNDATION — $500 · Health
Education$152,500Other$37,700Arts & Culture$21,250Food & Nutrition$11,750Civil Rights$10,000Recreation & Sports$9,000Health$5,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetSONOMA ACADEMY — $91,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetTrustees of Tufts College — $12,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER — $11,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSonoma County Grape Growers Foundation — $11,000 over 2y, 9.5% of budgetMEHARRY MEDICAL COLLEGE — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDallas Holocaust and Human Rights Museum — $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE FOUNDATION — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCULINARY INSTITUTE OF AMERICA — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSONOMA COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL — $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCHILDREN'S MUSEUM OF SONOMA COUNTY — $7,500 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF SONOMA-MARIN — $7,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMACCABI USA INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNeptune Swimming — $4,000 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetTHE SAN DIEGO FOUNDATION — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetABORTION CARE NETWORK — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL ABORTION FEDERATION — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHILLEL FOUNDATION AT TUFTS UNIVERSITY INC — $2,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetFRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH INC — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetISRAAID US GLOBAL HUMANITARIAN ASSISTANCE INC — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMACCABI WORLD UNION INC — $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMedical Society of Sonoma County — $2,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetCornell University — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE YOUNG WOMEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF SONOMA COUNTY — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHILLEL THE FOUNDATION FOR JEWISH CAMPUS LIFE — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetEVERYTOWN FOR GUN SAFETY SUPPORT FUND INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMINNESOTA FREEDOM FUND — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMetropolitan Opera Association Inc — $750 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHUMANE SOCIETY OF SONOMA COUNTY — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSAINT JOHN'S PROGRAM FOR REAL CHANGE — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSPCA INTERNATIONAL INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDAVID ANDREW POOH MADDAN FOUNDATION — $500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetFOOD LITERACY CENTER — $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLEE INITIATIVE INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICA GIVES INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDALLAS THEATER CENTER — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE GIVING KITCHEN INITIATIVE INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCentral Texas Food Bank Inc — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Sonoma County Communi…McNabb FoundationThe Heck FoundationKaiser Foundation Hos…Marin Community Found…National Philanthropi…The Ayco Charitable F…Vanguard Charitable E…Silicon Valley Commun…Morgan Stanley Global…Gs Donor Advised Phil…The Blackbaud Giving …
Sonoma County Community FoundationCA17.5× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Sonoma County Community Foundation · McNabb Foundation · The Heck Foundation · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · Marin Community Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · The Ayco Charitable Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Overstreet Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 13%
  • Trustees of Tufts College — 13% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 45 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines