Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Osteopathic Heritage Foundation of Nelsonville

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$325k
Granted FY2024still arriving
6
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$125k
Largest
01What you fund
01

What you funded, over time

By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 72% of OSTEOPATHIC HERITAGE FOUNDATION OF NELSONVILLE’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.

02FY2024 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k3 grants · $100k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $225k
$50,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ATHENS-HOCKING-VINTON 317 BOARD$125,000
APPALACHIAN CENTER FOR ECONOMIC NETWORKS$50,000
APPALACHIAN CENTER FOR ECONOMIC NETWORKS$50,000
ATHENS COUNTY FOUNDATION$40,000
ATHENS COUNTY FOUNDATION$35,000
ATHENS COUNTY FOUNDATION$25,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–23, $215k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%INTEGRATED SERVICES FOR BEHAVIORAL HEALTH: $113k → 15%INTEGRATED SERVICES FOR BEHAVIORAL HEALTH: $67k → 15%INTEGRATED SERVICES FOR BEHAVIORAL HEALTH: $20k → 15%NELSONVILLE FOOD CUPBOARD: $5k → 15%NELSONVILLE FOOD CUPBOARD: $5k → 15%INTEGRATED SERVICES FOR BEHAVIORAL HEALTH: $5k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 17% of Osteopathic Heritage Foundation of Nelsonville’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 100% of the giving stays in OH; read by stated purpose it is 78% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

Osteopathic Heritage Foundation of Nelsonvillelessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 19% directed abroad (not shown)

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$2.7M · 8 repeat orgs$228k to everyone else

8 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
11

Total granted

$2.7M
$228k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+59%
+69%

Still filing today

63%
45%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’20’21’22’23’24
Arts & CultureHuman ServicesPhilanthropyHealthCommunity ImprovementEducationOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HC
    HOCKINGATHENSPERRY COMMUNITY ACTION
    6× · 2017–2023 · $447k · revenue +59%
  • AC
    APPALACHIAN CENTER FOR ECONOMIC NETWORKS INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $380k · revenue +85%
  • IS
    INTEGRATED SERVICES FOR BEHAVIORAL HEALTH
    2× · 2022–2023 · $205k · revenue +101%

Funded once

  • HH
    HOPEWELL HEALTH CENTERS INCgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $96k · revenue +49%
  • AC
    ATHENS COUNTY HABITAT FOR HUMANITY
    one grant, 2018 · $50k
  • OC
    OHIOHEALTH CORPORATION
    one grant, 2017 · $30k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Southeast Ohio Independent News

Local public journalism in athens ohio

Arts & Culture
2
Philanthropy Ohio

To lead and equip ohio philanthropy to be effective partners for change in our communities.

Philanthropy
3
Association of Ohio Health Commissioners

The mission of aohc is to provide exceptional service to its members and to advance the mission of public health to prevent, promote and protect the health of the community by developing and maintaining strong local public health…

4
Hospice & Palliative Care of the Ohio Valley Inc

Helping individuals live with dignity through the final stage of life.

Human Services
5
Healthpath Foundation of Ohio

Helping all ohioans to reach their fullest health potential.

Health
6
Empowering and Strengthening Ohio's People Inc

Empowering and strengthening ohio's people (esop) helps adults in all stages of life achieve and maintain financial wellness and housing stability.

Housing & Shelter
7
Ohio Professionals Health Program

To facilitate the health and wellbeing of healthcare professionals in order to enhance patient care and safety.

Health
8
Public Health Fund of Ohio

The public health fund of ohio is designed to facilitate public/private partnerships and conduct critical, enduring, sustainable, and cost-effective public health projects and programming.

Philanthropy
9
Athens County Food Pantry

To provide emergency food to those in need in athens county ohio

10
Ohio United Way

To strengthen the capacity of United Ways across Ohio and to advance the common good for Ohioans.

Philanthropy
11
Ohio Hills Health Services

Ohio hills health services is a non-profit health care operation, organized by communities in eastern ohio to promote healthy lifestyles and to provide preventative and comprehensive medical and dental care for area residents. the primary…

12
Ohio Partners for Affordable Energy

To conduct research and educational programs on affordable energy policies, to advocate on behalf of affordable energy policies, and to implement and manage energy efficiency and related programs.

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Athens County Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Athens Photographic Project. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
12/12
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

ATHENS-HOCKING-VINTON 317 BOARD — $1,347,500 · OtherATHENS-HOCKING-VINTON 317 BOARDATHENS COUNTY FOUNDATION — $585,600 · OtherATHENS COUNTY FOUNDATIONHOCKINGATHENSPERRY COMMUNITY ACTION — $446,800 · OtherHOCKINGATHENSPERRY COMMUNITY ACTIONACENET VENTURES INC — $171,179 · OtherACENET VENTURES INCIndividual grant recipient — $150,000 · Other+7 more — $187,134 · Other+7 moreFOUNDATION FOR APPALACHIAN OHIO — $470,654 · PhilanthropyFOUNDATION FO…+1 more — $1,000 · PhilanthropyAPPALACHIAN CENTER FOR ECONOMIC NETWORKS INC — $380,000 · Community ImprovementAPPALACHIA…INTEGRATED SERVICES FOR BEHAVIORAL HEALTH — $205,000 · Human ServicesTHE NELSONVILLE FOOD CUPBOARD INCORPORATED — $10,000 · Human ServicesSTUARTS OPERA HOUSE — $22,500 · Arts & CultureATHENS PHOTOGRAPHIC PROJECT — $14,548 · Arts & CultureThe Ohio University Foundation — $24,425 · EducationHEALTH POLICY INSTITUTE OF OHIO — $1,000 · Health
Other$2,888,213Philanthropy$471,654Community Improvement$380,000Human Services$215,000Arts & Culture$37,048Education$24,425Health$1,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetATHENS COUNTY FOUNDATION — $585,600 over 7y, 9.9% of budgetFOUNDATION FOR APPALACHIAN OHIO — $470,654 over 5y, 1.6% of budgetHOCKINGATHENSPERRY COMMUNITY ACTION — $446,800 over 6y, 0.6% of budgetAPPALACHIAN CENTER FOR ECONOMIC NETWORKS INC — $380,000 over 5y, 8.3% of budgetINTEGRATED SERVICES FOR BEHAVIORAL HEALTH — $205,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetHOPEWELL HEALTH CENTERS INC — $95,850 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetThe Ohio University Foundation — $24,425 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSTUARTS OPERA HOUSE — $22,500 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetATHENS PHOTOGRAPHIC PROJECT — $14,548 over 1y, 4.3% of budgetTHE PHILANTHROPY ROUNDTABLE — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHEALTH POLICY INSTITUTE OF OHIO — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ATHENS COUNTY FOUNDATION
  • Who funds FOUNDATION FOR APPALACHIAN OHIO
  • Who funds HOCKINGATHENSPERRY COMMUNITY ACTION
  • Who funds APPALACHIAN CENTER FOR ECONOMIC NETWORKS INC
  • Who funds INTEGRATED SERVICES FOR BEHAVIORAL HEALTH
  • Who funds HOPEWELL HEALTH CENTERS INC
  • Who funds The Ohio University Foundation
  • Who funds STUARTS OPERA HOUSE
  • Who funds ATHENS PHOTOGRAPHIC PROJECT
  • Who funds THE NELSONVILLE FOOD CUPBOARD INCORPORATED
  • Who funds THE PHILANTHROPY ROUNDTABLE
  • Who funds HEALTH POLICY INSTITUTE OF OHIO

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Athens County FoundationOH22.1× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Athens County Foundation · Osteopathic Heritage Foundation · Sisters of St Joseph Charitable Fund Inc · Foundation for Appalachian Ohio · Community Foundations Inc · Peoples Bank Foundation · Columbus Foundation · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Network for Good · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Osteopathic Heritage Foundation of Nelsonville funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Osteopathic Heritage Foundation of Nelsonville?

    Find your warmest path to Osteopathic Heritage Foundation of Nelsonville through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 21 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph