Skip to content

· Private foundation

Onufrychuk Family Charitable Trust

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$233k
Granted FY2024still arriving
15
Grants FY2024still arriving
7
States reached
$195k
Largest
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$1.5MInternational$115kCommunity Improvement$23kEducation$21kScience & Tech$20kHuman Services$12kAnimals$10kReligion$6kOther$0
02FY2024 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k13 grants · $28k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $195k
$1,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$2.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NATIONAL MS SOCIETY$195,000
USA for UNFPA$10,000
HURU INTERNATIONAL$7,500
Cleveland Equine Center$5,500
FEDERAL LAW ENFORCEMENT FOUNDATION$5,000
Rustic Love$2,500
Individual grant recipient$1,800
Clover Health Foundation$1,000
CTNNB1 SYNDROME FOUNDATION$1,000
St Jude Children's Research Hospita$1,000
Hospital for Special Surgery Srvice$1,000
ALS Association$1,000
Great American Community$250
MS Association of America$250
Individual grant recipient$250
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–21, $10k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Boys Town: $5k → 12%Boys Town: $3k → 12%Boys Town: $2k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

VT
WA
IL
NY
MA
OH
PA
NJ
CT
CA
NE
VA
MD
TN
NC
DC
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.6M · 26 repeat orgs$95k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +40% since the first grant, against +10% for those funded once.

26 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2024, 14 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

26
24

Total granted

$1.6M
$92k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+40%
+10%

Still filing today

46%
63%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthInternationalFood & NutritionEducationHuman ServicesPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UF
    USA FOR UNFPA INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $30k · revenue +40%
  • HI
    HURU INTERNATIONAL INC
    4× · 2020–2024 · $30k · revenue +116%
  • FL
    FEDERAL LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS FOUNDATION INC
    2× · 2022–2024 · $10k · revenue +82%

Funded once

  • WR
    West River Community Project
    one grant, 2018 · $23k
  • TN
    THE NOT IMPOSSIBLE FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2018 · $20k · revenue +10%
  • TM
    Thurgood Marshall College Fund
    one grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue +13%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
University Family Physicians Inc

Engage actively and continuously in medical research, education and training in the practice of medicine in conjunction with the department of family medicine of the indiana university school of medicine and indiana university…

—
2
New York Blood Center Inc

As one of the most preeminent and comprehensive blood centers in theworld, nybc operates under a four-part mission. for more information,see sch. o and part iii, 4a-c.

Health
3
The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia

The children's hospital of philadelphia, the oldest hospital in the united states dedicated exclusively to pediatrics, strives to be the world leader in the advancement of health care for children by integrating excellent patient care,…

Health
4
MRIGlobal

To improve the lives of people through innovative scientific and engineering research.

Science & Tech
5
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
6
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc

The mission of dfci is to provide expert, compassionate, and equitable care to children, adults, and their families, while advancing the understanding, diagnosis, treatment, cure, and prevention of cancer and related diseases. we train new…

Health
7
National Foundation for Cancer Research

To support cancer research and public education relating to prevention, earlier diagnosis, better treatments and ultimately, a cure for cancer.

Health
8
City of Hope

City of Hope's mission is to make hope a reality for all touched by cancer and diabetes. PLEASE SEE SCHEDULE O FOR A CONTINUATION OF OUR MISSION

Health
9
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
10
United States Pharmacopeial Convention

Usp's mission is to improve global health through public standards and related programs that help ensure the quality, safety, and benefit of medicines and foods.

Health
11
International Food Information Council

To effectively communicate science based information on food safety, nutrition, and health for the public good.

Arts & Culture
12
Federation of State Medical Boards of the United States Inc

The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Children's Health Defense; the most unlike its peers is Path of Hope Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

29 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 29 of the 53 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
29/29
Grantees still filing
17/29
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NATIONAL MS SOCIETY: $1,311,750 · OtherNATIONAL MS SOCIETY+29 more: $229,650 · Other+29 moreTHE NOT IMPOSSIBLE FOUNDATION INC: $20,000 · HealthTHE ADDICTION POLICY FORUM: $8,000 · HealthAMYOTROPHIC LATERAL SCLEROSIS ASSN: $7,000 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $6,000 · HealthINOVA HEALTH SYSTEM FOUNDATION: $4,000 · Health+3 more: $2,300 · HealthUSA FOR UNFPA INC: $30,000 · Human ServicesFather Flanagan's Boys' Home: $9,500 · Human Services+1 more: $1,000 · Human ServicesHURU INTERNATIONAL INC: $30,000 · InternationalMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $2,500 · InternationalWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $2,500 · International+1 more: $1,000 · InternationalThurgood Marshall College Fund: $10,000 · EducationFEDERAL LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 · EducationSAINT FRANCIS UNIVERSITY: $1,250 · EducationRUSTIC LOVE: $2,500 · Food & NutritionTHE FATHER MCKENNA CENTER INC: $2,000 · Food & NutritionTHE WESTON A PRICE FOUNDATION: $1,000 · Food & NutritionGREAT AMERICAN COMMUNITY KITCHEN INC: $250 · Food & NutritionCHILDREN'S HEALTH DEFENSE: $5,000 · Environment
Other$1,541,400Health$47,300Human Services$40,500International$36,000Education$21,250Food & Nutrition$5,750Environment$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUSA FOR UNFPA INC: $30,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetHURU INTERNATIONAL INC: $30,000 over 4y, 1.1% of budgetTHE NOT IMPOSSIBLE FOUNDATION INC: $20,000 over 1y, 8.4% of budgetThurgood Marshall College Fund: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFEDERAL LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetFather Flanagan's Boys' Home: $9,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ADDICTION POLICY FORUM: $8,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetAMYOTROPHIC LATERAL SCLEROSIS ASSN: $7,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $6,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN'S HEALTH DEFENSE: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFEDERAL LAW ENFORCEMENT FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetINOVA HEALTH SYSTEM FOUNDATION: $4,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE JEWISH FOUNDATION FOR THE RIGHTEOUS INC: $3,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetRUSTIC LOVE: $2,500 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetChicago Blackhawks Foundation: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE FATHER MCKENNA CENTER INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSAINT FRANCIS UNIVERSITY: $1,250 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLauren Rose Albert Foundation Inc: $1,000 over 3y, 1.3% of budgetTHE WESTON A PRICE FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBUILDON INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NATIONAL MENTORING PARTNERSHIP INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUnited Help Ukraine Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL DANCE INSTITUTE: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPath of Hope Inc: $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGREAT AMERICAN COMMUNITY KITCHEN INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds USA FOR UNFPA INC ↗
  • Who funds HURU INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
  • Who funds THE NOT IMPOSSIBLE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Thurgood Marshall College Fund ↗
  • Who funds FEDERAL LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Father Flanagan's Boys' Home ↗
  • Who funds THE ADDICTION POLICY FORUM ↗
  • Who funds AMYOTROPHIC LATERAL SCLEROSIS ASSN ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S HEALTH DEFENSE ↗
  • Who funds FEDERAL LAW ENFORCEMENT FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds INOVA HEALTH SYSTEM FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE JEWISH FOUNDATION FOR THE RIGHTEOUS INC ↗
  • Who funds RUSTIC LOVE ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗
  • Who funds Chicago Blackhawks Foundation ↗
  • Who funds THE FATHER MCKENNA CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds SAINT FRANCIS UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds Lauren Rose Albert Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE WESTON A PRICE FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Charleigh Charitable TrustNY15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Charleigh Charitable Trust · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · American Endowment Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Network for Good · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Onufrychuk Family Charitable Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Onufrychuk Family Charitable Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • The Addiction Policy Forum: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Onufrychuk Family Charitable Trust?

Find your warmest path to Onufrychuk Family Charitable Trust through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 53 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Onufrychuk Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph