Skip to content
Onehope Foundation at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Onehope Foundation

ONEHOPE FOUNDATION is the matchmaker between for-profit companies and individuals who want to give back and nonprofit organizations that have been thoroughly vetted the foundation acts as a pass through organization for all of the donations that come into the organization.

$751k
Granted FY2020
1
Grants FY2020
1
States reached
$751k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2020.

International$922kFood & Nutrition$318kHealth$295kAnimals$193kEnvironment$95kPhilanthropy$49kEducation$48kHuman Services$36kOther$0
02FY2020 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$751,388
Median grant
1
States reached
$-1445689
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE END FUND$751,388
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–17, $36k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 69% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%CHRIS PAUL FAMILY FOUNDATION: $25k → 15%THE NYLE DIMARCO FOUNDATION: $11k → 6%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
IL
NY
MA
NV
CA
VA
MD
TN
NC
GA
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 63% of Onehope Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 23% of the giving stays in CA; by stated purpose, 0%.

Onehope Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.8M · 15 repeat orgs$200k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +80% since the first grant, against +9% for those funded once.

15 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2020, 14 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
14

Total granted

$1.8M
$200k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+80%
+9%

Still filing today

87%
79%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2020, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20
HealthPhilanthropyInternationalArts & CultureAnimalsHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TE
    The End Fund Inc
    3× · 2018–2020 · $787k · revenue +227%
  • WI
    WHYHUNGER INC
    2× · 2018–2019 · $312k · revenue +68%
  • TA
    THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS
    3× · 2017–2019 · $161k · revenue +80%

Funded once

  • PENCILS OF PROMISE INCORPORATED
    one grant, 2017 · $36k · revenue -75%
  • RC
    REDEEMER CHURCH OF ARLINGTON
    one grant, 2017 · $32k
  • WF
    Whole Foods Market Foundationgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $25k · revenue +261%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Target Als Foundation Inc

Our mission is to break down barriers to als research to find effective treatments. by uniting academia, the pharma and biotech industry, government, venture capital, related nonprofits, and the als community, we aim to overcome the…

Education
2
American Association for the Advancement of Science

Advance science, engineering, and innovation throughout the world for the benefit of all. the world's largest multidisciplinary scientific society and a leading publisher of cutting-edge research through its science family of journals,…

Science & Tech
3
National Foundation for Cancer Research

To support cancer research and public education relating to prevention, earlier diagnosis, better treatments and ultimately, a cure for cancer.

Health
4
Waterorg

Water.org's goal is to bring safe water and sanitation to the world through access to small, affordable loans.

International
5
Internet Society Foundation

At the internet society foundation, we focus on funding initiatives that strengthen the internet in function and reach so that it can effectively serve all people. our work advances the vision of the internet society (isoc): the internet…

International
6
National Comprehensive Cancer Network

To define and advance quality, effective, equitable, and accessible cancer care and prevention so all people can live better lives.

Health
7
Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology Foundation

To aid the alliance for clinical trials in oncology national clinical trials cooperative group and support the clinical trials and laboratory research of the alliance, as well as efforts to educate the medical community on methods of…

Health
8
Cancer Research and Biostatistics

To help conquer cancer and other diseases through the application of biostatistical principles and innovative data management methods.

Health
9
Allosource

Inspired by the gift of donation from our communities, allosource responsibly provides innovative cellular and tissue allografts to advance patient healing.

Health
10
Wikimedia Foundation Inc

The mission of the wikimedia foundation is to empower and engage people around the world to collect and develop educational content under a free license or in the public domain, and to disseminate it effectively and globally. (see schedule…

Education
11
The Water Research Foundation

The purpose of the water research foundation (wrf) is a definitive research organization to advance the science of all things water to better meet the evolving needs of its subscribers and the water sector. to engage exclusively in…

Environment
12
Paypal Charitable Giving Fund

Our vision is to reimagine everyday giving to help charities. our mission is to enable the world's leading online platforms to create opportunities for everyday charitable giving. in doing so, we ensure our programs are trustworthy,…

Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Edward Charles Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Whole Foods Market Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

26 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 26 of the 30 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
25/26
Grantees still filing
19/26
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

The End Fund Inc: $786,715 · InternationalThe End Fund IncPENCILS OF PROMISE INCORPORATED: $36,291 · InternationalWHYHUNGER INC: $312,059 · Arts & CultureWHYHUNGER INCCOUNTRY MUSIC ASSOCIATION INC: $10,800 · Arts & CultureTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $161,178 · AnimalsTHE AMERIC…WILDAID INC: $31,605 · AnimalsWILDAID IN…TREES4TREES: $70,004 · OtherTREES4TREESREDEEMER CHURCH OF ARLINGTON: $31,800 · OtherREDEEMER CHURCH OF A…CHRYSALIS CENTER: $22,211 · OtherCHRYSALIS CENTERPS ARTS: $19,385 · OtherTHE SUSAN ROMAN CHARITABLE FOUNDATION: $12,600 · OtherTREVOR PROJECT INC: $67,993 · OtherTREVOR PROJECT INCOLE HEALTH FOUNDATION: $51,530 · OtherOLE HEALTH FOUNDATIO…EDWARD CHARLES FOUNDATION: $25,000 · OtherEDWARD CHARLES FOUND…Whole Foods Market Foundation: $25,023 · OtherWhole Foods Market F…+6 more: $47,413 · Other+6 moreGATEWAY FOR CANCER RESEARCH: $86,573 · HealthALZHEIMER'S DISEASE RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $28,226 · HealthCRISIS TEXT LINE INC: $24,162 · HealthAUTISM CARE TODAY: $12,336 · HealthAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $5,809 · HealthWATSI INC: $5,584 · HealthTEAM RUBICON INC: $99,153 · Public Safety & DisasterROOM TO READ: $40,585 · EducationSOCIAL GOOD FUND INC: $36,444 · Education
International$823,006Arts & Culture$322,859Animals$192,783Other$372,959Health$162,690Public Safety & Disaster$99,153Education$77,029

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetThe End Fund Inc: $786,715 over 3y, 3.3% of budgetWHYHUNGER INC: $312,059 over 2y, 5.9% of budgetTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $161,178 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTEAM RUBICON INC: $99,153 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetGATEWAY FOR CANCER RESEARCH: $86,573 over 2y, 1.7% of budgetTREVOR PROJECT INC: $67,993 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetOLE HEALTH FOUNDATION: $51,530 over 3y, 1.5% of budgetROOM TO READ: $40,585 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSOCIAL GOOD FUND INC: $36,444 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPENCILS OF PROMISE INCORPORATED: $36,291 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetWILDAID INC: $31,605 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $28,226 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetEDWARD CHARLES FOUNDATION: $25,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetCRISIS TEXT LINE INC: $24,162 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetCHRYSALIS CENTER: $22,211 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetPS ARTS: $19,385 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetNYLE DIMARCO FOUNDATION: $11,049 over 1y, 24% of budgetAMERICAS FOUNDATION FOR CHESS: $7,500 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetTHE HEART FOUNDATION: $6,648 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetTHREE SQUARE: $6,118 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE OVARIAN CANCER RESEARCH FUND INC: $6,098 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $5,809 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWATSI INC: $5,584 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Gs Donor Advised Phil…National Philanthropi…Network for GoodMorgan Stanley Global…The Bank of America C…Vanguard Charitable E…American Online Givin…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management IncNY10.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Network for Good · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Onehope Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Onehope Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Onehope Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Onehope Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 30 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2020, released 2020. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Onehope’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home