· Private foundation
Intact Charitable Trust USA
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k131 grants · $283k
- $10k–50k16 grants · $335k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| SCHOOL ON WHEELS MA | $50,000 |
| SCHOLARSHIP OF AMERICA | $48,000 |
| FEEDING SOUTHWEST VIRGINIA | $40,000 |
| INSURANCE INDUSTRY CHARITABLE FOUNDATION | $30,000 |
| UNITED SOUTH END SETTLEMENTS | $25,000 |
| DEIRDRES HOUSE | $25,000 |
| INSURANCE INDUSTRY CHARITABLE FOUNDATION | $21,550 |
| SPECIAL OLYMPICS OF COLORADO | $20,000 |
| RBS CENTER FOR WOMEN IN BUSINESS SUPPORT | $20,000 |
| THE SURETY AND FIDELITY ASSOCIATION | $15,000 |
| UJAFEDERATION OF NEW YORK | $15,000 |
| NORTHSIDE ACHIEVEMENT ZONE | $15,000 |
| INSURANCE INDUSTRY CHARITABLE FOUNDATION | $15,000 |
| NEIGHBORHOOD BOYS GIRLS CLUB | $15,000 |
| HAYMAKERS FOR HOPE | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $195k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 88% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +19% since the first grant, against +11% for the ones you funded once.
109 repeat relationships — 53 still active in FY2024, 56 since wound down; 61 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 43% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $381k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- SOSCHOOL ON WHEELS OF MASSACHUSETTS INC2× · 2022–2023 · $110k · revenue +18%
- FSFEEDING SOUTHWEST VIRGINIA5× · 2020–2024 · $83k · revenue +20%
- BBBARNEY & BARNEY FOUNDATION4× · 2021–2024 · $60k · revenue +19%
Funded once
- TDTHE DEIDRE O'BRIEN FOUNDATIONone grant, 2022 · $25k
- RCRBS CENTER FOR WOMEN IN BUSINESSone grant, 2023 · $20k
- WEWALLIN EDUCATION PARTNERSone grant, 2023 · $20k · revenue -30%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.
Our mission is to solve hunger in central pennsylvania by ensuring that everyone struggling with hunger has access to enough wholesome food every day. we will achieve this bold goal with the help of our generous donors, volunteers and…
United Food Bank unites communities to alleviate hunger.
The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…
The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…
The food bank for central & northeast missouri is a regional disaster and hunger relief network that acquires and distributes millions of meals each year to help neighbors get the food they need to thrive. (continued on schedule o)the…
On a mission to connect every person facing hunger with nutritious meals by maximizing food rescue. through direct service and community partnerships, feeding san diego provides more than 26 million meals each year to children, families,…
The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.
Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…
Through philanthropy, empower current and future food and nutrition practitioners to optimize global health.
Food forward fights hunger and prevents food waste by rescuing fresh surplus produce, connecting this abundance with people experiencing food insecurity, and inspiring others to do the same.
Commonwealth care alliance, inc.'s mission is to improve the health and well-being of people with significant needs by innovating, coordinating and providing the highest quality, individualized care.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Feed My Starving Children Inc and the most unlike its peers is Ima Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 34 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 5% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
169 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 169 of the 309 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds SCHOOL ON WHEELS OF MASSACHUSETTS INC ↗
- Who funds INSURANCE INDUSTRY CHARITABLE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds UNITED SOUTH END SETTLEMENTS ↗
- Who funds FEEDING SOUTHWEST VIRGINIA ↗
- Who funds BARNEY & BARNEY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds NEIGHBORHOOD BOYS & GIRLS CLUB ↗
- Who funds DEIRDRE O'BRIEN CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds DENVER KIDS INC ↗
- Who funds UPTURNSHIPS INC ↗
- Who funds THE ACTUARIAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds NORTHSIDE ACHIEVEMENT ZONE ↗
- Who funds IMA FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds SPECIAL OLYMPICS COLORADO ↗
- Who funds WALLIN EDUCATION PARTNERS ↗
- Who funds THE SURETY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds CHRYSALIS CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds University of St Thomas ↗
- Who funds COUNCIL ON THE ENVIRONMENT INC ↗
- Who funds JEREMIAH PROGRAM ↗
- Who funds UNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC ↗
- Who funds CALIFORNIA MARITIME ACADEMY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Personal Best Charity Inc ↗
- Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
- Who funds Pediatric Brain Tumor Foundation of the United States Inc ↗
- Who funds ORANGEWOOD FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds EMMAUS INC ↗
- Who funds COLLEGE POSSIBLE INC ↗
- Who funds WHITE PONY EXPRESS ↗
- Who funds FAMILY PROMISE OF FORSYTH COUNTY INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Chubb Charitable Foundation · Rockland Trust Charitable Foundation Inc · The Andover Companies Charitable Foundation · Td Charitable Foundation · Eastern Bank Foundation · Liberty Mutual Foundation Inc · American Tower Corporation Foundation Inc · The Gap Foundation · Ch Robinson Worldwide Foundation · Ion Bank Foundation Inc · Analog Devices Foundation · Arthur J Gallagher Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Intact Charitable Trust USA funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Chrysalis Center Inc — 93% of income from government
- Friendship Service Center Inc — 85% of income from government
- Covenant to Care for Children Inc — 35% of income from government
- Prudence Crandall Center Inc — 30% of income from government
- Nourishnj Inc — 27% of income from government
- Family Promise of Morris County Inc — 17% of income from government
- Hull Lifesaving Museum Inc — 13% of income from government
- Eastie Farm Inc — 13% of income from government
- Trustees of Tufts College — 13% of income from government
- Community Servings Inc — 12% of income from government
- Emmaus Inc — 10% of income from government
- Women's Lunch Place Inc — 8% of income from government
- School On Wheels of Massachusetts Inc — 7% of income from government
- Connecticut Foodshare Inc — 5% of income from government
- Cradles to Crayons Inc — 2% of income from government
- Bentley University — 1% of income from government
- Nichols College — 0% of income from government
- Insurance Library Association of Boston — 0% of income from government
- Pan-Massachusetts Challenge Inc — 0% of income from government
- Shriners Hospitals for Children — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Intact Charitable Trust USA?
Find your warmest path to Intact Charitable Trust USA through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.