Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersAlso receives grants — funding profile →
Plinth

· Public charity

Ohio Community Development Finance Fund

Finance fund builds bridges between resources and the low-income community to improve the quality of life for people.

$14M
Granted FY2024still arriving
18
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$540k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.

Community Improvement$7.0MHousing & Shelter$2.3MHuman Services$196kPublic Benefit$75kHealth$69kArts & Culture$60kReligion$40kEmployment$32kOther$0
02FY2024 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 18 grants below total $1,607,014 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $13,903,013 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $12,295,999 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k5 grants · $96k
  • $50k–250k12 grants · $972k
  • $250k+1 grant · $540k
$50,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$73M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FINANCE FUND CAPITAL CORPORATION$540,000
DETROIT SHOREWAY COMMUNITY DEV$150,000
THE REFUGEE RESPONSE$146,500
MEDINA CREATIVE HOUSING$100,000
FRANKLINTON RISING$100,000
SOLON COMMUNITY LIVING INC$100,000
CLEVELAND PRINT ROOM$75,000
COLUMBUS HOUSING PARTNERSHIP$50,000
CINCINNATI NORTHSIDE COMMUNITY$50,000
YELLOW SPRINGS HOME INC$50,000
OVER-THE-RHINE COMMUNITY HOUSI$50,000
MEDINA CREATIVE HOUSING$50,000
BURTEN BELL CARR DEVELOPMENT$50,000
FRANKLINTON RISING$31,500
JURISDICTION-WIDE RESIDENT ADV$20,842
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $887k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 72% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%WELLNESS CENTER (EXTENDED HOUS: $50k → 9%HOPE HOUSE RESCUE MISSION INC: $100k → 12%WSOS COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY - GREAT LAKES COMM ACTION PARTNERSHIP: $96k → 12%HIGHLAND COUNTY COMMUNITY: $100k → 15%COMMUNITY ACTION ORGANIZATION: $30k → 22%WSOS COMMUNITY ACTION COMMISSION: $3k → 12%HOPE HOMES FOUNDATION INC: $19k → 13%HIGHLAND COUNTY CAO: $15k → 15%INTEGRATED SERVICES FOR BEHAVIOAL HEALTH INC: $90k → 15%BUCKEYE SHAKER SQUARE DEV CORP: $19k → 16%HOPE HOMES FOUNDATION INC: $11k → 13%HIGHLAND COUNTY COMMUNITY ACTION: $1k → 15%INTEGRATED SERVICES FOR BEHAVIORAL HEALTH INC: $10k → 15%BUCKEYE SHAKER SQUARE DEVELOPM: $11k → 16%THE REFUGEE RESPONSE: $147k → 17%HOMEFULL: $50k → 14%NEAR WESTSIDE MULTI SERVICE CE: $100k → 17%RESIDENTIAL HOME CORPORATION: $5k → 16%CINCINNATI UNION BETHEL DBA HE: $30k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

72%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$7.1M · 42 repeat orgs$2.8M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +46% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.

42 repeat relationships — 10 still active in FY2024, 32 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

42
50

Total granted

$7.1M
$2.4M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+46%
0%

Still filing today

95%
76%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 74% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $418k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Community ImprovementHousing & ShelterHuman ServicesHealthPhilanthropyArts & CultureOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MC
    MEDINA CREATIVE HOUSING INC
    6× · 2017–2024 · $630k · revenue +47%
  • IA
    IRONTON AND LAWRENCE COUNTY AREA COMMUNITY ACTION ORGANIZATION
    3× · 2020–2023 · $300k · revenue +49%
  • YN
    YOUNGSTOWN NEIGHBORHOOD DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
    4× · 2019–2023 · $213k · revenue +326%

Funded once

  • 1W
    1551 WEST BROAD LLC
    one grant, 2020 · $250k
  • CA
    COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY OF
    one grant, 2017 · $145k
  • UM
    URBAN MISSION MINISTRIES INC
    one grant, 2021 · $100k · revenue -5%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Columbus Housing Initiative Inc

Stabilize neighborhoods through establishing financing, education, rehabilitation of existing housing and development of new housing

Housing & Shelter
2
Neighborhood Recovery Communit Development Corp

Community development

Human Services
3
Home City Development Inc

1.to restore or replace substandard housing with a supply of decent, affordable, and well-managed housing for individuals and families.2.to facilitate neighborhood growth and health in collaboration with partners, leading to long-term…

Housing & Shelter
4
Ohio Housing Council

To advocate and educate on behalf of our members to increase the quality and supply of affordable housing in the state of ohio, and to provide our members with current legislative awareness, a forum for voicing legislative and programmatic…

Community Improvement
5
The Home Ownership Center of Greater Cincinnati in

The home ownership center is a non-profit that has been serving the cincinnati metro area since 1973, and is a member of the neighbor works network.

Housing & Shelter
6
Franklinton Development Association

The franklinton development association is a community development coporation formed to lead the revitalization of the franklinton neighborhhood of columubs ohio through the creation of affordable housing and commercial development for…

Community Improvement
7
Neighborhood Nonprofit Housing Corp

Create quality affordable housing opportunities, enhance communities and provide households with skills to become self-sufficient.

Housing & Shelter
8
Near North Development Corporation

Inner-city housing and economic development focusing on low-income individuals.

Community Improvement
9
The Affordable Housing Trust for Columbus and Franklin County

Facilitate and invest in developments designed to: create and preserve affordable homeownership and rental housing; strengthen and stabilize neighborhoods; support working households, seniors and special needs populations.

Housing & Shelter
10
Neighborhood Housing Services of Waco

Building stronger neighborhoods through homeownership, quality rental housing and community building initiatives.

Housing & Shelter
11
Ywca Housing Corporation

To encourage the development and operation of affordable residential real estate in downtown columbus for women with limited income and own and/or operate affordable residential real estate in downtown columbus for women with limited…

—
12
Chn Housing Capital

Chn housing capital is a certified community development financial institution serving low-income individuals and distressed communities guided by the belief that homeownership should be within everyone's reach.

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Neighborhood Housing Partnership of Greater Springfield and the most unlike its peers is East Liverpool Community Partnership. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 33 years old; the field is 21. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number19%1%<5yr13%9%5–10yr17%22%10–20yr15%21%20–35yr16%35%35–55yr21%12%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value19%0%<5yr13%5%5–10yr17%38%10–20yr15%19%20–35yr16%28%35–55yr21%10%55yr+

The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 1% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 1% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
1%1/90
the rest of the field
12%
4,383/35,760

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

86 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 86 of the 97 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

5
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
24
Early backer (in before they grew)
83/86
Grantees still filing
49/86
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

MEDINA CREATIVE HOUSING INC — $630,000 · Housing & ShelterMEDINA CREATIVE HOUSING INCBURTEN BELL CARR DEVELOPMENT INC — $239,899 · Housing & ShelterBURTEN BELL CARR DEVELOPMENT…YOUNGSTOWN NEIGHBORHOOD DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION — $212,750 · Housing & ShelterYOUNGSTOWN NEIGHBORHOOD DEVE…YELLOW SPRINGS HOME INC — $187,460 · Housing & ShelterYELLOW SPRINGS HOME INCCHN HOUSING PARTNERS — $160,000 · Housing & ShelterCHN HOUSING PARTNERSFAMICOS FOUNDATION — $160,000 · Housing & ShelterFAMICOS FOUNDATIONSOLON COMMUNITY LIVING INC — $152,667 · Housing & ShelterSOLON COMMUNITY LIVING INCOVER THE RHINE COMMUNITY HOUSING — $140,000 · Housing & ShelterOVER THE RHINE COMMUNITY HOU…Franklinton Rising — $131,500 · Housing & ShelterEAST AKRON NEIGHBORHOOD DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION — $100,000 · Housing & ShelterPRICE HILL WILL — $100,000 · Housing & Shelter+9 more — $302,519 · Housing & Shelter+9 moreNORTHWEST NEIGHBORHOODS CDC — $273,500 · Community ImprovementNORTHWEST NEIGHBORHOODS …Walnut Hills Redevelopment Foundation — $191,754 · Community ImprovementWalnut Hills Redevelopme…PARSONS AVENUE REDEVELOPMENT CORPORATION — $158,503 · Community ImprovementPARSONS AVENUE REDEVELOP…Homes on The Hill Community Development Corp — $133,700 · Community ImprovementHomes on The Hill Commun…SUNDAY CREEK ASSOCIATES — $130,000 · Community ImprovementSUNDAY CREEK ASSOCIATESNORTH END COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT COLLABORATIVE INC — $129,406 · Community ImprovementNORTH END COMMUNITY IMPR…Gertrude Wood Community Foundation — $110,000 · Community ImprovementGLOUSTER REVITALIZATION ORGANIZATIO — $100,000 · Community ImprovementCOMMUNITY ACTION PROGRAM COMMISSION OF THE LANCASTER-FAIRFIELD COUNTY AREA INC — $82,223 · Community ImprovementCINCINNATI NORTHSIDE COMMUNITY URBAN REDEVELOPMENT CORPORATION — $80,000 · Community ImprovementTHE NORTHEAST OHIO HISPANIC CENTER FOR ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT — $75,000 · Community Improvement+18 more — $684,850 · Community Improvement+18 moreFINANCE FUND CAPITAL CORPORATION — $2,014,000 · PhilanthropyFINANCE FUND CAPITAL COR…Madisonville Community Urban Redevelopment Corporation — $133,066 · PhilanthropyMadisonville Community U…IRONTON AND LAWRENCE COUNTY AREA COMMUNITY ACTION ORGANIZATION — $300,000 · OtherIRONTON AND LAWRENCE…1551 WEST BROAD LLC — $250,000 · Other1551 WEST BROAD LLCCOMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY OF — $145,433 · OtherCOMMUNITY ACTION AGE…ROSS COUNTY COMMUNITY ACTION COMMISSION — $130,000 · OtherROSS COUNTY COMMUNIT…CHARISMA COMMUNITY CONNECTION — $100,000 · OtherCHARISMA COMMUNITY C…URBAN MISSION MINISTRIES INC — $100,000 · OtherURBAN MISSION MINIST…COMMUNITY COOPERATIVE DEV'T FO - — $100,000 · OtherCOMMUNITY COOPERATIV…ASSOCIATION FOR BETTER COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT INC — $75,000 · OtherAVONDALE COMMUNITY COUNCIL — $75,000 · Other+17 more — $526,973 · Other+17 moreRESOURCE CLEVELAND — $146,500 · Human ServicesRESOURCE C…HIGHLAND COUNTY COMMUNITY ACTION ORGANIZATION INC — $116,330 · Human ServicesHIGHLAND C…Near Westside MultiService Corp — $100,000 · Human ServicesNear Wests…HOPE HOUSE RESCUE MISSION INC — $100,000 · Human ServicesHOPE HOUSE…INTEGRATED SERVICES FOR BEHAVIORAL HEALTH — $100,000 · Human ServicesINTEGRATED…GREAT LAKES COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP — $99,275 · Human ServicesGREAT LAKE…HOMEFULL — $50,000 · Human ServicesHOMEFULLEXTENDED HOUSING INC — $50,000 · Human ServicesEXTENDED H…COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY OF COLUMBIANA COUNTY INC — $30,000 · Human ServicesHOPE HOMES FOUNDATION INC — $30,000 · Human ServicesCOMMUNITY ACTION ORGANIZATION OF SCIOTO COUNTY INC — $30,000 · Human ServicesCincinnati Union Bethel — $30,000 · Human Services+1 more — $5,291 · Human ServicesMUSKINGUM BEHAVIORAL HEALTH INC — $100,000 · HealthNEW HOUSING OHIO INC — $90,000 · HealthHER STORY INC — $50,000 · HealthJoseph House Inc — $30,000 · HealthSQUARE ONE GJM — $18,600 · HealthCLEVELAND PRINT ROOM INC — $75,000 · Arts & CultureZORA'S HOUSE INC — $44,000 · Arts & Culture
Housing & Shelter$2,516,795Community Improvement$2,148,936Philanthropy$2,147,066Other$1,802,406Human Services$887,396Health$288,600Arts & Culture$119,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetFINANCE FUND CAPITAL CORPORATION — $2,014,000 over 3y, 14% of budgetMEDINA CREATIVE HOUSING INC — $630,000 over 6y, 11% of budgetIRONTON AND LAWRENCE COUNTY AREA COMMUNITY ACTION ORGANIZATION — $300,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetNORTHWEST NEIGHBORHOODS CDC — $273,500 over 5y, 5.7% of budgetBURTEN BELL CARR DEVELOPMENT INC — $239,899 over 4y, 3.2% of budgetYOUNGSTOWN NEIGHBORHOOD DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION — $212,750 over 4y, 1.7% of budgetWalnut Hills Redevelopment Foundation — $191,754 over 2y, 12% of budgetYELLOW SPRINGS HOME INC — $187,460 over 6y, 11% of budgetCHN HOUSING PARTNERS — $160,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetFAMICOS FOUNDATION — $160,000 over 3y, 1.3% of budgetPARSONS AVENUE REDEVELOPMENT CORPORATION — $158,503 over 3y, 97% of budgetSOLON COMMUNITY LIVING INC — $152,667 over 2y, 8.1% of budgetRESOURCE CLEVELAND — $146,500 over 1y, 3.4% of budgetOVER THE RHINE COMMUNITY HOUSING — $140,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetHomes on The Hill Community Development Corp — $133,700 over 4y, 7.8% of budgetMadisonville Community Urban Redevelopment Corporation — $133,066 over 2y, 14% of budgetFranklinton Rising — $131,500 over 1y, 12% of budgetROSS COUNTY COMMUNITY ACTION COMMISSION — $130,000 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetNORTH END COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT COLLABORATIVE INC — $129,406 over 2y, 3.3% of budgetHIGHLAND COUNTY COMMUNITY ACTION ORGANIZATION INC — $116,330 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetGertrude Wood Community Foundation — $110,000 over 4y, 88% of budgetGLOUSTER REVITALIZATION ORGANIZATIO — $100,000 over 2y, 80% of budgetURBAN MISSION MINISTRIES INC — $100,000 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetEAST AKRON NEIGHBORHOOD DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION — $100,000 over 1y, 2.7% of budgetPRICE HILL WILL — $100,000 over 1y, 5.6% of budgetNear Westside MultiService Corp — $100,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetMUSKINGUM BEHAVIORAL HEALTH INC — $100,000 over 2y, 3.8% of budgetHOPE HOUSE RESCUE MISSION INC — $100,000 over 1y, 5.7% of budgetINTEGRATED SERVICES FOR BEHAVIORAL HEALTH — $100,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetGREAT LAKES COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP — $99,275 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetNEW HOUSING OHIO INC — $90,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetCOMMUNITY ACTION PROGRAM COMMISSION OF THE LANCASTER-FAIRFIELD COUNTY AREA INC — $82,223 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetCINCINNATI NORTHSIDE COMMUNITY URBAN REDEVELOPMENT CORPORATION — $80,000 over 2y, 26% of budgetASSOCIATION FOR BETTER COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT INC — $75,000 over 1y, 3.3% of budgetCLEVELAND PRINT ROOM INC — $75,000 over 1y, 12% of budgetTHE NORTHEAST OHIO HISPANIC CENTER FOR ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT — $75,000 over 1y, 3.7% of budgetJURISDICTION WIDE RESIDENT ADVISORY — $67,334 over 3y, 51% of budgetOHIO HILL COUNTRY HERITAGE ARE — $60,001 over 4y, 5.9% of budgetNEIGHBORHOOD HOUSING PARTNERSHIP OF GREATER SPRINGFIELD — $60,000 over 2y, 4.1% of budgetUNION MILES DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION — $60,000 over 5y, 2.3% of budgetCOLLEGE HILL COMMUNITY URBAN REDEVELOPMENT CORPORATION — $60,000 over 4y, 1.4% of budgetCITYWIDE NEIGHBORHOOD DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION — $59,999 over 3y, 3.8% of budgetHOMEFULL — $50,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetMIDTOWN CLEVELAND INC — $50,000 over 1y, 3.2% of budgetElevate Northland — $50,000 over 1y, 5.8% of budgetCOLUMBUS HOUSING PARTNERSHIP INC — $50,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetHER STORY INC — $50,000 over 1y, 6.2% of budgetNEIGHBORHOOD HOUSING SERVICES OF TOLEDO INC — $50,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Ohio Capital Impact C…First Financial Found…The Cleveland Foundat…The George Gund Found…Peoples Bank Foundati…Coalition on Homeless…Enterprise Community …The CareSource Founda…Carol Ann and Ralph V…United Way of Greater…Neighborhood Progress…The Huntington Founda…
Ohio Capital Impact CorporationOH51× affinity23 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Ohio Capital Impact Corporation · First Financial Foundation · The Cleveland Foundation · The George Gund Foundation · Peoples Bank Foundation · Coalition on Homelessness and Housing in Ohio · Enterprise Community Partners Inc · The CareSource Foundation · Carol Ann and Ralph V Haile Jr Foundation · United Way of Greater Cincinnati · Neighborhood Progress Inc · The Huntington Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Ohio Community Development Finance Fund funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    39report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Ohio Community Development Finance Fund?

    Find your warmest path to Ohio Community Development Finance Fund through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 97 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home