Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersAlso receives grants — funding profile →
Plinth

· Private foundation

Odyssey Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$380k
Granted FY2024still arriving
6
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$126k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your fieldRead
01What you fund
0196% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2024.

Arts & Culture$345kHealth$271kEducation$196kInternational$170kRecreation & Sports$150kHousing & Shelter$120kEnvironment$100kCivil Rights$60kOther$0
02FY2024 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k1 grant · $40k
  • $50k–250k5 grants · $340k
$54,717
Median grant
3
States reached
$5.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LIMON EDUCATION FOUNDATION$125,652
JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF N NEVADA$60,000
CLEAN UP THE LAKE$54,717
FOOD BANK OF THE ROCKIES$50,000
SEATTLE BACH FESTIVAL$50,000
CRAIG HOSPITAL$40,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY20–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 91% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%STANFORD STUDENT ENTERPRISES: $60k → 8%SHOOT FOR THE STARS: $42k → 9%PROFESSIONAL SKI INSTRUCTORS OF AME: $45k → 11%COLLABORATIONS TEACHERS AND ARTISTS: $60k → 11%FRIENDS WITHOUT A BORDER: $110k → 17%VOICE IN SPORT FOUNDATION: $60k → 20%THE VIOLA DE GAMBA SOCIETY: $30k → 16%LIBERIAN ASSISTANCE PROGRAM: $15k → 10%CRAIG HOSPITAL: $63k → 8%KEYSTINE SCIENCE CAMP: $15k → 9%CROHNS & COLITIS FOUNDATION: $40k → 12%LIMON EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $126k → 16%SEATTLE BACH FESTIVAL: $50k → 9%CENTER FOR WHALE RESEARCH: $30k → 10%SOUND EXPERIENCE: $55k → 11%HEALWELL: $69k → 7%THE HAVEN: $120k → 8%CLEAN UP THE LAKE: $55k → 8%NEVADA MUSEUM OF ART: $150k → 10%CRAIG HOSPITAL: $40k → 8%FOOD BANK OF THE ROCKIES: $50k → 12%NATIVE ACTION NETWORK: $60k → 9%CLEAN UP THE LAKE: $45k → 8%JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF N NEVADA: $60k → 10%JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT-ROCKY MOUNTAIN INC: $45k → 8%ARAPAHOE LIBRARY FRIENDS FOUNDATION: $10k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

WA
WI
NY
NV
CA
CO
VA
KS

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 13% of Odyssey Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.

Odyssey Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Colorado Museum of Natural History

Be a catalyst! Ignite our community's passion for nature and science.

Arts & Culture
2
Alaska Whale Foundation

Alaska Whale Foundation is dedicated to marine mammal conservation through research monitoring and education.

Environment
3
Arbor Research Collaborative for Health

Arbor research collaborative for health is committed to improving patient care through research that shapes medical policies and practice. in particular, arbor research conducts health outcomes research on chronic disease and end-stage…

Health
4
Cascades Carnivore Project

Our mission is to study and restore carnivore populations at risk of extinction and the mountain ecosystems they call home through innovative science, strong partnerships and local community action.

Science & Tech
5
The Foundation for Medical Excellence

To promote excellence in medicine, to improve the quality of healthcare and to advance sound health policy in the pacific northwest through education programs, collaborative initiatives and research.

Education
6
Colorado Physician Health Program Corporation

The mission of the Colorado Physician Health Program Corporation is to promote the health and well-being of physicians and physician assistants through evaluation, treatment referral, support education and research.

Health
7
Renown Health

Renown Health makes a genuine difference in the health and well-being of the people and communities we serve.

Health
8
Honnold Foundation

Funding solar energy solutions, building capacity, and amplifying local leadership for those experiencing the greatest impacts from climate change, economic instability, and social injustice.

Environment
9
Cowiche Canyon Conservancy

Protecting our shrub-steppe and connecting people to this vanishing landscape.

—
10
Aquarium of the Pacific Corporation

The aquarium of the pacific's mission is to instill a sense of wonder, respect, and stewardship for the pacific ocean, its inhabitants, and ecosystems.

Animals
11
CarbonPlan

Improving the transparency and scientific integrity of climate solutions through open data and tools.

Environment
12
Regional West Health Services

Health care services for the people of western nebraska and eastern wyoming.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Crohn's & Colitis Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is The Haven Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 26 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/18
Grantees still filing
12/18
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Individual grant recipient — $60,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF N NEVADA — $60,000 · OtherJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF N NEVADACOLLABORATIONS TEACHERS AND ARTISTS — $60,000 · OtherCOLLABORATIONS TEACHERS AND ARTISTSVOICE IN SPORT FOUNDATION — $60,000 · OtherVOICE IN SPORT FOUNDATIONTHE CHANDA PLAN FOUNDATION — $59,805 · OtherTHE CHANDA PLAN FOUNDATIONPROFESSIONAL SKI INSTRUCTORS OF AME — $45,000 · OtherPROFESSIONAL SKI INSTRUCTORS OF AMESHOOT FOR THE STARS — $42,300 · OtherSHOOT FOR THE STARSTHE VIOLA DE GAMBA SOCIETY — $30,000 · OtherACHIEVE TAHOE — $30,000 · OtherJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT-ROCKY MOUNTAIN INC — $45,000 · OtherJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT-ROCKY MOUNTAIN INCFOOD BANK OF THE ROCKIES — $50,000 · OtherFOOD BANK OF THE ROCKIES+2 more — $30,000 · OtherNevada Museum of Art — $150,000 · Arts & CultureNevada Museum of A…NATIVE ACTION NETWORK — $60,000 · Arts & CultureNATIVE ACTION NETW…Seattle Bach Festival — $50,000 · Arts & CultureSeattle Bach Festi…LIMON EDUCATION FOUNDATION — $125,652 · EducationLIMON EDUCATION F…FRIENDS WITHOUT A BORDER — $110,000 · EducationFRIENDS WITHOUT A…ARAPAHOE LIBRARY FRIENDS FOUNDATION INC — $10,000 · EducationCraig Hospital — $102,500 · HealthCraig HospitalHealwell — $69,000 · HealthHealwellCROHN'S & COLITIS FOUNDATION INC — $40,000 · HealthCROHN'S & COLIT…THE HAVEN INC — $120,000 · Housing & ShelterCLEAN UP THE CAYES dba CLEAN UP THE LAKE — $99,717 · EnvironmentSound Experience — $55,000 · Science & TechCENTER FOR WHALE RESEARCH — $30,000 · Science & Tech
Other$572,105Arts & Culture$260,000Education$245,652Health$211,500Housing & Shelter$120,000Environment$99,717Science & Tech$85,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetNevada Museum of Art — $150,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetLIMON EDUCATION FOUNDATION — $125,652 over 1y, 64% of budgetFRIENDS WITHOUT A BORDER — $110,000 over 1y, 3.7% of budgetCraig Hospital — $102,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCLEAN UP THE CAYES dba CLEAN UP THE LAKE — $99,717 over 2y, 7.7% of budgetHealwell — $69,000 over 1y, 10% of budgetNATIVE ACTION NETWORK — $60,000 over 1y, 4.6% of budgetTHE CHANDA PLAN FOUNDATION — $59,805 over 1y, 4.3% of budgetSound Experience — $55,000 over 1y, 6.2% of budgetFOOD BANK OF THE ROCKIES — $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSeattle Bach Festival — $50,000 over 1y, 17% of budgetJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT-ROCKY MOUNTAIN INC — $45,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCROHN'S & COLITIS FOUNDATION INC — $40,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCENTER FOR WHALE RESEARCH — $30,000 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetACHIEVE TAHOE — $30,000 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetLiberian Assistance Program Inc — $15,000 over 1y, 20% of budgetARAPAHOE LIBRARY FRIENDS FOUNDATION INC — $10,000 over 1y, 5.5% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Morgan Stanley Global…Network for GoodPaypal Charitable Giv…American Online Givin…National Philanthropi…Vanguard Charitable E…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust IncIN10.8× affinity7 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Network for Good · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Odyssey Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 26 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home
    State money flows
    the interactive map of money crossing state lines