Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Ocean Rain Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$36k
Granted FY2024still arriving
17
Grants FY2024still arriving
8
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Education$398kHealth$109kCrime & Legal$11kRecreation & Sports$10kPublic Benefit$10kAnimals$7kArts & Culture$6kHuman Services$6kOther$0
02FY2024 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k16 grants · $26k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$1,030
Median grant
8
States reached
$406k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BLEEDING BLUE$10,000
BOWERY RESIDENTS' COMMITTEE$5,000
MEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING CANCER CENTER$5,000
UCONN FOUNDATION$3,500
ANIMAL RESCUE FUND OF THE HAMPTONS$1,637
SENIOR CAT ACTION NETWORK INC$1,150
BEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY$1,046
WIKIMEDIA$1,040
EVERYCAT$1,030
SHOE4AFRICA$1,000
KITTYKIND$1,000
THE FLAWLESS FOUNDATION$1,000
NORTH SHORE ANIMAL LEAGUE$1,000
EVERYTOWN$1,000
PAN MASS CHALLENGE$500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–24, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%BOWERY RESIDENTS' COMMITTEE: $5k → 17%EXHALE TO INHALE INC: $374 → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

NY
MA
IA
NJ
CT
CA
UT
DE
TN
DC
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 48% of Ocean Rain Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 23% of the giving stays in NY; read by stated purpose it is 19% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

Ocean Rain Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 2.1% directed abroad (not shown)

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$443k · 12 repeat orgs$48k to everyone else

12 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2024, 9 since wound down; 14 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
12

Total granted

$443k
$17k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+40%
+40%

Still filing today

58%
75%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 14% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $31k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthRecreation & SportsAnimalsEducationCrime & LegalHuman ServicesOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TU
    THE UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT FOUNDATION INC
    4× · 2018–2024 · $304k · revenue +102%
  • PC
    PACKER COLLEGIATE INSTITUTE
    3× · 2017–2021 · $21k · revenue +42%
  • CF
    Connecticut Flag Football League Inc
    2× · 2021–2023 · $10k · revenue +248%

Funded once

  • CL
    CIVICA LATINO
    one grant, 2018 · $10k
  • TH
    THE HAMPTONS INTERNATIONAL FILM FESTIVAL INC
    one grant, 2019 · $2k · revenue +14%
  • THE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCHgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $1k · revenue +213%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Multiple Myeloma Research Foundation Inc

The multiple myeloma research foundation (mmrf) is the largest nonprofit in the world solely focused on accelerating acurefor multiple myeloma patient. we drive the development and delivery of next-generation therapies, leverage data to…

Health
2
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
3
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
4
MRIGlobal

To improve the lives of people through innovative scientific and engineering research.

Science & Tech
5
Asco Association

Asco association promotes the common business interests of its members by: (1) advocating for policies that improve the quality of cancer care; (2) maintaining the highest standards of oncology medical care through programs supporting…

Community Improvement
6
International Biomedical Research Alliance

Our mission is to invest in and accelerate the development of the most promising future leaders in biomedical research with global impact.

Health
7
American Cancer Society Inc

Improve the lives of people with cancer and their families through advocacy, research, and patient support, to ensure everyone has an opportunity to prevent, detect, treat, and survive cancer.

Health
8
American Society of Clinical Oncology Inc

See schedule o:asco is a professional oncology society committed to conquering cancer through research, education, and promotion of the highest quality patient care.

Health
9
New York Blood Center Inc

As one of the most preeminent and comprehensive blood centers in theworld, nybc operates under a four-part mission. for more information,see sch. o and part iii, 4a-c.

Health
10
Commonwealth Cancer Consortium Inc

Break through cancer is a foundation dedicated to supporting translational research in the most difficult to treat cancers. our partner organizations are among the top cancer research centers and together, represent some of the most…

11
Breastcancerorg

Our mission is to help people make sense of the complex medical and personal information about breast health and breast cancer, so they can make the best decisions for their lives.

Health
12
Federation of State Medical Boards of the United States Inc

The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is March of Dimes Inc and the most unlike its peers is Bleeding Blue Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyYouth Sports Booster Organi…Public University Foundatio…Animal Rescue and AdoptionCancer Support OrganizationsCommunity Arts OrganizationsSouth Asian Cultural and Sp…Ymca Community CentersPregnancy Support ServicesIndependent K-8 SchoolsFaith-Based Liberal Arts Co…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 48 years old; the field is 21. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number18%4%<5yr12%13%5–10yr18%13%10–20yr18%17%20–35yr14%21%35–55yr20%33%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value18%2%<5yr12%5%5–10yr18%0%10–20yr18%2%20–35yr14%17%35–55yr20%74%55yr+

The field is 18% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/29
the rest of the field
10%
2,154/22,416

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

27 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 27 of the 40 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
27/27
Grantees still filing
14/27
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

THE UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT FOUNDATION INC — $303,500 · EducationTHE UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT FOUNDATION INCTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK — $70,000 · EducationTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORKPACKER COLLEGIATE INSTITUTE — $21,025 · Education+1 more — $1,000 · EducationTHE DAVID LYNCH FOUNDATION — $87,628 · OtherTHE DAVID LYNCH FOUNDA…+20 more — $24,651 · Other+20 moreCIVICA LATINO — $10,000 · Recreation & SportsConnecticut Flag Football League Inc — $10,000 · Recreation & SportsSHOE4AFRICA INC — $1,000 · Recreation & Sports+1 more — $275 · Recreation & SportsBLEEDING BLUE INC — $10,000 · Crime & LegalEVERYTOWN FOR GUN SAFETY SUPPORT FUND INC — $500 · Crime & LegalMEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CENTER — $5,000 · HealthNATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY — $2,500 · HealthTHE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCH — $1,000 · HealthMARCH OF DIMES INC — $1,000 · Health+1 more — $250 · HealthTHE BREAST CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC — $6,000 · Public Safety & DisasterNETWORK FOR GOOD — $1,030 · Public Safety & DisasterBOWERY RESIDENTS COMMITTEE INC — $5,000 · Human ServicesEXHALE TO INHALE INC — $374 · Human Services
Education$395,525Other$112,279Recreation & Sports$21,275Crime & Legal$10,500Health$9,750Public Safety & Disaster$7,030Human Services$5,374

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTHE UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT FOUNDATION INC — $303,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK — $70,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetPACKER COLLEGIATE INSTITUTE — $21,025 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBLEEDING BLUE INC — $10,000 over 1y, 2.8% of budgetConnecticut Flag Football League Inc — $10,000 over 2y, 3.7% of budgetTHE BREAST CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC — $6,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBOWERY RESIDENTS COMMITTEE INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CENTER — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPAN-MASSACHUSETTS CHALLENGE INC — $2,552 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY — $2,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetFlawless Foundation — $2,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetTHE HAMPTONS INTERNATIONAL FILM FESTIVAL INC — $1,760 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetANIMAL RESCUE FUND OF THE HAMPTONS INC — $1,637 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY — $1,046 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNETWORK FOR GOOD — $1,030 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKITTYKIND INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetSHOE4AFRICA INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCH — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWIKIMEDIA FOUNDATION INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNORTH SHORE ANIMAL LEAGUE AMERICA INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION RETIREMENT FUND — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEVERYTOWN FOR GUN SAFETY SUPPORT FUND INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEXHALE TO INHALE INC — $374 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetINTANDEM CYCLING INC — $275 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE ANDREW MCDONOUGH B FOUNDATION — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGUILD HALL OF EAST HAMPTON INC — $55 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift FundNY12.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift Fund · Jewish Communal Fund · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · National Philanthropic Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Ocean Rain Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 50%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 0%
  • Pan-Massachusetts Challenge Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
5get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 40 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph