Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersAlso receives grants — funding profile →
Plinth

· Public charity

North Texas Healthy Communities

Focus on the delivery of community benefit through well-being improvement initiatives.

$3.9M
Granted FY2024still arriving
24
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$674k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.

Health$5.0MPhilanthropy$2.5MFood & Nutrition$2.0MCommunity Improvement$1.8MEducation$1.8MHuman Services$1.6MCrime & Legal$1.2MPublic Benefit$909kOther$0
02FY2024 · 24 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k5 grants · $165k
  • $50k–250k14 grants · $1.7M
  • $250k+5 grants · $2.0M
$130,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Center for Nonprofit Management$674,100
Eastside Community Assistance$381,600
City of Bridgeport$358,600
Taste Project$321,463
Meadows Mental Health Policy Inst of TX$310,000
Plano ISD Counseling Svc$199,536
Wilkinson Center$160,000
Concilio$145,500
Geriatric Wellness Ctr Collin County$140,000
American Heart Association$140,000
Brother Bills Helping Hand$130,779
Health Services of North TX Inc$130,000
North Dallas Shared Ministries$117,010
Parker County Center of Hope$113,160
JED Foundation$100,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY21–24, $2.2M) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 78% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Parker County Center of Hope: $223k → 8%Eastside Community Assistance: $499k → 11%Parker County Center of Hope: $113k → 8%Eastside Community Assistance: $382k → 11%Parker County Center of Hope: $87k → 8%Eastside Community Assistance: $108k → 11%Parker County Center of Hope: $70k → 8%Eastside Community Assistance: $86k → 11%YMCA of Metropolitan Fort Worth: $10k → 11%Womens Center of Tarrant County: $30k → 11%Jubilee Park & Community Center: $38k → 14%Men of Nehemiah Inc: $100k → 14%Dallas Children's Advocacy Center: $41k → 14%Concilio: $150k → 14%Concilio: $146k → 14%North Dallas Shared Ministries: $117k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$17M · 31 repeat orgs$1.0M to everyone else

31 repeat relationships — 17 still active in FY2024, 14 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

31
13

Total granted

$17M
$492k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+18%
+28%

Still filing today

65%
54%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 86% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $548k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesHealthEducationPhilanthropyCommunity ImprovementCrime & LegalOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CF
    CENTER FOR NONPROFIT MANAGEMENT INC
    4× · 2021–2024 · $1.8M · revenue +50% · 35% of their budget
  • TC
    THE CENTER FOR INTEGRATIVE COUNSELING AND PSYCHOLOGY
    5× · 2019–2023 · $1.2M · revenue +99%
  • CA
    CHILDRENS ADVOCACY CENTER FOR NORTH TEXAS INC
    4× · 2019–2022 · $1.2M · revenue +44%

Funded once

  • SE
    Sanger Education Foundation Incgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $90k · revenue +40% · 34% of their budget
  • CO
    CITY OF FORT WORTH
    one grant, 2017 · $87k
  • TI
    TERRELL ISD
    one grant, 2023 · $65k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Dallas-Fort Worth Hospital Council

The mission of the Dallas-Fort Worth Hospital Council is to drive evidence-based improvement in patient care and health equity throughout the region.

—
2
The Dallas County System of Services Inc

To unify services across Dallas County, to empower youth, strengthen families and build safe, healthy communities.

Human Services
3
Your Health Clinic

Empowering north texans to optimize health through outreach, education, prevention, evidence-based interventions, integration, and quality measurement.

—
4
United Way of Brazoria County

To educate, unite and focus our community's resources in order to efficiently address the most critical needs of Brazoria County

Philanthropy
5
Texas Water Foundation

Texas water foundation is a statewide nonprofit that provides educational resources and educational services on water in texas for decision makers, water professionals, and everyday texans. texas water foundation works in the areas of…

Environment
6
North Texas Christian Foundation

National Christian Foundation North Texas (NCFNT) was created to facilitate smarter Christian giving with sophisticated charitable techniques.

Philanthropy
7
Texas Health Harris Methodist Hospital Fort Worth

A faith-based organization whose mission is to improve the health of the people in the communities it serves regardless of their ability to pay.

Health
8
Baylor Scott & White Medical Centers - Greater North Texas

Founded as a Christian ministry of healing, Baylor Scott & White Health (BSWH) promotes the well-being of all individuals, families and communities.

Health
9
West Texas Food Bank

The WTFB exists to collect, purchase, and distribute food to feed the hungry in 19 counties in West Texas in partnership with volunteers and community organizations and to educate these partners and the public at large about the real face…

—
10
East Texas Community Clinic Inc

To provide comprehensive primary care and preventive care to all persons regardless of their ability to pay.

—
11
Mission East Dallas and Metroplex

To provide Medical and Dental Care to all patients in Dallas and its surrounding cities regardless of ability to pay.

—
12
Raise Texas

RAISE Texas advances equitable policies and programs that foster financial security and economic mobility for low- and moderate-income Texans. We equip, innovate and advocate to reduce disparities, remove barriers and build opportunities…

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Dallas Children's Advocacy Center and the most unlike its peers is Max Factor Family Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 36 years old; the field is 11. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number28%3%<5yr17%0%5–10yr19%19%10–20yr15%24%20–35yr8%30%35–55yr13%24%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value28%2%<5yr17%0%5–10yr19%19%10–20yr15%29%20–35yr8%32%35–55yr13%18%55yr+

The field is 28% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 17% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
2%1/45
the rest of the field
17%
5,734/34,653

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

35 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 35 of the 51 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

8
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
34/35
Grantees still filing
18/35
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

City of Bridgeport — $858,850 · OtherCity of BridgeportERATH COUNTY UNITED WAY — $539,966 · OtherERATH COUNTY UNITED WAYSanger Independent School District — $478,580 · OtherSanger Independent School DistrictPlano ISD Counseling Svc — $448,956 · OtherPlano ISD Counseling SvcLAKE POINTE BAPTIST CHURCH — $345,000 · OtherLAKE POINTE BAPTIST CHURCHMaurice Barnett Geriatric Wellness Center Inc — $315,000 · OtherMaurice Barnett Geriatric Wellness C…UNIVERSITY OF NORTH TEXAS AT DALLAS FOUNDATION — $284,992 · OtherSENIOR CONNECT — $270,000 · OtherAVANCE PROGRAM INC — $232,164 · OtherFort Worth ISD — $212,000 · OtherTASTE PROJECT — $920,114 · OtherTASTE PROJECT+12 more — $860,577 · Other+12 moreTHE CENTER FOR INTEGRATIVE COUNSELING AND PSYCHOLOGY — $1,212,900 · HealthTHE CENTER FOR INTEGR…LIFEPATH SYSTEMS FOUNDATION — $880,000 · HealthLIFEPATH SYSTEMS FOUN…MEADOWS MENTAL HEALTH POLICY INSTITUTE FOR TEXAS — $510,000 · HealthMEADOWS MENTAL HEALTH…American Heart Association Inc — $245,000 · HealthAmerican Heart Associ…HEALTH SERVICES OF NORTH TEXAS INC — $227,500 · HealthHEALTH SERVICES OF NO…+3 more — $236,461 · Health+3 moreEASTSIDE MINISTRIES OF FT WORTH — $1,073,892 · Human ServicesEASTSIDE MINI…PARKER COUNTY CENTER OF HOPE INC — $493,218 · Human ServicesPARKER COUNTY…THE CONCILIO — $295,500 · Human ServicesTHE CONCILIONORTH DALLAS SHARED MINISTRIES INC — $117,010 · Human ServicesMEN OF NEHEMIAH INC — $100,000 · Human Services+4 more — $119,200 · Human Services+4 moreUNITED WAY OF TARRANT COUNTY — $1,647,500 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY O…UNITED WAY OF JOHNSON COUNTY INC — $270,000 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY O…+1 more — $25,000 · PhilanthropyCENTER FOR NONPROFIT MANAGEMENT INC — $1,774,200 · Community ImprovementCENTER FOR …+1 more — $25,700 · Community ImprovementPLANO ISD EDUCATION FOUNDATION — $892,237 · EducationPLANO ISD …WILKINSON CENTER — $360,000 · EducationWILKINSON …TARLETON STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION — $270,000 · EducationTARLETON S…Sanger Education Foundation Inc — $90,000 · EducationSanger Edu…+1 more — $25,000 · EducationCHILDRENS ADVOCACY CENTER FOR NORTH TEXAS INC — $1,162,440 · Crime & Legal
Other$5,766,199Health$3,311,861Human Services$2,198,820Philanthropy$1,942,500Community Improvement$1,799,900Education$1,637,237Crime & Legal$1,162,440

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCENTER FOR NONPROFIT MANAGEMENT INC — $1,774,200 over 4y, 35% of budgetUNITED WAY OF TARRANT COUNTY — $1,647,500 over 4y, 2.8% of budgetTHE CENTER FOR INTEGRATIVE COUNSELING AND PSYCHOLOGY — $1,212,900 over 5y, 10.0% of budgetCHILDRENS ADVOCACY CENTER FOR NORTH TEXAS INC — $1,162,440 over 4y, 6.3% of budgetEASTSIDE MINISTRIES OF FT WORTH — $1,073,892 over 4y, 69% of budgetTASTE PROJECT — $920,114 over 2y, 23% of budgetPLANO ISD EDUCATION FOUNDATION — $892,237 over 5y, 29% of budgetLIFEPATH SYSTEMS FOUNDATION — $880,000 over 5y, 34% of budgetERATH COUNTY UNITED WAY — $539,966 over 2y, 69% of budgetMEADOWS MENTAL HEALTH POLICY INSTITUTE FOR TEXAS — $510,000 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetPARKER COUNTY CENTER OF HOPE INC — $493,218 over 4y, 7.2% of budgetWILKINSON CENTER — $360,000 over 2y, 6.3% of budgetMaurice Barnett Geriatric Wellness Center Inc — $315,000 over 2y, 20% of budgetTHE CONCILIO — $295,500 over 2y, 4.8% of budgetUNITED WAY OF JOHNSON COUNTY INC — $270,000 over 2y, 34% of budgetTARLETON STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION — $270,000 over 2y, 9.4% of budgetSENIOR CONNECT — $270,000 over 2y, 12% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc — $245,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHEALTH SERVICES OF NORTH TEXAS INC — $227,500 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetBROTHER BILLS HELPING HAND — $143,279 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetNORTH DALLAS SHARED MINISTRIES INC — $117,010 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetTHE JED FOUNDATION — $100,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetMEN OF NEHEMIAH INC — $100,000 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetWATERMARK HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION — $97,810 over 1y, 3.9% of budgetSanger Education Foundation Inc — $90,000 over 1y, 34% of budgetMAX FACTOR FAMILY FOUNDATION — $53,500 over 1y, 4.2% of budgetDALLAS LEADERSHIP FOUNDATION — $50,361 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetDALLAS CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER — $40,800 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTexas Health Resources — $38,651 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJUBILEE PARK & COMMUNITY CENTER CORPORATION — $38,400 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetTHE WOMEN'S CENTER OF TARRANT COUNTY FOUNDATION — $30,000 over 1y, 32% of budgetSEARCH INSTITUTE — $25,700 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetLewisville Education Foundation Inc — $25,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetUNITED WAY OF METROPOLITAN DALLAS INC — $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYMCA of Metropolitan Fort Worth — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Communities Foundatio…United Way of Metropo…Community Foundation …The Dallas FoundationTexas Women's Foundat…Texas Instruments Fou…Hillcrest FoundationThe Moody FoundationSid W Richardson Foun…Meadows Foundation IncAmerica's CharitiesEpiscopal Health Foun…
Communities Foundation of Texas IncTX40.6× affinity23 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Communities Foundation of Texas Inc · United Way of Metropolitan Dallas Inc · Community Foundation of North Texas (Tax · The Dallas Foundation · Texas Women's Foundation · Texas Instruments Foundation · Hillcrest Foundation · The Moody Foundation · Sid W Richardson Foundation · Meadows Foundation Inc · America's Charities · Episcopal Health Foundation Of Dallas

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization North Texas Healthy Communities funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to North Texas Healthy Communities?

    Find your warmest path to North Texas Healthy Communities through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 51 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home
    State money flows
    the interactive map of money crossing state lines