· Private foundation
North Easton Savings Bank Charitable Foundation Inc
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2023–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k155 grants · $285k
- $10k–50k7 grants · $129k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| My Brother's Keeper Inc | $46,758 |
| Old Colony YMCA | $25,400 |
| Town of Norton | $13,000 |
| Town of Mansfield | $12,750 |
| Society of St Vincent De Paul in the Archdiocese of Boston Inc | $11,250 |
| Habitat for Humanity of Greater Plymouth | $10,000 |
| Town of Easton | $10,000 |
| Natural Resources Trust of Easton | $8,837 |
| Individual grant recipient | $7,500 |
| Mansfield Youth Football & Cheer | $7,500 |
| The Charity Guild Inc | $7,000 |
| House of Possibilities Inc (HOPe) | $6,000 |
| Norton Historical Society Inc | $5,300 |
| Easton Food Pantry Inc | $5,100 |
| Our Daily Bread Mansfield Food Pantry Inc | $5,100 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY23–25, $236k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 61% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +6% since the first grant, against +4% for the ones you funded once.
119 repeat relationships — 109 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 53 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 80% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $81k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- OCOLD COLONY YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION INC3× · 2023–2025 · $61k · revenue +19%
- SOSOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL3× · 2023–2025 · $37k · revenue +10%
- FBFATHER BILL'S & MAINSPRING INC3× · 2023–2025 · $35k · revenue +30%
Funded once
- AYATTLEBORO YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATIONgraduatedone grant, 2023 · $18k · revenue +31%
- MSMETRO SOUTH CHAMBER OF COMMERCE FOUNDATION INCone grant, 2023 · $8k · revenue +10% · 44% of their budget
- WHWhitman Hanson Regional School Districtone grant, 2024 · $5k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
250th Town of Cohasset, MA celebrations
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jc Solmonese Parents Organization Inc and the most unlike its peers is Make Me Brand New. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 16 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 19% of your grantees by number, and just 8% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 3% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
153 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2026, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 153 of the 224 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds My Brothers Keeper Inc ↗
- Who funds OLD COLONY YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL ↗
- Who funds FATHER BILL'S & MAINSPRING INC ↗
- Who funds Habitat for Humanity of Greater Plymouth ↗
- Who funds HOUSE OF POSSIBILITIES INC ↗
- Who funds NATURAL RESOURCES TRUST OF EASTON ↗
- Who funds THE LIONS CLUB OF EASTON FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds ATTLEBORO YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds THE CHARITY GUILD INC ↗
- Who funds EASTON FOOD PANTRY INC ↗
- Who funds COACHING FOR CHANGE INC ↗
- Who funds MANSFIELD YOUTH FOOTBALL AND CHEER INC ↗
- Who funds OUR DAILY BREAD MANSFIELD FOOD PANTRY INC ↗
- Who funds MANSFIELD HELPING HANDS OF GOD INC ↗
- Who funds JOE ANDRUZZI FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds SCHOOL ON WHEELS OF MASSACHUSETTS INC ↗
- Who funds SOUTH SHORE HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC ↗
- Who funds OLD COLONY HABITAT FOR HUMANITY ↗
- Who funds STURDY HEALTH FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds PLYMOUTH AREA COALITION FOR THE HOMELESS ↗
- Who funds STONEHILL COLLEGE INC ↗
- Who funds THE BROCKTON LIBRARY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds NEIGHBORHOOD REINVESTMENT CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF PLYMOUTH ↗
- Who funds MANSFIELD HIGH SCHOOL BOOSTERS CLUB INC ↗
- Who funds HANSON FOOD PANTRY INC (AKA HANSON FOOD PANTRY) ↗
- Who funds SHANE GIVES THANKS INC ↗
- Who funds THE BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF METRO SOUTH INC ↗
- Who funds CUPBOARD OF KINDNESS INC ↗
- Who funds METRO SOUTH CHAMBER OF COMMERCE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds LOVE LIFE NOW FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds AMES FREE LIBRARY OF EASTON INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Bluestone Bank Charitable Foundation Inc · Eastern Bank Foundation · Rockland Trust Charitable Foundation Inc · The Harborone Foundation · Bristol County Savings Charitable Foundation Inc · Arbella Insurance Foundation · Mansfield Community Charitable Foundation Inc · Massachusetts Bankers Association Charitable Foundation Inc · Abington Bank Community Foundation Inc F/K/A Envision Bank Foundation Inc · Southcoast Community Foundation Inc · South Shore Bank Charitable Foundation Inc · Goddard Health Services Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization North Easton Savings Bank Charitable Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Habitat for Humanity of Greater Plymouth — 100% of income from government
- Community Autism Resources Inc — 92% of income from government
- Road to Responsibility Inc — 92% of income from government
- The Nemasket Group Inc — 91% of income from government
- Brockton Area Arc Inc — 91% of income from government
- Learn to Cope Inc — 89% of income from government
- House of Possibilities Inc — 76% of income from government
- New Hope Inc — 73% of income from government
- New England Village Inc — 68% of income from government
- Kennedy-Donovan Center Inc — 62% of income from government
- United Way of Greater Plymouth County in — 56% of income from government
- Family and Community Resources Inc — 54% of income from government
- South Shore Stars Inc — 54% of income from government
- The May Institute Inc — 47% of income from government
- Health Resources in Action Inc — 39% of income from government
- Cape Verdean Women United Inc — 37% of income from government
- Father Bill's & Mainspring Inc — 24% of income from government
- Greater Boston Food Bank Inc — 22% of income from government
- To the Moon and Back — 21% of income from government
- South Shore Community Action Council Inc — 20% of income from government
- Southcoast Hospitals Group Inc — 15% of income from government
- Digger Foods Inc — 15% of income from government
- The Boys & Girls Clubs of Metro South Inc — 13% of income from government
- Friends and Mentors — 12% of income from government
- Community Servings Inc — 12% of income from government
- Epilepsy Foundation New England — 11% of income from government
- The Charity Guild Inc — 10% of income from government
- Raising Multicultural Kids — 8% of income from government
- School On Wheels of Massachusetts Inc — 7% of income from government
- Coaching for Change Inc — 5% of income from government
- Girls On the Run Greater Boston — 4% of income from government
- Easton Food Pantry Inc — 4% of income from government
- The Carroll Center for the Blind Inc — 3% of income from government
- Bridgewater State University Foundation — 2% of income from government
- Norton Historical Society Inc — 2% of income from government
- The Pilgrim Society — 1% of income from government
- Brockton Visiting Nurse Association Inc — 1% of income from government
- Haitian Community Partners Foundation Inc — 1% of income from government
- Plimoth Patuxet Museums Inc — 1% of income from government
- Mass Insight Education and Research Institute Inc — 1% of income from government
- Hope and Comfort Inc — 1% of income from government
- The Children's Museum in Easton Inc — 1% of income from government
- Brockton Area Multi-Services Inc — 0% of income from government
- Stonehill College Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to North Easton Savings Bank Charitable Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to North Easton Savings Bank Charitable Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.