· Private foundation
Goddard Health Services Inc
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k34 grants · $112k
- $10k–50k6 grants · $104k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| BROCKTON VISITING NURSES ASSOCIATION | $20,000 |
| BAMSI | $20,000 |
| BROCKTON NEIGHBORHOOD HEALTH CENTER | $20,000 |
| SEVITA CONNECTED CARE | $19,294 |
| THE CHARITY GUILD | $15,000 |
| LIVING INDEPENDENTLY FOR EQUALITY | $10,000 |
| MY BROTHERS KEEPER | $7,000 |
| EASTON CHARITABLE TRUST INC (FESTIVAL OF TREES) | $5,000 |
| ARC OF GREATER BROCKTON | $5,000 |
| SCHOOL ON WHEELS OF MA | $5,000 |
| BROCKTON DAY NURSERY INC | $5,000 |
| FATHER BILLS & MAINSPRING HOUSE | $5,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $5,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $3,500 |
| NAKAYLA CENTEIO | $3,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $208k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 6%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +69% since the first grant, against +21% for the ones you funded once.
58 repeat relationships — 15 still active in FY2024, 43 since wound down; 25 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 54% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $99k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- SHSignature Healthcare Corporation2× · 2019–2020 · $118k · revenue +124%
- BNBROCKTON NEIGHBORHOOD HEALTH CENTER INC6× · 2017–2024 · $117k · revenue +52%
- OCOLD COLONY YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION INC4× · 2017–2021 · $77k · revenue +49%
Funded once
- BKBROCKTON KNOCKS DOWN DIABETESone grant, 2017 · $25k
- KSKING SOLOMON HUMANITARIAN FOUNDATION FOR HANDICAPPED CHILDREN INCone grant, 2017 · $10k · revenue -95%
- MAMASSACHUSETTS ASSOCIATION FOR THE BLINDone grant, 2019 · $10k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Beyond the boundries, inc is a lifestyle center designed for children and adults with developmental and intellectual disabilities, and their families.
The brien center provides a continuum of care for children, adolescents, adults and families living with significant and persistent mental health and substance use disorders. we are guided by the belief that everyone in berkshire county…
Patient care, teaching, research and serving the community.
To provide services to individuals who were disabled due to or during their military service.
charitable, educational, and social welfare services.
Helping adults and children with disabilities, (incl asd), become full participants in the community.
The ymca of greater boston is dedicated to improving the health of mind, body, and spirit of individuals and families in our communities. we promote welcoming, belonging, and opportunity for all.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Brockton Area Arc Inc and the most unlike its peers is Smashmouth Wresting Club Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 33 years old; the field is 13. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 11% of your grantees by number, and just 3% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
29 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 29 of the 179 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Signature Healthcare Corporation ↗
- Who funds BROCKTON NEIGHBORHOOD HEALTH CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds Brockton Visiting Nurse Association Inc ↗
- Who funds OLD COLONY YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds HEALTH IMPERATIVES INC ↗
- Who funds THE BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF METRO SOUTH INC ↗
- Who funds My Brothers Keeper Inc ↗
- Who funds FATHER BILL'S & MAINSPRING INC ↗
- Who funds THE CHARITY GUILD INC ↗
- Who funds LIVING INDEPENDENTLY FOR EQUALITY I ↗
- Who funds Brockton Day Nursery Inc ↗
- Who funds SCHOOL ON WHEELS OF MASSACHUSETTS INC ↗
- Who funds SUPPORT OUR LIBRARY ASSOCIATIONINC ↗
- Who funds BROCKTON AREA ARC INC ↗
- Who funds DJ HENRY DREAM FUND INC ↗
- Who funds Massasoit Community College Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds EASTON FOOD PANTRY INC ↗
- Who funds SUNSHINE FARM SANCTUARY INC ↗
- Who funds West Bridgewater Food Pantry Inc ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: North Easton Savings Bank Charitable Foundation Inc · Rockland Trust Charitable Foundation Inc · United Way of Greater Plymouth County In · Eastern Bank Foundation · Bluestone Bank Charitable Foundation Inc · Mansfield Community Charitable Foundation Inc · Boston Foundation Inc · Abington Bank Community Foundation Inc F/K/A Envision Bank Foundation Inc · Goddard Restorative Care Unit Inc · The Harborone Foundation · Southcoast Community Foundation Inc · Arbella Insurance Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Goddard Health Services Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Brockton Area Arc Inc — 91% of income from government
- Health Imperatives Inc — 79% of income from government
- House of Possibilities Inc — 76% of income from government
- Mab Community Services Inc — 69% of income from government
- Living Independently for Equality I — 46% of income from government
- Brockton Day Nursery Inc — 36% of income from government
- Father Bill's & Mainspring Inc — 24% of income from government
- The Boys & Girls Clubs of Metro South Inc — 13% of income from government
- The Charity Guild Inc — 10% of income from government
- Brockton Neighborhood Health Center Inc — 9% of income from government
- School On Wheels of Massachusetts Inc — 7% of income from government
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc — 7% of income from government
- Easton Food Pantry Inc — 4% of income from government
- Brockton Visiting Nurse Association Inc — 1% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.