· Private foundation
Mansfield Community Charitable Foundation Inc
Its FY2022 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 41% of MANSFIELD COMMUNITY CHARITABLE FOUNDATION INC’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2021
- Under $10k10 grants · $33k
- $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| MMAS | $50,000 |
| NEW HOPE INC | $10,000 |
| NORTON ENERGY FUNDST VINCENT DE PAUL | $5,000 |
| HORACE MANN EDUCATIONAL ASSOCIATESHMEA | $5,000 |
| MY BROTHER'S KEEPER | $5,000 |
| CITIZENS SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION OF MANSFIELD | $3,500 |
| JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF SOUTHERN MA | $3,000 |
| GILLY'S HOUSE | $3,000 |
| NORTON SINGERS INC | $2,500 |
| AMES FREE LIBRARY | $2,190 |
| SOUTHEASTERN MA ARTS COLLABORATIVE (SMARTS) | $2,000 |
| BAMSI | $2,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–21, $107k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 78% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +69% since the first grant, against +66% for the ones you funded once.
49 repeat relationships — 11 still active in FY2021, 38 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2021 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2021, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- MIMMAS INC5× · 2017–2021 · $156k · revenue +8%
- WSWEST SIDE BENEVOLENT CIRCLE INC4× · 2017–2020 · $25k · revenue +39%
- NHNEW HOPE INC3× · 2017–2021 · $23k · revenue +142%
Funded once
- OCOLD COLONY HABITAT FOR HUMANITYgraduatedone grant, 2018 · $10k · revenue +134%
- NRNATURAL RESOURCES TRUST OF MANSFIELD INCgraduatedone grant, 2019 · $9k · revenue +845%
- TWTHE WOMAN AT THE WELLone grant, 2018 · $5k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Founded in 1973, bristol aging & wellness, inc. is a private non-profit corporation, designated as an aging services access point and an area agency on aging. bristol serves as the entry point for elder services in southeastern…
Helping adults and children with disabilities, (incl asd), become full participants in the community.
We are committed to providing the highest quality, compassionate home care to the patients entrusted to us. We are also steadfast in our pledge to be a responsive and innovative advocate for the communities we serve, focusing on health…
Provide specialized services to assist individuals and their families in overcoming the challenges of developmental disabilities, mental illness, and medical conditions.
Hac's mission is to promote and implement the right of all people on cape cod and the islands to occupy safe and affordable housing. to achieve this goal, hac has concentrated its major programs around rental subsidies, shelter services,…
To advance the interests of the human services sector and providers through advocacy, education, and engagement of diverse stakeholders for collective impact.
Mfhc is committed to ending systemic housing discrimination and creating inclusive communities through education, outreach, advocacy, housing counseling and enforcement.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Special Olympics Massachusetts Inc and the most unlike its peers is Sharon Community Chamber Orchestra Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 36 years old; the field is 15. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 21% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 4% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
47 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2026, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 47 of the 81 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds MMAS INC ↗
- Who funds WEST SIDE BENEVOLENT CIRCLE INC ↗
- Who funds NEW HOPE INC ↗
- Who funds GREATER ATTLEBORO AREA COUNCIL FOR CHILDREN INC ↗
- Who funds NARRAGANSETT COUNCIL BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA ↗
- Who funds SPECIAL OLYMPICS MASSACHUSETTS INC ↗
- Who funds HORACE MANN EDUCATIONAL ASSOCIATES INC ↗
- Who funds THE CHILDREN'S MUSEUM IN EASTON INC ↗
- Who funds JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF SOUTHERN MA ↗
- Who funds STURDY HEALTH FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Gillys House Inc ↗
- Who funds PRO-HOME INC ↗
- Who funds FATHER BILL'S & MAINSPRING INC ↗
- Who funds ATTLEBORO MUSEUM INC ↗
- Who funds OLD COLONY HABITAT FOR HUMANITY ↗
- Who funds West Bridgewater Food Pantry Inc ↗
- Who funds CUPBOARD OF KINDNESS INC ↗
- Who funds OLD COLONY YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds NATURAL RESOURCES TRUST OF MANSFIELD INC ↗
- Who funds SCHOOL ON WHEELS OF MASSACHUSETTS INC ↗
- Who funds KENNEDY-DONOVAN CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds My Brothers Keeper Inc ↗
- Who funds On Common Ground Inc ↗
- Who funds SPACE2THRIVE INC ↗
- Who funds THE BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF METRO SOUTH INC ↗
- Who funds RISE ABOVE FOUNDATION INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Bluestone Bank Charitable Foundation Inc · Bristol County Savings Charitable Foundation Inc · Rockland Trust Charitable Foundation Inc · North Easton Savings Bank Charitable Foundation Inc · The Harborone Foundation · Southcoast Community Foundation Inc · Eastern Bank Foundation · United Way of Greater Attleborotaunton Inc · United Way Of Massachusetts Bay Inc · Community Health Systems Inc · Arbella Insurance Foundation · Massachusetts Bankers Association Charitable Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Mansfield Community Charitable Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Health Imperatives Inc — 79% of income from government
- House of Possibilities Inc — 76% of income from government
- New Hope Inc — 73% of income from government
- SPACE2THRIVE Inc — 69% of income from government
- Associates for Human Services Inc — 64% of income from government
- Kennedy-Donovan Center Inc — 62% of income from government
- The Arc of Bristol County Inc — 55% of income from government
- Father Bill's & Mainspring Inc — 24% of income from government
- Rise Above Foundation Inc — 14% of income from government
- The Boys & Girls Clubs of Metro South Inc — 13% of income from government
- Brockton Neighborhood Health Center Inc — 9% of income from government
- School On Wheels of Massachusetts Inc — 7% of income from government
- Sharon Community Chamber Orchestra Inc — 5% of income from government
- Easton Food Pantry Inc — 4% of income from government
- Special Olympics Massachusetts Inc — 1% of income from government
- Brockton Visiting Nurse Association Inc — 1% of income from government
- Old Colony Historical Society — 1% of income from government
- The Children's Museum in Easton Inc — 1% of income from government
- Attleboro Museum Inc — 0% of income from government
- Mmas Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Mansfield Community Charitable Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to Mansfield Community Charitable Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.