Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersAlso receives grants — funding profile →
Plinth

· Public charity

North Central Accountable Community of Health

The mission of thriving together ncw is to advance health and wellbeing in north central washington by unifying partners, supporting collaboration, and enabling systems change.

$3.8M
Granted FY2023
40
Grants FY2023
1
States reached
$547k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
0161% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2022–2023.

Human Services$1.1MCommunity Improvement$600kScience & Tech$547kHealth$458kEducation$270kRecreation & Sports$127kCrime & Legal$63kPhilanthropy$30kOther$2.1M
02FY2023 · 40 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2023

  • Under $10k2 grants · $14k
  • $10k–50k11 grants · $315k
  • $50k–250k24 grants · $2.2M
  • $250k+3 grants · $1.2M
$69,200
Median grant
1
States reached
$26M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NCW TECH ALLIANCE$547,463
CITY OF OMAK$349,500
OUR VALLEY OUR FUTURE$287,413
THE COMMUNITY FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF FAMILY EDUCATION$188,400
HOPESOURCE$187,416
CHELAN-DOUGLAS COUNTY COMMUNITY ACTION COUNCIL INC$165,000
PUBLIC HOSPITAL DISTRICT NO 4 OKANOGAN COUNTY WASHINGTON$151,410
CHELAN COUNTY PUBLIC HOSPITAL DISTRICT #1$120,000
DADS MOVE$111,240
GRANT COUNTY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL$100,000
COGNITION MED LLC$90,000
GRANT COUNTY HEALTH DISTRICT$86,454
CHELAN-DOUGLAS COMMUNITY ACTION COUNCIL$85,000
CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE DIOCESE OF YAKIMA$82,500
FAMILY HEALTH CENTERS OMAK$81,259
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY22–23, $999k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%CHILDREN'S HOME SOCIETY OF WASHINGTON: $75k → 9%HOPESOURCE: $187k → 11%RURAL RESOURCES COMMUNITY ACTION: $143k → 13%CHILDREN'S HOME SOCIETY OF WASHINGTON: $65k → 9%HOPESOURCE: $165k → 11%CHELAN-DOUGLAS COUNTY COMMUNITY ACTION COUNCIL INC: $165k → 9%CHELAN-DOUGLAS COMMUNITY ACTION COUNCIL: $85k → 9%OKANOGAN COUNTY COMMUNITY ACTION COUNCIL: $25k → 17%OKANOGAN COUNTY COMMUNITY ACTION COUNCIL: $15k → 17%WENATCHEE VALLEY YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION: $44k → 9%YWCA NORTH CENTRAL WASHINGTON: $30k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

49%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$2.6M · 19 repeat orgs$2.7M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +26% since the first grant, against +16% for the ones you funded once.

19 repeat relationships — 19 still active in FY2023, 0 since wound down; 18 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

19
15

Total granted

$2.6M
$524k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+26%
+16%

Still filing today

74%
60%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 43% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2.1M went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23
HealthHuman ServicesEducationCommunity ImprovementRecreation & SportsScience & TechOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • OV
    OUR VALLEY OUR FUTURE
    3× · 2022–2024 · $418k · revenue +14% · 73% of their budget
  • H
    HOPESOURCE
    2× · 2022–2023 · $352k · revenue +4%
  • GC
    GRANT COUNTY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL
    3× · 2022–2024 · $175k · revenue +26%

Funded once

  • RR
    RURAL RESOURCES COMMUNITY ACTION
    one grant, 2022 · $143k · revenue +12%
  • CC
    Community Choice
    2× · 2022–2024 · $108k · revenue +10%
  • TC
    THE CENTER FOR ALCOHOL & DRUG TREATMENTgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $50k · revenue +41%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Northwest Community Health Care

The mission of the organization is to provide primary medical, dental, behavioral health, pharmacy and related support services to the residents of the Rhode Island communities that it serves regardless of ability to pay. The emphasis is…

Health
2
Cowiche Canyon Conservancy

Protecting our shrub-steppe and connecting people to this vanishing landscape.

—
3
Central Washington Health Services Association

Local care by and for our community.

Health
4
Wenatchee Valley Hospital

We are dedicated to improving our patients' health by providing safe, high-quality care in a compassionate and cost-effective manner.

—
5
Regional West Health Services

Health care services for the people of western nebraska and eastern wyoming.

Health
6
Washington Health Care Association

Trade association dedicated to providing educational opportunities, legal and regulatory advice, quality compliance assistance, lobbying and discounted group member benefits for long-term care facilities.

—
7
Whatcom Dispute Resolution Center

Provide and promote constructive and collaborative approaches to conflict resolution through mediation, training, facilitation, supervised visits and community education.

Unclassified
8
Northwest Counseling Service Inc

Housing Counseling Services

Housing & Shelter
9
United Way of Snohomish County

United way of snohomish county improves lives for families in snohomish county by bringing people, resources, and strategy together.

Philanthropy
10
Coast Fork Willamette Watershed Council

The Coast Fork Willamette Watershed Council is a local nonprofit organization that strives to enhance and restore habitat for fish and wildlife our community and for future generations. Our Board of Directors consists of seven members with…

Environment
11
Chelan Valley Hope

Chelan Valley Hope is a gross-roots local social services agency 'hub' for compassionate connections and resources since 2009. We empower people to improve their own lives by giving them a hand up; not just a hand-out. We do this by…

Human Services
12
North Olympic Healthcare Network

To provide patient-centered, quality-driven, whole-person healthcare services, accessible to everyone in our community.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Rural Resources Community Action and the most unlike its peers is Together for Youth. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 36 years old; the field is 19. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number19%3%<5yr11%13%5–10yr21%15%10–20yr16%18%20–35yr13%31%35–55yr20%21%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value19%1%<5yr11%16%5–10yr21%30%10–20yr16%14%20–35yr13%17%35–55yr20%23%55yr+

The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
2%1/56
the rest of the field
11%
131/1,188

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

38 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 38 of the 53 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
38/38
Grantees still filing
27/38
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

CITY OF OMAK — $349,500 · OtherCITY OF OMAKGRANT COUNTY — $205,711 · OtherGRANT COUNTYOKANOGAN COUNTY PUBLIC HEALTH — $162,223 · OtherOKANOGAN COUNTY PUBLIC HEALTHPUBLIC HOSPITAL DISTRICT NO 4 OKANOGAN COUNTY WASHINGTON — $151,410 · OtherPUBLIC HOSPITAL DISTRICT NO 4 OKANOGAN COUNTY …CHELAN COUNTY PUBLIC HOSPITAL DISTRICT NO 1 — $139,720 · OtherCHELAN COUNTY PUBLIC HOSPITAL DISTRICT NO 1Together For Youth — $125,853 · OtherTogether For YouthCommunity Choice — $108,372 · OtherCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE DIOCESE OF YAKIMA — $102,500 · OtherConfluence Health System — $96,476 · OtherWOMEN'S RESOURCE CENTER OF NORTH CENTRAL WASHINGTON — $91,600 · OtherCOGNITION MED LLC — $90,000 · OtherFOUNDATION FOR YOUTH RESILIENCY AND ENGA — $89,200 · OtherGRANT COUNTY HEALTH DISTRICT — $86,454 · OtherPHYSICIAN & HEALTHCARE CONSULTING — $79,563 · Other+13 more — $299,644 · Other+13 moreHOPESOURCE — $352,416 · Human ServicesHOPESOURCECHELAN-DOUGLAS COMMUNITY ACTION COU — $250,000 · Human ServicesCHELAN-DOUGLAS COMMUNIT…RURAL RESOURCES COMMUNITY ACTION — $143,400 · Human ServicesRURAL RESOURCES COMMUNI…CHILDRENS HOME SOCIETY OF WASHINGTON — $139,722 · Human ServicesCHILDRENS HOME SOCIETY …Dads Move — $111,240 · Human ServicesDads MoveYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF WENATCHEE — $44,000 · Human ServicesOKANOGAN COUNTY COMMUNITY ACTION COUNCIL INC — $40,000 · Human Services+1 more — $29,920 · Human ServicesOUR VALLEY OUR FUTURE — $418,238 · Community ImprovementOUR VALLEY O…GRANT COUNTY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL — $175,000 · Community ImprovementGRANT COUNTY…+1 more — $6,500 · Community ImprovementNCW TECH ALLIANCE — $547,463 · Science & TechNCW TECH AL…FAMILY HEALTH CENTERS OMAK — $165,259 · HealthFAMILY HE…COLUMBIA VALLEY COMMUNITY HEALTH — $97,222 · HealthCOLUMBIA …THE CENTER FOR ALCOHOL & DRUG TREATMENT — $49,751 · HealthTHE CENTE…METHOW VALLEY HOME HEALTH AGENCY — $45,000 · HealthMETHOW VA…OKANOGAN BEHAVIORAL HEALTHCARE — $36,250 · HealthOKANOGAN …MOSES LAKE COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER — $20,000 · HealthSAMARITAN HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION — $16,250 · HealthFAMILY HEALTH CENTERS — $16,250 · Health+1 more — $12,500 · HealthTHE COMMUNITY FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF FAMILY EDUCATION — $188,400 · EducationCENTRE FOR COLLABORATION MOTIVATION AND INNOVATION SOCIETY — $41,600 · EducationLittle Star School Montessori — $40,000 · EducationWENATCHEE VALLEY TREAD — $77,160 · Recreation & SportsPLAIN VALLEY SKI TRAILS — $50,000 · Recreation & Sports
Other$2,178,226Human Services$1,110,698Community Improvement$599,738Science & Tech$547,463Health$458,482Education$270,000Recreation & Sports$127,160

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetNCW TECH ALLIANCE — $547,463 over 2y, 35% of budgetOUR VALLEY OUR FUTURE — $418,238 over 3y, 73% of budgetHOPESOURCE — $352,416 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetCHELAN-DOUGLAS COMMUNITY ACTION COU — $250,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetTHE COMMUNITY FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF FAMILY EDUCATION — $188,400 over 2y, 12% of budgetGRANT COUNTY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL — $175,000 over 3y, 19% of budgetFAMILY HEALTH CENTERS OMAK — $165,259 over 3y, 11% of budgetRURAL RESOURCES COMMUNITY ACTION — $143,400 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetCHILDRENS HOME SOCIETY OF WASHINGTON — $139,722 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetTogether For Youth — $125,853 over 3y, 14% of budgetDads Move — $111,240 over 1y, 13% of budgetCommunity Choice — $108,372 over 2y, 2.2% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE DIOCESE OF YAKIMA — $102,500 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetCOLUMBIA VALLEY COMMUNITY HEALTH — $97,222 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetConfluence Health System — $96,476 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetWOMEN'S RESOURCE CENTER OF NORTH CENTRAL WASHINGTON — $91,600 over 3y, 3.5% of budgetFOUNDATION FOR YOUTH RESILIENCY AND ENGA — $89,200 over 2y, 6.5% of budgetWENATCHEE VALLEY TREAD — $77,160 over 2y, 9.5% of budgetThe Hope Agency Family Services — $62,500 over 2y, 28% of budgetPLAIN VALLEY SKI TRAILS — $50,000 over 1y, 9.1% of budgetTHE CENTER FOR ALCOHOL & DRUG TREATMENT — $49,751 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetMETHOW VALLEY HOME HEALTH AGENCY — $45,000 over 1y, 3.1% of budgetYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF WENATCHEE — $44,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetCENTRE FOR COLLABORATION MOTIVATION AND INNOVATION SOCIETY — $41,600 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetOKANOGAN COUNTY COMMUNITY ACTION COUNCIL INC — $40,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetUPPER VALLEY MEND — $40,000 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetLittle Star School Montessori — $40,000 over 3y, 1.3% of budgetOKANOGAN BEHAVIORAL HEALTHCARE — $36,250 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF NCW — $30,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetYWCA North Central Washington — $29,920 over 1y, 2.7% of budgetMOSES LAKE COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER — $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSAMARITAN HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION — $16,250 over 1y, 5.0% of budgetFAMILY HEALTH CENTERS — $16,250 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCOLUMBIA BASIN HEALTH ASSOCIATION — $12,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation …Seattle FoundationColumbia Basin Founda…Inatai FoundationSecond Harvest Inland…Ncw Tech AllianceNumerica Credit UnionLamb Weston Charitabl…Az Wells FoundationNames Family Foundati…Northwest Harvest EmmUnited Way of Chelan …
Community Foundation of NcwWA62.1× affinity28 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation of Ncw · Seattle Foundation · Columbia Basin Foundation · Inatai Foundation · Second Harvest Inland Northwest · Ncw Tech Alliance · Numerica Credit Union · Lamb Weston Charitable Foundation · Az Wells Foundation · Names Family Foundation · Northwest Harvest Emm · United Way of Chelan & Douglas Counties Dba United Way of North Central Wa

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization North Central Accountable Community of Health funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%5%19%42%75%your share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    12report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 53 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record and reports $3.3M of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2023, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home
    State money flows
    the interactive map of money crossing state lines