How much did NCW TECH ALLIANCE grant in FY2023?

NCW TECH ALLIANCE reported 12 grants totaling $182,181 in its FY2023 IRS filing.

Where is NCW TECH ALLIANCE based?

NCW TECH ALLIANCE is based in WA.

NCW TECH ALLIANCE

Foundation Dossiers Mostly funded, not a grantmaker — see who funds it →

· Public charity

NCW TECH ALLIANCE

NCW TECH ALLIANCE is a 501(c)3 with a mission to bring people and technology resources together to create a thriving community.

$182k

Granted FY2023

Grants

Communities

$26k

Largest

01What you fund

0169% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2020–2023.

Human Services$38kCommunity Improvement$34kEducation$11kHealth$7kOther$41k

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2020

—

2023

wenatchee valleycdcachealthwelfareeducationneustropromotes

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2023 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2023

Under $10k9 grants · $62k
$10k–50k3 grants · $56k

$8,000

Median grant

States reached

$853k

Total assets

Largest grants

ECONOMIC ALLIANCE$26,000
BIGFOOT COMMUNICATIONS LLC$20,000
WENATCHEE VALLEY SENIOR ACTIVITY CENTER$10,000
COLUMBIA BASIN FOUNDATION$9,681
NCW LIBRARIES$8,500
OUR VALLEY OUR FUTURE$8,000
UNIDOS NUEVA ALIANZA FOUNDATION$7,000
THRIVING NCW$6,500
CHELAN-DOUGLAS COMMUNITY ACTION COUNCIL$6,000
WENATCHEE VALLEY COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC$5,500
RURAL RESOURCES COMMUNITY ACTION$5,500
BIG BEND COMMUNITY COLLEGE$5,500

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY23–23, $38k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12% — the area typically sits at 12%. 58% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Whatcom Community College Foundation

Promote, support, develop, increase, and extend the educational offerings of whatcom community college.

Education

Cowlitz Economic Development Council

Foster Growth in the Community

—

Cascade Pacific Rc&D Area

To enhance communities through social, economic, educational, and environmental recovery improvements

Community Improvement

Clatsop Community College Foundation

Foundation provides scholarships and other financial support to Clatsop Community College and its students.

—

Community Action Center

The center provides resources and direct services to low income residents.

Human Services

Whatcom Dispute Resolution Center

Provide and promote constructive and collaborative approaches to conflict.

Unclassified

Northwest Commission on Colleges and

Northwest Commission on Colleges and Universities accredits institutions of higher education by applying evidence-informed standards and processes to support continuous improvements and promote equitable student achievement and success.

Education

Pacific Northwest Economic Region

To increase the economic well-being and quality of life for all citizens of the region; to coordinate provincial, territorial, and state policies throughout the region; to identify and promote "models of success and to serve as a conduit…

—

Clackamas River Basin Council Inc

The council is organized to foster partnerships for clean water, healthy streams, and abundant fisheries in the Clackamas Watershed

Environment

Re Sources

RE Sources mobilizes people of Northwest Washington to build just and thriving communities and to protect the land, water, and climate on which we all depend.

Environment

Bellingham Technical College Foundation

Enhancing instructional programs at Bellingham Technical College.

Education

Community Foundation of Snohomish County

To strengthen communities in greater everett and snohomish county.

Philanthropy

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Rural Resources Community Action and the most unlike its peers is Unidos Nueva Alianza Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

10 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

10/10

Grantees still filing

8/10

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$40,500Human Services$38,181Community Improvement$34,000Education$11,000Health$6,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation of NcwWA20.2× affinity7 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation of Ncw · Inatai Foundation · North Central Accountable Community Of · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation NCW TECH ALLIANCE funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

0get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

04Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: ECONOMIC ALLIANCE.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

medium risk

~5 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 8 filed years.

Track record & reputation

low risk

8 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up 2.6× since.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 912058440 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on ECONOMIC ALLIANCE, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

WatchFinancial stability— Roughly 5 months of cash on hand.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue grew over the period.
On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 3% of their budget — diversified.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Ncw Tech Alliance?

Find your warmest path to Ncw Tech Alliance through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

NCW TECH ALLIANCE

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

10 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2024.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Ncw Tech Alliance?

More from the funding graph

NCW TECH ALLIANCE

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

10 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2024.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Ncw Tech Alliance?

More from the funding graph