· Private foundation
Norman Raab Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k55 grants · $105k
- $10k–50k29 grants · $755k
- $50k–250k5 grants · $275k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| SANDY HOOK PROMISE FOUNDATION | $75,000 |
| FACING HISTORY AND OURSELVES | $50,000 |
| JEWISH FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICE (JFCS) OF GREATER PHILADELPHIA | $50,000 |
| US HOLOCAUST MEMORIAL MUSEUM | $50,000 |
| SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER | $50,000 |
| JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY | $40,000 |
| ICIVICS INC | $40,000 |
| JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY | $35,000 |
| JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY | $35,000 |
| 826 VALENCIA | $30,000 |
| MAGEE REHAB HOSPITAL FOUNDATION | $30,000 |
| THE CEDARS OF MARIN | $30,000 |
| MARINE MAMMAL CENTER | $30,000 |
| COLORADO COALITION FOR THE HOMELESS | $30,000 |
| CAMPING UNLIMITED FOR THE DEVELOPMENTALLY DISABLED | $30,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $992k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 31% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +28% since the first grant, against +18% for the ones you funded once.
109 repeat relationships — 66 still active in FY2025, 43 since wound down; 15 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $36k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- FHFACING HISTORY & OURSELVES INC6× · 2020–2025 · $300k · revenue +29%
- TUThe United States Holocaust Memorial Museum6× · 2020–2025 · $275k · revenue +36%
SANDY HOOK PROMISE FOUNDATION6× · 2020–2025 · $275k · revenue +77%
Funded once
- JHJOHNS HOPKINS COMPREHENSIVE DIABETES CENTERone grant, 2020 · $50k
- VVOTEORGone grant, 2024 · $25k · revenue -37%
UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEFone grant, 2022 · $25k · revenue -21%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Seattle humane promotes the human-animal bond by saving and serving pets in need, regardless of age, ability, circumstance or geography.
The union of concerned scientists puts rigorous, independent science into action, developing solutions and advocating for a healthy, safe, and just future.
The purpose of the water research foundation (wrf) is a definitive research organization to advance the science of all things water to better meet the evolving needs of its subscribers and the water sector. to engage exclusively in…
To establish and promote programs to protect the global climate, forests, wildlife and the natural environment, through research, advocacy, and investigation.
To provide meaningful access to high quality, civil legal services in the pursuit of justice for as many low income persons and members of vulnerable populations throughout colorado as possible.
The california dental association is committed to the success of our members in service to their patients and the public.
The npr foundation ("foundation") is organized and operated exclusively for the benefit of its sole supported organization, national public radio, inc. ("npr inc."). the foundation supports npr inc. through various activities such as…
Pro publica is an independent, non-profit, pulitzer prize-winning newsroom that produces investigative journalism in the public interest. our work focuses exclusively on truly important stories. [see continuation on schedule o] we produce…
Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.
The aquarium of the pacific's mission is to instill a sense of wonder, respect, and stewardship for the pacific ocean, its inhabitants, and ecosystems.
The association of washington cities builds connections between our state's diverse cities and towns, while providing our members with the support needed to thrive through delivery of data-driven education, nationally recognized pooling…
Disability rights washington's mission is to advance the dignity, equality, and self determination of people with disabilities. we work to pursue justice on matters related to human and legal rights.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Seattle Public Library Foundation and the most unlike its peers is The California Liver Institute a Nonprofit Corporation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 34 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.7% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
148 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 148 of the 175 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds FACING HISTORY & OURSELVES INC ↗
- Who funds The United States Holocaust Memorial Museum ↗
- Who funds SANDY HOOK PROMISE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds JEWISH FAMILY & CHILDREN'S SERVICE OF GREATER PHILADELPHIA ↗
- Who funds CAMPING UNLIMITED FOR THE DEVELOPMENTALLY DISABLED ↗
- Who funds ICIVICS INC ↗
- Who funds SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds JEWISH FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICES ↗
- Who funds Team Read ↗
- Who funds Extrafood ↗
- Who funds 826 Valencia ↗
- Who funds SAN FRANCISCO FOOD BANK ↗
- Who funds GIFFORDS LAW CENTER TO PREVENT GUN VIOLENCE ↗
- Who funds JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds Network of Victim Assistance ↗
- Who funds THE MARINE MAMMAL CENTER ↗
- Who funds The Cedars of Marin ↗
- Who funds MARIN HUMANE SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds THE GATHERING PLACE A REFUGE FOR REBUILDING LIVES ↗
- Who funds Vivalon ↗
- Who funds SEATTLE ARTS AND LECTURES ↗
- Who funds MIGHTY WRITERS ↗
- Who funds AIM HIGH FOR HIGH SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds SEATTLE PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Zeno ↗
- Who funds Refugee Womens Alliance ↗
- Who funds ANN SILVERMAN COMMUNITY HEALTH CLINIC ↗
- Who funds FREE LIBRARY OF PHILADELPHIA FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CENTRAL BUCKS AMBULANCE & RESCUE UNIT ↗
- Who funds DIRECT RELIEF ↗
- Who funds WELLSPRING FAMILY SERVICES ↗
- Who funds WOODLAND PARK ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds DOWNTOWN WOMEN'S CENTER ↗
- Who funds KQED INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Foundations Community Partnership · Penn Community Bank Foundation · Seattle Foundation · The Philadelphia Foundation · Medina Foundation · The Norcliffe Foundation · Lucky Seven Foundation · Albert W Bader Foundation Inc · Real Progress Foundation · The Haley Foundation · The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation · Greater Good Charities
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Norman Raab Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Save the Children Federation Inc — 30% of income from government
- Xerces Society Inc — 22% of income from government
- Icivics Inc — 13% of income from government
- Johns Hopkins University — 12% of income from government
- Mcphs University — 1% of income from government
- Sandy Hook Promise Foundation — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Norman Raab Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Norman Raab Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.