· Private foundation
Foundations Community Partnership
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k52 grants · $232k
- $10k–50k21 grants · $316k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| VALLEY YOUTH HOUSE COMMITTEE INC | $32,500 |
| BUCKS COUNTY OPPORTUNITY COUNCIL | $30,590 |
| WOODS SERVICES INC | $30,000 |
| POTENTIAL INC | $18,000 |
| YMCA OF BUCKS AND HUNTERDON COUNTIE | $17,500 |
| FAMILY SERVICE ASSOCIATION | $15,800 |
| SNIPES FARM AND EDUCATION CENTER | $15,000 |
| SEACHANGE CAPITAL PARTNERS | $15,000 |
| NOVA | $15,000 |
| SPECIAL EQUESTRIANS | $15,000 |
| BCHIP | $12,000 |
| BUCKS COUNTY CHILDREN MUSEUM | $10,000 |
| COMPREHENSIVE LEARNING CENTER | $10,000 |
| ROLLING HARVEST FOOD RESCUE | $10,000 |
| THE SALVATION ARMY CHILDREN'S SERVI | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $1.1M) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 16% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +37% since the first grant, against +9% for the ones you funded once.
133 repeat relationships — 50 still active in FY2025, 83 since wound down; 23 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 82% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $98k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- BCBUCKS COUNTY OPPORTUNITY COUNCIL INC9× · 2017–2025 · $143k · revenue +168%
SNIPES FARM AND EDUCATION CENTER8× · 2017–2025 · $121k · revenue +77%- YOYWCA OF BUCKS COUNTY9× · 2017–2025 · $105k · revenue +69%
Funded once
- ATALONG THE WAYone grant, 2024 · $25k · revenue 0%
- HFHABITAT FOR HUMANITYone grant, 2023 · $21k
- MMMERCER MUSEUM OF BCHSone grant, 2020 · $12k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Mission: we listen, care and help. every day. vision: a community where anyone can achieve their full potential. programs: our services treat mental health issues; reduce substance use; shelter, feed, educate and seek permanent housing for…
Berks counseling center (bcc) is a recovery oriented certified community behavioral health center (ccbhc) with an integrated behavioral and physical health model of service delivery. the center provides a holistic approach to a culturally…
Philhaven promotes hope, healing and wholeness through the provision of behavioral resources.
To heal. to teach. to empower. to amaze.
Elwyn makes life better for people with developmental and behavioral health challenges.
Provides supports to people with intellectual/developmental disability across the lifespan that encourages growth and meaningful life choices while assisting persons in finding home, health, friends, work, and presence in their…
Through a wide range of child welfare services, our mission is to keep children & youth safe, strengthen families & promote the independence of youth & families.
Easter seals eastern pa creates life-changing solutions for individuals with disablities and their families in their community by increasing independence, maximizing opportunities, minimizing barriers and enhancing quality of life.
Keystone organizations (keystone) provide comprehensive community-based services for children, young people, adults and families in the areas of intellectual disability, autism, mental health, and children and family services. keystone…
Penncares advances the quality of life and promotes independence and productivity for individuals with disabilities and challenges throughout their lives.
See schedule o.power's mission is to help women reclaim their lives from addiction and related emotional health issues and improve the well-being of future generations. we provide a range of gender-responsive, trauma-informed drug and…
Summary
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Access Services Inc and the most unlike its peers is Bucks County Playhouse Theater Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 24 years old; the field is 15. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 1% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
124 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 124 of the 206 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds BUCKS COUNTY OPPORTUNITY COUNCIL INC ↗
- Who funds SNIPES FARM AND EDUCATION CENTER ↗
- Who funds YWCA OF BUCKS COUNTY ↗
- Who funds BUCKS COUNTY CHILDREN'S MUSEUM ↗
- Who funds Special Equestrians Inc ↗
- Who funds VALLEY YOUTH HOUSE COMMITTEE INC ↗
- Who funds ANN SILVERMAN COMMUNITY HEALTH CLINIC ↗
- Who funds POTENTIAL INC ↗
- Who funds Woods Services Inc ↗
- Who funds BARC DEVELOPMENTAL SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds Network of Victim Assistance ↗
- Who funds CANCER SUPPORT COMMUNITY GREATER PHILADELPHIA ↗
- Who funds ROLLING HARVEST FOOD RESCUE ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY CONSERVATORY OF MUSIC ↗
- Who funds RIVER CROSSING YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds LIBERTAE INCORPORATED ↗
- Who funds THE COUNCIL OF SOUTHEAST PENNSYLVANIA INC ↗
- Who funds BUCKS COUNTY HOUSING GROUP INC ↗
- Who funds Pegasus Therapeutic Riding Academy Inc ↗
- Who funds ONE HOUSE AT A TIME INC ↗
- Who funds WORTHWHILE WEAR INC ↗
- Who funds PEARL S BUCK INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
- Who funds Maternity Care Coalition ↗
- Who funds CHRISTS HOME ↗
- Who funds BUCKS-MONT COLLABORATIVE ↗
- Who funds BUCKS COUNTY AUDUBON SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds Travis Manion Foundation ↗
- Who funds Penndel Mental Health Center Inc ↗
- Who funds HERITAGE CONSERVANCY INC ↗
- Who funds OPERATION PATHWAYS INC ↗
- Who funds THE PEACE CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds COMPREHENSIVE LEARNING CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds AUTISM CARES FOUNDATION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Penn Community Bank Foundation · The Philadelphia Foundation · United Way of Bucks County · Bucks County Foundation · W W Smith Charitable Trust · Bucks County Conference & Visitors Bureau · Norman Raab Foundation · Albert W Bader Foundation Inc · William Penn Bank Community Foundation · Henry Dolfinger 2 Trust Uw · The Cigna Group Foundation · Cw Schrenk & Marjorie J Schrenk Family Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Foundations Community Partnership funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Best Buddies International Inc — 4% of income from government
- Shriners Hospitals for Children — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Foundations Community Partnership?
Find your warmest path to Foundations Community Partnership through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.