Skip to content
Newborn Hope Incorporated at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

Newborn Hope Incorporated

Newborn hope provides resources for colorado babies and families impacted by prematurity.

$61k
Granted FY2024still arriving
2
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$229kCrime & Legal$3k
02FY2024 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 2 grants below total $17,500, the rows itemized in this filing. The $60,500 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $43,000 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $8k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$10,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$446k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PARKVIEW MEDICAL CENTER$10,000
CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL COLORADO FDN$7,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 89% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%SPECIAL KIDS SPECIAL CARE: $8k → 3%MOUNTAIN FAMILY HEALTH CENTERS: $6k → 8%CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL COLORADO FDN: $10k → 9%INNER CITY HEALTH: $8k → 12%PARKVIEW MEDICAL CENTER: $10k → 15%PROWERS MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION: $4k → 19%ARKANSAS VALLEY REGIONAL MED CENTER: $8k → 23%SPECIAL KIDS SPECIAL CARE: $6k → 3%CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL COLORADO FDN: $10k → 9%SAINT JOSEPH HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $8k → 12%PARKVIEW MEDICAL CENTER: $10k → 15%SPECIAL KIDS SPECIAL CARE: $5k → 3%CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL COLORADO FDN: $10k → 9%PARKVIEW MEDICAL CENTER: $10k → 15%CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL COLORADO FDN: $8k → 9%PARKVIEW MEDICAL CENTER: $10k → 15%CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL COLORADO FOUNDATION: $7k → 9%PARKVIEW MEDICAL CENTER: $9k → 15%CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL COLORADO FOUNDATION: $5k → 9%PARKVIEW MEDICAL CENTER: $8k → 15%RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITY SOCO: $6k → 9%PARKVIEW MEDICAL CENTER: $7k → 15%PENROSE ST FRANCIS HEALTH FDC: $10k → 9%PARKVIEW MEDICAL CENTER: $6k → 15%PENROSE ST FRANCIS HEALTH FDC: $8k → 9%PUEBLO COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER INC: $8k → 15%PENROSE ST FRANCIS HEALTH FDC: $7k → 9%PENROSE ST FRANCIS HEALTH FDC: $6k → 9%MEMORIAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $4k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

73%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$170k · 4 repeat orgs$62k to everyone else

4 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
10

Total granted

$170k
$62k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+22%
+28%

Still filing today

75%
90%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthCrime & LegalHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PM
    PARKVIEW MEDICAL CENTER
    8× · 2017–2024 · $70k · revenue +22%
  • CH
    Children's Hospital Colorado Foundation
    5× · 2017–2024 · $50k · revenue +42%
  • CH
    CATHOLIC HEALTH INITIATIVES COLORADO FOUNDATION
    4× · 2019–2022 · $31k · revenue -4%

Funded once

  • LF
    LOVE FOR LILYgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $9k · revenue +70%
  • PC
    PUEBLO COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $8k · revenue +75%
  • IC
    INNER CITY HEALTH CENTERgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $8k · revenue +67%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Colorado West Healthcare System

The mission of colorado west healthcare system and community hospital is to improve the health and quality of life of the individuals and communities we serve.

Health
2
Summit Community Care Clinic Inc

Provide exceptional, integrated, patient-centered health care services designed to meet the needs of all patients, particularly those who experience barriers to accessing care, regardless of their ability to pay.

Health
3
Poudre Valley Medical Group Llc

We improve lives. in big ways through learning, healing and discovery. in small, personal ways through human connection. but in all ways, we improve lives.

Health
4
Colorado Physician Health Program Corporation

The mission of the Colorado Physician Health Program Corporation is to promote the health and well-being of physicians and physician assistants through evaluation, treatment referral, support education and research.

Health
5
Boulder Community Health

To provide our community the highest value healthcare in an innovative, patient-centered environment.

Health
6
Regional West Health Services

Health care services for the people of western nebraska and eastern wyoming.

Health
7
The Colorado Health Foundation
Health
8
Vail Health Services

Vail health services is the parent company of a group of companies generally known as vail health, whose mission is to elevate health across our mountain communities.

Health
9
Plains Hospital Corporation

Clark fork valley hospital and family medicine network will partner with our communities to improve the health of those we serve.

Health
10
Parkview Health System Inc

To operate exclusively for the benefit of parkview medical center, inc. and to support other non-profit health care providers organized for charitable purpose.

Health
11
Mental Health Center of Boulder County Inc

Partnering to improve quality of life as a nonprofit organization dedicated to mental health and wellness. healing is our purpose, help is our promise, health is our passion.

—
12
Taos Health Systems Inc

To provide our community with the best health care choices close to home in an environment of continual improvement.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mountain Family Health Centers; the most unlike its peers is Prowers Medical Center Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/14
Grantees still filing
8/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

PARKVIEW MEDICAL CENTER: $69,600 · HealthPARKVIEW MEDICAL CENTERChildren's Hospital Colorado Foundation: $49,633 · HealthChildren's Hospital Colorado FoundationCATHOLIC HEALTH INITIATIVES COLORADO FOUNDATION: $30,914 · HealthCATHOLIC HEALTH INITIATIVES COLORADO FOUNDATIONINNER CITY HEALTH CENTER: $7,575 · HealthSAINT JOSEPH HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $7,500 · HealthARKANSAS VALLEY REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER: $7,500 · HealthRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF SOUTHERN COLORADO: $6,477 · Health+3 more: $13,841 · Health+3 moreSpecial Kids Special Care Inc: $19,365 · OtherSpecial Kids …PUEBLO COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER INC: $8,194 · OtherPUEBLO COMMUN…LOVE FOR LILY: $8,500 · Human ServicesFAMILY VISITOR PROGRAM OF GARFIELD COUNTY INC: $2,580 · Crime & Legal
Health$193,040Other$27,559Human Services$8,500Crime & Legal$2,580

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPARKVIEW MEDICAL CENTER: $69,600 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetChildren's Hospital Colorado Foundation: $49,633 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCATHOLIC HEALTH INITIATIVES COLORADO FOUNDATION: $30,914 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetSpecial Kids Special Care Inc: $19,365 over 3y, 42% of budgetLOVE FOR LILY: $8,500 over 1y, 3.8% of budgetPUEBLO COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER INC: $8,194 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetINNER CITY HEALTH CENTER: $7,575 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSAINT JOSEPH HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $7,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetARKANSAS VALLEY REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER: $7,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF SOUTHERN COLORADO: $6,477 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetMOUNTAIN FAMILY HEALTH CENTERS: $5,613 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MEMORIAL HEALTH SYSTEM FOUNDATION: $4,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetFAMILY VISITOR PROGRAM OF GARFIELD COUNTY INC: $2,580 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Colorado Gives Founda…Mile High United Way …Caring for Colorado F…El Pomar FoundationNational Philanthropi…Morgan Stanley Global…Fidelity Investments …Donor Advised Charita…Amazonsmile Foundation
Colorado Gives FoundationCO18.5× affinity7 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Colorado Gives Foundation · Mile High United Way Inc · Caring for Colorado Foundation · El Pomar Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Newborn Hope Incorporated funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Newborn Hope Incorporated. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Newborn Hope Incorporated?

    Find your warmest path to Newborn Hope Incorporated through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Newborn Hope’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home