Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Newborn Hope Incorporated

Newborn hope provides resources for colorado babies and families impacted by prematurity.

$61k
Granted FY2024still arriving
2
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Health$229kCrime & Legal$3k
02FY2024 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 2 grants below total $17,500 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $60,500 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $43,000 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $8k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$10,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$446k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PARKVIEW MEDICAL CENTER$10,000
CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL COLORADO FDN$7,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 89% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%SPECIAL KIDS SPECIAL CARE: $8k → 3%MOUNTAIN FAMILY HEALTH CENTERS: $6k → 8%CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL COLORADO FDN: $10k → 9%INNER CITY HEALTH: $8k → 12%PARKVIEW MEDICAL CENTER: $10k → 15%PROWERS MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION: $4k → 19%ARKANSAS VALLEY REGIONAL MED CENTER: $8k → 23%SPECIAL KIDS SPECIAL CARE: $6k → 3%CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL COLORADO FDN: $10k → 9%SAINT JOSEPH HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $8k → 12%PARKVIEW MEDICAL CENTER: $10k → 15%SPECIAL KIDS SPECIAL CARE: $5k → 3%CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL COLORADO FDN: $10k → 9%PARKVIEW MEDICAL CENTER: $10k → 15%CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL COLORADO FDN: $8k → 9%PARKVIEW MEDICAL CENTER: $10k → 15%CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL COLORADO FOUNDATION: $7k → 9%PARKVIEW MEDICAL CENTER: $9k → 15%CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL COLORADO FOUNDATION: $5k → 9%PARKVIEW MEDICAL CENTER: $8k → 15%RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITY SOCO: $6k → 9%PARKVIEW MEDICAL CENTER: $7k → 15%PENROSE ST FRANCIS HEALTH FDC: $10k → 9%PARKVIEW MEDICAL CENTER: $6k → 15%PENROSE ST FRANCIS HEALTH FDC: $8k → 9%PUEBLO COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER INC: $8k → 15%PENROSE ST FRANCIS HEALTH FDC: $7k → 9%PENROSE ST FRANCIS HEALTH FDC: $6k → 9%MEMORIAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $4k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

73%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$170k · 4 repeat orgs$62k to everyone else

4 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
10

Total granted

$170k
$62k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+22%
+28%

Still filing today

75%
90%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthCrime & LegalHuman ServicesOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PM
    PARKVIEW MEDICAL CENTER
    8× · 2017–2024 · $70k · revenue +22%
  • CH
    Children's Hospital Colorado Foundation
    5× · 2017–2024 · $50k · revenue +42%
  • CH
    CATHOLIC HEALTH INITIATIVES COLORADO FOUNDATION
    4× · 2019–2022 · $31k · revenue -4%

Funded once

  • LF
    LOVE FOR LILYgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $9k · revenue +70%
  • PC
    PUEBLO COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $8k · revenue +58%
  • IC
    INNER CITY HEALTH CENTERgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $8k · revenue +67%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Colorado West Healthcare System

The mission of colorado west healthcare system and community hospital is to improve the health and quality of life of the individuals and communities we serve.

Health
2
Summit Community Care Clinic Inc

Provide exceptional, integrated, patient-centered health care services designed to meet the needs of all patients, particularly those who experience barriers to accessing care, regardless of their ability to pay.

Health
3
Poudre Valley Medical Group Llc

We improve lives. in big ways through learning, healing and discovery. in small, personal ways through human connection. but in all ways, we improve lives.

Health
4
Colorado Physician Health Program Corporation

The mission of the Colorado Physician Health Program Corporation is to promote the health and well-being of physicians and physician assistants through evaluation, treatment referral, support education and research.

Health
5
Boulder Community Health

To provide our community the highest value healthcare in an innovative, patient-centered environment.

Health
6
Plains Hospital Corporation

Clark fork valley hospital and family medicine network will partner with our communities to improve the health of those we serve.

Health
7
The Colorado Health Foundation
Health
8
Vail Health Services

Vail health services is the parent company of a group of companies generally known as vail health, whose mission is to elevate health across our mountain communities.

Health
9
Mental Health Center of Boulder County Inc

Partnering to improve quality of life as a nonprofit organization dedicated to mental health and wellness. healing is our purpose, help is our promise, health is our passion.

10
Regional West Health Services

Health care services for the people of western nebraska and eastern wyoming.

Health
11
Little Colorado Medical Center

To be a healthcare organization trusted by its community that provides appropriate, sustainable medical and hospital services in collaboration with other regional care partners.

Health
12
Parkview Health System Inc

To operate exclusively for the benefit of parkview medical center, inc. and to support other non-profit health care providers organized for charitable purpose.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mountain Family Health Centers and the most unlike its peers is Prowers Medical Center Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/14
Grantees still filing
8/14
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

PARKVIEW MEDICAL CENTER — $69,600 · HealthPARKVIEW MEDICAL CENTERChildren's Hospital Colorado Foundation — $49,633 · HealthChildren's Hospital Colorado FoundationCATHOLIC HEALTH INITIATIVES COLORADO FOUNDATION — $30,914 · HealthCATHOLIC HEALTH INITIATIVES COLORADO FOUNDATIONINNER CITY HEALTH CENTER — $7,575 · HealthSAINT JOSEPH HOSPITAL FOUNDATION — $7,500 · HealthARKANSAS VALLEY REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER — $7,500 · HealthRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF SOUTHERN COLORADO — $6,477 · Health+3 more — $13,841 · Health+3 moreSpecial Kids Special Care Inc — $19,365 · OtherSpecial Kids …PUEBLO COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER INC — $8,194 · OtherPUEBLO COMMUN…LOVE FOR LILY — $8,500 · Human ServicesFAMILY VISITOR PROGRAM OF GARFIELD COUNTY INC — $2,580 · Crime & Legal
Health$193,040Other$27,559Human Services$8,500Crime & Legal$2,580

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetPARKVIEW MEDICAL CENTER — $69,600 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetChildren's Hospital Colorado Foundation — $49,633 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCATHOLIC HEALTH INITIATIVES COLORADO FOUNDATION — $30,914 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetSpecial Kids Special Care Inc — $19,365 over 3y, 42% of budgetLOVE FOR LILY — $8,500 over 1y, 3.8% of budgetPUEBLO COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER INC — $8,194 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetINNER CITY HEALTH CENTER — $7,575 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSAINT JOSEPH HOSPITAL FOUNDATION — $7,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetARKANSAS VALLEY REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER — $7,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF SOUTHERN COLORADO — $6,477 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetMOUNTAIN FAMILY HEALTH CENTERS — $5,613 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MEMORIAL HEALTH SYSTEM FOUNDATION — $4,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetFAMILY VISITOR PROGRAM OF GARFIELD COUNTY INC — $2,580 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Colorado Gives FoundationCO18.5× affinity7 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Colorado Gives Foundation · Mile High United Way Inc · Caring for Colorado Foundation · El Pomar Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Newborn Hope Incorporated funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%3%13%28%50%your share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Newborn Hope Incorporated?

    Find your warmest path to Newborn Hope Incorporated through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph