· Private foundation
New York Self Reliance Foundation Ltd
Its FY2018 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2018.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2018
- Under $10k3 grants · $15k
- $10k–50k17 grants · $175k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| UKRAINIAN MUSEUM | $50,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $15,000 |
| UKRAINIAN STUDIO OF DRAMA IN NEW YORK | $10,000 |
| UKRAINIAN CATHOLIC EPARCHY OF STAMFORD | $10,000 |
| UKRAINIAN ORTHODOX CHURCH OF THE USA | $10,000 |
| UKRAINIAN CONGRESS COMMITTEE OF AMERICA | $10,000 |
| US-UKRAINE FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
| UKRAINIAN MUSEUM & LIBRARY OF STAMFORD | $10,000 |
| UNITED UKRAINIAN AMERICAN RELIEF COMMITTEE | $10,000 |
| YARA ARTS GROUP | $10,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $10,000 |
| UKRAINIAN NATIONAL INFORMATION SERVICE | $10,000 |
| ORDER OF ST BASIL THE GREAT ORPHANS | $10,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $10,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–18) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 74% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
16 repeat relationships — 16 still active in FY2018, 0 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2018 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2018, 63% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $90k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- UCUKRAINIAN CONGRESS COMMITTEE OF AMERICA2× · 2017–2018 · $22k · revenue +219%
- UIUKRAINIAN INSTITUTE OF AMERICA INC2× · 2017–2018 · $20k · revenue +20%
- UUUNITED UKRAINIAN AMERICAN RELIEF COMMITTEE INC2× · 2017–2018 · $20k · revenue +168%
Funded once
- UCUKRAINIAN CHORUS DUMKA OF AMERICA INCgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $20k · revenue +69%
- HUHARVARD UKRAINIAN RESEARCH INSTITUTE - KRYTYKA JOURNALone grant, 2017 · $10k
- PUPLAST UKRAINIAN SCOUTING ORGANIZATIONone grant, 2017 · $5k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Research, advancement and promotion of Ukrainian studies and culture in the United States.
To unite and organize women interested in ukraine and those of ukrainian descent for the purpose of fostering ukrainian cultural heritage, promoting knowledge of ukrainian culture; promoting ties to other ukrainian, american and…
Providing services to Ukrainian Citizens
Preservation and exhibition of Ukrainian history and culture.
Ukrainian educational and cultural center's mission is to establish and maintain facilities for the promulgation of ukrainian culture and heritage, and to promote, support, conduct and maintain social services and educational programs…
Collecting and preserving public historical treasures, and other items relating to Ukrainian heritage and culture.
To support services and programs which contribute to the preservation, enrichment and promotion of ukrainian identity, language and culture.
Provide financial aid to preserve conscientiousness and identity, cultural heritage and tradition among ukrainian youth, especially among students of higher educational institutions in the united states and abroad.
Publication of educational journal and educational conferences
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Ukrainian Museum and the most unlike its peers is Yara Arts Group. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds UKRAINIAN MUSEUM ↗
- Who funds UKRAINIAN CONGRESS COMMITTEE OF AMERICA ↗
- Who funds UKRAINIAN INSTITUTE OF AMERICA INC ↗
- Who funds UKRAINIAN MUSEUM & LIBRARY OF STAMFORD ↗
- Who funds UKRAINIAN CHORUS DUMKA OF AMERICA INC ↗
- Who funds UNITED UKRAINIAN AMERICAN RELIEF COMMITTEE INC ↗
- Who funds Yara Arts Group ↗
- Who funds U S-UKRAINE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds KYIV MOHYLA FOUNDATION OF AMERICA ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Ukrainian American Community (Uac) Foundation Inc · Charles Stewart Mott Foundation · Chopivsky Family Foundation · The Heritage Foundation of First Security Federal Savings Bank Inc · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Network for Good · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization New York Self Reliance Foundation Ltd funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to New York Self Reliance Foundation Ltd?
Find your warmest path to New York Self Reliance Foundation Ltd through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.