· Private foundation
Chopivsky Family Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2018–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k11 grants · $36k
- $10k–50k4 grants · $80k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| UKRAINIAN INSTITUTE OF AMERICA | $25,000 |
| ST ALBANS SCHOOL | $25,000 |
| NATIONAL CATHERDRAL SCHOOL | $20,000 |
| THE ORCHESTRA OF THE AMERICAS GROUP | $10,000 |
| ST ANDREWS UKRAINIAN ORTHODOX | $7,500 |
| US-UKRAINE FOUNDATION | $5,000 |
| NOVA UKRAINE | $5,000 |
| NATIONAL ENDOWMENT FOR DEMOCRACY | $5,000 |
| ASSOCIAZION XENIA ENSEMBLE | $5,000 |
| TARAS SHEVCHENKO SCHOOL OF UKRAINIA | $2,500 |
| BEAUVOIR SCHOOL | $2,500 |
| BEAUVOIR SCHOOL | $2,500 |
| WOMEN'S FOREIGN POLICY GROUP | $1,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $250 |
| YALE UNIVERSITY CLUB | $95 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY19–19, $1k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
29 repeat relationships — 9 still active in FY2024, 20 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 81% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $23k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- ACATLANTIC COUNCIL OF THE UNITED STATES INC3× · 2018–2020 · $250k · revenue +135%
- UIUKRAINIAN INSTITUTE OF AMERICA INC6× · 2018–2024 · $146k · revenue +20%
- UUUNITED UKRAINIAN AMERICAN RELIEF COMMITTEE INC3× · 2018–2020 · $46k · revenue +51%
Funded once
- UUUNITED UKRANIAN AMERICAN RELIEFone grant, 2023 · $280k
- KOKYIV ORTHODOX THEOLOGICAL ACADEMYone grant, 2019 · $100k
- UWUKRAINIAN WORLD FOUNDATION USAone grant, 2022 · $100k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The mission of the ukrainian museum is to acquire, preserve, exhibit & interpret articles of artistic, historic, & scientific value related to ukrainian life & culture; to promote all aspects of ukrainian culture; & to educate the public…
Conveying factual, accurate, unbiased, first hand information about ukraine to policymakers and the public at large
Support of the educational and research activities of the american university of armenia (aua).
The mission of universities studies abroad consortium ("usac") is to provide students with the opportunity to develop the knowledge, skills, and attitudes to succeed in the global society of the 21st century. we strive to provide an…
Research, advancement and promotion of Ukrainian studies and culture in the United States.
Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.
To provide accurate, objective information and analysis on international strategic issues for legislators, diplomats, foreign affairs analysts, international business leaders, economists, the military, defense commentators, journalists,…
The university of virginia investment management company (uvimco) is organized to invest funds on behalf of the rector and visitors of the university of virginia (the university or uva) and university-associated organizations (uaos).
American foreign service association (afsa) is both the principal advocate for the long-term institutional wellbeing of the professional career foreign service and responsible for safeguarding the interest of afsa members. (continued on…
See schedule oustelecom exists to ensure members can compete, grow and thrive to build a world where families, enterprises and communities are connected through the power of broadband.our member companies have committed a considerable…
To provide humanitarian aid to citizens and soldiers of ukraine.
American gas association's (the association) mission is to develop and advocate for informed, innovative, and durable policy that fulfills our nation's energy needs, environmental aspirations and economic potential. we are committed to…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Ukrainian National Association Inc and the most unlike its peers is Central Loudoun Basketball League Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 36 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
33 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 33 of the 71 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds ATLANTIC COUNCIL OF THE UNITED STATES INC ↗
- Who funds UKRAINIAN INSTITUTE OF AMERICA INC ↗
- Who funds UNITED UKRAINIAN AMERICAN RELIEF COMMITTEE INC ↗
- Who funds Orchestra of the Americas Group Inc ↗
- Who funds JAMESTOWN FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds U S-UKRAINE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds RAZOM INC ↗
- Who funds TRUST FOR THE NATIONAL MALL ↗
- Who funds TRANSNATIONAL EDUCATION GROUP ↗
- Who funds CENTRAL LOUDOUN BASKETBALL LEAGUE INC ↗
- Who funds UKRAINE GLOBAL SCHOLARS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds TARAS SHEVCHENKO SCHOOL OF UKRAINIAN STUDIES OF GREATER WASHINGTON INC ↗
- Who funds KYIV MOHYLA FOUNDATION OF AMERICA ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL ENDOWMENT FOR DEMOCRACY ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN SOCIETY OF INTERNATIONAL LAW ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Ukrainian Catholic University Foundation ↗
- Who funds NOVA UKRAINE ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Ukrainian American Community (Uac) Foundation Inc · Charles Stewart Mott Foundation · Greater Washington Community Foundation · New York Self Reliance Foundation Ltd · The Maria Hulai Lion Foundation Inc · The Heritage Foundation of First Security Federal Savings Bank Inc · Brillembourg Ochoa Family Foundation Inc · Sami & Annie Totah Family Foundation · T Rowe Price Program for Charitable Giving Inc · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · The Ayco Charitable Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Chopivsky Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Chesapeake Bay Trust — 100% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Chopivsky Family Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Chopivsky Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.