How much did CHOPIVSKY FAMILY FOUNDATION grant in FY2023?

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 85% of CHOPIVSKY FAMILY FOUNDATION’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2019

conductkyivorthodoxchurchcatholiceducationgroup

2020

andrew'schurchcommitteecatholicukranianeducation

2022

orchestra americas

2023

group

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2023 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2023

Under $10k14 grants · $41k
$10k–50k1 grant · $26k
$50k–250k1 grant · $100k
$250k+1 grant · $280k

$5,000

Median grant

States reached

$3.6M

Total assets

Largest grants

UNITED UKRANIAN AMERICAN RELIEF$280,000
ATLANTIC COUNSEL$100,000
UKRAINIAN INSTITUTE OF AMERICA$25,900
THE JAMESTOWN FOUNDATION$5,000
US-UKRAINE FOUNDATION$5,000
THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF INT'L LAW$5,000
HELP US HELP$5,000
ST ALBANS SCHOOL$5,000
THE ORCHESTRA OF THE AMERICAS GROUP$5,000
TARAS SHEVCHENKO SCHOOL OF$2,500
BEAUVOIR SCHOOL$2,500
NATIONAL CATHERDRAL SCHOOL$2,500
WOMEN FORWARD INTERNAIONAL$1,500
WOMEN'S FOREIGN POLICY GROUP$1,144
BLUE AND YELLOW$650

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY18–23) land where the poverty rate runs at 16% — the area typically sits at 10%. 94% of your dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

56%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$774k · 27 repeat orgs$608k to everyone else

27 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2023, 20 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$774k

$309k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+20%

+73%

Still filing today

30%

33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 33% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $299k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

EducationInternationalArts & CulturePhilanthropyReligionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

UI
UKRAINIAN INSTITUTE OF AMERICA
5× · 2018–2023 · $121k · revenue +20%
RAZOM INC
2× · 2018–2022 · $11k · revenue +25128%
KM
KYIV MOHYLA FOUNDATION OF AMERICA
3× · 2018–2020 · $7k · revenue +17%

Funded once

KO
KYIV ORTHODOX THEOLOGICAL ACADEMY
one grant, 2019 · $100k
UW
UKRAINIAN WORLD FOUNDATION USA
one grant, 2022 · $100k
KP
KYIV PATRIARCHATE OF UKROTRHODOX CHURCH
one grant, 2018 · $25k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Ukrainian Academy of Arts & Sciences in the U S Inc

Research, advancement and promotion of Ukrainian studies and culture in the United States

Arts & Culture

Ukrainian Museum

Provide exhibits and programs designed to acquaint the public with ukraine's cultural heritage.

Arts & Culture

Ukrainian Leadership Foundation

The ukrainian leadership foundation mission is for charitable, scientific or educational purposes and to engage in such other activities which are exclusively in furtherance of these purposes.

International

American University of Armenia

Support of the educational and research activities of the american university of armenia (aua).

Education

Ukraine Freedom Project

Conveying factual, accurate, unbiased, first hand information about ukraine to policymakers and the public at large

International

Association for Slavic East European

Association for slavic, east european, and eurasian studies ("aseees") is a non-political scholarly society dedicated to the advancement of knowledge about central asia, the caucasus, russia, and eastern europe in regional and global…

Social Science

American Councils for International

Leader in international education, academic exchange, and overseas language immersion.

International

English Speaking Union of the United

To employ english as a catalyst to foster global understanding and good will through educational opportunities and cultural exchange programs.

—

Ukrainian Congress Committee of America

Mission is to support cultural, educational, and humanitarian activites that emphasize the ukrainian american heritage.

—

The Central European University

Central european university is an institution of advanced research and teaching, dedicated to socially and morally responsible intellectual inquiry. having launched a new undergraduate offer in 2020, ceu's distinctive educational program…

International

The American College of Greece

The american college of greece is an independent, not for profit, (continued on schedule o)

International

The Museum of Russian Art

The museum of russian art collects, preserves, exhibits, and illuminates the rich artistic tapestry of russia, past and present, through outstanding exhibitions and public programs for all audiences.

Arts & Culture

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Ukrainian Institute of America Inc and the most unlike its peers is Lake Forest Academy. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 29 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 5% of your grantees by number, and just 3% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

0.0%0/22

the rest of the field

11%

206,164/1,819,543

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

21 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

20/21

Grantees still filing

15/21

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$1,177,895Arts & Culture$137,280International$38,644Education$16,300Philanthropy$6,500Religion$5,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Sami & Annie Totah Family FoundationMD13.8× affinity4 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Sami & Annie Totah Family Foundation · Greater Washington Community Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Network for Good · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · American Endowment Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation CHOPIVSKY FAMILY FOUNDATION funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

6get no government money at all

1rely on government for over half their income

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: TRANSNATIONAL EDUCATION GROUP.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

insufficient risk

Limited financial data in public filings.

Track record & reputation

high risk

4 years of Form 990 filings, no recent filing.

Legal standing

medium risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 461245954 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on TRANSNATIONAL EDUCATION GROUP, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

Awaiting reportFinancial stability— Runway not derivable from filings.
FlagSustained operations— No recent filing on record.
WatchReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 100% of their budget — load-bearing; a dependency Plinth would track.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Chopivsky Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Chopivsky Family Foundation through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

CHOPIVSKY FAMILY FOUNDATION

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

21 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2024.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Chopivsky Family Foundation?

More from the funding graph

CHOPIVSKY FAMILY FOUNDATION

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

21 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2024.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Chopivsky Family Foundation?

More from the funding graph