· Private foundation
Ukrainian American Community (Uac) Foundation Inc
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Individual grant recipient | $8,900 |
| Individual grant recipient | $4,000 |
| University of Rochester | $3,000 |
| US Ukraine Foundation | $2,000 |
| UKRAINIAN CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION | $2,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $2,000 |
| THE NATIONAL SUSAN B ANTHONY MUSEUM | $1,500 |
| UKRAINIAN ACADEMY OF ARTS AND SCIENCE | $1,500 |
| UNWLA Br 120 | $1,060 |
| Irondequoit Public Library Foundation | $1,000 |
| PROTEZ FOUNDATION | $1,000 |
| UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER - SKALNY CENTER | $1,000 |
| IRONDEQUOIT CHAMBER OF COMMERCE | $700 |
| SLAVIC BIBLE BAPTIST CHURCH | $300 |
| AMITY STREET ALLIANCE OF THE ARTS | $250 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY19–24, $3k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
31 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2025, 25 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 59% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $12k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- UCUkrainian Catholic University Foundation8× · 2017–2025 · $10k · revenue +93%
UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER3× · 2023–2025 · $8k · revenue +19%
United Help Ukraine Inc3× · 2019–2024 · $3k · revenue ×96
Funded once
- PUPlast Ukrainian Scouting Org KPS-USAone grant, 2020 · $8k
- URUKRAINIAN ROCHESTER COLLECTION AT URone grant, 2021 · $5k
- WWWorld Wide Foundation at WOCCUone grant, 2023 · $3k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Research, advancement and promotion of Ukrainian studies and culture in the United States.
Providing services to Ukrainian Citizens
Funding charitable and educational work in Ukrainian studies.
To unite and organize women interested in ukraine and those of ukrainian descent for the purpose of fostering ukrainian cultural heritage, promoting knowledge of ukrainian culture; promoting ties to other ukrainian, american and…
Preservation and exhibition of Ukrainian history and culture.
To promote and expand relationships and mutual understanding through educational,business and humanitarian programs between ukraine and the united states.
We are focused on providing and coordinating much needed assistance to Ukrainians who are fighting for their existence after Russian invasion. With the help of caring and well-wishing people here in America we organize fundraising events…
Uchi's mission is to develop relationships between the us and ukraine on cultural, educational, and humanitarian levels. it also serves to develop cross-cultural understanding between the peoples of the us and ukraine.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Ukrainian American Freedom Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is Yara Arts Group. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 23 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 14% of your grantees by number, and just 25% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
22 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 22 of the 82 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds U S-UKRAINE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ROCMAIDAN INC ↗
- Who funds Ukrainian Catholic University Foundation ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER ↗
- Who funds United Help Ukraine Inc ↗
- Who funds IRONDEQUOIT PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Revived Soldiers Ukraine ↗
- Who funds UKRAINIAN HISTORY AND EDUCATION CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds UKRAINIAN MUSEUM ↗
- Who funds KYIV MOHYLA FOUNDATION OF AMERICA ↗
- Who funds Ukrainian American Civic Center Inc ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Heritage Foundation of First Security Federal Savings Bank Inc · Charles Stewart Mott Foundation · New York Self Reliance Foundation Ltd · The Maria Hulai Lion Foundation Inc · The Selfreliance Foundation · UMANA Foundation · Chopivsky Family Foundation · Fedoriw Family Foundation Inc · Rochester Area Community Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Ukrainian American Community (Uac) Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Ukrainian American Community (Uac) Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to Ukrainian American Community (Uac) Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.