Skip to content
New Profit Inc at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

New Profit Inc

New profit is a venture philanthropy organization that catalyzes the impact of social entrepreneurs who are expanding access and opportunity in america.

$31M
Granted FY2025still arriving
59
Grants FY2025still arriving
21
States reached
$5.0M
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$48MYouth Development$9.5MEmployment$7.9MHealth$7.0MCommunity Improvement$5.9MHuman Services$3.4MPublic Benefit$2.6MScience & Tech$2.4MOther$0
02FY2025 · 59 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $50k–250k16 grants · $1.8M
  • $250k+43 grants · $29M
$375,000
Median grant
21
States reached
$99M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LIVING CITIES$5,000,000
BRAVEN INC$1,666,665
GIRL TREK INCORPORATED$1,000,000
BIG PICTURE LEARNING$1,000,000
THE HEALTH INITIATIVE$1,000,000
GENERATION HOPE$875,000
VILLAGE OF WISDOM$875,000
MARCY LAB INC$875,000
AMERICA ON TECH INC$875,000
THE OAKLAND REACH$875,000
DEMOCRACY AT WORK INSTITUTE$875,000
FAIR COUNT INC$875,000
GEORGIA RESILIENCE AND OPPORTUNITY FUND$875,000
DIGITAL PROMISE GLOBAL$875,000
LIBERATION VENTURES$875,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $16.8M) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 96% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%3RD DECADE INC: $110k → 15%LIVE AGAIN FRESNO: $100k → 19%WORKFORCE SOLUTIONS GREATER DALLAS: $135k → 14%STITCHCREW INC: $110k → 16%NATIONAL BLACK JUSTICE COLLECTIVE INSTITUTE: $125k → 14%COLLABORATIVE HEALING INITIATIVE WITHIN COMMUNITIES (CHIC INC): $100k → 8%MOORE IMPACT INC: $100k → 12%LIVE AGAIN FRESNO: $100k → 19%THE ARTHUR PROJECT INC: $100k → 17%THINK OF US: $250k → 14%MISSION LAUNCH: $125k → 19%SOCIAL CREATURES INC: $100k → 20%THINK OF US: $250k → 14%TELPOCHCALLI COMMUNITY EDUCATION PROJECT: $100k → 14%CAST: $100k → 8%STREET MINISTRIES: $100k → 17%HIGHLANDER INSTITUTE: $250k → 14%PROJECT FOR PRIDE IN LIVING INC (PPL): $100k → 11%SPRINGBOARD COLLABORATIVE: $250k → 22%TIDES CENTER: $220k → 10%STREETS MINISTRIES: $100k → 17%HIGHLANDER INSTITUTE: $250k → 14%GEORGIA RESILIENCE AND OPPORTUNITY FUND: $875k → 13%SPRINGBOARD COLLABORATIVE: $250k → 22%UNBOUNDED: $250k → 20%HIGHLANDER INSTITUTE: $250k → 14%GEORGIA RESILIENCE AND OPPORTUNITY FUND: $375k → 13%EQUITY AND TRANSFORMATION: $375k → 14%SPRINGBOARD COLLABORATIVE: $250k → 22%OPEN SOURCE WELLNESS: $110k → 9%UNBOUNDED: $250k → 20%HIGHLANDER INSTITUTE: $250k → 14%SPRINGBOARD COLLABORATIVE: $250k → 22%UNBOUNDED: $250k → 20%UNBOUNDED: $250k → 20%LIVING CITIES: $5.0M → 14%HOME IS HERE NOLA: $110k → 23%CLOSEGAP: $110k → 14%DATA QUALITY CAMPAIGN: $110k → 14%YOUTH PASSAGEWAYS: $108k → 10%WE ARE BETTER TOGETHER WARREN DANIEL HAIRSTON PROJECT: $110k → 16%THINK OF US: $250k → 17%THINK OF US: $250k → 17%THINK OF US: $125k → 17%LEAP INNOVATIONS: $650k → 14%LEAP INNOVATIONS: $650k → 14%LEAP INNOVATIONS: $400k → 14%LEAP INNOVATIONS: $250k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
MN
IL
MI
NY
MA
IA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
CO
MO
KY
WV
VA
MD
AZ
NM
KS
AR
TN
NC
SC
DC
LA
AL
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

76%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$95M · 131 repeat orgs$29M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +23% since the first grant, against +12% for those funded once.

131 repeat relationships: 34 still active in FY2025, 97 since wound down; 24 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

131
145

Total granted

$95M
$18M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+23%
+12%

Still filing today

96%
90%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 63% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $11M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHuman ServicesCommunity ImprovementEmploymentYouth DevelopmentCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BI
    BRAVEN INC
    7× · 2019–2025 · $6.0M · revenue +97%
  • GI
    GIRLTREK INCORPORATED
    5× · 2019–2025 · $3.3M · revenue +113%
  • TI
    TRANSCEND INC
    8× · 2017–2025 · $3.3M · revenue +398%

Funded once

  • XP
    X PRIZE FOUNDATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $2.4M · revenue +140%
  • NT
    NEW TEACHER CENTER
    one grant, 2017 · $1.0M · revenue -51%
  • ML
    MANAGEMENT LEADERSHIP FOR TOMORROWgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $500k · revenue +264%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Embracing Equity Inc

Embracing equity cultivates the mindsets and practices necessary to create an affirming, inclusive, and equitable educational ecosystem.

Education
2
The Management Center

We help leaders working for social change build and run more equitable, sustainable, and results-driven organizations.

Education
3
Deans for Impact

See Schedule ODeans for Impact supports educator-preparation programs to bring the science of learning into teaching practice; partners with policymakers to ensure pathways into teaching are accessible, practice-based, and…

Education
4
PROMISE54

We partner with people and organizations to solve their toughest talent-related challenges. we believe organizations will best maximize their impact and truly thrive when their teams are diverse, their cultures are inclusive, and their…

Education
5
The Common Application Inc

The common application is a not-for-profit membership organization of over 1,100 colleges and universities across the globe committed to access, equity, and integrity in the college admission process. every year, over 1.5 million students…

Education
6
Partnership On Ai to Benefit People and Society

Bringing diverse voices together across global sectors, disciplines, and demographics so developments in ai advance positive outcomes for people and society.

Science & Tech
7
Partnership for Public Service Inc

Making our government work better is a daunting task, and we are a small organization seeking to transform a government that employs millions of civilians and manages trillions of dollars in taxpayer revenue needed to protect public…

Employment
8
Central Indiana Corporate Partnership Inc

Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…

Community Improvement
9
Common Future

Common future is a network of pioneering leaders across the u.s. and canada who work deeply within their communities to create alternative approaches to business, philanthropy, and investing. we envision an economy that has transitioned…

Community Improvement
10
Upturn Inc

Upturn advances equity and justice in the design, governance, and use of technology.

—
11
New Classrooms Innovation Partners Inc

To create and inspire better ways to give every student an educational foundation for lifelong success. we imagine a world where every student attends a school that meets them where they are, adapts to the unique ways they learn, and…

Education
12
Common Impact Inc

Common impact's mission is to strengthen the capacity of social change organizations, enabling them to better run and scale their programs. through its partnership with companies, common impact taps into the business skills and expertise…

Unclassified
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Leadersup; the most unlike its peers is Onepeople Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

295 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 295 of the 310 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

19
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
73
Early backer (in before they grew)
291/295
Grantees still filing
177/295
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

GIRLTREK INCORPORATED: $3,325,000 · EducationGIRLTREK INCORPORATEDTRANSCEND INC: $3,310,000 · EducationTRANSCEND INCEnlearn: $2,250,000 · EducationTHE BIG PICTURE COMPANY: $2,060,000 · EducationZEARN: $1,750,000 · Education+47 more: $32,911,947 · Education+47 moreLIVING CITIES INC THE NATIONAL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT INITIATIVE: $5,000,000 · Human ServicesLIVING CITIES I…LEAP Innovations: $1,950,000 · Human ServicesLEAP Innovation…GEORGIA RESILIENCE AND OPPORTUNITY FUND DBA THE GRO FUND: $1,250,000 · Human ServicesGEORGIA RESILIE…THINK OF US: $1,175,000 · Human ServicesTHINK OF USTHROUGHLINE LEARNING: $1,060,000 · Human ServicesTHROUGHLINE LEA…SPRINGBOARD COLLABORATIVE: $1,000,000 · Human ServicesSPRINGBOARD COL…Unbound: $1,000,000 · Human ServicesUnbound+19 more: $3,432,500 · Human Services+19 moreBRAVEN INC: $6,002,501 · Youth DevelopmentBRAVEN INCONEGOAL: $1,377,500 · Youth DevelopmentONEGOALGENERATION CITIZEN INC: $1,125,000 · Youth DevelopmentGENERATION …COLLABORATIVE FOR ACADEMIC SOCIAL AND EMOTIONAL LEARNING: $1,000,000 · Youth DevelopmentCOLLABORATI…Village Of Wisdom: $875,000 · Youth DevelopmentVillage Of …+10 more: $1,552,500 · Youth Development+10 moreNORTH AMERICAN COUNCIL FOR ONLINE LEARNING: $1,060,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS: $1,000,000 · OtherCITY BUREAU NFP: $1,250,000 · OtherCENTER FOR BLACK EDUCATOR DEVELOPMENT: $1,125,000 · OtherEDUCATION LEADERS OF COLOR INC: $1,125,000 · OtherTHE HEALTH INITIATIVE INC: $3,200,000 · OtherTHE HEALTH INITIATIVE INCGirls Leadership Institute Inc dba Girls Leadership: $1,000,000 · OtherThe Beloved Community Center of Greensboro Inc: $1,000,000 · OtherDIGITAL PROMISE GLOBAL: $1,350,000 · OtherLIBERATION VENTURES INC: $875,000 · OtherPowerMyLearning Inc: $1,210,000 · Other+50 more: $11,941,805 · Other+50 moreINNER-CITY COMPUTER STARS FOUNDATION: $1,100,000 · EmploymentTHE URBAN ALLIANCE FOUNDATION INC: $1,000,000 · EmploymentThe Cara Program: $1,000,000 · EmploymentThe Knowledge House Fellowship Inc: $1,000,000 · EmploymentDEMOCRACY AT WORK INSTITUTE: $875,000 · EmploymentPowerCorpsPHL: $375,000 · EmploymentLIFT INC: $250,000 · Employment+9 more: $1,315,000 · EmploymentINCLUSIVE ACTION FOR THE CITY: $1,250,000 · Community ImprovementAVANCE INC: $1,000,000 · Community ImprovementThe Workers Lab: $1,000,000 · Community ImprovementFAIR COUNT INC: $875,000 · Community ImprovementPOLICYLINK: $475,000 · Community ImprovementTHE COLORADO NONPROFIT DEVELOPMENT CENTER: $402,500 · Community Improvement+15 more: $1,887,500 · Community ImprovementX PRIZE FOUNDATION INC: $2,400,000 · Public BenefitMILLENNIAL ACTION PROJECT DBA FUTURE CAUCUS: $900,000 · Public BenefitTHIRD SECTOR CAPITAL PARTNERS INC: $500,000 · Public BenefitCITIZEN UNIVERSITY: $250,000 · Public BenefitSHARED AMERICA INC: $250,000 · Public Benefit+4 more: $455,000 · Public Benefit
Education$45,606,947Human Services$15,867,500Youth Development$11,932,501Other$26,136,805Employment$6,915,000Community Improvement$6,890,000Public Benefit$4,755,000

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBRAVEN INC: $6,002,501 over 7y, 5.9% of budgetGIRLTREK INCORPORATED: $3,325,000 over 5y, 24% of budgetTRANSCEND INC: $3,310,000 over 8y, 3.7% of budgetTHE HEALTH INITIATIVE INC: $3,200,000 over 5y, 16% of budgetX PRIZE FOUNDATION INC: $2,400,000 over 1y, 12% of budgetEnlearn: $2,250,000 over 3y, 41% of budgetTHE BIG PICTURE COMPANY: $2,060,000 over 6y, 7.7% of budgetLEAP Innovations: $1,950,000 over 4y, 7.8% of budgetZEARN: $1,750,000 over 6y, 2.2% of budgetLEADING EDUCATORS INC: $1,500,000 over 3y, 7.1% of budgetONEGOAL: $1,377,500 over 3y, 2.2% of budgetMARCY LAB INC: $1,350,000 over 3y, 15% of budgetDIGITAL PROMISE GLOBAL: $1,350,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetAMERICA ON TECH INC: $1,350,000 over 3y, 3.6% of budgetCITY BUREAU NFP: $1,250,000 over 2y, 12% of budgetThe Oakland REACH: $1,250,000 over 2y, 11% of budgetINCLUSIVE ACTION FOR THE CITY: $1,250,000 over 2y, 5.3% of budgetGEORGIA RESILIENCE AND OPPORTUNITY FUND DBA THE GRO FUND: $1,250,000 over 2y, 7.3% of budgetPowerMyLearning Inc: $1,210,000 over 5y, 3.4% of budgetTHINK OF US: $1,175,000 over 6y, 6.9% of budgetSURGE INSTITUTE: $1,175,000 over 4y, 9.6% of budgetCENTER FOR BLACK EDUCATOR DEVELOPMENT: $1,125,000 over 3y, 3.7% of budgetEDUCATION LEADERS OF COLOR INC: $1,125,000 over 4y, 13% of budgetGENERATION CITIZEN INC: $1,125,000 over 3y, 10% of budgetTHE MATCH FOUNDATION INC: $1,100,000 over 3y, 8.8% of budgetINNER-CITY COMPUTER STARS FOUNDATION: $1,100,000 over 5y, 5.6% of budgetARIZOU: $1,100,000 over 5y, 6.4% of budgetCODEPATHORG: $1,100,000 over 5y, 2.4% of budgetBEYOND 12 EDUCATION INC: $1,075,000 over 4y, 4.9% of budgetVALOR COLLEGIATE ACADEMIES: $1,060,000 over 5y, 2.6% of budgetNORTH AMERICAN COUNCIL FOR ONLINE LEARNING: $1,060,000 over 5y, 8.9% of budgetTHE LEARNING ACCELERATOR: $1,060,000 over 5y, 13% of budgetTHROUGHLINE LEARNING: $1,060,000 over 5y, 8.5% of budgetENVISION EDUCATION INC: $1,017,500 over 4y, 1.1% of budgetSAGA INNOVATIONS INC: $1,002,500 over 4y, 2.3% of budgetBARR CENTER: $1,000,000 over 4y, 3.6% of budgetSPRINGBOARD COLLABORATIVE: $1,000,000 over 4y, 2.2% of budgetTHE URBAN ALLIANCE FOUNDATION INC: $1,000,000 over 4y, 2.6% of budgetKingmakers of Oakland: $1,000,000 over 3y, 4.0% of budgetNEW TEACHER CENTER: $1,000,000 over 1y, 2.9% of budget4point0 Schools: $1,000,000 over 4y, 16% of budgetAVANCE INC: $1,000,000 over 4y, 1.7% of budgetINSTRUCTION PARTNERS: $1,000,000 over 4y, 3.0% of budgetUnbound: $1,000,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetCOLLABORATIVE FOR ACADEMIC SOCIAL AND EMOTIONAL LEARNING: $1,000,000 over 4y, 5.0% of budgetThe Cara Program: $1,000,000 over 4y, 2.1% of budgetGirls Leadership Institute Inc dba Girls Leadership: $1,000,000 over 4y, 14% of budgetThe Knowledge House Fellowship Inc: $1,000,000 over 4y, 5.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds BRAVEN INC ↗
  • Who funds LIVING CITIES INC THE NATIONAL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT INITIATIVE ↗
  • Who funds GIRLTREK INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds TRANSCEND INC ↗
  • Who funds THE HEALTH INITIATIVE INC ↗
  • Who funds X PRIZE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Enlearn ↗
  • Who funds THE BIG PICTURE COMPANY ↗
  • Who funds LEAP Innovations ↗
  • Who funds ZEARN ↗
  • Who funds LEADING EDUCATORS INC ↗
  • Who funds ONEGOAL ↗
  • Who funds MARCY LAB INC ↗
  • Who funds DIGITAL PROMISE GLOBAL ↗
  • Who funds AMERICA ON TECH INC ↗
  • Who funds CITY BUREAU NFP ↗
  • Who funds The Oakland REACH ↗
  • Who funds INCLUSIVE ACTION FOR THE CITY ↗
  • Who funds GENERATION HOPE ↗
  • Who funds GEORGIA RESILIENCE AND OPPORTUNITY FUND DBA THE GRO FUND ↗
  • Who funds PowerMyLearning Inc ↗
  • Who funds THINK OF US ↗
  • Who funds SURGE INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds CENTER FOR BLACK EDUCATOR DEVELOPMENT ↗
  • Who funds EDUCATION LEADERS OF COLOR INC ↗
  • Who funds GENERATION CITIZEN INC ↗
  • Who funds THE MATCH FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds INNER-CITY COMPUTER STARS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ARIZOU ↗
  • Who funds CODEPATHORG ↗
  • Who funds BEYOND 12 EDUCATION INC ↗
  • Who funds VALOR COLLEGIATE ACADEMIES ↗
  • Who funds NORTH AMERICAN COUNCIL FOR ONLINE LEARNING ↗
  • Who funds THE LEARNING ACCELERATOR ↗
  • Who funds THROUGHLINE LEARNING ↗
  • Who funds ENVISION EDUCATION INC ↗
  • Who funds SAGA INNOVATIONS INC ↗
  • Who funds BARR CENTER ↗
  • Who funds SPRINGBOARD COLLABORATIVE ↗
  • Who funds THE URBAN ALLIANCE FOUNDATION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Gates FoundationCarnegie Corporation …Walton Family Foundat…New Schools FundMichael & Susan Dell …Rockefeller Philanthr…Chan Zuckerberg Initi…Tides FoundationSilicon Valley Commun…Robin Hood FoundationNew Venture FundStand Together Founda…
Gates FoundationWA72.4× affinity61 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Gates Foundation · Carnegie Corporation of New York · Walton Family Foundation Inc · New Schools Fund · Michael & Susan Dell Foundation · Rockefeller Philanthropy Advisors Inc · Chan Zuckerberg Initiative Foundation · Tides Foundation · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Robin Hood Foundation · New Venture Fund · Stand Together Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization New Profit Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from New Profit Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 60%6%23%51%90%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 22%
  • Capital Workforce Partners Inc: 86% of income from government
  • Youthbuild Global Inc: 69% of income from government
  • Legendary Legacies Inc: 58% of income from government
  • New Beginnings Reentry Services Inc: 42% of income from government
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology: 35% of income from government
  • Saga Innovations Inc: 28% of income from government
  • Fathers Uplift Incorporated: 22% of income from government
  • Foodcorps Inc: 21% of income from government
  • Third Sector Capital Partners Inc: 16% of income from government
  • Parity Baltimore Incorporated: 11% of income from government
  • Trustees of Boston College: 3% of income from government
  • The Achievement Network Ltd: 1% of income from government
  • Zearn: 0% of income from government
  • Chainless Change Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
6get no government money at all
49report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
3rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 310 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on New Profit’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home