Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersMostly funded, not a grantmaker — see who funds it →
Plinth

· Public charity

New Profit Inc

New profit is a venture philanthropy organization that catalyzes the impact of social entrepreneurs who are expanding access and opportunity in america.

$17M
Granted FY2024still arriving
83
Grants FY2024still arriving
21
States reached
$1.7M
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
0199% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.

Education$48MYouth Development$9.5MEmployment$7.9MHealth$7.0MCommunity Improvement$5.9MHuman Services$3.4MPublic Benefit$2.6MScience & Tech$2.4MOther$0
02FY2024 · 83 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k3 grants · $17k
  • $10k–50k25 grants · $292k
  • $50k–250k20 grants · $2.3M
  • $250k+35 grants · $14M
$110,000
Median grant
21
States reached
$120M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BRAVEN INC$1,666,668
GIRL TREK INCORPORATED$1,000,000
THE HEALTH INITIATIVE$1,000,000
TRANSCEND INC$750,000
CITY BUREAU NFP$375,000
GEORGIA RESILIENCE AND OPPORTUNITY FUND$375,000
WASHINGTON HOUSING CONSERVANCY INC$375,000
DIGITAL PROMISE GLOBAL$375,000
SURGE INSTITUTE$375,000
MARCY LAB INC$375,000
AMERICA ON TECH INC$375,000
ONEGOAL$375,000
POLICYLINK (DBA LIBERATION VENTURES)$375,000
THE CENTER FOR BLACK EDUCATOR DEVELOPMENT$375,000
PROPEL AMERICA$375,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $10.4M) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 93% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%LIVE AGAIN FRESNO: $100k → 19%THE ARTHUR PROJECT INC: $100k → 17%WORKFORCE SOLUTIONS GREATER DALLAS: $135k → 14%NATIONAL BLACK JUSTICE COLLECTIVE INSTITUTE: $125k → 14%COLLABORATIVE HEALING INITIATIVE WITHIN COMMUNITIES (CHIC INC): $100k → 8%CAST: $100k → 8%LIVE AGAIN FRESNO: $100k → 19%THINK OF US: $250k → 14%MISSION LAUNCH: $125k → 19%SOCIAL CREATURES INC: $100k → 20%THINK OF US: $250k → 14%TELPOCHCALLI COMMUNITY EDUCATION PROJECT: $100k → 14%PROJECT FOR PRIDE IN LIVING INC (PPL): $100k → 11%HIGHLANDER INSTITUTE: $250k → 14%SPRINGBOARD COLLABORATIVE: $250k → 22%TIDES CENTER: $220k → 10%STREETS MINISTRIES: $100k → 17%HIGHLANDER INSTITUTE: $250k → 14%GEORGIA RESILIENCE AND OPPORTUNITY FUND: $375k → 13%MOORE IMPACT INC: $100k → 12%SPRINGBOARD COLLABORATIVE: $250k → 22%UNBOUNDED: $250k → 20%STREET MINISTRIES: $100k → 17%HIGHLANDER INSTITUTE: $250k → 14%SPRINGBOARD COLLABORATIVE: $250k → 22%ADVANCE NATIVE POLITICAL LEADERSHIP EDUCATION FUND (THROUGH FISCAL SPONSOR: $100k → 10%UNBOUNDED: $250k → 20%HIGHLANDER INSTITUTE: $250k → 14%EQUITY AND TRANSFORMATION: $100k → 14%SPRINGBOARD COLLABORATIVE: $250k → 22%OPEN SOURCE WELLNESS: $110k → 9%UNBOUNDED: $250k → 20%UNBOUNDED: $250k → 20%THE FARMLINK PROJECT: $100k → 17%HOME IS HERE NOLA: $110k → 23%FUND FOR GUARANTEED INCOME: $100k → 14%DATA QUALITY CAMPAIGN: $110k → 14%CLOSEGAP: $110k → 14%YOUTH PASSAGEWAYS: $108k → 10%EVER FORWARD (THROUGH FISCAL SPONSOR YOUTH PASSAGEWAYS): $100k → 10%WE ARE BETTER TOGETHER WARREN DANIEL HAIRSTON PROJECT: $110k → 16%THINK OF US: $250k → 17%THINK OF US: $250k → 17%THINK OF US: $125k → 17%LEAP INNOVATIONS: $650k → 14%LEAP INNOVATIONS: $650k → 14%LEAP INNOVATIONS: $400k → 14%LEAP INNOVATIONS: $250k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

WA
MN
IL
MI
NY
MA
IA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
CO
MO
KY
WV
VA
MD
AZ
NM
KS
AR
TN
NC
SC
DC
LA
AL
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

79%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$73M · 125 repeat orgs$20M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +30% since the first grant, against +23% for the ones you funded once.

125 repeat relationships — 55 still active in FY2024, 70 since wound down; 24 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

125
127

Total granted

$73M
$16M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+30%
+23%

Still filing today

96%
89%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 75% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4.0M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHuman ServicesCommunity ImprovementEmploymentCrime & LegalYouth DevelopmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BI
    BRAVEN INC
    6× · 2019–2024 · $4.3M · revenue +97%
  • TI
    TRANSCEND INC
    7× · 2017–2024 · $2.6M · revenue +398%
  • GI
    GIRLTREK INCORPORATED
    4× · 2019–2024 · $2.3M · revenue +113%

Funded once

  • XP
    X PRIZE FOUNDATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $2.4M · revenue +140%
  • NT
    NEW TEACHER CENTER
    one grant, 2017 · $1.0M · revenue -51%
  • ML
    MANAGEMENT LEADERSHIP FOR TOMORROWgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $500k · revenue +264%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
New Classrooms Innovation Partners Inc

To create and inspire better ways to give every student an educational foundation for lifelong success. we imagine a world where every student attends a school that meets them where they are, adapts to the unique ways they learn, and…

Education
2
Embracing Equity Inc

Embracing equity cultivates the mindsets and practices necessary to create an affirming, inclusive, and equitable educational ecosystem.

Education
3
Deans for Impact

See Schedule ODeans for Impact supports educator-preparation programs to bring the science of learning into teaching practice; partners with policymakers to ensure pathways into teaching are accessible, practice-based, and…

Education
4
The Common Application Inc

The common application is a not-for-profit membership organization of over 1,100 colleges and universities across the globe committed to access, equity, and integrity in the college admission process. every year, over 1.5 million students…

Education
5
Partnership for Public Service Inc

Making our government work better is a daunting task, and we are a small organization seeking to transform a government that employs millions of civilians and manages trillions of dollars in taxpayer revenue needed to protect public…

Employment
6
Central Indiana Corporate Partnership Inc

Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…

Community Improvement
7
Partnership On Ai to Benefit People and Society

Bringing diverse voices together across global sectors, disciplines, and demographics so developments in ai advance positive outcomes for people and society.

Science & Tech
8
Achieve Now

Achieve now is a philadelphia-based social justice organization that sees literacy as a mechanism to effect social change. our mission is to provide k-2 school children in greater philadelphia with high-quality, culturally competent…

Education
9
Common Future

Common future is a network of pioneering leaders across the u.s. and canada who work deeply within their communities to create alternative approaches to business, philanthropy, and investing. we envision an economy that has transitioned…

Community Improvement
10
Common Impact Inc

Common impact's mission is to strengthen the capacity of social change organizations, enabling them to better run and scale their programs. through its partnership with companies, common impact taps into the business skills and expertise…

Unclassified
11
Upturn Inc

Upturn advances equity and justice in the design, governance, and use of technology.

—
12
Activate Global Inc

Activate empowers scientists to reinvent the world by bringing their research to market. activate partners with u.s. based funders, research institutions, and other pillars of the hard technology community to help entrepreneurial…

Environment

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Leadersup and the most unlike its peers is Onepeople Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyPolicy Research and AdvocacyWomen & Girls Leadership De…Health Access Advocacy and …Immigrant Worker SupportYouth Mentoring ProgramsYouth Sports ProgramsAffordable Housing Developm…Environmental Conservation …School District FoundationsLgbtq+ Community SupportAddiction Recovery ServicesCommunity Arts CentersChild Abuse Advocacy Servic…Youth Development ServicesCommunity FoundationsLocal Food System Organizat…Community College Foundatio…Jewish Community Organizati…Independent K-12 SchoolsCommunity Foundations
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 12 years old; the field is 16. You back the younger end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%7%<5yr14%27%5–10yr19%39%10–20yr16%17%20–35yr13%8%35–55yr16%2%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%4%<5yr14%19%5–10yr19%49%10–20yr16%22%20–35yr13%5%35–55yr16%1%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 7% of your grantees by number, and just 4% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 1% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
1%4/286
the rest of the field
13%
240,392/1,819,279

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

271 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 271 of the 286 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

18
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
67
Early backer (in before they grew)
267/271
Grantees still filing
171/271
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

TRANSCEND INC — $2,560,000 · EducationTRANSCEND INCGIRLTREK INCORPORATED — $2,325,000 · EducationGIRLTREK INCORPORATEDEnlearn — $2,250,000 · EducationEnlearnZEARN — $1,500,000 · EducationLEADING EDUCATORS INC — $1,500,000 · Education+46 more — $26,341,947 · Education+46 moreLEAP Innovations — $1,950,000 · Human ServicesLEAP Innovat…THINK OF US — $1,175,000 · Human ServicesTHINK OF USTHROUGHLINE LEARNING — $1,060,000 · Human ServicesTHROUGHLINE …Unbound — $1,000,000 · Human ServicesUnboundSPRINGBOARD COLLABORATIVE — $1,000,000 · Human ServicesSPRINGBOARD …GEORGIA RESILIENCE AND OPPORTUNITY FUND DBA THE GRO FUND — $375,000 · Human ServicesTIDES CENTER — $370,000 · Human Services+20 more — $2,867,500 · Human Services+20 moreBRAVEN INC — $4,335,836 · Youth DevelopmentBRAVEN INCCOLLABORATIVE FOR ACADEMIC SOCIAL AND EMOTIONAL LEARNING — $1,000,000 · Youth DevelopmentCOLLABORATI…ONEGOAL — $752,500 · Youth DevelopmentONEGOALGENERATION CITIZEN INC — $750,000 · Youth DevelopmentGENERATION …The FIND Design — $290,000 · Youth Development+12 more — $1,542,500 · Youth Development+12 moreNORTH AMERICAN COUNCIL FOR ONLINE LEARNING — $1,060,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS — $1,000,000 · OtherFAMILY INDEPENDENCE INITIATIVE — $822,240 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA — $750,000 · OtherPIVOT LEARNING — $750,000 · OtherACELERO — $750,000 · OtherTHE HEALTH INITIATIVE INC — $2,200,000 · OtherTHE HEALTH INITIATIVE INCEDUCATION LEADERS OF COLOR INC — $1,125,000 · OtherCENTER FOR BLACK EDUCATOR DEVELOPMENT — $750,000 · OtherThe Beloved Community Center of Greensboro Inc — $1,000,000 · OtherGirls Leadership Institute Inc dba Girls Leadership — $750,000 · OtherPowerMyLearning Inc — $1,210,000 · OtherPowerMyLearning Inc+51 more — $9,044,565 · Other+51 moreTHE URBAN ALLIANCE FOUNDATION INC — $1,000,000 · EmploymentINNER-CITY COMPUTER STARS FOUNDATION — $850,000 · EmploymentThe Cara Program — $750,000 · EmploymentThe Knowledge House Fellowship Inc — $750,000 · EmploymentLIFT INC — $250,000 · EmploymentWORKFORCE ALLIANCE OF SOUTH CENTRAL KANSAS INC — $210,000 · EmploymentTHE COLLECTIVE BLUEPRINT — $200,000 · EmploymentSAN DIEGO WORKFORCE PARTNERSHIP INC — $195,000 · Employment+6 more — $700,000 · EmploymentX PRIZE FOUNDATION INC — $2,400,000 · Public BenefitMILLENNIAL ACTION PROJECT DBA FUTURE CAUCUS — $525,000 · Public BenefitTHIRD SECTOR CAPITAL PARTNERS INC — $500,000 · Public BenefitCITIZEN UNIVERSITY — $250,000 · Public BenefitSHARED AMERICA INC — $250,000 · Public Benefit+3 more — $345,000 · Public BenefitAVANCE INC — $750,000 · Community ImprovementPOLICYLINK — $475,000 · Community ImprovementTHE COLORADO NONPROFIT DEVELOPMENT CENTER — $402,500 · Community ImprovementINCLUSIVE ACTION FOR THE CITY — $375,000 · Community ImprovementGENTLEMENS LEAGUE — $202,500 · Community ImprovementREINVENT STOCKTON FOUNDATION — $200,000 · Community ImprovementORANGE COUNTY COMMUNITIES ORGANIZED FOR RESPONSIBLE DEVELOPMENT — $150,000 · Community Improvement+13 more — $1,440,000 · Community Improvement
Education$36,476,947Human Services$9,797,500Youth Development$8,670,836Other$21,211,805Employment$4,905,000Public Benefit$4,270,000Community Improvement$3,995,000

Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetBRAVEN INC — $4,335,836 over 6y, 5.4% of budgetTRANSCEND INC — $2,560,000 over 7y, 3.7% of budgetX PRIZE FOUNDATION INC — $2,400,000 over 1y, 12% of budgetGIRLTREK INCORPORATED — $2,325,000 over 4y, 24% of budgetEnlearn — $2,250,000 over 3y, 41% of budgetTHE HEALTH INITIATIVE INC — $2,200,000 over 4y, 16% of budgetLEAP Innovations — $1,950,000 over 4y, 7.8% of budgetZEARN — $1,500,000 over 5y, 2.2% of budgetLEADING EDUCATORS INC — $1,500,000 over 3y, 7.1% of budgetPowerMyLearning Inc — $1,210,000 over 5y, 3.4% of budgetTHINK OF US — $1,175,000 over 6y, 6.9% of budgetEDUCATION LEADERS OF COLOR INC — $1,125,000 over 4y, 13% of budgetTHE MATCH FOUNDATION INC — $1,100,000 over 3y, 8.8% of budgetBEYOND 12 EDUCATION INC — $1,075,000 over 4y, 4.9% of budgetTHE LEARNING ACCELERATOR — $1,060,000 over 5y, 13% of budgetVALOR COLLEGIATE ACADEMIES — $1,060,000 over 5y, 2.6% of budgetNORTH AMERICAN COUNCIL FOR ONLINE LEARNING — $1,060,000 over 5y, 8.9% of budgetTHE BIG PICTURE COMPANY — $1,060,000 over 5y, 4.3% of budgetTHROUGHLINE LEARNING — $1,060,000 over 5y, 8.5% of budgetENVISION EDUCATION INC — $1,017,500 over 4y, 1.1% of budgetSAGA INNOVATIONS INC — $1,002,500 over 4y, 2.3% of budgetThe Beloved Community Center of Greensboro Inc — $1,000,000 over 4y, 44% of budgetEQUAL OPPORTUNITY SCHOOLS — $1,000,000 over 4y, 2.1% of budgetUnbound — $1,000,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetCOLLABORATIVE FOR ACADEMIC SOCIAL AND EMOTIONAL LEARNING — $1,000,000 over 4y, 5.0% of budgetSPRINGBOARD COLLABORATIVE — $1,000,000 over 4y, 2.2% of budget4point0 Schools — $1,000,000 over 4y, 16% of budgetINSTRUCTION PARTNERS — $1,000,000 over 4y, 3.0% of budgetNEW TEACHER CENTER — $1,000,000 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetTHE URBAN ALLIANCE FOUNDATION INC — $1,000,000 over 4y, 2.6% of budgetKingmakers of Oakland — $1,000,000 over 3y, 4.0% of budgetARIZOU — $850,000 over 4y, 6.4% of budgetCODEPATHORG — $850,000 over 4y, 2.4% of budgetINNER-CITY COMPUTER STARS FOUNDATION — $850,000 over 4y, 5.6% of budgetJUMPSTART FOR YOUNG CHILDREN INC — $825,000 over 2y, 4.0% of budgetSURGE INSTITUTE — $800,000 over 3y, 9.6% of budgetONEGOAL — $752,500 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetBARR CENTER — $750,000 over 3y, 3.6% of budgetCHILDREN'S LITERACY INITIATIVE — $750,000 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetPIVOT LEARNING — $750,000 over 3y, 6.7% of budgetCENTER FOR BLACK EDUCATOR DEVELOPMENT — $750,000 over 2y, 3.7% of budgetThe Cara Program — $750,000 over 3y, 2.1% of budgetGENERATION CITIZEN INC — $750,000 over 2y, 5.9% of budgetGirls Leadership Institute Inc dba Girls Leadership — $750,000 over 3y, 14% of budgetThe Knowledge House Fellowship Inc — $750,000 over 3y, 5.1% of budgetAVANCE INC — $750,000 over 3y, 1.7% of budgetGREATSCHOOLS INC — $667,500 over 3y, 4.0% of budgetINNOVATE PUBLIC SCHOOLS — $568,000 over 3y, 3.9% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds BRAVEN INC ↗
  • Who funds TRANSCEND INC ↗
  • Who funds X PRIZE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds GIRLTREK INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds Enlearn ↗
  • Who funds THE HEALTH INITIATIVE INC ↗
  • Who funds LEAP Innovations ↗
  • Who funds ZEARN ↗
  • Who funds LEADING EDUCATORS INC ↗
  • Who funds PowerMyLearning Inc ↗
  • Who funds THINK OF US ↗
  • Who funds EDUCATION LEADERS OF COLOR INC ↗
  • Who funds THE MATCH FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds BEYOND 12 EDUCATION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE LEARNING ACCELERATOR ↗
  • Who funds VALOR COLLEGIATE ACADEMIES ↗
  • Who funds NORTH AMERICAN COUNCIL FOR ONLINE LEARNING ↗
  • Who funds THE BIG PICTURE COMPANY ↗
  • Who funds THROUGHLINE LEARNING ↗
  • Who funds ENVISION EDUCATION INC ↗
  • Who funds SAGA INNOVATIONS INC ↗
  • Who funds The Beloved Community Center of Greensboro Inc ↗
  • Who funds EQUAL OPPORTUNITY SCHOOLS ↗
  • Who funds Unbound ↗
  • Who funds COLLABORATIVE FOR ACADEMIC SOCIAL AND EMOTIONAL LEARNING ↗
  • Who funds SPRINGBOARD COLLABORATIVE ↗
  • Who funds THE ACHIEVEMENT NETWORK LTD ↗
  • Who funds 4point0 Schools ↗
  • Who funds INSTRUCTION PARTNERS ↗
  • Who funds NEW TEACHER CENTER ↗
  • Who funds THE URBAN ALLIANCE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Kingmakers of Oakland ↗
  • Who funds ARIZOU ↗
  • Who funds CODEPATHORG ↗
  • Who funds INNER-CITY COMPUTER STARS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds JUMPSTART FOR YOUNG CHILDREN INC ↗
  • Who funds SURGE INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds ONEGOAL ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Gates FoundationCarnegie Corporation …Walton Family Foundat…New Schools FundMichael & Susan Dell …Rockefeller Philanthr…Chan Zuckerberg Initi…Tides FoundationSilicon Valley Commun…Robin Hood FoundationNew Venture FundStand Together Founda…
Gates FoundationWA72.4× affinity61 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Gates Foundation · Carnegie Corporation of New York · Walton Family Foundation Inc · New Schools Fund · Michael & Susan Dell Foundation · Rockefeller Philanthropy Advisors Inc · Chan Zuckerberg Initiative Foundation · Tides Foundation · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Robin Hood Foundation · New Venture Fund · Stand Together Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization New Profit Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 60%6%23%51%90%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 22%
  • Capital Workforce Partners Inc — 86% of income from government
  • Youthbuild Global Inc — 69% of income from government
  • Legendary Legacies Inc — 58% of income from government
  • New Beginnings Reentry Services Inc — 42% of income from government
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology — 35% of income from government
  • Saga Innovations Inc — 28% of income from government
  • Fathers Uplift Incorporated — 22% of income from government
  • Foodcorps Inc — 21% of income from government
  • Third Sector Capital Partners Inc — 16% of income from government
  • Parity Baltimore Incorporated — 11% of income from government
  • Trustees of Boston College — 3% of income from government
  • The Achievement Network Ltd — 1% of income from government
  • Zearn — 0% of income from government
  • Chainless Change Inc — 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
6get no government money at all
49report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
3rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 286 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home