How much did NEW PROFIT INC grant in FY2024?

NEW PROFIT INC reported 83 grants totaling $16,880,857 in its FY2024 IRS filing.

Foundation Dossiers Mostly funded, not a grantmaker — see who funds it →

· Public charity

NEW PROFIT INC

New profit is a venture philanthropy organization that catalyzes the impact of social entrepreneurs who are expanding access and opportunity in america.

$17M

Granted FY2024

Grants

Communities

$1.7M

Largest

01What you fund

0191% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2024.

Education$38MHuman Services$11MYouth Development$8.7MEmployment$5.4MCommunity Improvement$4.3MPublic Benefit$4.3MHealth$3.4MArts & Culture$2.8MPhilanthropy$2.0MOther$17M

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2018

charterdisabilitiessalemskills succeedsucceed jumpstartpreschool childrenneurodiversity

2019

muslimspillarenlearncharterpillarsfivemaking

2020

arrayfreedomworking studentsfaithgetfosteringtransforms

2021

foregoingparticipationboardtechnologiesemployment trainingadministermoney

2022

health disparitiesasian-american womenahecfarmlinkparticipantsincubatorbusiness cooperative

2023

lonelinesssensecounselingmental wellnessgbvmedicalintegrated

2024

modelsrrepsfacilitatesustainedlifestyledifferentstress reduction

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2024 · 83 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

Under $10k3 grants · $17k
$10k–50k25 grants · $292k
$50k–250k20 grants · $2.3M
$250k+35 grants · $14M

$110,000

Median grant

States reached

$120M

Total assets

Largest grants

BRAVEN INC$1,666,668
GIRL TREK INCORPORATED$1,000,000
THE HEALTH INITIATIVE$1,000,000
TRANSCEND INC$750,000
THE OAKLAND REACH$375,000
DIGITAL PROMISE GLOBAL$375,000
WASHINGTON HOUSING CONSERVANCY INC$375,000
INCLUSIVE ACTION FOR THE CITY$375,000
FUTURE CAUCUS$375,000
GENERATION CITIZEN$375,000
SURGE INSTITUTE$375,000
CITY BUREAU NFP$375,000
THE CENTER FOR BLACK EDUCATOR DEVELOPMENT$375,000
POLICYLINK (DBA LIBERATION VENTURES)$375,000
GEORGIA RESILIENCE AND OPPORTUNITY FUND$375,000

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $10.2M) land where the poverty rate runs at 16% — the area typically sits at 10%. 93% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

79%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$76M · 134 repeat orgs$20M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +155% since the first grant, against +109% for the ones you funded once.

134 repeat relationships — 59 still active in FY2024, 75 since wound down; 24 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

134

128

Total granted

$76M

$16M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+155%

+109%

Still filing today

96%

88%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 76% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4.0M went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

EducationHuman ServicesCommunity ImprovementEmploymentCrime & LegalYouth DevelopmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

BI
BRAVEN INC
6× · 2019–2024 · $4.3M · revenue +469%
TI
TRANSCEND INC
7× · 2017–2024 · $2.6M · revenue +255%
TH
THE HEALTH INITIATIVE (PREVIOUS FISCAL SPONSOR GDI)
4× · 2019–2024 · $2.2M · revenue +741%

Funded once

XF
XPRIZE FOUNDATIONgraduated
one grant, 2021 · $2.4M · revenue +72%
NT
NEW TEACHER CENTER
one grant, 2017 · $1.0M · revenue -34%
ML
MANAGEMENT LEADERSHIP FOR TOMORROWgraduated
one grant, 2017 · $500k · revenue +264%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Upturn Inc

Upturn advances equity and justice in the design, governance, and use of technology.

—

The Nasdaq Entrepreneurial Center Inc

Deliver world-class resources and mentoring to enable every entrepreneur across the globe to realize their maximum potential.

Arts & Culture

Deans for Impact

Deans for Impact supports educator-preparation programs to bring the science of learning into teaching practice; partners with policymakers to ensure pathways into teaching are accessible, practice-based, and instructionally-focused; and…

Education

The Common Application Inc

The common application promotes access, equity, and integrity in the college admission process.

Education

Catalyst for Educational Change

Catalyst for educational change (cec) is a nonprofit consulting agency that works with adult leaders in solving complex problems in educational systems. cec uses continuous improvement practices and deep collaboration to help educational…

Education

Equal Justice Works

Mobilizing passionate public service leaders.

Crime & Legal

New Classrooms Innovation Partners Inc

New classrooms innovation partners (new classrooms) believes it is possible to make the u.s. education system work for each and every student. we recognize that learning is personal. each student is different. and when schools can truly…

Education

College Summit Inc

Peerforward transforms the lives of low-income youth by connecting them to college and career.

Education

Greenwood Project

Greenwood project trains ambitious college students to compete and win in high-trajectory financial careers that drive long-term economic mobility.

Human Services

Embracing Equity Inc

To create an affirming, inclusive, and equitable educational ecosystem.

Education

California Competes

California Competes: Higher Education for a Strong Economy is a nonpartisan policy and research organization focused on identifying solutions to the states most critical challenges at the intersection of higher education, equity, and the…

Education

Aire Ventures Inc

To bridge systemic gaps in access, opportunity, and racial equity by scaling innovation and technology solutions to them.

Community Improvement

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Policylink and the most unlike its peers is Mortar Cincinnati. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side

Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 12 years old; the field is 16. You back the younger end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 7% of your grantees by number, and just 4% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 1% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

1%4/286

the rest of the field

11%

206,160/1,819,279

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

269 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

130

Early backer (in before they grew)

265/269

Grantees still filing

223/269

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Education$37,759,947Human Services$10,620,227Other$25,112,305Youth Development$8,670,836Employment$5,415,000Community Improvement$4,295,000Public Benefit$4,270,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Gates FoundationWA62.8× affinity51 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Gates Foundation · Carnegie Corporation of New York · Walton Family Foundation Inc · New Schools Fund · Chan Zuckerberg Initiative Foundation · Rockefeller Philanthropy Advisors Inc · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Robin Hood Foundation · Michael & Susan Dell Foundation · Tides Foundation · Amalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc · Stand Together Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation NEW PROFIT INC funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

9get no government money at all

2rely on government for over half their income

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: THE GENTLEMEN'S LEAGUE.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

insufficient risk

Limited financial data in public filings.

Track record & reputation

low risk

6 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up 8.0× since.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 821791721 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on THE GENTLEMEN'S LEAGUE, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

Awaiting reportFinancial stability— Runway not derivable from filings.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2025; revenue grew over the period.
WatchReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 77% of their budget — load-bearing; a dependency Plinth would track.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to New Profit Inc?

Find your warmest path to New Profit Inc through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

NEW PROFIT INC

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

269 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to New Profit Inc?

More from the funding graph

NEW PROFIT INC

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

269 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to New Profit Inc?

More from the funding graph