Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation Dossiers
Plinth

· Private foundation

Neporent Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$342k
Granted FY2025still arriving
12
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$156k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
0193% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.

Education$1.0MHealth$652kReligion$589kRecreation & Sports$67kPhilanthropy$59kArts & Culture$33kHuman Services$30kInternational$23kOther$0
02FY2025 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k7 grants · $20k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $66k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $256k
$6,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$415k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
VAIL HEALTH FOUNDATION$155,818
SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY$100,000
SKI SNOWBOARD CLUB VAIL$30,000
WESTERN COLORADO COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$25,000
LIFELINE CENTER FOR CHILD$11,110
Individual grant recipient$6,000
ROUND UP RIVER RANCH$5,000
BE THE DIFFERENCE FOUNDATION$5,000
FIRST DESCENTS$2,500
ROCK WRAP IT UP$1,000
LET'S WIN PANCREATIC CANCER FOUNDATION$500
BREAKFAST OPTIMIST CLUB$150
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–19, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%THE LUSTGARTEN FOUNDATION: $200 → 6%RISING STAR OUTREACH INC: $1k → 8%RISING STAR OUTREACH INC: $1k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

WA
IL
MI
NY
MA
PA
NJ
CT
CA
UT
CO
VA
GA
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$2.4M · 24 repeat orgs$121k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +43% since the first grant, against +24% for the ones you funded once.

24 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2025, 17 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

24
40

Total granted

$2.4M
$89k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+43%
+24%

Still filing today

63%
53%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $32k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthEducationInternationalPhilanthropyHuman ServicesPublic Safety & DisasterOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY
    9× · 2017–2025 · $992k · revenue +45%
  • VH
    VAIL HEALTH SERVICES FOUNDATION
    5× · 2020–2025 · $556k · revenue +139%
  • SC
    SKIDMORE COLLEGE
    5× · 2017–2021 · $28k · revenue +34%

Funded once

  • AMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEEgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $10k · revenue +116%
  • MARCH OF DIMES INC
    one grant, 2019 · $10k · revenue -35%
  • PC
    PROSTATE CANCER FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $10k · revenue +57%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Stony Brook Urology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
2
Stony Brook Internists University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
3
Stony Brook Surgical Associates University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
4
Neurology Associates of Stony Brook University Faculty Practice Corp

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
5
Stony Brook Childrens Services University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
6
Metropolitan Jewish Health System Inc

Mjhs health system is a charitable not-for-profit established to support the activities of affiliated organizations. mjhs is built on the core values of compassion, dignity and respect, first established by the four brooklyn ladies in…

Health
7
Samuel Waxman Cancer Research Foundation

The samuel waxman cancer research foundation (the "foundation") funds innovative research to bring faster cures to patients. in addition to supporting ongoing collaborative research in specific cancers, our scientists are investigating the…

—
8
University Associates in Obstetrics and Gynecology University Faculty Pract ice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
9
Stony Brook Ophthalmology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
10
Federation of State Medical Boards of the United States Inc

The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…

Health
11
The Rand Corporation

Help improve policy and decision making through research and analysis.

Public Benefit
12
Stony Brook Orthopedic Associates University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Vail Health Services Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Friends of Mountain Rescue Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyCommunity Health CentersYouth Ice Hockey ProgramsCommunity FoundationsChristian Youth CampsFood Pantries & AssistanceVolunteer Fire DepartmentsSubstance Abuse TreatmentYouth Sports Booster Organi…Veteran Support ServicesSmall Business Development …Pregnancy Support ServicesJewish Community FederationsCancer Support OrganizationsFaith-Based Liberal Arts Co…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 33 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number19%0%<5yr14%5%5–10yr20%10%10–20yr19%39%20–35yr13%21%35–55yr16%26%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value19%0%<5yr14%0%5–10yr20%1%10–20yr19%8%20–35yr13%19%35–55yr16%71%55yr+

The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/42
the rest of the field
10%
11,858/120,718

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

40 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 40 of the 69 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
40/40
Grantees still filing
27/40
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY — $991,500 · EducationSYRACUSE UNIVERSITY+5 more — $31,750 · EducationNEW YORK-PRESBYTERIAN — $336,000 · OtherNEW YORK-PRESBYTERIANCONGREGATION B NAI YISRAEL OF ARMONK — $252,633 · OtherCONGREGATION B NAI YISRAEL OF ARMONKIndividual grant recipient — $48,900 · OtherIndividual grant recipientSki and Snowboard Club Vail — $30,000 · OtherWEILL CORNELL — $28,250 · Other+36 more — $124,269 · Other+36 moreVAIL HEALTH SERVICES FOUNDATION — $555,818 · HealthVAIL HEALTH SERVICES FOUN…+9 more — $22,770 · HealthWESTERN COLORADO COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC — $25,000 · PhilanthropyTHE DISCOVERY LAND COMPANY FOUNDATION — $20,000 · PhilanthropyUNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC — $11,550 · PhilanthropyPROSTATE CANCER FOUNDATION — $10,000 · PhilanthropyROUNDUP RIVER RANCH — $25,750 · Recreation & SportsFIRST DESCENTS — $10,000 · Recreation & SportsBIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION — $21,000 · InternationalENDEAVOR GLOBAL INC (F/K/A THE ENDEAVOR INITIATIVE INC) — $5,000 · InternationalUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF — $1,500 · International+1 more — $500 · InternationalTHE BREAST CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC — $10,500 · Public Safety & Disaster+1 more — $150 · Public Safety & Disaster
Education$1,023,250Other$820,052Health$578,588Philanthropy$66,550Recreation & Sports$35,750International$28,000Public Safety & Disaster$10,650

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetSYRACUSE UNIVERSITY — $991,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetVAIL HEALTH SERVICES FOUNDATION — $555,818 over 5y, 2.0% of budgetSki and Snowboard Club Vail — $30,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetSKIDMORE COLLEGE — $27,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetROUNDUP RIVER RANCH — $25,750 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetWESTERN COLORADO COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC — $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION — $21,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE DISCOVERY LAND COMPANY FOUNDATION — $20,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetTHE VALERIE FUND — $15,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetUNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC — $11,550 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BREAST CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC — $10,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFIRST DESCENTS — $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMARCH OF DIMES INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DRUG DISCOVERY FOUNDATION — $8,600 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCITIZENS COMMITTEE FOR NEW YORK CITY INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetENDEAVOR GLOBAL INC (F/K/A THE ENDEAVOR INITIATIVE INC) — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWESTCHESTER JEWISH COMMUNITY SERVICES INC — $2,800 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL JEWISH HEALTH — $2,600 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBrothers for Life — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF KAREN INC — $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE JEWISH MUSEUM — $2,250 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetRising Star Outreach Inc — $2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetThe Rogosin Institute Inc — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF — $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetROCK & WRAP IT UP INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetSHATTERPROOF A NONPROFIT CORPORATION — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSMALL CHAMPIONS INC — $1,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetBROOKLYN LAW SCHOOL — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetENGLEWOOD HOSPITAL AND MEDICAL CENTER — $870 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLETS WIN PANCREATIC CANCER FOUNDATION — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE JESSE KOLBER FOUNDATION INC — $500 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetPACE UNIVERSITY — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMARC LUSTGARTEN PANCREATIC CANCER FOUNDATION — $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPLAY FOR PINK INC — $195 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFriends of Mountain Rescue Inc — $150 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Communal FundThe Goldman Sachs Cha…National Philanthropi…American Endowment Fo…Morgan Stanley Global…Jpmorgan Chase Founda…The Bank of America C…American Online Givin…Donor Advised Charita…Vanguard Charitable E…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Jewish Communal FundNY15.9× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Communal Fund · The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift Fund · National Philanthropic Trust · American Endowment Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Neporent Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →median 2%
  • Shatterproof a Nonprofit Corporation — 2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 69 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home