Skip to content
Neighborhood Partnerships Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Neighborhood Partnerships Inc

See schedule oneighborhood partnerships, inc.

$3.1M
Granted FY2025still arriving
11
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$5.0M
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Housing & Shelter$47MCommunity Improvement$23MEducation$5.7MHuman Services$4.2MYouth Development$3.5M
02FY2025 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$675,790
Median grant
1
States reached
$26M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CASA OF OREGON$5,030,697
DEVNW$1,567,499
THE IMMIGRANT AND REFUGEE COMMUNITY ORGANIZATION$838,398
NEIGHBOR IMPACT$817,025
PORTLAND HOUSING CENTER$691,504
NATIVE AMERICAN YOUTH AND FAMILY CENTER$675,790
NEIGHBORWORKS UMPQUA$627,582
PROJECT YOUTH$587,943
MICROENTERPRISE SERVICE OF OR$415,874
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY$404,707
WARM SPRINGS COMMUNITY ACTION TEAM$394,438
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–25, $3.1M) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 4% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%NEIGHBOR IMPACT: $1.5M → 10%EUVALCREE: $20k → 20%NEIGHBOR IMPACT: $817k → 10%EUVALCREE: $10k → 20%NEIGHBOR IMPACT: $450k → 10%NEIGHBOR IMPACT: $232k → 10%JOIN: $10k → 12%URBAN LEAGUE OF PORTLAND: $25k → 12%JOIN: $10k → 12%OR COALITION AGAINST DOMESTIC: $10k → 12%OR COALITION AGAINST DOMESTIC: $10k → 12%NORTHWEST PILOT PROJECT: $10k → 12%NORTHWEST PILOT PROJECT: $10k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$83M · 19 repeat orgs$1.4M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +42% since the first grant, against -10% for those funded once.

19 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

19
6

Total granted

$83M
$1.4M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+42%
-10%

Still filing today

89%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHousing & ShelterEducationEmploymentCommunity ImprovementYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CA
    COMMUNITY AND SHELTER ASSISTANCE CORP
    9× · 2017–2025 · $31M · revenue +409% · 95% of their budget
  • UC
    UMPQUA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORP
    9× · 2017–2025 · $11M · revenue +28% · 31% of their budget
  • CD
    COLLEGE DREAMS INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $5.7M · revenue +170% · 47% of their budget

Funded once

  • O
    OHCS
    one grant, 2023 · $1.3M
  • URBAN LEAGUE OF PORTLAND INCgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $25k · revenue +123%
  • BIENESTAR INC
    one grant, 2022 · $20k · revenue -24%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Neighborhood Partnerships Inc

See schedule oneighborhood partnerships, inc. (np or the organization) is an oregon non-profit corporation founded in 1989 whose mission is to help create a better oregon, one in which we all have access to opportunity, stability, and what…

Philanthropy
2
Welcome Home Coalition

Welcome Home is a diverse coalition in the Portland metropolitan region that uses its collective resources to create healthy communities by ensuring everyone has an affordable and stable home. We use community education and collaboration…

Community Improvement
3
Oregon Human Development Corporation

To promote economic and social advancement of farmworkers and disadvantaged individuals through the provision of education, training, advocacy and services that enhance self-sufficiency.

Human Services
4
Housing Oregon

Housing oregon strengthens the collective voice and capacity of mission-driven organizations that share a commitment to housing justice. through our statewide network, we build the affordable housing sector by offering education, resource…

Housing & Shelter
5
Innovative Housing Inc

Develop, preserve and operate affordable housing for low and moderate- income households and provde services to residents to maintain housing stability, improve quality of life and break the cycle of poverty.

Housing & Shelter
6
Cultivate Initiatives

The organization collectively works alongside those on the margins to empower individuals and communities through an inclusive range of services and support in east portland.

Housing & Shelter
7
Thrive Central Oregon

To connect individuals to the housing and community resources they seek.

Human Services
8
Impact Nw

Impact nw prevents homelessness by supporting people as they navigate their journey to stability and strength. founded in portland in 1966, impact nw now serves 26,944 people a year in the greater portland, oregon metro area, including…

Human Services
9
Portland Community Reinvestment Initiatives Inc

Preserve, expand, and manage affordable housing in the city of portland and provide access to and advocacy services for our residents. continued on schedule o.to serve the region as an advocate for low-income housing, as well as low-income…

Unclassified
10
Oregon Coast Community Action

Positive change for thriving communities: to empower people to work toward social and economic independence, otherwise improving the lives of those served by the corporation, under relevant community services block grant programs.

Housing & Shelter
11
Center for Intercultural Organizing

Center for intercultural organizing dba unite oregon is a diverse, grassroots organization working to build a multicultural movement for immigrant and refugee rights through education, civic engagement, community organizing and…

Civil Rights
12
Office of Rural and Farmworker Housing

Improving the lives of farmworkers and low-income individuals in rural communities through affordable housing, advocacy, building financial assets and other innovative solutions.

Housing & Shelter
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mid Willamette Valley Community Action Agency; the most unlike its peers is Euvalcree. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

22 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 22 of the 25 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

8
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
20/22
Grantees still filing
16/22
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

COMMUNITY AND SHELTER ASSISTANCE CORP: $31,033,500 · OtherCOMMUNITY AND SHELTER ASSISTANCE CORPNEIGHBORHOOD ECONOMIC DEVELOP CORP: $7,654,844 · OtherNEIGHBORHOOD ECONOMIC DEVELOP CORPMERCY ENTERPRISE CORPORATION: $3,174,850 · OtherMERCY ENTERPRISE CORPORATIONTHE IMMIGRANT AND REFUGEE COMMUNITY ORGANIZATION: $2,693,528 · OtherTHE IMMIGRANT AND REFUGEE COMMUNITY ORGANIZATION+8 more: $3,744,177 · Other+8 moreUMPQUA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORP: $10,579,735 · Housing & ShelterUMPQUA COMMUNITY DEV…PORTLAND HOUSING CENTER: $4,526,371 · Housing & ShelterPORTLAND HOUSING CEN…+1 more: $20,000 · Housing & ShelterCOLLEGE DREAMS INC: $5,738,953 · EducationMICRO ENTERPRISE SERVICES OF OREGON: $4,636,969 · EmploymentWARM SPRINGS COMMUNITY ACTION TEAM: $3,623,591 · Community ImprovementNATIVE AMERICAN YOUTH AND FAMILY CENTER: $3,538,229 · Youth DevelopmentNEIGHBORIMPACT: $2,979,594 · Human Services+5 more: $115,000 · Human Services
Other$48,300,899Housing & Shelter$15,126,106Education$5,738,953Employment$4,636,969Community Improvement$3,623,591Youth Development$3,538,229Human Services$3,094,594

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCOMMUNITY AND SHELTER ASSISTANCE CORP: $31,033,500 over 9y, 95% of budgetUMPQUA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORP: $10,579,735 over 9y, 31% of budgetNEIGHBORHOOD ECONOMIC DEVELOP CORP: $7,654,844 over 7y, 90% of budgetCOLLEGE DREAMS INC: $5,738,953 over 9y, 47% of budgetMICRO ENTERPRISE SERVICES OF OREGON: $4,636,969 over 9y, 25% of budgetPORTLAND HOUSING CENTER: $4,526,371 over 9y, 36% of budgetWARM SPRINGS COMMUNITY ACTION TEAM: $3,623,591 over 9y, 27% of budgetNATIVE AMERICAN YOUTH AND FAMILY CENTER: $3,538,229 over 9y, 4.8% of budgetMERCY ENTERPRISE CORPORATION: $3,174,850 over 6y, 29% of budgetNEIGHBORIMPACT: $2,979,594 over 4y, 3.2% of budgetTHE IMMIGRANT AND REFUGEE COMMUNITY ORGANIZATION: $2,693,528 over 8y, 1.2% of budgetHabitat for Humanity of Oregon Inc: $1,177,507 over 4y, 32% of budgetCORVALLIS NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSING SERVICES INC: $1,151,550 over 2y, 10% of budgetCOALITION OF COMMUNITIES OF COLOR: $40,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetEUVALCREE: $30,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetURBAN LEAGUE OF PORTLAND INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetJOIN: $20,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetBIENESTAR INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMID WILLAMETTE VALLEY COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY: $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetOREGON COALITION AGAINST DOMESTIC AND SEXUAL VIOLENCE: $20,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetNORTHWEST PILOT PROJECT: $20,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetOSPIRG FOUNDATION INC: $15,000 over 1y, 13% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds COMMUNITY AND SHELTER ASSISTANCE CORP ↗
  • Who funds UMPQUA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORP ↗
  • Who funds NEIGHBORHOOD ECONOMIC DEVELOP CORP ↗
  • Who funds COLLEGE DREAMS INC ↗
  • Who funds MICRO ENTERPRISE SERVICES OF OREGON ↗
  • Who funds PORTLAND HOUSING CENTER ↗
  • Who funds WARM SPRINGS COMMUNITY ACTION TEAM ↗
  • Who funds NATIVE AMERICAN YOUTH AND FAMILY CENTER ↗
  • Who funds MERCY ENTERPRISE CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds NEIGHBORIMPACT ↗
  • Who funds THE IMMIGRANT AND REFUGEE COMMUNITY ORGANIZATION ↗
  • Who funds Habitat for Humanity of Oregon Inc ↗
  • Who funds CORVALLIS NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSING SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds COALITION OF COMMUNITIES OF COLOR ↗
  • Who funds EUVALCREE ↗
  • Who funds URBAN LEAGUE OF PORTLAND INC ↗
  • Who funds JOIN ↗
  • Who funds BIENESTAR INC ↗
  • Who funds MID WILLAMETTE VALLEY COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY ↗
  • Who funds OREGON COALITION AGAINST DOMESTIC AND SEXUAL VIOLENCE ↗
  • Who funds NORTHWEST PILOT PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds OSPIRG FOUNDATION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Meyer Memorial TrustThe Collins FoundationThe Oregon Community …Onpoint Community Cre…The Ford Family Found…Seeding JusticeUmpqua Bank Charitabl…United Way of the Col…OCF Joseph E Weston P…Oregon Consumer Justi…Northwest Health Foun…Northwest Area Founda…
Meyer Memorial TrustOR43.6× affinity19 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Meyer Memorial Trust · The Collins Foundation · The Oregon Community Foundation · Onpoint Community Credit Union · The Ford Family Foundation · Seeding Justice · Umpqua Bank Charitable Foundation · United Way of the Columbia-Willamette · OCF Joseph E Weston Public Foundation · Oregon Consumer Justice · Northwest Health Foundation Fund II · Northwest Area Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Neighborhood Partnerships Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Neighborhood Partnerships Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 18%
  • Oregon Coalition Against Domestic and Sexual Violence: 100% of income from government
  • Mid Willamette Valley Community Action Agency: 81% of income from government
  • Neighborimpact: 68% of income from government
  • Urban League of Portland Inc: 33% of income from government
  • Warm Springs Community Action Team: 28% of income from government
  • College Dreams Inc: 23% of income from government
  • Native American Youth and Family Center: 23% of income from government
  • Portland Housing Center: 19% of income from government
  • Euvalcree: 18% of income from government
  • Coalition of Communities of Color: 15% of income from government
  • Umpqua Community Development Corp: 12% of income from government
  • Corvallis Neighborhood Housing Services Inc: 11% of income from government
  • Bienestar Inc: 8% of income from government
  • Northwest Pilot Project: 6% of income from government
  • Micro Enterprise Services of Oregon: 5% of income from government
  • Community and Shelter Assistance Corp: 5% of income from government
  • The Immigrant and Refugee Community Organization: 4% of income from government
  • Join: 4% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
3rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 25 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Neighborhood Partnerships’ filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home