How much did NEIGHBORHOOD PARTNERSHIPS INC grant in FY2023?

NEIGHBORHOOD PARTNERSHIPS INC reported 20 grants totaling $9,862,430 in its FY2023 IRS filing.

Where is NEIGHBORHOOD PARTNERSHIPS INC based?

NEIGHBORHOOD PARTNERSHIPS INC is based in OR.

NEIGHBORHOOD PARTNERSHIPS INC

Foundation Dossiers Also receives grants — funding profile →

· Public charity

NEIGHBORHOOD PARTNERSHIPS INC

Neighborhood partnerships (np) works with communities across oregon to develop human-centered and emergent solutions to immediate harms, and to power liberatory and transformative change through organizing, policy advocacy, and narrative change.

$9.9M

Granted FY2023

Grants

Communities

$2.8M

Largest

01What you fund

What you funded, over time

By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 57% of NEIGHBORHOOD PARTNERSHIPS INC’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2019

—

2020

northwest

2021

northwest

2022

hopehabitat humanitybuilds

2023

habitat humanity

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2023 · 20 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2023

Under $10k1 grant · $8k
$10k–50k7 grants · $98k
$250k+12 grants · $9.8M

$429,000

Median grant

States reached

$26M

Total assets

Largest grants

CASA OF OREGON$2,805,660
OHCS$1,318,120
DEVNW$1,244,100
MICROENTERPRISE SERVICE OF OR$607,750
PROJECT YOUTH$572,000
NATIVE AMERICAN YOUTH & FAM$572,000
NEIGHBORWORKS UMPQUA$543,400
PORTLAND HOUSING CENTER$536,250
NEIGHBOR IMPACT$450,450
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY$429,000
WARM SPRINGS COMMUNITY ACTION$414,700
IRCO$264,000
COALITION OF COMMU OF COLOR$22,500
EUVALCREE$20,000
OSPIRG$15,000

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY22–23, $2.0M) land where the poverty rate runs at 10% — the area typically sits at 11%. 6% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$56M · 19 repeat orgs$1.4M to everyone else

19 repeat relationships — 17 still active in FY2023, 2 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$56M

$67k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+139%

+382%

Still filing today

89%

50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 86% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.3M went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

Human ServicesHousing & ShelterEducationEmploymentCommunity ImprovementYouth DevelopmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

CO
CASA OF OREGON
6× · 2018–2023 · $21M · revenue +409% · 90% of their budget
NU
NEIGHBORWORKS UMPQUA
6× · 2018–2023 · $7.4M · revenue +28% · 28% of their budget
PY
PROJECT YOUTH PLUS
6× · 2018–2023 · $4.1M · revenue +114% · 41% of their budget

Funded once

URBAN LEAGUE OF PORTLANDgraduated
one grant, 2022 · $25k · revenue +382%
BIENESTARgraduated
one grant, 2022 · $20k · revenue +207%
CC
CATHOLIC CHARITIES-SAVE FIRST
one grant, 2022 · $12k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Portland Community Reinvestment

Preserve, expand, and manage affordable housing in the city of portland and provide access to and advocacy services for our residents. continued on schedule o.

Unclassified

Community Housing Partnership

Providing affordable housing to underserved communities locally and around the world.

Housing & Shelter

Housing Oregon

Housing oregon strengthens the collective voice and capacity of mission-driven organizations that share a commitment to housing justice. through our statewide network, we build the affordable housing sector by offering education, resource…

Housing & Shelter

South Portland Housing Development Corp

Low income housing

Housing & Shelter

Welcome Home Coalition

Welcome Home is an alliance in the Portland Metropolitan Region that uses its collective resources to build a movement for housing justice. We believe that everyone deserves to have an affordable and safe home in a neighborhood of their…

Community Improvement

Oregon Rural Action Inc

We are working to promote social justice, agricultural and economic sustainability, and stewardship of the region's land, air, and water.

Public Benefit

Fair Housing Opportunities of Northwest

The fair housing center is a civil rights agency that promotes housing choice, the protection and expansion of fair housing rights and the resolution of landlord tenant disputes through mediation.

Housing & Shelter

League of Oregon Cities

To be the effective and collective voice of oregon's cities and their authoritative and best source of information and training

Public Benefit

Community Action Center

The center provides resources and direct services to low income residents.

Human Services

Portland Jobs With Justice Education

We are a coalition that connects community and labor.

Employment

Portland Collective Housing

Portland Collective Housing is a volunteer run public benefit corporation formed to provide low income housing for people of low to moderate income.

Housing & Shelter

North West Housing Partnership

Established in 1990, North West Housing Partnership (NWHP) is a nonprofit agency that promotes public and private partnerships that create and preserve cost-effective quality housing for low to moderate income residents and workers through…

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Neighborimpact and the most unlike its peers is Community and Shelter Assistance Corp. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 33 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

0.0%0/24

the rest of the field

10%

1,118/10,668

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

21 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

20/21

Grantees still filing

19/21

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$32,720,173Housing & Shelter$10,193,065Education$4,055,000Employment$3,397,200Community Improvement$2,695,293Youth Development$2,373,569Human Services$2,045,194

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Collins FoundationOR44.6× affinity19 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Collins Foundation · Meyer Memorial Trust · The Oregon Community Foundation · Umpqua Bank Charitable Foundation · The Ford Family Foundation · Seeding Justice · Onpoint Community Credit Union · United Way of the Columbia-Willamette · OCF Joseph E Weston Public Foundation · Oregon Consumer Justice · Northwest Health Foundation · Careoregon Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation NEIGHBORHOOD PARTNERSHIPS INC funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

2get no government money at all

1rely on government for over half their income

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: CASA OF OREGON.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

low risk

~28 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 8 filed years.

Track record & reputation

low risk

8 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up 5.1× since.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 930977842 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on CASA OF OREGON, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

On trackFinancial stability— Roughly 28 months of cash on hand.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue grew over the period.
WatchReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 90% of their budget — load-bearing; a dependency Plinth would track.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Neighborhood Partnerships Inc?

Find your warmest path to Neighborhood Partnerships Inc through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

NEIGHBORHOOD PARTNERSHIPS INC

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

21 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Neighborhood Partnerships Inc?

More from the funding graph

NEIGHBORHOOD PARTNERSHIPS INC

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

21 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Neighborhood Partnerships Inc?

More from the funding graph