· Public charity
Neighborhood Partnerships Inc
See schedule oneighborhood partnerships, inc.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| CASA OF OREGON | $5,030,697 |
| DEVNW | $1,567,499 |
| THE IMMIGRANT AND REFUGEE COMMUNITY ORGANIZATION | $838,398 |
| NEIGHBOR IMPACT | $817,025 |
| PORTLAND HOUSING CENTER | $691,504 |
| NATIVE AMERICAN YOUTH AND FAMILY CENTER | $675,790 |
| NEIGHBORWORKS UMPQUA | $627,582 |
| PROJECT YOUTH | $587,943 |
| MICROENTERPRISE SERVICE OF OR | $415,874 |
| HABITAT FOR HUMANITY | $404,707 |
| WARM SPRINGS COMMUNITY ACTION TEAM | $394,438 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY22–25, $3.1M) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 4% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +42% since the first grant, against -10% for the ones you funded once.
19 repeat relationships — 11 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CACOMMUNITY AND SHELTER ASSISTANCE CORP9× · 2017–2025 · $31M · revenue +409% · 95% of their budget
- UCUMPQUA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORP9× · 2017–2025 · $11M · revenue +28% · 31% of their budget
- CDCOLLEGE DREAMS INC9× · 2017–2025 · $5.7M · revenue +170% · 47% of their budget
Funded once
- OOHCSone grant, 2023 · $1.3M
URBAN LEAGUE OF PORTLAND INCgraduatedone grant, 2022 · $25k · revenue +123%
BIENESTAR INCone grant, 2022 · $20k · revenue -24%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
See schedule oneighborhood partnerships, inc. (np or the organization) is an oregon non-profit corporation founded in 1989 whose mission is to help create a better oregon, one in which we all have access to opportunity, stability, and what…
Welcome Home is a diverse coalition in the Portland metropolitan region that uses its collective resources to create healthy communities by ensuring everyone has an affordable and stable home. We use community education and collaboration…
To promote economic and social advancement of farmworkers and disadvantaged individuals through the provision of education, training, advocacy and services that enhance self-sufficiency.
Housing oregon strengthens the collective voice and capacity of mission-driven organizations that share a commitment to housing justice. through our statewide network, we build the affordable housing sector by offering education, resource…
Develop, preserve and operate affordable housing for low and moderate- income households and provde services to residents to maintain housing stability, improve quality of life and break the cycle of poverty.
The organization collectively works alongside those on the margins to empower individuals and communities through an inclusive range of services and support in east portland.
To connect individuals to the housing and community resources they seek.
Impact nw prevents homelessness by supporting people as they navigate their journey to stability and strength. founded in portland in 1966, impact nw now serves 26,944 people a year in the greater portland, oregon metro area, including…
Preserve, expand, and manage affordable housing in the city of portland and provide access to and advocacy services for our residents. continued on schedule o.to serve the region as an advocate for low-income housing, as well as low-income…
Positive change for thriving communities: to empower people to work toward social and economic independence, otherwise improving the lives of those served by the corporation, under relevant community services block grant programs.
Center for intercultural organizing dba unite oregon is a diverse, grassroots organization working to build a multicultural movement for immigrant and refugee rights through education, civic engagement, community organizing and…
Improving the lives of farmworkers and low-income individuals in rural communities through affordable housing, advocacy, building financial assets and other innovative solutions.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mid Willamette Valley Community Action Agency and the most unlike its peers is Euvalcree. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 33 years old; the field is 17. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
22 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 22 of the 25 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds COMMUNITY AND SHELTER ASSISTANCE CORP ↗
- Who funds UMPQUA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORP ↗
- Who funds NEIGHBORHOOD ECONOMIC DEVELOP CORP ↗
- Who funds COLLEGE DREAMS INC ↗
- Who funds MICRO ENTERPRISE SERVICES OF OREGON ↗
- Who funds PORTLAND HOUSING CENTER ↗
- Who funds WARM SPRINGS COMMUNITY ACTION TEAM ↗
- Who funds NATIVE AMERICAN YOUTH AND FAMILY CENTER ↗
- Who funds MERCY ENTERPRISE CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds NEIGHBORIMPACT ↗
- Who funds THE IMMIGRANT AND REFUGEE COMMUNITY ORGANIZATION ↗
- Who funds Habitat for Humanity of Oregon Inc ↗
- Who funds CORVALLIS NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSING SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds COALITION OF COMMUNITIES OF COLOR ↗
- Who funds EUVALCREE ↗
- Who funds URBAN LEAGUE OF PORTLAND INC ↗
- Who funds MID WILLAMETTE VALLEY COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY ↗
- Who funds NORTHWEST PILOT PROJECT ↗
- Who funds OREGON COALITION AGAINST DOMESTIC AND SEXUAL VIOLENCE ↗
- Who funds JOIN ↗
- Who funds BIENESTAR INC ↗
- Who funds OSPIRG FOUNDATION INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Meyer Memorial Trust · The Collins Foundation · The Oregon Community Foundation · Onpoint Community Credit Union · The Ford Family Foundation · Seeding Justice · Umpqua Bank Charitable Foundation · United Way of the Columbia-Willamette · OCF Joseph E Weston Public Foundation · Oregon Consumer Justice · Northwest Health Foundation Fund II · Northwest Area Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Neighborhood Partnerships Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Oregon Coalition Against Domestic and Sexual Violence — 100% of income from government
- Mid Willamette Valley Community Action Agency — 81% of income from government
- Neighborimpact — 68% of income from government
- Urban League of Portland Inc — 33% of income from government
- Warm Springs Community Action Team — 28% of income from government
- College Dreams Inc — 23% of income from government
- Native American Youth and Family Center — 23% of income from government
- Portland Housing Center — 19% of income from government
- Euvalcree — 18% of income from government
- Coalition of Communities of Color — 15% of income from government
- Umpqua Community Development Corp — 12% of income from government
- Corvallis Neighborhood Housing Services Inc — 11% of income from government
- Bienestar Inc — 8% of income from government
- Northwest Pilot Project — 6% of income from government
- Micro Enterprise Services of Oregon — 5% of income from government
- Community and Shelter Assistance Corp — 5% of income from government
- The Immigrant and Refugee Community Organization — 4% of income from government
- Join — 4% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.