Skip to content
Nbh Charitable Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Nbh Charitable Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$95k
Granted FY2024still arriving
9
Grants FY2024still arriving
6
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Housing & Shelter$83kPhilanthropy$82kCommunity Improvement$55kHuman Services$51kYouth Development$50kHealth$39kInternational$25kEducation$18kOther$0
02FY2024 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k3 grants · $15k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $80k
$10,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$183k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY$25,000
JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF UTAH$15,000
THE GOLDEN SCHOOL$10,000
A PRECIOUS CHILD$10,000
HOPE HOUSE$10,000
YOUNG AMERICANS CENTER FOR FINL ED$10,000
PEOPLE FUND$5,000
HOMEWISE INC$5,000
JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF DALLAS$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–24, $51k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 80% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%A PRECIOUS CHILD: $10k → 5%HOPE HOUSE: $11k → 15%HOPE HOUSE: $10k → 15%HOPE HOUSE: $10k → 15%HOPE HOUSE: $10k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

79%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$355k · 11 repeat orgs$93k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +58% since the first grant, against +2% for those funded once.

11 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
9

Total granted

$355k
$73k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+58%
+2%

Still filing today

73%
44%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 79% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $20k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesInternationalHealthPublic Safety & DisasterEducationRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HH
    HOPE HOUSE INC
    4× · 2020–2024 · $41k · revenue +18%
  • TW
    THIRD WAY CENTER INC
    3× · 2020–2023 · $39k · revenue +74%
  • IV
    Impact Ventures Accelerator dba Impact Ventures
    3× · 2021–2023 · $35k · revenue +63%

Funded once

  • FC
    FULLER CENTER FOR HOUSING OF CACHE VALLEY INCgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $15k · revenue +26%
  • JA
    JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF KANSAS CITY
    one grant, 2022 · $10k
  • PO
    PEOPLE OF ALL COLORS SUCCEED
    one grant, 2023 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Enterprise Community Investment Inc

All our efforts support our strategic goals to increase housing supply, advance racial equity and build resilience and upward mobility.the organization raises private capital through investment and by forming effective partnerships.…

Housing & Shelter
2
Careerwise Colorado

Careerwise's mission is to forge pathways to meaningful careers through bold advocacy, innovative apprenticeships, and industry led partnerships, creating a dynamic talent ecosystem that connects ambition to opportunity for empowered young…

Education
3
Junior Achievement-Rocky Mountain Inc

Junior achievement - rocky mountain, inc. (ja) is critical for inspiring and preparing young people to own their economic success. in partnership with business and educators, ja immerses students in disruptive, real-world experiences,…

International
4
Activate Work Inc

We provide training, coaching, community supports and access to leading colorado employers enabling coloradans to acheive economic security, mobility and prosperity.

Human Services
5
United Way of Greater Philadelphia and Southern New Jersey

United way's mission is to end intergenerational poverty in our region by harnessing, leveraging and strategically investing the collective power of donors, advocates and volunteers, to help individuals and families break the cycle of…

Philanthropy
6
Goodwill Industries of Central Oklahoma Inc

We help people overcome challenges to employment.

Employment
7
Junior Achievement of Middle America Inc

Junior achievement accelerates economic opportunity and mobility for youth through cross-sector collaboration to deliver innovative solutions that improve educational and economic outcomes for students.

International
8
Endeavor Colorado

Endeavor colorado is a not-for-profit leading the high-impact entrepreneurship movement in colorado to catalyze long-term economic growth by selecting, mentoring, and supporting the best high-impact entrepreneurs in our region. high-impact…

Community Improvement
9
Mi Casa Resource Center

Advancing economic prosperity of the latino community.

Human Services
10
Central Indiana Corporate Partnership Inc

Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…

Community Improvement
11
Enterprise for Youth

Enterprise for youth empowers under-resourced san francisco youths to reach their potential through transformative paid internship experiences supported by a community of employers, caring adults, and peers.

Youth Development
12
Jobsfirstnyc

Jobsfirstnyc's mission is to create and advance solutions that break down barriers and transform the systems supporting young adults and their communities in the pursuit of economic opportunities.

Youth Development
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Peoplefund; the most unlike its peers is Hope House Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/15
Grantees still filing
9/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $82,200 · OtherIndividual grant recipientHABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $30,000 · OtherHABITAT FOR HUMANITYHOMEWISE INC: $20,000 · OtherHOMEWISE INCYOUNG AMERICANS CENTER FOR FINL ED: $17,500 · OtherYOUNG AMERICANS CENTER FOR FINL EDFULLER CENTER FOR HOUSING OF CACHE VALLEY INC: $15,000 · OtherFULLER CENTER FOR HOUSING OF CACHE VALLEY INCJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF KANSAS CITY: $10,000 · OtherPEOPLE OF ALL COLORS SUCCEED: $10,000 · OtherTHE GOLDEN SCOOP LLC: $10,000 · OtherPEOPLEFUND: $15,000 · OtherPEOPLEFUNDCOMMUNITY LINC: $10,000 · Other+4 more: $22,500 · Other+4 moreJunior Achievement of Utah & Idaho: $35,000 · InternationalJunior Achieve…JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF DALLAS INC: $25,000 · InternationalJUNIOR ACHIEVE…HOPE HOUSE INC: $40,538 · Human ServicesHOPE HOUSE I…A PRECIOUS CHILD INC: $10,000 · Human ServicesA PRECIOUS C…THIRD WAY CENTER INC: $39,000 · HealthTHIRD WAY…Impact Ventures Accelerator dba Impact Ventures: $35,000 · EducationCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION BOULDER COUNTY: $25,000 · PhilanthropyPIKES PEAK UNITED WAY: $5,000 · PhilanthropyYOUNG AMERICANS CENTER FOR FINANCIAL EDUCATION: $16,000 · Recreation & Sports
Other$242,200International$60,000Human Services$50,538Health$39,000Education$35,000Philanthropy$30,000Recreation & Sports$16,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHOPE HOUSE INC: $40,538 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetTHIRD WAY CENTER INC: $39,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetImpact Ventures Accelerator dba Impact Ventures: $35,000 over 3y, 2.0% of budgetJunior Achievement of Utah & Idaho: $35,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF DALLAS INC: $25,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION BOULDER COUNTY: $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHOMEWISE INC: $20,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetYOUNG AMERICANS CENTER FOR FINANCIAL EDUCATION: $16,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetFULLER CENTER FOR HOUSING OF CACHE VALLEY INC: $15,000 over 1y, 10.0% of budgetPEOPLEFUND: $15,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE GOLDEN SCOOP LLC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetA PRECIOUS CHILD INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCOMMUNITY LINC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetPIKES PEAK UNITED WAY: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetALL CLEAR FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Charles Schwab Founda…Daniels FundCharities Aid Foundat…The Bank of America C…Gs Donor Advised Phil…The Blackbaud Giving …Jpmorgan Chase Founda…American Online Givin…Natl Christian Charit…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Charles Schwab FoundationCO13.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Charles Schwab Foundation · Daniels Fund · Charities Aid Foundation America · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Nbh Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Nbh Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Nbh Charitable Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Nbh Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 23 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Nbh’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home