· Private foundation
Nature Sacred
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k41 grants · $103k
- $10k–50k5 grants · $69k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| FRIENDS OF PATTERSON PARK | $16,500 |
| BACKYARD BASECAMP INC | $15,500 |
| FRIENDS OF KIRBY LANE PARK | $15,500 |
| BROOKLYN GREENWAY INITIATIVE | $11,000 |
| JACKSONVILLE STATE UNIVERSITY | $10,000 |
| INTERSECTION OF CHANGE | $9,730 |
| Village Learning Place | $8,500 |
| Marian House Inc | $8,500 |
| Community Foundation of Northeast Alabama | $8,000 |
| GEDCO | $7,500 |
| THE LEAGUE FOR PEOPLE WITH DISABILITIES | $5,500 |
| Individual grant recipient | $5,500 |
| UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND | $5,000 |
| HOSPITALITY HUB MEMPHIS | $5,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $4,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY21–24, $47k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 58% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +23% since the first grant, against +18% for the ones you funded once.
27 repeat relationships — 19 still active in FY2024, 8 since wound down; 26 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 68% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $53k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
University of Chicago2× · 2017–2019 · $81k · revenue +56%- FOFriends of Patterson Park Inc4× · 2021–2024 · $24k · revenue +260%
- TVTHE VILLAGE LEARNING PLACE INC4× · 2021–2024 · $22k · revenue +7%
Funded once
- DUDrury Universitygraduatedone grant, 2017 · $64k · revenue +34%
- EMEMANUEL MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATIONone grant, 2017 · $41k · revenue -76%
- UDURBAN DREAMSone grant, 2023 · $7k · revenue -23%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Baltimore Green Space is a land trust that partners with communities to preserve and support community gardens , forest patches , pocket parks , and other community-managed spaces.
Greater Baybrook Alliance GBA is a non-profit community development organization whose mission is to act as a catalyst and conduit for equitable development and reinvestment in the Brooklyn, Brooklyn Park, Curtis Bay neighborhoods and…
Greater Baltimore Committee, Inc. is a not-for-profit, civic-interest corporation comprised of business and professional organizations located within the Greater Baltimore Area. Its purpose is to provide a strong, unified and effective…
The mission of baltimore washington medical center (bwmc) is to provide the highest quality healthcare services to the communities we serve. our vision is to be the preferred regional medical center through nationally recognized quality,…
To cultivate career advancement opportunities for local talent, facilitate talent acquisition for local employers, increase access to capital for local entrepreneurs' social ventures, and foster cross-sector collaboration to address city…
To restore the quality of baltimore's rivers, streams and harbor to foster a healthy environment, a strong economy, and thriving communities.
DC Greens advances health equity by building a just and resilient food system.
Johns hopkins community physicians, inc (jhcp), a valued member of johns hopkins medicine, is a network of medical practices strategically positioned throughout communities in maryland and dc. we strive to meet the needs of each community…
The mission of umbwms is to provide the highest quality healthcare services to the communities we serve. our vision is to be the preferred regional medical center through nationally recognized quality, personalized service and outstanding…
Brooklyn bridge park corporation's mission, d/b/a brooklyn bridge park ("bbp") mission is to provide an exceptional public space that connects people, nature, and the waterfront, through inclusive, innovative, and sustainable management…
To eliminate health disparities by educating and strengthening the health care workforce. bahec provides interdisciplinary education programs that bridge academic, healthcare, and community settings to transform the health of underserved…
To provide the highest quality healthcare services to the community we serve through our vision statement: outstanding people, exceptional service and uncompromising quality.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Baltimore Washington Medical Center Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is Friends of Georgetown Waterfront Pa. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 34 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
44 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 44 of the 75 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds BROOKLYN GREENWAY INITIATIVE ↗
- Who funds University of Chicago ↗
- Who funds Drury University ↗
- Who funds TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA ↗
- Who funds EMANUEL MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Washington Parks & People ↗
- Who funds Friends of Patterson Park Inc ↗
- Who funds THE VILLAGE LEARNING PLACE INC ↗
- Who funds INTERSECTION OF CHANGE INC ↗
- Who funds Backyard Basecamp Inc ↗
- Who funds GOVANS ECUMENICAL DEVELOPMENT CORP ↗
- Who funds LANGTON GREEN INC ↗
- Who funds Community Foundation of Northeast Alabama ↗
- Who funds MARIAN HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds RESERVOIR HILL IMPROVEMENT COUNCIL INC ↗
- Who funds URBAN DREAMS ↗
- Who funds CITY BLOSSOMS INC ↗
- Who funds THE LEAGUE FOR PEOPLE WITH DISABILITIES ↗
- Who funds ANNAPOLIS MARITIME MUSEUM INC ↗
- Who funds Asylee Women Enterprise Inc ↗
- Who funds MARYLAND HALL FOR THE CREATIVE ARTS INC ↗
- Who funds THE HOSPITALITY HUB OF MEMPHIS ↗
- Who funds Bon Secours Baltimore Community Works Inc ↗
- Who funds JOHNS HOPKINS BAYVIEW MEDICAL CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF GEORGETOWN WATERFRONT PA ↗
- Who funds REBUILD JOHNSTON SQUARE NEIGHBORHOOD ORGANIZATION INC ↗
- Who funds FILBERT STREET GARDEN ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Baltimore Community Foundation Inc · France-Merrick Foundation Inc · The United Way of Central Maryland Inc · Annie E Casey Foundation Inc · Associated Jewish Charities of Baltimore · Fund for Educational Excellence Inc · T Rowe Price Program for Charitable Giving Inc · The Harry and Jeanette Weinberg Foundation Inc · The Abell Foundation Inc · The Morris Goldseker Foundation of Maryland Inc · Chesapeake Bay Trust · Baltimore Civic Fund Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Nature Sacred funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- St James Development Corporation Inc — 100% of income from government
- Reservoir Hill Improvement Council Inc — 68% of income from government
- Parks and People Inc — 43% of income from government
- Govans Ecumenical Development Corp — 28% of income from government
- Asylee Women Enterprise Inc — 26% of income from government
- Roberta's House Inc — 21% of income from government
- Intersection of Change Inc — 20% of income from government
- The Village Learning Place Inc — 6% of income from government
- The American Visionary Art Museum Inc — 6% of income from government
- Baltimore Clayworks Inc — 5% of income from government
- Bon Secours Baltimore Community Works Inc — 3% of income from government
- Maryland Hall for the Creative Arts Inc — 3% of income from government
- Marian House Inc — 2% of income from government
- Annapolis Maritime Museum Inc — 2% of income from government
- Franklin Square Hospital Center Inc — 0% of income from government
- Johns Hopkins Bayview Medical Center Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.