Skip to content

· Public charity

National Youth Leadership Council

To equip young people with the knowledge, skills, and confidence, amplifying youth voice, to co-create a more just, sustainable, and peaceful world.

$168k
Granted FY2025still arriving
4
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$30k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Education$423kYouth Development$97kPhilanthropy$25k
02FY2025 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 4 grants below total $117,500, the rows itemized in this filing. The $167,601 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $50,101 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.
$30,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$363k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NEBRASKA CHILDREN AND FAMILIES FOUNDATION$30,000
CURATORS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI$30,000
NEW MEXICO OUT OF SCHOOL TIME NETWORK$30,000
MASSACHUSETTS AFTERSCHOOL PARTNERSHIP$27,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–22, $35k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%UNITED WAYS OF TENNESSEE: $25k → 9%VOICES FOR GEORGIA'S CHILDREN: $10k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
MI
MA
OR
IN
PA
NE
MO
MD
DE
NM
TN
NC
LA
GA
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

70%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$383k · 8 repeat orgs$163k to everyone else

8 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
13

Total granted

$383k
$163k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+30%
+49%

Still filing today

63%
77%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’24’25
EducationPhilanthropyHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NC
    NEBRASKA CHILDREN & FAMILIES FOUNDATION
    3× · 2020–2025 · $65k · revenue +2%
  • TP
    TEXAS PARTNERSHIP FOR OUT OF SCHOOL TIME
    4× · 2020–2023 · $45k · revenue +30%
  • MA
    MASSACHUSETTS AFTERSCHOOL PARTNER- SHIP INC
    2× · 2020–2025 · $38k · revenue +339%

Funded once

  • AFTERSCHOOL ALLIANCEgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $35k · revenue +63%
  • UW
    UNITED WAYS OF TENNESSEE
    2× · 2022–2023 · $25k · revenue -46%
  • UW
    UNITED WAY OF DELAWARE
    one grant, 2020 · $10k · revenue +7%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Utah Afterschool Network

Uan is a catalyst for building strong, safe, and healthy afterschool/out- of-school time programs to support youth, families, and communities. uan has three main objectives. first, to create a sustainable structure of statewide, regional,…

Youth Development
2
Tennessee State Collaborative On Reforming Education

The mission of the state collaborative on reforming education (score) is to catalyze transformative change in tennessee education so that all students can achieve success. score is an independent, nonprofit, and nonpartisan institution,…

Education
3
Learning First Alliance

The learning first alliance, a partnership of leading education associations representing more than 10 million members, supports improved student learning in america's public schools by engaging individual and organizational expertise,…

Arts & Culture
4
Child First Authority Inc

The mission of child first is to develop youth and strengthen families by providing high quality community schools, after-school and summer learning programs that promote academic achievement, social and emotional well-being, and parent…

Human Services
5
Arizona Center for Afterschool Excellence Inc

The arizona center for afterschool excellence is dedicated to the enhancement of child and youth development and educational achievement through quality afterschool programming.

Education
6
United Way of Greater Philadelphia and Southern New Jersey

United way's mission is to end intergenerational poverty in our region by harnessing, leveraging and strategically investing the collective power of donors, advocates and volunteers, to help individuals and families break the cycle of…

Philanthropy
7
Alliance for Early Success Fka Birth to Five Policy Alliance

The organization is a catalyst for putting vulnerable young children on a path to success. our goal is to advance state policies that lead to improved health, learning, and family support outcomes for young children ages birth through…

Human Services
8
American Youth Policy Forum

The organization's purpose is to provide learning opportunities, to perform research and publish resources useful to policy makers and others working on youth-related issues at the local, state and national levels.

—
9
National Association of Independent Schools Inc

As the largest association of independent schools, nais co-creates the future of education by uniting and empowering our community. we do this through thought leadership, research, creation and curation of resources, and direct…

—
10
California School-Age Consortium Inc

The California School-Age Consortium (CalSAC) builds professional networks that provide training, leadership development and advocacy to ensure that all young people have access to high quality out-of-school time programs and to create a…

—
11
Citizen Schools Inc

In fiscal year 2025, the agency operated an americorps maker fellowship, placing 7 americorps vista members at 6 different education focused organizations in ca, ma, and ny. americorps members worked on capacity building projects to expand…

Education
12
Massachusetts Business Alliance for Education Inc

The massachusetts business alliance for education (mbae) is committed to excellence, opportunity and innovation in our public education system to prepare all students to engage successfully in a global economy and society.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Afterschool Alliance; the most unlike its peers is Camp Fire Usa. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/16
Grantees still filing
12/16
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NEW MEXICO OUT-OF SCHOOL TIME NETWORK: $55,000 · EducationNEW MEXICO OUT-OF SCHOOL TIME NETWORKTEXAS PARTNERSHIP FOR OUT OF SCHOOL TIME: $45,000 · EducationTEXAS PARTNERSHIP FOR OUT OF SCHOOL TIMEMASSACHUSETTS AFTERSCHOOL PARTNER- SHIP INC: $37,500 · EducationMASSACHUSETTS AFTERSCHOOL PARTNER- SHIP I…IGNITE AFTERSCHOOL: $20,000 · EducationIGNITE AFTERSCHOOLINDIANA AFTERSCHOOL NETWORK INC: $10,000 · EducationLOUISIANA TECH UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 · EducationPUBLIC SCHOOL FORUM OF NC INC: $10,000 · EducationMichigan Afterschool Partnership: $10,000 · EducationCENTRAL SUSQUEHANNA INTERMEDIATE UNIT EDUCATION ASSOCIATION: $70,000 · OtherCENTRAL SUSQUEHANNA INTERMEDIATE UNIT ED…CURATORS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI SPECIAL TR: $55,000 · OtherCURATORS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI S…Individual grant recipient: $35,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientBEYOND SCHOOL BELLS: $10,000 · OtherNORTH CAROLINA CENTER FOR AFTERSCHOOL PROGRAMS: $10,000 · OtherCAMP FIRE USA: $7,168 · Other+1 more: $5,500 · OtherNEBRASKA CHILDREN & FAMILIES FOUNDATION: $65,000 · PhilanthropyNEBRASKA CHILDREN…UNITED WAY OF DELAWARE: $10,000 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY OF DEL…UNITED WAY OF FRANKLIN COUNTY: $10,000 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY OF FRA…AFTERSCHOOL ALLIANCE: $35,000 · Youth DevelopmentUNITED WAYS OF TENNESSEE: $25,000 · Human ServicesVOICES FOR GEORGIA'S CHILDREN INC: $10,000 · Human Services
Education$197,500Other$192,668Philanthropy$85,000Youth Development$35,000Human Services$35,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNEBRASKA CHILDREN & FAMILIES FOUNDATION: $65,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetNEW MEXICO OUT-OF SCHOOL TIME NETWORK: $55,000 over 2y, 5.5% of budgetTEXAS PARTNERSHIP FOR OUT OF SCHOOL TIME: $45,000 over 4y, 15% of budgetMASSACHUSETTS AFTERSCHOOL PARTNER- SHIP INC: $37,500 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetAFTERSCHOOL ALLIANCE: $35,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetUNITED WAYS OF TENNESSEE: $25,000 over 2y, 4.4% of budgetIGNITE AFTERSCHOOL: $20,000 over 2y, 3.2% of budgetUNITED WAY OF DELAWARE: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetINDIANA AFTERSCHOOL NETWORK INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetLOUISIANA TECH UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetVOICES FOR GEORGIA'S CHILDREN INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetPUBLIC SCHOOL FORUM OF NC INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetUNITED WAY OF FRANKLIN COUNTY: $10,000 over 1y, 5.5% of budgetCAMP FIRE USA: $7,168 over 2y, 8.9% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Charles Stewart Mott FoundationMI25.2× affinity10 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Charles Stewart Mott Foundation · Afterschool Alliance · STEM Next Opportunity Fund · United Way Worldwide · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization National Youth Leadership Council funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from National Youth Leadership Council. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 82%
  • Massachusetts Afterschool Partner- Ship Inc: 82% of income from government
  • United Way of Delaware: 58% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
2rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to National Youth Leadership Council?

Find your warmest path to National Youth Leadership Council through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 21 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on National Youth Leadership Council’s filings →

More from the funding graph