How much did AFTERSCHOOL ALLIANCE grant in FY2024?

AFTERSCHOOL ALLIANCE reported 14 grants totaling $315,000 in its FY2024 IRS filing.

Where is AFTERSCHOOL ALLIANCE based?

AFTERSCHOOL ALLIANCE is based in DC.

AFTERSCHOOL ALLIANCE

Foundation Dossiers Mostly funded, not a grantmaker — see who funds it →

· Public charity

AFTERSCHOOL ALLIANCE

$315k

Granted FY2024

Grants

Communities

$50k

Largest

01What you fund

0179% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2024.

Education$732kHuman Services$357kArts & Culture$170kInternational$135kYouth Development$125kPhilanthropy$120kScience & Tech$45kHealth$10kOther$443k

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2018

overdeck stem

2019

social emotionalemotional learninglearning policyout-of-schoolempowerfuturefull potential

2020

award stemadvancing selsel charactercharacter policystem policyeducation outreach

2021

credit outsideoutside learningstem policyoutreach stemeducation outreach

2022

voiceslivesculturaltraditionalincreasecredit learningeducation outreach

2023

credit learningstem policyeducation outreach

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2024 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

$10k–50k13 grants · $265k
$50k–250k1 grant · $50k

$20,000

Median grant

States reached

$16M

Total assets

Largest grants

VA PARTNERSHIP FOR OUT-OF-SCHOOL TIME'$50,000
VOICES FOR ALABAMA'S CHILDREN$35,000
NEBRASKA CHILDREN AND FAMILIES FOUNDATION$30,000
JANNUS INC$25,000
WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION$25,000
VOICES FOR GEORGIA'S CHILDREN$20,000
SCHOOL SERVICES OF MONTANA$20,000
TEXAS PARTNERSHIP OUT OF SCHOOL TIME$20,000
NEW MEXICO OUT-OF-SCHOOL TIME NETWORK$20,000
NEW YORK STATE NETWORK FOR YOUTH SUCCESS$20,000
METROPOLITAN FAMILY SERVICE$20,000
CENTRAL SUSQUEHANNA INTERMEDIATE UNIT$10,000
VERMONT AFTERSCHOOL INC$10,000
BLACK HILL SPECIAL SERVICES COOPERATIVE$10,000

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $352k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11% — the area typically sits at 10%. 59% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$1.9M · 31 repeat orgs$237k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +135% since the first grant, against -2% for the ones you funded once.

31 repeat relationships — 13 still active in FY2024, 18 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$1.9M

$227k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+135%

-2%

Still filing today

84%

81%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

EducationHuman ServicesArts & CultureYouth DevelopmentInternationalPhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

VP
VIRGINIA PARTNERSHIP FOR OUT-OF-SCHOOL TIME
4× · 2021–2024 · $180k · revenue +243% · 41% of their budget
VA
VERMONT AFTERSCHOOL INC
8× · 2017–2024 · $115k · revenue +626%
NC
NEBRASKA CHILDREN AND FAMILIES FOUNDATION
5× · 2018–2024 · $110k · revenue +186%

Funded once

TU
THE UNITED WAYS OF TENNESSEE
one grant, 2017 · $50k · revenue -10%
AS
ASU SYSTEM FOUNDATION INCgraduated
one grant, 2018 · $37k · revenue +116%
SAVE THE CHILDREN
one grant, 2019 · $20k · revenue +21%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

North Carolina Partnership for

Advance a high quality, comprehensive, accountable early childhood system that benefits each child in north carolina beginning with a healthy birth.

Education

United Children's Services of

Children's services

Human Services

Out Teach

We inspire and prepare today's elementary students to explore the wonders of science and become tomorrow's innovators.

Education

Educare Dc

To eliminate the opportunity gap with high-quality early learning for children prenatal to age 5.

Human Services

Augustana College

Offer a challenging education that develops the qualities of mind, spirit and body for students.

Education

Great Mn Schools

Makes strategic investments in proven and promising schools, providing the expert guidance, funding resources to create a community of great schools.

Education

Education Commission of the States

Identify, develop, and implement education public policy to address current and future needs.

Education

Yes Every Kid Inc

yes. every kid. is a leading advocacy team with a families-first approach to transform America's education policy landscape.

—

Colorado Association of School

Empower colorado education leaders through advocacy, professional learning and networking to deliver on the promise of public education

—

School Boards for Academic Excellence

To restore academic excellence and parental rights in the american education system by building a national network of state-based organizations and school board members dedicated to reforming policies and practices that improve student…

Civil Rights

Minnesota Child Care Resource and

To provide statewide leadership in shaping collaborations that collectively build a diverse, high quality child care system accessible to all minnesota families through partnership with and in support of local child care resource and…

Human Services

The Parents' Campaign

To ensure brighter futures for ms children by improving public schools through parent advocacy.

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Public School Forum of Nc Inc and the most unlike its peers is The Iowa Children's Museum. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side

Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 28 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

2%1/48

the rest of the field

11%

206,163/1,819,517

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

40 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

39/40

Grantees still filing

32/40

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Education$732,000Other$498,000Human Services$357,000Arts & Culture$170,000International$135,000Youth Development$125,000Philanthropy$120,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Charles Stewart Mott FoundationMI52.2× affinity24 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Charles Stewart Mott Foundation · STEM Next Opportunity Fund · National Youth Leadership Council · Annie E Casey Foundation Inc · Partnership for Americas Children · Alliance for Early Success Fka · WK Kellogg Foundation · The Allstate Foundation · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation AFTERSCHOOL ALLIANCE funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

1get no government money at all

1rely on government for over half their income

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: VIRGINIA PARTNERSHIP FOR OUT-OF-SCHOOL TIME.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

low risk

~16 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 4 filed years.

Track record & reputation

medium risk

4 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up 3.4× since.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 834446151 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on VIRGINIA PARTNERSHIP FOR OUT-OF-SCHOOL TIME, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

On trackFinancial stability— Roughly 16 months of cash on hand.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue grew over the period.
WatchReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 41% of their budget — load-bearing; a dependency Plinth would track.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Afterschool Alliance?

Find your warmest path to Afterschool Alliance through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

AFTERSCHOOL ALLIANCE

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

40 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Afterschool Alliance?

More from the funding graph

AFTERSCHOOL ALLIANCE

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

40 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Afterschool Alliance?

More from the funding graph