· Public charity
National Youth Leadership Council
To equip young people with the knowledge, skills, and confidence, amplifying youth voice, to co-create a more just, sustainable, and peaceful world.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 4 grants below total $117,500 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $167,601 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $50,101 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| CURATORS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI | $30,000 |
| NEW MEXICO OUT OF SCHOOL TIME NETWORK | $30,000 |
| NEBRASKA CHILDREN AND FAMILIES FOUNDATION | $30,000 |
| MASSACHUSETTS AFTERSCHOOL PARTNERSHIP | $27,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–22, $35k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
8 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- NCNEBRASKA CHILDREN & FAMILIES FOUNDATION3× · 2020–2025 · $65k · revenue +2%
- TPTEXAS PARTNERSHIP FOR OUT OF SCHOOL TIME4× · 2020–2023 · $45k · revenue +30%
- MAMASSACHUSETTS AFTERSCHOOL PARTNER- SHIP INC2× · 2020–2025 · $38k · revenue +339%
Funded once
AFTERSCHOOL ALLIANCEgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $35k · revenue +63%- UWUNITED WAYS OF TENNESSEE2× · 2022–2023 · $25k · revenue -46%
- IAINDIANA AFTERSCHOOL NETWORK INCgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $10k · revenue +996%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Uan is a catalyst for building strong, safe, and healthy afterschool/out- of-school time programs to support youth, families, and communities. uan has three main objectives. first, to create a sustainable structure of statewide, regional,…
The mission of the state collaborative on reforming education (score) is to catalyze transformative change in tennessee education so that all students can achieve success. score is an independent, nonprofit, and nonpartisan institution,…
The learning first alliance, a partnership of leading education associations representing more than 10 million members, supports improved student learning in america's public schools by engaging individual and organizational expertise,…
The mission of child first is to develop youth and strengthen families by providing high quality community schools, after-school and summer learning programs that promote academic achievement, social and emotional well-being, and parent…
The arizona center for afterschool excellence is dedicated to the enhancement of child and youth development and educational achievement through quality afterschool programming.
United way's mission is to end intergenerational poverty in our region by harnessing, leveraging and strategically investing the collective power of donors, advocates and volunteers, to help individuals and families break the cycle of…
The organization is a catalyst for putting vulnerable young children on a path to success. our goal is to advance state policies that lead to improved health, learning, and family support outcomes for young children ages birth through…
The organization's purpose is to provide learning opportunities, to perform research and publish resources useful to policy makers and others working on youth-related issues at the local, state and national levels.
As the largest association of independent schools, nais co-creates the future of education by uniting and empowering our community. we do this through thought leadership, research, creation and curation of resources, and direct…
The California School-Age Consortium (CalSAC) builds professional networks that provide training, leadership development and advocacy to ensure that all young people have access to high quality out-of-school time programs and to create a…
In fiscal year 2025, the agency operated an americorps maker fellowship, placing 7 americorps vista members at 6 different education focused organizations in ca, ma, and ny. americorps members worked on capacity building projects to expand…
The massachusetts business alliance for education (mbae) is committed to excellence, opportunity and innovation in our public education system to prepare all students to engage successfully in a global economy and society.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Afterschool Alliance and the most unlike its peers is Camp Fire Usa. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds NEBRASKA CHILDREN & FAMILIES FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds NEW MEXICO OUT-OF SCHOOL TIME NETWORK ↗
- Who funds TEXAS PARTNERSHIP FOR OUT OF SCHOOL TIME ↗
- Who funds MASSACHUSETTS AFTERSCHOOL PARTNER- SHIP INC ↗
- Who funds AFTERSCHOOL ALLIANCE ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAYS OF TENNESSEE ↗
- Who funds IGNITE AFTERSCHOOL ↗
- Who funds INDIANA AFTERSCHOOL NETWORK INC ↗
- Who funds Michigan Afterschool Partnership ↗
- Who funds VOICES FOR GEORGIA'S CHILDREN INC ↗
- Who funds PUBLIC SCHOOL FORUM OF NC INC ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF FRANKLIN COUNTY ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF DELAWARE ↗
- Who funds LOUISIANA TECH UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds CAMP FIRE USA ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Charles Stewart Mott Foundation · Afterschool Alliance · STEM Next Opportunity Fund · United Way Worldwide · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization National Youth Leadership Council funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Massachusetts Afterschool Partner- Ship Inc — 82% of income from government
- United Way of Delaware — 58% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to National Youth Leadership Council?
Find your warmest path to National Youth Leadership Council through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.