Loading…
· Public charity
NATIONAL YOUTH LEADERSHIP COUNCIL
See schedule o.to equip young people with the knowledge, skills, and confidence, amplifying youth voice, to co-create a more just, sustainable, and peaceful world.
$119k
Granted FY2024
4
Grants
4
Communities
$25k
Largest
01What you fund
0162% classified
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2020–2024.
Education$140kPhilanthropy$55kYouth Development$35kHuman Services$35kOther$163k
02beneath the categories
Past the labels — and the year it shifted
Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.
…and in their own words, year by year
2020
techadvancepartnersout-of-schoolempowerfull potentialvoices
2021
afterschoolpartnership
2022
—
2024
child
2025
child
Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.
03FY2024 · 4 grants
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k1 grant · $6k
- $10k–50k3 grants · $75k
$25,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$730k
Total assets
Largest grants
- NEBRASKA CHILDREN AND FAMILIES FOUNDATION$25,000
- CURATORS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI$25,000
- NEW MEXICO OUT OF SCHOOL TIME NETWORK$25,000
- WE THRIVE IN RIVERSIDE RENTERS ASSOCIATION$5,500
02The need
04
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
show:
Your human-services grants (FY20–22, $35k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10% — the area typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
03Your edge
repeat funding
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
48%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$205k · 5 repeat orgs$223k to everyone else
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +285% since the first grant, against +14% for the ones you funded once.
5 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Re-uppedFunded once
Organizations
5
13
Total granted
$205k
$167k
Median revenue growth · since first grant
+285%
+14%
Still filing today
60%
85%
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 31% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $56k went to new ones.
RenewedFirst-time
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
EducationPhilanthropyHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentOther
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- TPTEXAS PARTNERSHIP FOR OUT OF SCHOOL TIME4× · 2020–2023 · $45k · revenue +285%
- NCNEBRASKA CHILDREN AND FAMILIES FOUNDATION2× · 2020–2024 · $35k · revenue +186%
- IAIGNITE AFTERSCHOOL2× · 2020–2021 · $20k · revenue +988%
Funded once
TENNESSEE AFTERSCHOOL NETWORKgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $35k · revenue +89%- UWUNITED WAYS OF TENNESSEE2× · 2022–2023 · $25k · revenue -10%
- MAMASSACHUSETTS AFTERSCHOOL PARTNERSHIPone grant, 2020 · $10k · revenue +11%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
04Your field
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
1
Utah Afterschool Network
Utah afterschool network (uan) is a statewide nonprofit organization that ensures utahs children have access to high-quality afterschool programs that keep them engaged, learning, and safe. we assist afterschool teams in building quality…
Youth Development
2
Allegheny Partners for Out-of-
Allegheny partners for out-of-school time (apost) is a convener, connector and collaborator with out-of-school time (ost) providers focusing on school-aged youth in allegheny county. our mission: we collaborate with providers to strengthen…
Youth Development
3
Ohio Afterschool Network
Oan convenes stakeholders to advocate for support and facilitate the development of quality, sustainability, out-of-school time programs for ohio's children and youth.
—
4
Alliance for Early Success Fka
The organization is a catalyst for putting vulnerable young children on a path to success. our goal is to advance state policies that lead to improved health, learning, and family support outcomes for young children ages birth through…
Human Services
5
Tennessee State Collaborative On
The mission of the state collaborative on reforming education (score) is to catalyze transformative change in tennessee education so that all students can achieve success. score is an independent, nonprofit, and nonpartisan institution,…
Education
6
Minnesota Parent Union
MNPU is dedicated to creating an environment where the vision for education in Minnesota is created with children and families, not for them. We aim to eliminate the status quo so that school leaders and parents are partners in creating…
Education
7
Boston After School & Beyond Inc
Boston after school & beyond, inc. is a public private partnership that pursues a unified after-school and summer learning system that promotes stakeholder alignment, a focus on results, and access to learning opportunities, particularly…
Education
8
American Youth Policy Forum
The organization's purpose is to provide learning opportunities, to perform research and publish resources useful to policy makers and others working on youth-related issues at the local, state and national levels.
—
9
National Association for Family School & Community
The National Association for Family, School, and Community Engagement envisions a world where effective family engagement practices are universally practiced as a strategy to improve childrens learning, and advance equity.
Education
10
The Partnership for After School
The partnership for after school education is a child-focused organization that promotes and supports quality after school programs, particularly those serving young people from underserved communities. the partnership for after school…
Education
11
National AfterSchool Association Inc
National Afterschool Association, the membership association for professionals who work with children and youth in afterschool programs, works to assure that the vision of high-quality,
Education
12
Education Forward Arizona
Advocate for and act on edu. improvements that advance the quality of life for all arizonans
—
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Public School Forum of Nc Inc and the most unlike its peers is United Way of Delaware. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network
16 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.
0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/16
Grantees still filing
12/16
Grew since you first funded
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Other$162,668Education$140,000Philanthropy$55,000Youth Development$35,000Human Services$35,000
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds TEXAS PARTNERSHIP FOR OUT OF SCHOOL TIME ↗
- Who funds NEBRASKA CHILDREN AND FAMILIES FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds TENNESSEE AFTERSCHOOL NETWORK ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAYS OF TENNESSEE ↗
- Who funds NEW MEXICO OUT OF SCHOOL TIME NETWORK ↗
- Who funds IGNITE AFTERSCHOOL ↗
- Who funds MASSACHUSETTS AFTERSCHOOL PARTNERSHIP ↗
- Who funds VOICES FOR GEORGIA'S CHILDREN ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF DELAWARE ↗
- Who funds LOUISIANA TECH UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds INDIANA AFTERSCHOOL NETWORK INC ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF TENNESSEE ↗
- Who funds PUBLIC SCHOOL FORUM OF NC INC ↗
- Who funds MICHIGAN AFTERSCHOOL PARTNERSHIP ↗
- Who funds CAMP FIRE USA PATUXENT AREA COUNCIL INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Afterschool AllianceDC24.7× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →
Open a dossier: Afterschool Alliance · Charles Stewart Mott Foundation · STEM Next Opportunity Fund · United Way Worldwide · American Endowment Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organisation NATIONAL YOUTH LEADERSHIP COUNCIL funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY20–24
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
05Through Plinth
Through Plinth
Your grantmaking, live and operational
This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: TEXAS PARTNERSHIP FOR OUT OF SCHOOL TIME.
Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk
Financial management
high risk
~3 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 8 filed years.
Track record & reputation
low risk
8 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up 3.8× since.
Legal standing
low risk
US 501(c)(3); EIN 275024847 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.
Governance
Live in Plinth
Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.
Compliance & sanctions
Live in Plinth
OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.
Program capacity
Live in Plinth
Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.
Live · Plinth’s real DD engine
Run the actual assessment on TEXAS PARTNERSHIP FOR OUT OF SCHOOL TIME, cold from public data.
Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.
Post-award monitoring · continuous checks
- FlagFinancial stability— Roughly 3 months of cash on hand.
- On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue grew over the period.
- On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 15% of their budget — diversified.
- Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.
What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.
Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing
Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro
How do I get to National Youth Leadership Council?
Find your warmest path to National Youth Leadership Council through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.
Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.
More from the funding graph
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars pass through an intermediary
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
Strange bedfellows
the named clusters of US funding
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines