· Public charity
National Partnership for New Americans
Advance an immigrant equity and inclusion agenda at the state, local, and federal level
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2018–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k23 grants · $63k
- $10k–50k32 grants · $672k
- $50k–250k5 grants · $433k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| HARRIS COUNTY | $123,148 |
| CITY OF HOUSTON | $100,000 |
| COALITION FOR HUMANE IMMIGRANT RIGHTS | $100,000 |
| INSTITUTO LAB | $60,000 |
| MAKE THE ROAD NEW YORK | $50,000 |
| MAINE IMMIGRANTS' RIGHT COALITION | $35,000 |
| MICHIGAN UNITED | $30,000 |
| ONEAMERICA | $30,000 |
| NEW YORK IMMIGRATION COALITION | $30,000 |
| ELENA'S LIGHT | $30,000 |
| MI FAMILIA EN ACCION | $30,000 |
| NATIONAL KOREAN AMERICAN SERVICE AND EDUCATION CONSORTIUM INC | $30,000 |
| PROGRESSIVE LEADERSHIP ALLIANCE OF NEVADA | $29,200 |
| SISTER 2 SISTAH | $25,000 |
| FLORIDA IMMIGRANT COALITION | $25,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY18–25, $1.4M) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 38% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +78% since the first grant, against +0% for the ones you funded once.
39 repeat relationships — 19 still active in FY2025, 20 since wound down; 41 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 62% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $441k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- TITENNESSEE IMMIGRANT AND REFUGEE RIGHTS COALITION8× · 2018–2025 · $551k · revenue +229%
CASA INC5× · 2018–2022 · $549k · revenue +244%- CFCOALITION FOR HUMANE IMMIGRANT RIGHTS7× · 2018–2025 · $486k · revenue +210%
Funded once
- HIHouston Immigration Legal ServicesCollabone grant, 2024 · $200k · revenue -62%
- TITexas Immigration Law Councilone grant, 2024 · $150k · revenue -11%
- WAWELCOMING AMERICA INCone grant, 2021 · $95k · revenue -11%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Ensuring greater access to high-quality low-cost immigration legal services across the United States through local immigrant connection sites across the country. Our sites based in both rural and urban areas are established in…
Immigration Legal Services and Advocacy (ISLA) provides direct representation to indigent detained immigrants throughout Louisiana on a pro bono basis and under a universal representation model. ISLA provides information to the public to…
We empower people to achieve their educational and career goals through personal, institutional and policy transformation.
The mission of Justice for All Immigrants is to provide low-income individuals and families with affordable, high quality immigration legal services, and to engage in immigration education and advocacy.
The organizations primary exempt purpose is charitable and educational.
VACIR is a multi-racial and multi-ethnic coalition of organizations that exists to win dignity, power and quality of life for all immigrant and refugee communities.
Colectiva Legal del Pueblo is a non-hierarchal collective organization founded for and by undocumented immigrants working to build community leadership and power for migrant justice through legal services, advocacy and education.
The Asian Law Caucus's mission is to promote, advance, and represent the legal and civil rights of Asian American Pacific Islander (AAPI) communities, recognizing that social, economic, political and racial inequalities continue to exist…
Connect immigrants to legal, social, and interpretation services.
Southern California Immigration Project is a public interest nonprofit organization dedicated to providing pro bono legal services to survivors of human and civil rights violations.
Ayuda's mission is to advocate for low-income immigrants through direct legal, social and language services, training and outreach in washington, d.c., maryland, and virginia. we envision a community where all immigrants succeed and thrive…
Asian Immigrant Women Advocates empowers low-income, limited English speaking immigrant women and youth through education, leadership development and civic participation programs.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mi Familia En Accion and the most unlike its peers is Louisiana Organization for Refugees and Immigrants. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 16 years old; the field is 16. You back the younger end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 18% of your grantees by number, and just 5% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
83 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 83 of the 99 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds TENNESSEE IMMIGRANT AND REFUGEE RIGHTS COALITION ↗
- Who funds CASA INC ↗
- Who funds COALITION FOR HUMANE IMMIGRANT RIGHTS ↗
- Who funds LOUISIANA ORGANIZATION FOR REFUGEES AND IMMIGRANTS ↗
- Who funds HISPANIC AND IMMIGRANT CENTER OF ALABAMA ↗
- Who funds Florida Immigrant Coalition Inc ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL KOREAN AMERICAN SERVICE AND EDUCATION CONSORTIUM INC ↗
- Who funds Latin American Coalition ↗
- Who funds Houston Immigration Legal ServicesCollab ↗
- Who funds MICHIGAN ORGANIZING PROJECT ↗
- Who funds NEW YORK IMMIGRATION COALITION INC ↗
- Who funds SOMOS UN PUEBLO UNIDO ↗
- Who funds Texas Immigration Law Council ↗
- Who funds MI FAMILIA EN ACCION ↗
- Who funds PROMISE ARIZONA ↗
- Who funds CENTER FOR POPULAR DEMOCRACY INC ↗
- Who funds ONEAMERICA ↗
- Who funds Comunidades Unidas ↗
- Who funds Arkansas United ↗
- Who funds Vietnamese American Young Leaders Association of New Orleans ↗
- Who funds EL CENTRO DE IGUALDAD Y DERECHOS ↗
- Who funds GREATER PORTLAND IMMIGRANT WELCOME CENTER ↗
- Who funds The Resurrection Project ↗
- Who funds WELCOMING AMERICA INC ↗
- Who funds VOCES DE LA FRONTERA INC ↗
- Who funds Asian Pacific Development Center of COLORADO ↗
- Who funds Make the Road New York ↗
- Who funds THE IMMIGRANT WELCOME CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds THE LEGAL CLINIC ↗
- Who funds GLOBAL CLEVELAND ↗
- Who funds YWCA TULSA INC ↗
- Who funds Catholic Charities of Idaho ↗
- Who funds KENTUCKY REFUGEE MINISTRIES INC ↗
- Who funds PROGRESSIVE LEADERSHIP ALLIANCE OF NEVADA ↗
- Who funds MAINE IMMIGRANTS' RIGHTS COALITION ↗
- Who funds Instituto Lab ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: NEO Philanthropy Inc · Center for Community Change · Immigrant Legal Resource Center · National Immigration Law Center · Houston Endowment Inc · Amalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc · Casa Inc · Center for Community Change Action · New Venture Fund · Tides Foundation · Marguerite Casey Foundation · Asian Americans Advancing Justice - Aajc Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization National Partnership for New Americans funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Center for Intercultural Organizing — 28% of income from government
- Massachusetts Immigrant and Refugee Advocacy Coalition Inc — 8% of income from government
- Casa Inc — 8% of income from government
- Ywca Tulsa Inc — 3% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.